Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:41:08.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On essential extensions of rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

E. R. Puczyłwski
E. R. Puczyłwski
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, University of Warsaw, PKiN, 00-901 Warsaw, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper concerns the problem of description of the set of rings containing a given ring as an essential ideal. The results obtained are applied to some problems of ring theory and radicals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , June 1987 , pp. 379 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1987

References

[1]Andrunakievich, V. A. and Ryabukhin, J. M., Radicals of algebras and structural theory, Nauka, Moscow, 1979 (Russian).Google Scholar
[2]Beidar, K. I., “Examples of rings and radicals”, Radical Theory, Colloq. Math. Soc. Janos Bolyai 38 (1982), 19–46.Google Scholar
[3]Dubrovin, N. I., “Chain domains”, Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh., 1980, no. 2, 51–54 (Russian).Google Scholar
[4]Gardner, B. J., “Simple rings whose lower radicals are atoms”, Acta Math. Hungar. 43 (1984), 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Divinsky, N., Krempa, J. and Sulinski, A., “Strong radical properties of alternative and associative rings”, J. Algebra 17 (1971), 369–388.Google Scholar
[6]Leavitt, W. G. and VanLeeuwen, L. C. A., “Multiplier algebras and minimal embeddability”, Publ. Math. Debrecen 29 (1982), 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Puczyłowski, E. R., “Remarks on stable radicals”. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. 28 (1980), 11–16.Google Scholar
[8]Puczyłowski, E. R., “On Sands' questions concerning strong and hereditary radicals”, Glasgow Math. J. 28 (1986), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Robson, J. C., “Simple Noetherian rings need not have unity elements”. Bull. London Math. Soc. 7 (1975), 269–270.Google Scholar
[10]Robson, J. C., “Idealizers and hereditary Noetherian prime rings”, J. Algebra 22 (1972), 45–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Robson, J. C., “A.unified approach to unity”, Comm. Algebra 7 (1979), 1245–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Sands, A. D., “On relations among radical properties”, Glasgow Math. J. 18 (1977), 17–23.Google Scholar