Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T20:23:25.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Life-course socio-economic status and its impact on functional health of Portuguese older adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2023

A. Henriques*
Affiliation:
EPIUnit – Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
L. Ruano
Affiliation:
EPIUnit – Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal Serviço de Neurologia, Centro Hospitalar de Entre Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal
S. Fraga
Affiliation:
EPIUnit – Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
S. Soares
Affiliation:
EPIUnit – Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal
H. Barros
Affiliation:
EPIUnit – Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
M. Talih
Affiliation:
EPIUnit – Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal
*
Corresponding author: A. Henriques; Email: ana.henriques@ispup.up.pt

Abstract

Functional health is arguably one of the most important health indicators for older adults, because it assesses physical, cognitive and social functions in combination. However, life-course circumstances may impact this multidimensional construct. The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between life-course socio-economic status (SES) and different dimensions of functional health in older adults. Data on 821 Portuguese adults aged 50 years and over in 2013–2015 were analysed. Life-course SES was computed using participants’ paternal occupation (non-manual (nm); manual (m)) and own occupation (nm; m), resulting in four patterns: stable high (nm + nm), upward (m + nm), downward (nm + m) and stable low (m + m). Functional health included physical and mental functioning, cognitive function, handgrip strength, and walking speed. Linear (beta coefficients) and logistic regressions (odds ratios) were used to estimate the association between life-course SES and functional health.

Overall, those who accumulated social disadvantage during life-course presented worse functional health than those with stable high SES (stable low – SF-36 physical functioning: β = −9.75; 95% CI: −14.34; −5.15; SF-36 mental health: β = −7.33; 95% CI: −11.55; −3.11; handgrip strength: β = −1.60; 95% CI: −2.86; −0.35; walking time, highest tertile: OR = 5.28; 95% CI: 3.07; 9.09). Those with an upward SES were not statistically different from those in the stable high SES for most of the health outcomes; however, those with an upward SES trajectory tended to have higher odds of cognitive impairment (OR = 1.75; 95% CI: 0.96; 3.19). A downward SES trajectory increased the odds of slower walking speed (OR = 4.62; 95% CI: 1.78; 11.95). A disadvantaged life-course SES impacts older adults’ physical and mental functioning. For some outcomes, this was attenuated by a favourable adulthood SES but those with a stable low SES consistently presented worse functional health.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, L, Williams, J, Townsend, N, et al. (2017). Socioeconomic status and non-communicable disease behavioural risk factors in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: A systematic review. Lancet Global Health 5(3), e277e289. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30058-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alwin, DF and Wray, LA (2005). A life-span developmental perspective on social status and health. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 60 Spec No 2, 714. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.special_issue_2.s7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angelini, V, Howdon, DDH and Mierau, JO (2019). Childhood socioeconomic status and late-adulthood mental health: Results from the survey on health, ageing and retirement in Europe. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 74(1), 95104. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby028 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arber, S and Ginn, J (1993). Gender and inequalities in health in later life. Social Science & Medicine 36(1), 3346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90303-l CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beard, JR, Officer, A, de Carvalho, IA, et al. (2016). The World report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet 387(10033), 21452154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00516-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shlomo, Y and Kuh, D (2002). A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: Conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. International Journal of Epidemiology 31(2), 285293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowling, A and Iliffe, S (2011). Psychological approach to successful ageing predicts future quality of life in older adults. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 9, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-13 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, GC (2015). Living too long: The current focus of medical research on increasing the quantity, rather than the quality, of life is damaging our health and harming the economy. EMBO Reports 16(2), 137141. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201439518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmel, S (2019). Health and well-being in late life: Gender differences worldwide. Frontiers in Medicine 6, 218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00218 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupre, ME (2007). Educational differences in age-related patterns of disease: Reconsidering the cumulative disadvantage and age-as-leveler hypotheses. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 48(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650704800101 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fillenbaum, GG (2013). Multidimensional Functional Assessment of Older Adults: The Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Freitas, S, Simões, MR, Alves, L, et al. (2011). Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Normative study for the Portuguese population. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 33(9), 989996. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2011.589374 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galobardes, B, Shaw, M, Lawlor, DA, et al. (2006). Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 60(1), 712. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (US). (1988). 3. Health Status and Quality of Life. In Gilford, DM (Ed.), The Aging Population in the Twenty-First Century: Statistics for Health Policy. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US).Google Scholar
