Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:35:26.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of wilting and short-chopping of grass on the subsequent voluntary intake of silage, and live-weight gain of calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. England  and
M. Gill
P. England
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
M. Gill
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

Four silages were prepared from perennial ryegrass. Half the crop was picked up soon after mowing and the remainder left to wilt for 24 h. Half the unwilted and half the wilted grass was chopped by a forage harvester with its normal complement of knives; the remainder was chopped by a forage harvester with all but two of its knives removed. The ensiled material was offered ad libitum for 80 days as the sole food to 32 British Friesian male castrates initially 14 weeks of age and 111 kg live weight.

Wilting raised silage dry-matter content by 31 g/kg fresh weight and gave lower concentrations of acetic acid whilst short chopping gave lower butyric acid. Concentrations of acetic acid, butyric acid and ammonia nitrogen were high on all treatments. Organic matter digestibility was significantly increased by wilting (P < 0·001) and significantly depressed by chopping (P < 0·001). There was no response in dry-matter intake to short chopping, but wilting raised daily intake from 18·4 to 19·9 g silage dry matter per kg live weight (P < 0·001). Live-weight gain was increased from 0·42 to 0·46 kg/day by short chopping (P < 0·05) and from 0·40 to 0·48 kg/day by wilting (P < 0·01)

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 73 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Castle, M. E., Retter, W. C. and Watson, J. N. 1979. Silage and milk production: comparisons between grass silage of three different chop lengths. Grass Forage Sci. 34: 293–301.Google Scholar
Deswysen, A. and Vanbelle, M. 1978. How chopping improves grass silage intake by sheep and heifers. Proc. 7th gen. Meet. Eur. Grassld Fed. pp. 6.18–6.26.Google Scholar
Deswysen, A., Vanbelle, M. and Focant, M. 1978. The effect of silage chop length on the voluntary intake and rumination behaviour of sheep. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 33: 107–115.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. and McDonald, P. 1961. Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12: 790–795.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P. 1980. The intake of conserved forages. In Forage Conservation in the 80's (ed. Thomas, C.). Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc, No. 11, pp. 107–121.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Bechet, G. and Thomson, E. 1975. [Effect of physical structure and conservation quality of grass silages on their intake.] Annls Zootech. 24: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulphy, J. P. and Demarquilly, C. 1972. [Effect of harvesting machine on the feeding value of silages. 1. Preliminary results.] Annls Zootech. 21: 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulphy, J. P. and Demarquilly, C. 1973. [Effect of harvesting machine and fineness of chopping on the feeding value of silages.] Annls Zootech. 22: 199–217.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P. and Demarquilly, C. 1975. [Effect of harvesting machine on the value of grass silages for dairy heifers.] Annls Zootech. 24: 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulphy, J. P. and Michelet, B. 1975. [Comparative effect of harvesting machine on silage intake by heifers and sheep.] Annls Zootech. 24: 757–763.Google Scholar
Elsden, S. R. and Gibson, Q. H. 1954. The estimation of lactic acid using cerie sulphate. Biochem. J. 58: 154–158.Google Scholar
Gale, G. E. and Knight, A. C. 1980. Apparatus for the accurate assessment of forage chop length. In Forage Conservation in the 80's (ed. Thomas, C.), Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld. Soc, No. 11, pp. 335–338.Google Scholar
Jackson, N. and Forbes, T. J. 1970. The voluntary intake by cattle of four silages differing in dry matter content. Anim. Prod. 12: 591–599.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, P. 1981. The Biochemistry of Silage. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Marsh, R. 1979. The effects of wilting on fermentation in the silo and on the nutritive value of silage. Grass Forage Sci. 34: 1–10.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. 1965. The effect of length of silage on its voluntary intake by cattle. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 20: 54–58.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C., Balch, D. A., Holdsworth, Muriel C. and Wood, Marion. 1955. The effect of chopping, lacerating and wilting of herbage on the chemical composition of silage. J. Br. Grassld Soc., 10: 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. and Moore, L. A. 1965. New chemical methods for analysis of forages for the purpose of predicting nutritive value. Proc. 9th int. Grassld Congr., Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 783–789.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Hutchinson, K. J., Wilson, R. F. and Harris, C. E. 1971. The voluntary intake of silage by sheep. 1. Interrelationships between silage composition and intake. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77: 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar