Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T02:09:08.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infant saccades are not slow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2006

Siobhan Garbutt
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and WM Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mark R Harwood
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, City College of New York, NY, USA.
Christopher M Harris
Affiliation:
SensoriMotor Laboratory, Centre for Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements are essential for redirecting the fovea at different visual targets. In adults and children saccades are remarkably stereotyped. Peak velocity and duration of saccades are a simple function of saccade amplitude called the ‘main sequence’. Saccades that are substantially slower than normal often reflect disease of the brain stem saccade generator but may also be associated with diseases of higher level structures including the cerebral hemispheres and superior colliculus. However, little is known about the speed of saccades in infancy. A single previous study reported that infant saccades may be similar to or slower than those of adults, but few saccades were recorded. The present study re-examined this issue with the technique of measuring optokinetic (OKN) quick phases, which are readily elicited from healthy and sick infants, with a view to using saccade speed as a quantitative neurological measure. We measured the duration and peak velocity of saccades (main sequence) using direct-current electro-oculography from OKN quick phases in 18 infants (nine males, nine females) aged 2 to 18 months (mean age 8mo [SD 4]) and seven adult comparison participants (four males, three females; age range 21–32y, mean age 27y [SD 3]). All infant saccades showed typical relationships between duration, peak velocity, and amplitude. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between adult and infant main sequences for duration or peak velocity. However, the differences in the main sequence for duration almost reached significance (p=0.051) for infant saccades being faster than adults. Individual differences were also present, and some infants produced saccades faster than adults, but not slower. There was no significant age trend. We conclude that measuring saccade speed is practicable in the young infant. From the age of at least 2 months, infants generate saccades with speeds similar to or slightly higher than those of adults.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
2006 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)