Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T05:10:40.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

33 - Process-based erosion modelling: promises and progress

from Part IV - New methods for evaluating effects of land-use change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

B. Yu
Affiliation:
Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
M. Bonell
Affiliation:
UNESCO, Paris
L. A. Bruijnzeel
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Accelerated soil and nutrient losses and their off-site impacts are of great concern for sustainable agriculture and, more generally, for sustainable land management. Prediction of the rate of soil erosion over a range of temporal and spatial scales is important for land use planning, erosion risk assessment, and for evaluating the effects of land use change (Penning de Vries et al., 1998). With urbanisation and population growth in traditionally rural areas, farming on steeplands has continued to increase in recent years, especially in the developing regions of the world (Oldeman et al., 1991; Fisher and Heilig, 1997). In plantation forestry, logging and site preparation activities on steep slopes also expose forested areas temporarily to high risk of soil erosion and nutrient losses (cf. the chapter by Grip et al., this volume).

The most widely used soil erosion prediction technology is the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) (Wischmeier and Smith, 1978) and its successor the Revised USLE (Renard et al., 1997). In recent years, however, a new generation of physically based models such as WEPP (Nearing et al., 1989; Flanagan and Nearing, 1995; Laflen et al., 1997), LISEM (De Roo et al., 1996a), EUROSEM (Morgan et al., 1998) and GUEST (Misra and Rose, 1996; Rose et al., 1997) has been developed to describe and quantify soil erosion processes. These models are particularly suitable for adaptation across a range of scales in the landscape because physical principles and physically meaningful parameters are involved.

Type
Chapter
Information
Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics
Past, Present and Future Hydrological Research for Integrated Land and Water Management
, pp. 790 - 810
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, A. D. and Parsons, A. J. (1994) hydraulics of interrill overland flow on stone-covered desert surfaces. Catena 23:111–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agus, F., Gintings, A. N., Kurnia, U., Abdurachman, A. and van der Poel, P. (1997) Soil erosion research in Indonesia: Past experience and future direction. In: F. W. T. Penning de Vries, F. Agus and J Kerr (eds). Soil Erosion at Multiple Scales, CABI Publsihing, pp. 255–267
Alberts, E. E., Nearing, M. A., Weltz, M. A., Risse, L. M., Pierson, F. B., Zhang, X. C., Laflen, J. M. and Simanton, J. R. (1995). Ch. 7 Soil component. In D. C. Flanagan and M. A. Nearing (ed.) USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project: Hillslope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation. NSERL Report No. 10. West Lafayette, Ind.: USDA-ARS Nat. Soil Erosion Research Laboratory
Bagnold, R. A. (1977) Bedload transport by natural rivers. Water Resour. Res. 13:303–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beasley, D. B., Huggins, L. F. and Monke, E. J. (1980) ANSWERS: A model for watershed planning. Trans ASAE, 23(4), 938–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuselinck, L., Govers, G., Hairsine, P. B., Sander, G. C. and Breynaert, M. (2002a) The influence of rainfall impact on sediment transport by overland flow over areas of net deposition, J. Hydrol. 257:145–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuselinck, L., Hairsine, P. B.Sander, G. C. and Govers, G. (2002b) Evaluating a multi-class net deposition equation across a range of conditions. Water Resour. Res. 38(7), doi: 10.1029/2001 WR000250, 2002Google Scholar
Bingner, R. L. (1990) Comparison of the components used in several sediment yield models. Trans ASAE 33:1229–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorneberg, D. L., Trout, T. J., Sojka, R. E. and Aase, J. K. (1999) Evaluating WEPP-predicted infiltration, runoff, and soil erosion for furrow irrigation. Trans. the ASAE 42:1733–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouraoui, F. and Dillaha, T. A. (1996) ANSWERS-2000: Runoff and sediment transport model. J. Env. Engg., ASCE, 122:493–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (1990) Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion. A state-of-knowledge review. UNESCO International Hydrological Programme, Paris, 224 pp
Catena (1999) Vol. 36, Issue 3–4, Special issue on ‘Modelling soil erosion by water at the catchment scale
Chu, S. T. (1978) Infiltration during unsteady rain. Water Resour. Res. 14:461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciesiolka, C. A. A., Coughlan, K. J., Rose, C. W., Escalante, M. C., Hasim, G. M., Paningbatin, E. P. Jr. and Sombatpanit, S. (1995). Methodology for a multi-country study of soil erosion management. Soil Tech. 8: 179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogle, A. L., Lane, L. J. and Basher, L. (2001) Testing the Hillslope erosion model for Application in India, New Zealand and Australia. In MODSIM 2001, 10–13 December 2001, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, pp. 173–178
Coughlan, K. J. and Rose, C. W. (Eds). (1997) ‘A New Soil Conservation Methodology and Application to Cropping Systems in Tropical Steeplands’. ACIAR Technical Report No. 40. (ACIAR: Canberra.)
