Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T08:17:27.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Secondary sexual dimorphism in biomass production of Ilex paraguariensis progenies associated with their provenances and morphotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2023

Miroslava Rakocevic*
Affiliation:
Embrapa Florestas, P.O.Box 319, Colombo, PR 83411-000, Brazil Embrapa Meio Ambiente, P.O.Box 69, Jaguariúna, SP 13918-110, Brazil
Aline de Holanda Nunes Maia
Affiliation:
Embrapa Meio Ambiente, P.O.Box 69, Jaguariúna, SP 13918-110, Brazil
Manoela Mendes Duarte
Affiliation:
Embrapa Florestas, P.O.Box 319, Colombo, PR 83411-000, Brazil
Ivar Wendling
Affiliation:
Embrapa Florestas, P.O.Box 319, Colombo, PR 83411-000, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: mima.rakocevic61@gmail.com

Summary

Secondary sexual dimorphism (SSD) in flowering plants is expressed as differences in sexual characteristics that are not directly related to gamete production, involving a wide variety of morphological and physiological traits. Yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis) is an evergreen dioecious tree native to South America. It was hypothesized that: (1) in early years, the two yerba-mate genders would segregate with lower frequency in biomass production than during later years; (2) in the case of SSD, higher biomass production would be seen for female plants when compared to male plants at a more advanced age; (3) higher SSD would appear in morphotypes that represent leaf adaptations to full sunlight cultivation; and (4) progenies originated from provenances from higher altitudes will show greater SSD in biomass production. One experiment with 135 progenies originated from six provenances with different altitudes was established in 1997 in a monoculture (under full sunlight conditions). Biomass production (leaves and thin twigs) per plant was evaluated during four harvests (1999, 2001, 2003, and 2015). The frequency of SSD in biomass production did not change throughout the plant’s life. Males were more productive than females in 1999, 2001, and 2003, while the increased frequency of more productive female plants was observed during the most recent harvest (2015), resulting in an equal frequency of female and male progenies. Sexual segregation was observed in dully green, sassafras, and gray morphotypes that are characterized by their waxy leaf structures, an adaptation to elevated irradiance and UV. As a result of adaptative responses to stressful conditions and elevated interplant variability, the relationship between SSD and biomass production of progenies originated from the highest altitudes segregated with higher frequency when compared to the lowest altitudes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Obaidi, J.R., Halabi, M.F., Al-Khalifah, N.S., Asanar, S., Al-Soqeer, A.A. and Attia, M.F. (2017). A review on plant importance, biotechnological aspects, and cultivation challenges of jojoba plant. Biological Research 50, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-017-0131-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrés, A.M. and Tejedor, I.H. (1995). Is Fisher’s exact test very conservative? Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 19, 579591. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(94)00013-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S.C.H. and Hough, J. (2013). Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 6782. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers308 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busta, L., Schmitz, E., Kosma, D.K., Schnable, J.C. and Cahoon, E.B. (2021). A co-opted steroid synthesis gene, maintained in sorghum but not maize, is associated with a divergence in leaf wax chemistry. PNAS 118, e2022982118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022982118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassini, M.H. (2020). Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in primates. Mammal Review 50, 231239. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, P.H., Harris, W. and Korn, E. (2017). Optimal sex allocation under pollen limitation. Theoretical Ecology 10, 417431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-017-0339-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruden, R.W. and Lloyd, R.M. (1995). Embryophytes have equivalent sexual phenotypes and breeding systems: why not a common terminology to describe them? American Journal of Botany 82, 816. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, T.E. and Geber, M.A. (1999). Dimorphism in physiology and morphology. In Geber, M.A., Dawson, T.E. and Delph, L.F. (eds), Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 175216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delph, L.F. (2009). Sex allocation: evolution to and from dioecy. Current Biology 19, R250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.048 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duarte, M.M., Gabira, M.M., Tomas, G.C., Amano, E., Nogueira, A.C. and Wendling, I. (2022). Bioactive compounds and leaf anatomy of yerba mate morphotypes. PAB 57, e02441. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2022.v57.02441 Google Scholar
