Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:26:41.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Redescription of some Type Specimens of British Ordovician Bryozoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Nils Spjeldnæs
Affiliation:
Paleontological Institute, University of Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

Five species of Ordovician Bryozoa are redescribed, based on the type specimens of Lonsdale (in Murchison, 1839: “Favosites fibrosa” (1843: “Ptilodichtya” dichotoma), Phillips (1848: “Favositesfavulosa), and McCoy (1850: “Nebulipora lens” and “Ptilodichtya explanata”). Six other species are discussed and some of them figured, but the preservation of the material does not allow a complete redescription of them.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bassler, R. S., 1911. The Early Paleozoic Bryozoa of the Baltic Provinces. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., 77.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S., 1935. Fossilium Catalogus I. Animalia 67, pars Bryozoa. S-Gravenhage.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S., 1953. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part G. Bryozoa. Lawrence, Ka.Google Scholar
Edwards, H., and Haime, J., 1854. A Monograph of the British Fossil Corals. Palaeontographical Soc. London.Google Scholar
Hisinger, W., 1837. Lethœa Svecica seu Petrificata Svecœ, iconibus et characteribus illustrata. 124 pp., 39 pls. Holmia.Google Scholar
Kjerulf, Th., 1865. Veiviser ved Geologiske excursioner i Christiania omegn. Universitetsprogram. Christiania (Oslo).Google Scholar
Lonsdale, W., 1839. In Murchison, R..: Silurian System, London.Google Scholar
McCoy, F., 1850. Silurian Radiata. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 2, vi.Google Scholar
McCoy, F., 1852. In Sedgwick, A., and McCoy, F.: British Palœzoic Fossils. London and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nicholson, A., 1881. On the Structure and Affinities of the Genus Monti-culipora and its Sub-genera. Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Phillips, J., 1848. Malvern Hills compared with the Palaeozoic Districts of Abberley, etc. Mem. Geol. Surv., 2, part 1.Google Scholar
Portlock, J. E., 1843. Report on the Geology of the county of Londonderry and parts of Tyrone and Fermanagh. Dublin.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C, 1907. Sedgwick Museum Notes. New Fossils from Haver-fordwest VII. Geol. Mag., xlv, 208211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S., 1930. Some Valentian Corals from Shropshire and Montgomeryshire, with a Note on a new Stromatoporid. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxvi, 291330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubblefield, C. J., 1938. The Types and Figured Specimens in Phillips's and Salter's Palaeontological Appendix to John Phillips's Memoir on “The Malvern Hills Compared with the Palaeozoic Districts of Abberley”. Summary Progr. Geol. Survey Gt. Brit. 1936, part ii, 2751.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., 18821884. American Paleozoic Bryozoa. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., v–vii.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., 1889. Contributions to the Micro-Palæontology of the Cambro-Silurian Rocks of Canada. Part II. Geol. Nat. Hist. Survey Canada. Montreal.Google Scholar
Voigt, E., 1956. Der Nachweis des Phytals durch Epizoen als Kriterium der Tiefe vorzeitlicher Meere. Geologische Rundschau, xlv, 97119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., 1949. New Lower Ordovician Brachiopods from the Llandeilo–Llangadock District. Geol. Mag., lxxxvi, 161174, 226238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., 1953. The Geology of the Llandeilo District, Carmarthenshire. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., cviii, 177207.Google Scholar
Woods, H., 1891. Catalogue of the Type Species in the Woodwardian Museum, Cambridge. Cambridge.Google Scholar