Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:45:10.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The potential of semi-dwarf oilseed rape genotypes to reduce the risk of N leaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

K. SIELING*
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Str. 9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
H. KAGE
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Str. 9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: sieling@pflanzenbau.uni-kiel.de

Summary

In northwest (NW) Europe, oilseed rape (OSR) is often used as a preceding crop for winter wheat. Due to its low N harvest index (HI) and to favourable soil conditions after harvest, large amounts of mineral N remain in the soil, which cannot completely be taken up by the subsequent wheat crop. This increases the risk of N leaching into the groundwater during the following winter. Recently, semi-dwarf genotypes of OSR were developed and made commercially available that show similar yields but reduced height growth compared to conventional genotypes. The present authors hypothesized that the introduction of dwarfing genes leads to an increase in HI for dry matter (DM) and for N of OSR. As a consequence, semi-dwarf genotypes would accumulate less aerial biomass, return fewer plant residues to the soil and need less N to achieve yield maximum compared to conventional hybrids or open pollinating varieties. This may lead to a reduced risk of N leaching after growing OSR. In order to test this hypothesis, field trials conducted in 2003/04–2005/06 near Kiel in NW Germany combined four commercial varieties of OSR (Express, Talent, Trabant and Belcanto as semi-dwarf genotype), two seeding dates (mid-August and beginning of September) and eight mineral N fertilization rates (0–240 kg N/ha). On average in 2003/04–2004/05, the semi-dwarf genotype Belcanto achieved significantly less seed yield (4·44 t/ha) than the other varieties (4·65–4·88 t/ha). However, all varieties tested required similar N fertilization to achieve maximum yield. In addition, N offtake by the seeds did not differ. No interaction between genotype and N treatment was observed. Detailed analysis of DM accumulation and N uptake during the growth period revealed only small differences between the varieties in the averages of all N treatments and both years. At harvest, Belcanto produced more pods/m2 and a slightly higher 1000 seed weight. Nevertheless, HI and N HI were similar for all genotypes. It is concluded that, despite its lower plant height, the semi-dwarf genotype did not provide the opportunity to reduce the risk of N leaching after growing OSR.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, M. F., Armstrong, M. J., Jaggard, K. W. & Todd, A. D. (1998). Integration of nitrate cover crops into sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) rotations. I. Management and effectiveness of nitrate cover crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 130, 5360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aufhammer, W., Kübler, E. & Bury, M. (1994). Nitrogen uptake and nitrogen residuals of winter oilseed rape and fallout rape. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 172, 255264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélanger, G., Walsh, J. R., Richards, J. E., Milburn, P. H. & Ziadi, N. (2000). Comparison of three statistical models describing potato yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy Journal 92, 902908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerrato, M. E. & Blackmer, A. M. (1990). Comparison of models for describing corn yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy Journal 82, 138143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düngeverordnung, (2006). Bekanntmachung der Neufassung der Düngeverordnung. Bundesgesetzblatt I 2, 3343.Google Scholar
EU (1991). Implementation of nitrates Directive (Directive 91/676/EEC). Brussels: European Commission. Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-nitrates/directiv.html (verified 28/6/07).Google Scholar
Goss, M. J., Howse, K. R., Lane, P. W., Christian, D. G. & Harris, G. L. (1993). Losses of nitrate-nitrogen in water draining from under autumn-sown crops established by direct drilling or mouldboard ploughing. Journal of Soil Science 44, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henke, J., Breustedt, G., Sieling, K. & Kage, H. (2007). Impact of uncertainty on the optimum nitrogen fertilization rate and agronomic, ecological and economic factors in an oilseed rape based crop rotation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 455468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, B. & Christen, C. (2007). Effect of sowing date and genotype on the yield, yield formation and root development of winter oilseed rape. In Proceedings of the 12th International Rapeseed Congress (Wuhan, China.), III (Agronomy), pp 139142. New Jersey, USA: Science Press USA Inc.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, H. & Engels, T. (1989). Nitrogen utilization in relation to N-fertilization. The International Fertilizer Society, Proceedings 287, 2843.Google Scholar
Lindén, B. & Wallgren, B. (1993). Nitrogen mineralization after leys ploughed in early or late autumn. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 7789.Google Scholar
Malagoli, P., Laine, P., Rossato, L. & Ourry, A. (2005). Dynamics of nitrogen uptake and mobilization in field grown winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) from stem extension to harvest. 1. Global N flows between vegetative and reproductive tissues in relation to leaf fall and their residual N. Annals of Botany 95, 853861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öborn, I., Edwards, A. C., Witter, E., Oenema, O., Ivarsson, K., Withers, P. J. A., Nilsson, S. I. & Stinzing, A. R. (2003). Element balances as a tool for sustainable nutrient management: a critical appraisal of their merits and limitations within an agronomic and environmental context. European Journal of Agronomy 20, 211225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathke, G.-W., Christen, O. & Diepenbrock, W. (2005). Effects of nitrogen source and rate on productivity and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown in different crop rotations. Field Crops Research 94, 103113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (1999). SAS/Stat, Guide for Personal Computer. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. A. & Lord, E. I. (1996). Nitrate leaching from a sandy soil: the effect of previous crop and post-harvest soil management in an arable rotation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 127, 215229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieling, K. & Kage, H. (2006). N balance as an indicator of N leaching in an oilseed rape–winter wheat–winter barley rotation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 115, 261269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieling, K., Günther-Borstel, O. & Hanus, H. (1997). Effects of slurry application and mineral nitrogen fertilization on N leaching in different crop combinations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 128, 7986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieling, K., Schröder, H. & Hanus, H. (1998). Mineral and slurry nitrogen effects on yield, N uptake, and apparent N use efficiency of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 130, 165172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieling, K., Stahl, C., Winkelmann, C. & Christen, O. (2005). Growth and yield of winter wheat in the first three years of a monoculture under varying N fertilization in NW Germany. European Journal of Agronomy 22, 7184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. J., Schepers, S. J. & Porter, L. K. (1990). Assessing and managing agricultural nitrogen losses to the environment. Advances in Soil Science 14, 113.Google Scholar