Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T14:17:10.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of temperature and method of feeding on the diestibility of two milk substitutes and on the performance of lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. D. Penning
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 5LR
Ines M. Penning
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 5LR
T. T. Treacher
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 5LR

Summary

The effects of temperature and method of feeding on the intake characteristics and digestibilities of two milk substitutes were examined.

Forty Finnish Landrace x Dorset Horn lambs (20 males and 20 females) were fed one of two milk substitutes from 3 to 25 days of age when they were slaughtered and chemical composition of the empty body was measured.

The two milk substitutes contained 30% fat in the dry matter as butter fat (diet B), or tallow and coconut oil (diet TC).

The diets were offered at either 34°C (W) or 5 °C (C) and three methods of feeding were used. The diets were given: ad libitumcold (AL1), four feeds to appetite per day either warm or cold (AL2W and AL2C) and four feeds restricted to an intake of 62 g D.M./kg live weight0·5 either warm or cold (RW or RC).

Digestibilities of the milk substitutes were not affected by the temperature at which they were offered or the feeding regime used. Diet B had an apparent dry-matter digestibility of 97·6% and diet TC 92·5%. The fat digestibility of diet TC was 13·6 units lower than diet B and this affected the digestibility of all the other dietary components.

Lambs tended to consume more of diet B and grow faster.

Lambs on treatment AL1 consumed 21% more milk substitute than those on treatment AL2.

The composition of the body-weight gain was found to alter with rate of gain.

The temperature at which the milk substitutes were offered had only a minor effect on the performance of the lambs. The type of milk substitute and feeding regime used had a greater influence on both lamb intake and growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brisson, G. J. & Bouchard, R. (1970). Artificial rearing of lambs: Feeding cold milk ad libitum versus warm milk three times per day to appetite, and effects of an antibiotic-vitamin-iron supplement on growth performance and digestibility of diet constituent. Journal of Animal Science 31, 810–15.Google Scholar
Bukokakt, M. & Bauer, J. (1974). Artificial Bearing and Intensive Fattening of Lambs in Qermany, pp. 2941. Published by Roche Information Services.Google Scholar
Jagusch, K. T. (1968). The utilization of energy by the milk-fed lamb with special reference to the composition of the gain in weight. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Jagusch, K. T. & Mitchell, R. M. (1971). Utilization of the metabolizable energy of ewes milk by the lamb. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 434–41.Google Scholar
Large, R. V. & Penning, P. D. (1967). The artificial rearing of lambs on cold reconstituted whole milk and on milk substitute. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 69, 405–9.Google Scholar
Maff, (1975). Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. Published H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Mlc, (1970). Artificial rearing of lambs. Sheep Improvement Service, Technical Report.Google Scholar
Norton, B. W. (1968). The nutrition of the milk-fed lamb. N retention during growth. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Penning, Ines M. (1976). Nutrition of the liquid-fed lamb. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D. (1967). Artificial rearing of lambs. Annual Report of the Grassland Research Institute (1966), pp. 8692.Google Scholar
Raven, A. M. & Robinson, K. L. (1958). Studies of the nutrition of the young calf. A comparison of starch, lactose and hydrogenated palm oil with butterfat in milk diets. British Journal of Nutrition 12, 469–82.Google Scholar
Raven, A.M. & Robinson, K. L. (1959). Studies of the nutrition of the young calf. 2. The nutritive value of unhydrogenated palm oil, unhydrogenated palm-kernel oil and butterfat as additions to a milk diet. British Journal of Nutrition 13, 178–90.Google Scholar
Searle, T. W., Graham, N. Mcc. & O'Callaghan, M. (1972). Growth in sheep. 1. The chemical composition of the body. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 371–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, T. T. & Penning, P. D. (1971). The development of an automatic system for rearing lambs artificially. Outlook on Agriculture 6, 227–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M. (1950). Observation on behaviour in young calves. The Bulletin of Animal Behaviour 8, 520.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M., Cook, L.J. & Jagusch, K. T. (1967). Nitrogen balance studies with the milk-fed lamb. 5. Effect of frequency of feeding.British Journal of Nutrition 21, 275–87.Google Scholar
Walkeb, D. M. & Faichney, G. J. (1964). Nitrogen balance studies with the milk-fed lamb. 3. Effect of different nitrogen intakes on growth and nitrogen balance. British Journal of Nutrition 18, 295306.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Jagusch, K. T. (1969). Utilisation of the metabolisable energy of cows’ milk by the lamb. Proceedings 4th Symposium Energy Metabolism, EAAP Publication 12, pp. 187–93.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Norton, B. W. (1970). The utilisation of energy by the milk-fed lamb. Proceedings 5th Symposium Energy Metabolism, EAAP Publication 13, pp. 125–8.Google Scholar