Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:48:04.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of pruning on growth, leaf yield and pod yields of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

F. O. OLASANTAN  and
A. W. SALAU
F. O. OLASANTAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Agriculture, PMB 2240, Abeokuta, Nigeria
A. W. SALAU
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Agriculture, PMB 2240, Abeokuta, Nigeria
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressedss. Email: olasantan@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Young leaves and pods of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) are edible, and so a crop management strategy for removing edible leaves while sustaining good pod yields is required. Pruning treatments were imposed on apically debudded okra plants for 3 years to assess effects of removing a quarter, half or three-quarters of the primary branches on growth and fresh leaf and pod yields. Pruning significantly (P<0·05) delayed fruiting by 8–10 days, extended length of harvest duration by 12–15 days and increased number of pods/plant by 10–40% and pod yield by 9–36% more than the control plants which had neither apical bud removal nor pruning. However, no difference in pod weight or pod length was found between these treatments and the control. Three-quarters pruning significantly (P<0·05) increased fresh leaf yield by 29–49%, but not all the leaves were desirable for consumption because of high fibre content. Decreases were seen in the numbers of secondary branches, shoot dry weight and pod yields (by 40–57, 22–36 and 22–30%, respectively, more than a quarter or half pruning). Although early production of pods in the control plants is often important for early maturity and high market prices, the present study found that a delay in fruiting, an extension in length of harvest duration and an increase in pod yield in plants with a quarter or half pruning enhanced staggered production and maximal pod yield. This helps to ensure a better market price and to enable growers avoid a glut on the market. A direct promotional effect of pruning on pod yields provides a possible strategy for growing okra for both leaf and pod harvests. A quarter or half pruning from the upper parts of the main stems of apically debudded plants to ensure good production and quality of leaves and pods is therefore recommended if okra is to be grown for both leaf and pod yields.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 146 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 93 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, S. R. & Langton, F. A. (2005). Photoperiod and plant growth: a review. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 80, 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alegbejo, M. D. (2003). Okra cultivars with moderate resistance to okra mosaic virus genus Tymovirus. Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science 8, 3–7.Google Scholar
Asif, M. I. (1977). Estimation of leaf area in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 54, 192.Google Scholar
Björkman, O. & Holmgren, P. (1963). Adaptability of the photosynthetic apparatus to light intensity in ecotypes from exposed and shaded habitats. Physiologia Plantarum 16, 889–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, J. S. (1969). Measurement of water status of plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 20, 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockshull, K. E. (1966). Effects of night-break treatment on leaf area and leaf dry weight in Callistephus chinensis. Annals of Botany 30, 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahniya, M. T., Hahn, S. K. & Oputa, C. O. (1985). Effect of shoot removal on shoot and root yields of sweet potato. Experimental Agriculture 21, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubben, G. J. H. (1977). Tropical Vegetables and their Genetic Resources. Rome: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR).Google Scholar
Hamon, S. & Charrier, A. (1997). Les Gombos. In L'amelioration des Plantes Tropicales (Eds Charrier, A., Jacquote, M., Hamon, S. & Nicholas, D.), pp. 313–333. Montpellier, France: CIRAD–ORSTOM.Google Scholar
Heide, O. M., Bush, M. G. & Evans, L. T. (1985). Interaction of photoperiod and gibberellin on growth and photosynthesis of high-latitude Poa pratensis. Physiologia Plantarum 65, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeorgu, J. E. G., Ezumah, H. C. & Wahua, T. A. T. (1989). Productivity of species in cassava/maize/okra/egusi melon complex mixtures in Nigeria. Field Crops Research 21, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, W. (1999). Okra – a versatile vegetable crop. HortTechnology 9, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasantan, F. O. (1986). Effect of apical debudding on growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). Experimental Agriculture 22, 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasantan, F. O. (1988). Effect of leaf removal on the growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and its relevance to leaf harvesting patterns and pest damage. Experimental Agriculture 24, 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasantan, F. O. (1999). Nitrogen fertilization of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) in an inter-cropping system with cassava (Manihot esculenta) and maize (Zea mays) in south-western Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 133, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasantan, F. O. (2001). Optimum plant populations for okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) in a mixture with cassava (Manihot esculenta) and its relevance to rainy season-based cropping systems in south-western Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 136, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasantan, F. O. (2007). Apical shoot harvest affects growth and apical shoot and fruit yields of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima Duch. Ex. Lam.). Journal of Vegetable Science 12, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasantan, F. O. & Bello, N. J. (2004). Optimum sowing dates for okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) in monoculture and mixture with cassava (Manihot esculenta) during the rainy season in the south-west of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 142, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olasantan, F. O. & Olowe, V. I. O. (2006). Effects of sowing date on response of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) to intercropping with contrasting cassava cultivars in south-western Nigeria. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 24, 55–70.Google Scholar
Parr, W. J. & Hussey, N. W. (1962). Response of cucumber plants to different levels of artificial leaf damage in an attempt to simulate the effects of red spider mite. In Report of the Glasshouse Crops Research Institute for 1961, Vol. 1, pp. 95–99. Glasshouse Crop Research Institute, Europe.Google Scholar
Purseglove, J. W. (1977). Tropical Crops. Dicotyledons, Vols 1 and 2, 2nd edn. London: Longman Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Schippers, R. R. (2000). African Indigenous Vegetables. An Overview of the Cultivated Species. Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute/ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation.Google Scholar
Stacey, D. L. (1983). The effect of artificial defoliation on the yield of tomato plants and its relevance to pest damage. Journal of Horticultural Science 58, 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (1990). SAS/STAT Users' Guide, Version 6, 4th edn.Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Tayo, T. O. (1980). The response of two soya-bean varieties to the loss of apical dominance at the vegetative stage of growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayo, T. O. (1982). Growth, development and yield of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) in the low-land tropics. 3. Effect of early loss of apical dominance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahua, T. A. T. (1985). Effects of melon (Colocynthis vulgaris) population density on intercropped maize (Zea mays) and melon. Experimental Agriculture 21, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakankar, S. M. & Yadua, L. N. (1975). Path analysis of yield components in arhar (Cajanus cajan). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 182–186.Google Scholar