Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:22:01.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Turbulent mixing in a shear-free stably stratified two-layer fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 1998

DAVID A. BRIGGS
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA Present address: Contra Costa Water District, PO Box H2O, Concord, CA, USA.
JOEL H. FERZIGER
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA Also: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-3030, USA.
JEFFREY R. KOSEFF
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA
STEPHEN G. MONISMITH
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA

Abstract

Direct numerical simulation is used to examine turbulent mixing in a shear-free stably stratified fluid. Energy is continuously supplied to a small region to maintain a well-developed kinetic energy profile, as in an oscillating grid flow (Briggs et al. 1996; Hopfinger & Toly 1976; Nokes 1988). A microscale Reynolds number of 60 is maintained in the source region. The turbulence forms a well-mixed layer which diffuses from the source into the quiescent fluid below. Turbulence transport at the interface causes the mixed layer to grow under weakly stratified conditions. When the stratification is strong, large-scale turbulent transport is inactive and pressure transport becomes the principal mechanism for the growth of the turbulence layer. Down-gradient buoyancy flux is present in the large scales; however, far from the source, weak counter-gradient fluxes appear in the medium to small scales. The production of internal waves and counter-gradient fluxes rapidly reduces the mixing when the turbulent Froude number is lower than unity. When the stratification is weak, the turbulence is strong enough to break up the density interface and transport fluid parcels of different density over large vertical distances. As the stratification intensifies, turbulent eddies flatten against the interface creating anisotropy and internal waves. The dominant entrainment mechanism is then scouring. Mixing efficiency, defined as the ratio of buoyancy flux to available kinetic energy, exhibits a similar dependence on Froude number to other stratified flows (Holt et al. 1992; Lienhard & Van Atta 1990). However, using the anisotropy of the turbulence to define an alternative mixing efficiency and Froude number improves the correlation and allows local scaling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)