Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident Due to planned maintenance there will be periods of time where the website may be unavailable. We apologise for any inconvenience.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
For more than fifty years the Weber thesis, which attributed to Calvinism a decisive influence in the development of modern capitalism, has been vigorously debated. In his celebrated essay, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Calvinism (1904), Max Weber had suggested that Calvinism contributed to the rise of capitalism in various ways—by relaxing the restraints which hitherto had largely served to impede its growth; by fostering the economic virtues of diligence, frugality, honesty, prudence, and sobriety; and, most of all, by providing a psychological fillip to the development of the “spirit” of capitalism, “the temper of single-minded concentration upon pecuniary gain.” The controversy precipitated by the publication of Weber's essay engendered considerable heat that often served to obscure the points at issue, but over the years the continuing discussion has served to remove many of the issues from the area of debate and to narrow the focus of the central issue that remains.
1. Tawney, R. H., Religion and the Rise of Capitalism, pp. 212, 226, 316.Google Scholar
2. Ephraim, Fischoff, “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: the History of a Controversy,” Social Research, XI (1944)Google Scholar; reprinted in Green, Robert W., Protestantism and Capitalism: The Weber Thesis and its Critics, pp. 108–09, 113–14.Google Scholar
3. Tawney, , op. cit., 226.Google Scholar
4. Ibid., 316; Robertson, H. M., Aspects of the Rise of Economic Individualism, pp. 52–56Google Scholar; Amintore, Fanfani, Catholicism, Protestantism, and Capitalism, pp. 160–82.Google Scholar
5. Green, R. W., op. cit., 30–34Google Scholar; Robertson, , op. cit., 4–7Google Scholar; Fanfani, , op. cit., 196, 200–04.Google Scholar
6. Fanfani, , op. cit., 186–187.Google Scholar
7. Max, Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, p. 27.Google Scholar
8. Ibid., 2.
9. Ibid., 3, 160–63, 172.
10. Green, , op. cit., 107, 109, 112, 113.Google Scholar
11. A not untypical instance of manipulation is the way in which he handles Cromwell's request for legislation to reform economic abuses. Cromwell, after the battle of Dunbar, had written to the Long Parliament: “Be pleased to reform the abuses of all professions: and if there be any one that makes many poor to make a few rich, that suits not a Commonwealth.” Weber then adds the comment: “Nevertheless, we will find Cromwell following a quite specifically capitalistic line of thought,” documenting this assertion by quoting in a footnote Cromwell's words of reproach to the Irish rebels—a reproach which was actually very conventional and might have been spoken by any ruler to rebellious subjects. By this means Cromwell's forthright request for legislation to curb an unbridled lust for gain is brushed aside. Weber, , op. cit., 82, 213.Google Scholar
12. Ibid., 7, 10–11.
13. Green, , op. cit., 111.Google Scholar See also Fanfani, , op. cit., 160–82.Google Scholar
14. Weber, , op. cit., 155.Google Scholar
15. Tawney, , op. cit., 213, 226, 317.Google Scholar
16. Ernst, Troeltsch, The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, II, 649.Google Scholar
17. Tawney, , op. cit., 317.Google Scholar
18. Ibid., 226, 227.
20. Ibid., 230.
21. Ibid., 240. See Troeltsch (op. cit., 645), who also traces “the present-day bourgeois way of life” to the Calvinist doctrine of the calling with its emphasis upon profit and gain as a sign of God's blessing.
22. Robertson, , op. cit., 1–7.Google Scholar
23. Fanfani, , op. cit., 204.Google Scholar
24. Ibid., 192.
25. Baxter's views have been summarized in Hudson, W. S., “Puritanism and the Spirit of Capitalism,” Church History, XVIII (1949), 8–14.Google Scholar
26. Fanfani, , op. cit., 153–54.Google Scholar
27. Weber, , op. cit., 60.Google Scholar
28. Troeltsch, , op. cit., 645.Google Scholar
29. Tawney, , op. cit., 226.Google Scholar
30. Ibid., 225.
31. Ibid., 103.
32. Fanfani, , op. cit., 202.Google Scholar
33. Ibid., 178–79.
34. Ibid., 197–99.
35. Ibid., 210.
36. Tawney, , op. cit., 237–38.Google Scholar
37. Robertson, , op. cit., 22, 27.Google Scholar
38. Tawney, , op. cit., 238.Google Scholar
39. Robertson, , op. cit., 210–11.Google Scholar
40. Fanfani, , op. cit., 187–88.Google Scholar