Friedrich, J.C., Gonela, A., Vidigal, M.C.G, Vidigal Filho, P.S., Sturion, J.A. and Cardozo Junior, E.L. (2017). Genetic and phytochemical analysis to evaluate the diversity and relationships of mate (Ilex paraguariensis A.St.-Hil.) elite genetic resources in a germplasm collection. Chemical Biodiversity 14, e1600177. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201600177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galfrascoli, G.M. and Calviño, A. (2020). Secondary sexual dimorphism in a dioecious tree: a matter of inter-plant variability? Flora 266, 151595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2020.151595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, V.N. (2017). Sexual forms and their ecological correlates of flowering plants in Siberia. Russian Journal of Ecology 48, 433439. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413617050058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R.H., Heisler, , Gao, W. and Jenks, M. (2003). Ultraviolet leaf reflectance of common urban trees and the prediction of reflectance from leaf surface characteristics. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 120, 127139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guédon, Y., Costes, E. and Rakocevic, M. (2018). Modulation of the yerba-mate metamer production phenology by the cultivation system and the climatic factors. Ecological Modelling 384, 188197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, H.-Y., Tseng, Y.-H., Hsieh, C.-F. and Hu, J.M. (2020). Geographical distribution of dioecy and its ecological correlates based on fine-scaled species distribution data from a subtropical island. Ecological Research 35, 170181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenfors, P., Gittleman, J.L. and Jones, K.E. (2007). Sexual size dimorphism in mammals. In Blackenhorn, W.V., Fairbairn, D.J. and Székely, T. (eds), Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 280315. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.003.0003 Google Scholar
Matsunaga, F.T., Rakocevic, M. and Brancher, J.D. (2014). Modeling the 3D structure and rhythmic growth responses to environment in dioecious yerba-mate. Ecological Modelling 290, 3444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obeso, J.R. (2002). The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytologist 155, 321348. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obeso, J.R. (2004). A hierarchical perspective in allocation to reproduction from whole plant to fruit and seed level. A hierarchical perspective in allocation to reproduction from whole plant to fruit and seed level. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6, 217225. https://doi.org/10.1078/1433-8319-00080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oñate, M. and Munné-Bosch, S. (2009). Influence of plant maturity, shoot reproduction and sex on vegetative growth in the dioecious plant Urtica dioica . Annals of Botany 104, 945956. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp176 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pannell, J.R. (2000). A hypothesis for the evolution of androdioecy: the joint influence of reproductive assurance and local mate competition in a metapopulation. Evolutionary Ecology 14, 195211. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011082827809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauli, E.D., Scheel, G.L., Delaroza, F., Rakocevic, M., Bruns, R.E. and Scarminio, I.S. (2019). Photodiode array chromatographic-spectrophotometric metabolite quantification for yerba-mate plant sexual dimorphism differentiation. Microchemical Journal 151, 104218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Llorca, M. and Munné-Bosch, S. (2021) Aging, stress, and senescence in plants: what can biological diversity teach us? Geroscience 43, 167180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-021-00336-y CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popp, J.W. and Reinartz, J.A. (1988). Sexual dimorphism in biomass allocation and clonal growth of Xanthoxylum americanum . American Journal of Botany 75, 17321741. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb11249.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakocevic, M., Costes, E. and Assad, E.D. (2011). Structural and physiological sexual dimorphism estimated from three-dimensional virtual trees of yerba-mate (Ilex paraguariensis) is modified by cultivation environment. Annals of Applied Biology 159, 178191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00484.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakocevic, M., Janssens, M. and Scherer, R. (2012). Light responses and gender issues in the domestication process of yerba-mate, a sub-tropical evergreen. In Bezerra, A.D. and Ferreira, T.S. (eds), Evergreens: Types, Ecology and Conservation. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc, pp. 6395.Google Scholar
Rakocevic, M. and Martim, S.F. (2011). Time series in analysis of yerba-mate biennial growth modified by environment. International Journal of Biometeorology 55, 161171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-010-0322-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rakocevic, M., Medrado, M.J.S. and Lavoranti, O.J. (2007a). Leaf gas exchange differences between males and females of yerba-mate. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira 54, 3744.Google Scholar
Rakocevic, M., Medrado, M.J.S., Lavoranti, O.J. and Valduga, A.T. (2007b). Quality of yerba-mate leaves originating from male and female plants. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira 54, 7183.Google Scholar
Rakocevic, M., Medrado, M.J.S., Lucambio, F. and Valduga, A.T. (2008a). Intensity of bitterness of processed yerba mate leaves originated in two contrasted light environments. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 51, 569579. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132008000300018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakocevic, M., Medrado, M.J.S., Martim, S.F. and Assad, E.D. (2009). Sexual dimorphism and seasonal changes of leaf gas exchange in the dioecious tree Ilex paraguariensis grown in two contrasted cultivation types. Annals of Applied Biology 154, 291301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00298.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakocevic, M., Silva, M.H.M., Assad, E.D. and Megeto, G.A.S. (2008b). Reconstruction of 3D mock-up and architecture manipulation in perennial species cultivated in Brazil. PAB 43, 241245. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2008000900019 Google Scholar