Roo, A. P. J. (1998) Modelling runoff and sediment transport in catchment using GIS. Hydrol. Process: 12, 905–9223.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roo, A. P. J. and Jetten, V. G. (1999) Calibrating and validating the LISEM model for two data sets from the Netherlands and South Africa. Catena 37: 477–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roo, A. P. J., Offermans, R. J. E. and Cremers, N. D. T. (1996b) LISEM: A single-event physically based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins. II. Sensitivity analysis, validation and application. Hydrol. Processes, 10:1119–11263.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roo, A. P. J., Wesseling, C. G. and Ritsema, C. J. (1996a) LISEM: A single-event physically based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins. I. Theory, input and output. Hydrol. Processes, 10:1107–11173.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roo, A. P. J., Wesseling, C. G. and Deursen, W. P. A. (2000) Physically based river basin modelling within a GIS: the LISFLOOD model. Hydrol. Proc. 14: 1981–19923.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, A. and Collins, R. (1998) Predicting erosion and sediment yield at the catchment scale. In: F. W. T. Penning de Vries, F. Agus and J Kerr (eds). Soil Erosion at Multiple Scales, 317–342
Dietrich, W. E., Wilson, C. J., Montgomery, D. R., McKean, J. and Bauer, R. (1992) Erosion thresholds and land surface morphology. Geology 20: 675–6792.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, T. (1978) Field studies of hillslope flow process. In: M. J. Kirkby (ed.) Hillslope Hydrology. Wiley, Chichester, 227–293
El-Swaify, S. A. and Dangler, E. W. (1977) Erodibility of selected tropical soils in relation to structural and hydrologic parameters. In Soil Erosion: Prediction and Control, Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, Iowa, pp. 105–114
Everaert, W. (1991) Empirical relations for the sediment transport capacity of interrill flows. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 16:513–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favis-Mortlock, D. T., Quinton, J. N. and Dickinson, W. T. (1996) The GCTE validation of soil erosion models for global change studies. J. Soil and Water Conservation 51:397–403Google Scholar
Fentie, B. (2001) Sustainability of the resource base in grazing lands, Queensland: Modelling erosion-productivity pf pasture lands. Unpubl. Ph. D. thesis, University of Queensland
Fentie, B., Coughlan, K. J. and Rose, C. W. (1997) Manual for Use of Program GUEST30. Faculty of Environmental Sciences. (Griffith University: Brisbane.)