Haas, S (2008). Trajectories of functional health: The ‘long arm’ of childhood health and socioeconomic factors. Social Science & Medicine 66(4), 849861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallqvist, J, Lynch, J, Bartley, M, et al. (2004). Can we disentangle life course processes of accumulation, critical period and social mobility? An analysis of disadvantaged socio-economic positions and myocardial infarction in the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program. Social Science & Medicine 58(8), 15551562. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00344-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayward, MD and Gorman, BK (2004). The long arm of childhood: The influence of early-life social conditions on men’s mortality. Demography 41(1), 87107. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriques, A, Silva, S, Severo, M, et al. (2020). Socioeconomic position and quality of life among older people: The mediating role of social support. Preventive Medicine 135, 106073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106073 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higginson, IJ, Gomes, B, Calanzani, N, et al. (2014). Priorities for treatment, care and information if faced with serious illness: A comparative population-based survey in seven European countries. Palliative Medicine 28(2), 101110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216313488989id> CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlamangla, AS, Miller-Martinez, D, Aneshensel, CS, et al. (2009). Trajectories of cognitive function in late life in the United States: Demographic and socioeconomic predictors. American Journal of Epidemiology 170(3), 331342. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp154 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kivimäki, M, Batty, GD, Pentti, J, et al. (2020). Association between socioeconomic status and the development of mental and physical health conditions in adulthood: A multi-cohort study. Lancet Public Health 5(3), e140e149. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30248-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krawczyk-Suszek, M and Kleinrok, A (2022). Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of people over 65 years of age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(2), 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020625 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacey, RJ, Belcher, J and Croft, PR (2013). Does life course socio-economic position influence chronic disabling pain in older adults? A general population study. The European Journal of Public Health 23(4), 534540. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cks056 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landös, A, von Arx, M, Cheval, B, et al. (2019). Childhood socioeconomic circumstances and disability trajectories in older men and women: A European cohort study. The European Journal of Public Health 29(1), 5058. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky166 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, N (2016). Cultural differences in emotion: Differences in emotional arousal level between the East and the West. Integrative Medicine Research 5(2), 105109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2016.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luppa, M, Luck, T, Weyerer, S, et al. (2010). Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. A systematic review. Age and Ageing 39(1), 3138. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afp202 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyu, J and Burr, JA (2016). Socioeconomic status across the life course and cognitive function among older adults: An examination of the latency, pathways, and accumulation hypotheses. Journal of Aging Health 28(1), 4067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264315585504 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, S, Musich, S, Hawkins, K, et al. (2016). The impact of resilience among older adults. Geriatric Nursing 37(4), 266272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.02.014 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mao, F, Han, Y, Chen, J, et al. (2016). Development of a Multidimensional Functional Health Scale for Older Adults in China. Community Mental Health Journal 52(4), 466471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9945-6id> CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMunn, A, Nazroo, J and Breeze, E (2009). Inequalities in health at older ages: A longitudinal investigation of the onset of illness and survival effects in England. Age and Ageing 38(2), 181187. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afn236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasreddine, ZS, Phillips, NA, Bédirian, V, et al. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53(4), 695699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Rand, AM and Henretta, JC (1999). Age and Inequality: Diverse Pathways through Later Life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Otero-Rodríguez, A, León-Muñoz, LM, Banegas, JR, et al. (2011). Life-course socioeconomic position and change in quality of life among older adults: Evidence for the role of a critical period, accumulation of exposure and social mobility. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 65(11), 964971. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2010.113555 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, RL, George, KM, Gilsanz, P, et al. (2021). Lifecourse socioeconomic changes and late-life cognition in a cohort of U.S.-born and U.S. immigrants: Findings from the KHANDLE study. BMC Public Health 21(1), 920. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10976-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phan-Ba, R, Pace, A, Calay, P, et al. (2011). Comparison of the timed 25-foot and the 100-meter walk as performance measures in multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 25(7), 672679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310397204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichler, F and Wallace, C (2007). Patterns of formal and informal social capital in Europe. European Sociological Review 23(4), 423435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, E, Lopes, C and Barros, H (2004). Investigating the effect of nonparticipation using a population-based case-control study on myocardial infarction. Annals of Epidemiology 14(6), 437441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.09.013 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocha, V, Stringhini, S, Henriques, A, et al. (2020). Life-course socioeconomic status and lung function in adulthood: A study in the EPIPorto cohort. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 74(3), 290297. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-212871 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, D and Harrison, E (2007). The European socio-economic classification: A new social class schema for comparative European research. European Societies 9(3), 459490. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690701336518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöllgen, I, Huxhold, O and Tesch-Römer, C (2010). Socioeconomic status and health in the second half of life: Findings from the German Ageing Survey. European Journal of Ageing 7(1), 1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0140-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Severo, M, Santos, AC, Lopes, C, et al. (2006). [Reliability and validity in measuring physical and mental health construct of the Portuguese version of MOS SF-36]. Acta Médica Portuguesa 19(4), 281287.Google ScholarPubMed
Singh-Manoux, A, Ferrie, JE, Chandola, T, et al. (2004). Socioeconomic trajectories across the life course and health outcomes in midlife: Evidence for the accumulation hypothesis? International Journal of Epidemiology 33(5), 10721079. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh224 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares, S, López-Cheda, A, Santos, AC, et al. (2020). How do early socioeconomic circumstances impact inflammatory trajectories? Findings from Generation XXI. Psychoneuroendocrinology 119, 104755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104755 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stringhini, S, Carmeli, C, Jokela, M, et al. (2018). Socioeconomic status, non-communicable disease risk factors, and walking speed in older adults: Multi-cohort population based study. The BMJ 360, k1046. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1046 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stringhini, S, Zaninotto, P, Kumari, M, et al. (2018). Socio-economic trajectories and cardiovascular disease mortality in older people: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. International Journal of Epidemiology 47(1), 3646. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx106 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Team, RC (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Vable, AM, Gilsanz, P and Kawachi, I (2019). Is it possible to overcome the ‘long arm’ of childhood socioeconomic disadvantage through upward socioeconomic mobility? Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England) 41(3), 566574. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdz018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victora, CG, Huttly, SR, Fuchs, SC, et al. (1997). The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: A hierarchical approach. International Journal of Epidemiology 26(1), 224227. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/26.1.224 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahrendorf, M, Reinhardt, JD and Siegrist, J (2013). Relationships of disability with age among adults aged 50 to 85: Evidence from the United States, England and continental Europe. PLoS One 8(8), e71893. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071893 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J and Hulme, C (2021). Frailty and socioeconomic status: A systematic review. Journal of Public Health Research 10(3), 2036. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2036 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, JE Jr, Kosinsky, M and Keller, SD (1994). SF-36 Physical and Mental: Health Summary Scales: A User´s Manual. Boston, MA: Health Assessment Lab, New England Medical Center.Google Scholar
Ware, JE Jr and Sherbourne, CD (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30(6), 473483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, IB and Cleary, PD (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Jama 273(1), 5965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, Y, Wang, J and Nicholas, S (2017). Gender, childhood and adult socioeconomic inequalities in functional disability among Chinese older adults. International Journal for Equity in Health 16(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0662-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Henriques et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Henriques et al. supplementary material(File)
File 36.8 KB