Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T18:10:07.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Potential Yields of Rice Varieties in the Australian Tropics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

P. C. Owen
Affiliation:
Division of Land Research, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia

Summary

During the wet summer season of northern tropical Australia higher yields were attained by introduced weakly photoperiod-sensitive short-duration rice varieties than by locally-bred strongly photoperiod-sensitive varieties resembling traditional tropical indicas. There was no clear relationship between growth durations and yields. Dry season yields were lower, associated with shortened durations (especially of the reproductive phase) and lower cumulative radiation totals in the late phases of growth. Dawn, a variety of U.S. origin imported from the Philippines, outyielded all other varieties. In both wet and dry seasons yields depended largely on panicle weights, which in turn depended on high seed numbers per panicle. Individual seed weights were of less importance. The results tended to confirm a prior interpretation of climatic data, i.e. that there is no environmental factor limiting wet season yields in the region to levels below those obtained elsewhere in the tropics, provided the crop receives a high standard of care and attention.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Best, R. (1962). Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 10, 347.Google Scholar
Boerema, E. B. (1965). Aust.J. exp. Agric. and Anim. Husb. 5, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irri (1963). International Rice Research Institute Annual Report for 1963Google Scholar
Irri (1965). International Rice Research Institute Annual Report for 1965Google Scholar
Irri (1966a). International Rice Research Institute Annual Report for 1996Google Scholar
Irri (1966b). The IRRI Reporter 2, 4.Google Scholar
Moomaw, J. C., Baldazo, P. G. & Lucas, L. (1967). International Rice Commission Newsletter Special issue 1967, 18.Google Scholar
Murata, Y. (1966). International Rice Commission Newsletter, 15, 20.Google Scholar
Owen, P. C. (1967).J.Aust. Inst. agric. Sci., 33, 247.Google Scholar
Tanaka, A., Kawano, K. & Yamaguchi, J. (1966). International Rice Research Institute Technical Bulletin, 7, 32.Google Scholar