Fentie, B.Yu, B., Silburn, M. D. and Ciesiolka, C. A. A. (2002) Evaluation of eight different methods to predict hillslope runoff rates for a grazing catchment in Australia. J. Hydrol. 261:102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, G. and Heilig, G. K. (1997) Population momentum and the demand for on land and water resources. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B352:862–869Google Scholar
Flanagan, D. C. and Nearing, M. A. (Ed.) (1995) WEPP Technical Documentation. NSERL Report No. 10. USDA-ARS-MWA: West Lafayette, IN
Flanagan, D. C. and Livingston, S. J. (Ed.) (1995) WEPP User Summary. NSERL Report No. 11. USDA-ARS-MWA: West Lafayette, IN
Flanagan, D. C. and Nearing, M. A. (2000) Sediment particle sorting on hillslope profiles in the WEPP model. Trans. ASAE, 43: 573–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, D. C., Renschler, C. S., Frankenberger, J. R., Cochrane, T. A., and Angel, B. A. (2001) Enhanced WEPP model applicability for improved erosion prediction. In MODSIM 2001, 10–13 December 2001, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, pp. 1817–1822
Folly, A., Quinton, J. N. and Smith, R. E. (1999) Evaluation of the EUROSEM model using data from the Catsop watershed, the Netherlands. Catena 37:507–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, G. R. (1982) Modelling the erosion process. Chapter 8 in C. T. Haan (ed). Hydrologic Modelling of Small Watershed. ASAE Monograph No. 5, pp. 297–360
Ghidey, F. and Alberts, E. E. (1996) Comparison of measured and WEPP predicted runoff and soil loss for Midwest claypan soil. Trans. ASAE 39:1395–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giménez, R. and Govers, G. (2001) Interaction between bed roughness and flow hydraulics in eroding rills. Water Resour. Res. 37:791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govers, G. (1990) empirical relationships for the transport capacity of overland flow. In erosion Transport and depositiion Processes, Proceedings of Jarusalem Workshop, 187. IAHS Publi No 189
Hairsine, P. B. and Rose, C. W. (1991) Rainfall detachment and deposition: Sediment transport in the absence of flow-driven processes. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:320–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairsine, P. B. and Rose, C. W. (1992a) Modelling water erosion due to overland flow using physical principles: I. Uniform flow. Water Resour. Res. 28:237–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairsine, P. B. and Rose, C. W. 1992b) Modelling water erosion due to overland flow using physical principles: II. Rill flow. Water Resour. Res. 28:245–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairsine, P. B., Sander, G. C., Rose, C. W., Parlange, J.-Y., Hogarth, W. L., Lisle, I. and Rouhipour, H. (1999) Unsteady soil erosion due to rainfall impact: a model of sediment sorting on the hillslope. J. Hydrol. 220:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairsine, P. B., Sander, G. C., and Beuselinck, L.. 2002. Sediment transport through an area of net deposition. Water Resour. Res. 38(6), 10.1029/2001 WR000265, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, G. R., Willgoose, G. R. and Evans, K. G. (2002) Testing of the SIBERIA landscape evolution model using the Tin Camp Creek, Northern Territory, Australia, field catchment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessel, R. (2002). Adapting the LISEM model to Loess Plateau conditions. ISCO 2002, 26–31, May, Beijing, China, pp. 110–115
Hogarth, W. L., Rose, C. W., Parlange, J. Y., Sander, G. C. and Carey, G. (2004) Soil erosion due to rainfall impact with no inflow: a numerical solution with spatial and temporal effects of sediment settling velocity characteristics. J. Hydrol. 294(4): 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtan, H. N. (1961) A concept for infiltration estimates in watershed engineering. ARS-4-51, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 25 p
Huang, C., Wells, L. K. and Norton, L. D. (1999) Sediment transport capacity and erosion processes: Model concepts and reality. Earth Surface Process and Landform 24:503–5163.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jetten, V., Roo, A. and Favis-Mortlock, D. (1999) Evaluation of field-scale and catchment-scale soil erosion model. Catena 37:521–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. E., Julien, P. Y., Molnar, D. K. and Watson, C. C. (2000). The two—dimensional upland erosion model CASC2D-SED. J. Amer. Water Resourc. Assoc. 36:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, D. D., Western, A. W., Grayson, R. B. and Turral, H. N. (2001) Testing current generation soil erosion models at two—minute and daily scales against plot scale data from mid-hill catchment of Nepal. In MODSIM 2001, 10–13 December 2001, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, pp. 173–178
Klik A., Hebel B., Zartl A. and Rosner J. (1997) Measured vs. WEPP simulated runoff and erosion from differently tilled plots. In ‘ASAE Annual International Meeting’. 10 pp. (Minneapolis, MN)
Kincaid, D. C. (2002) The WEPP model for runoff and erosion prediction under sprinkler irrigation. Trans ASAE 45:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnell, P. I. A. (1997) Runoff ratio as a factor in the empirical modelling of soil erosion by individual rainstorms. Aust. J. Soil Res. 35:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnell, P. I. A. (1998) Converting USLE soil erodibilities for use with QREI30 index. Soi. and Tillage Res. 45:349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knisel, W. G. (1980) CREAMS: A field-scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. USDA Conservation Research Report No. 26. (USDA-ARS: Washington, DC)
Knisel, W. G. (1991) CREAMS/GLEAMS: A development overview. In Beasley, D. B., Knisel, W. G. Rice, A. P. Eds. Proc. of the CREAMS/ GLEAMS Symposium, Publ. 4, Agric Engineering, U. Georgia, Athens, p. 9–17
Laflen, J. M., Elliot, W. J., Flanagan, D. C., Meyer, C. R. and Nearing, M. A. (1997) WEPP-Predicting water erosion using a process-based model. J. Soil and Water Conserv 52:96–102Google Scholar
Lal, R. (1990) Soil erosion in the tropics: Principles and management. McGraw Hill, New York
Lane, L. J., Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R. and Laflen, J. M. (1992) Development and application of modern soil erosion prediction technology – The USDA experience. Aust. J. Soil Res. 30:893–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, L. J., Nichols, H. M. and Paige, G. B. (1995) Modelling erosion on hillslopes: Concepts, theory and data. In Proceddings of the International Congress on Modeliing and Simulation (MOSIM'1995), University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia, 1–7
Lisle, I. G., Coughlan, K. J., and Rose, C. W. (1996) ‘GUPRO 3.1: A Program for Calculating Particle Size and Settling Characteristics’. ENS Working Paper, 7/96. Faculty of Environmental Sciences. (Griffith University: Brisbane.)