Randriamihamison, N., Vialaneix, N. and Neuvial, P. (2021). Applicability and interpretability of Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering with or without contiguity constraints. Journal of Classification 38, 363389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reissmann, C.B., Dünisch, O. and Boeger, M.R. (2003). Beziehung zwischen ernährungsbiologischen (Fe, Mn, Ca) und strukturellen merkmalen ausgewählter morphotypen der mate-pflanze (Ilex paragueriensis St. Hil). In Hüttl, R. F. (ed.), Boden, Wald und Wasser. Germany: Kluwer, pp. 146171.Google Scholar
Renner, S.S. and Ricklefs, R.E. (1995). Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82, 596606. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruxton, G.D. and Neuhäuser, M. (2010). Good practice in testing for an association in contingency tables. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64, 15011513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1014-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, A.K. and Weller, S.G. (1999). A review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. In Geber, M.A., Dawson, T.E. and Delph, L.F. (eds), Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 132.Google Scholar
Sakai, A.K., Weller, S.G., Culley, T.M., Campbell, D.R., Dunbar-Wallis, A.K. and Andres, A. (2008). Sexual dimorphism and the genetic potential for evolution of sex allocation in the gynodioecious plant, Schiedea salicaria . Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21, 1829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01439.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santin, D., Benedetti, E.L., Barros, N.F.D., Fontes, L.L., Almeida, I.C.D., Neves, J.C.L. and Wendling, I. (2017). Harvest handling and phosphate nutrition in yerba-matte (Ilex paraguariensis) culture during production stage. Ciência Florestal 27, 783797. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509828629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, H.G., Jacomine, P.K.T., Anjos, L.H.C., Oliveira, V.A., Oliveira, J.B., Coelho, M.R., Lumbreras, J.F. and Cunha, T.J.F. (2006). Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (2018). SAS/STAT® 15.1 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Schärer, L., Sandner, P. and Michiels, N.K. (2004). Trade-off between male and female allocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatworm Macrostomum sp. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 396404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00827.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyedi, N., Costa, C., Maguas, C. and Correia, O. (2019). The contribution of leaf life span to sexual dimorphism in deciduous and evergreen Pistacia species under Mediterranean conditions. Flora 251, 114121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2019.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, M.H.M. and Rakocevic, M. (2010). Software for interpolation of vegetative growth of yerba mate plants in 3D. PAB 45, 244251. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2010000300003 Google Scholar
Slate, M.L., Rosenstiel, T.N. and Eppley, S.M. (2017). Sex-specific morphological and physiological differences in the moss Ceratodon purpureus (Dicranales). Annals of Botany 120, 845854. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx071 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tormena, C.D., Pauli, E.D., Marcheafave, G.G., Scheel, L.G., Rakocevic, M., Bruns, R.E. and Scarminio, I.S. (2020). FT-IR biomarkers of sexual dimorphism in yerba-mate plants: seasonal and light accessibility effects. Microchemical Journal 158, 105329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenta, K., Dimac-Stohl, K., Baines, F., Smith, T., Piotrowski, G., Hill, N., Kuppler, J. and Nevo, O. (2020). Ultraviolet radiation changes plant color. BMC Plant Biology 20, 253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02471-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vega-Frutis, R., Macías-Ordóñez, R., Guevara, R. and Fromhage, L. (2014). Sex change in plants and animals: a unified perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27, 667675. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12333 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilas, J.S. and Pannell, J.R. (2011). Sexual dimorphism in resource acquisition and deployment: both size and timing matter. Annals of Botany 107, 119126. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendling, I., Sturion, A.A., Reis, C.A.F., Stuepp, C.A. and Peña, M.A.P. (2016). Indirect and expedite assessment of Ilex paraguariensis commercial yield. Cerne 22, 241248. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201622032189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelwright, N.T. and Logan, B.A. (2004). Previous-year reproduction reduces photosynthetic capacity and slows lifetime growth in females of a neotropical tree. PNAS 101, 80518055. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402735101 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Rakocevic et al. supplementary material

Rakocevic et al. supplementary material

Download Rakocevic et al. supplementary material(File)
File 79.6 KB