Liu, B. Y., Nearing, M. A., Baffaut, C. and Ascough, J. C. II (1997) The WEPP watershed model: III Comparison to measured data from small watersheds. Trans. the ASAE 40: 945–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loch, R. J. and Rosewell, C. J. (1992) Laboratory methods for measurement of soil erodibilities (K-factor) for the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Aust. J. Soil Res. 30:231–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, H., Gallant, J., Prosser, I. P., Moran, C. and Priestley G. (2001) Prediction of sheet and rill erosion over the Australian continent: Incorporating monthly soil loss distribution. Technical report 13/01, CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, Australia
Myers, N. (1993) Gaia: An Atlas of Planet Management. Anchor and Doubleday, Garden City, NY
Misra, R. K. and Rose, C. W. (1995) An examination of the relationship between erodibility parameters and soil strength. Aust. J. Soil Res. 33:715–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, R. K. and Rose, C. W. (1996) Application and sensitivity analysis of process-based erosion model GUEST. European Journal of Soil Science 47:593–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R. P. C., Quenton, J. N., Smith, R. E., Govers, G., Poesen, J. W. A., Auerswald, K., Chisci, G., Torri, D. and Styczen, M. E. (1998) The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM): A dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23:527–5443.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, A. J. (1988) The effects of flow-velocity variations on rain-driven transportation and the role of raindrop impact in the movement of solids. Aust. J Soil Res. 26:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutchler, C. K., Murphree, C. E. and McGregor, K. C. (1994) Laboratory and field plots for erosion research. In R. Lal (ed.) Soil Erosion Research Methods, Soil and Water Conservation Society and St Lucie Press
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10:282–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nearing, M. A., Foster, G. R., Lane, L. J. and Finkner, S. C. (1989) A process based erosion model for USDA water erosion prediction project technology. Trans ASAE 32:158–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldeman, L. R., Hakkerling, R. T. A. and Sombroek, W. G. (1991) ‘World Map of the Status of Human-induced Soil Degradation: An Explanatory Note.’ (International Soil Reference and Information Centre:Wageningen.)
Onstad, C. A., and Foster, G. R. (1975). Erosion modelling on a watershed. Trans. ASAE 18:288–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning de Vries, F. W. T., F. Agus and J Kerr (eds) (1998) Soil Erosion at Multiple Scales. CABi Publishing, Wallingford, UK
Popa, N. (2002). Soil erosion models used in Romania. In ISCO 2002, 26–31, May 2002, Beijing, China, pp. 222–226
Povilaitis, A., Robichaud, P., Dumbrauskas, A., Tumas, R., Ruseckas, J. and Heatwole, C. (1995) Erosion prediction in the Republic of Lithuania with the WEPP model. In ‘Water quality modelling: Proceedings of the International Symposium’. pp. 333–340. (Orlando, FL)
Proffitt, A. P. B., Hairsine, P. B. and Rose, C. W. (1993) Modelling soil erosion by overland flow: application over a range of hydraulic conditions. Trans ASAE, 36:1743–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proffitt, A. P. B., Rose, C. W. and Hairsine, P. B. (1991) Rainfall detachment and deposition: experiments with low slopes and significant water depths. Soi. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinton, J. N. and Morgan, R. P. C. (1998) EUROSEM: an evaluation with single event data from the C5 watershed, Oklahoma, USA. In: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop ‘Global change: modelling soil erosion by water’, J. Boardman and D. Favis-Mortlock (ed.), 65–74CrossRef
Renard, K. G., Foster, G. A., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D. K., Yoder, D. (1997) Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 703, (US Gov. Print. Office: Washington DC.)
Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D. K. and Yoder, D. C. coordinators. (1997). Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 703, 404 pp
Roose, E. (1977) Use of the Universal Soil Loss Equation to reduce erosion in West Africa. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Soil Erosion. Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, Iowa
Rose, C. W. (1997) Modelling erosion by water and wind. In Advances in Soil Science, Eds R. Lal, W. H. Blum, C. Valentine, B. A. Stewart. 57–88
Rose, C. W. (1993) Erosion and sedimentation. In ‘Hydrology and Water Management in the Humid Tropics – Hydrological Research Issues and Strategies for Water Management’. (Eds M. Bonnell, M. M. Hufschmidt and J. S. Gladwell) pp. 301–43. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)
Rose, C. W., Coughlan, K. J., Ciesiolka, C. A. A. and Fentie, B. (1997). Program GUEST (Griffith University Erosion System Template). In ‘A New Soil Conservation Methodology and Application to Cropping Systems in Tropical Steeplands’. (Eds K. J. Coughlan and C. W. Rose) ACIAR Technical Report, No. 40, pp. 34–58. (ACIAR: Canberra.)
Rose, C. W., Williams, J. R., Sander, G. C. and Barry D. A. (1983a) A mathematical model of soil erosion and deposition processes. I. Theory for a plane land element. Soi. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47:991–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, C. W., Williams, J. R., Sander, G. C. and Barry, D. A. (1983b) A mathematical model of soil erosion and deposition processes. II. Application to data from an arid-zone catchment. Soi. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47:996–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, C. W. and Yu, B. (1998) Dynamic process modelling of hydrology and soil erosion. In: F. W. T. Penning de Vries, F. Agus, and J. Kerr eds. Soil Erosion at Multiple Scales. CAB Internationals, 269–286
Rose, C. W., Yu, B., Hogarth, W. L., Okom, A. E. A., and Ghadiri, H. (2002) Theoretical interpretation of the spatial and size distribution of sediment deposited by buffer strips from flow at modest land slopes. J Hydrol. In revievGoogle Scholar
Sander, G. C., Hairsine, P. B., Rose, C. W., Cassidy, D., Parlange, J. Y., Hogarth, W. L., Lisle, I. (1996) Soil erosion due to rainfall impact during the early stages of a rainstorm. J. Hydrol. 178:351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, G. C., Hairsine, P. B., Beuselinck, L., and Govers, G.. 2002. Multi-class net deposition solutions. Water Resour. Res. 38(6), 10.1029/2001 WR000323, 2002Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. (1996). Entwicklung und Anwendung eines physikalisch begründeten Simulationsmodells für die Erosion geneigter, landwirtschaftlicher Nutzflächen. Berliner Geographische Abhandlungen 61. Department of Geography of the Free University, Berlin
Schröder, A. (2000) WEPP, EuROSEM, E-2D: Results of applicatios at the plot scale. 199–250. In J Schmidt (ed.) Soil Erosion, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Siepel, A. C., Steenhuis, T. S., Rose, C. W., Parlange, J.-Y. and McIsaac, G. F. (2002) A simplified hillslope erosion model with vegetation elements for practical applications. J. Hydrol. 258:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. E., Goodrich, D. and Quinton, J. N. (1995) Dynamic distributed simulation of water shed erosion: the KINEROS2 and EUROSEM models. J. Soil Water Conserv. 50:517–520Google Scholar
Smith, R. E. and Parlange, J. (1978) A parameter-efficient hydrologic infiltration model. Water Resour. Res. 14:533–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Technology (1995). Special Issue: Soil Erosion and Conservation. Soi. Tech. 8:177–258
Soto, B. and Diaz-Fierros, F. (1998) Runoff and soil erosion from areas of burnt scrub: comparison of experimental results with those predicted by the WEPP model. Catena 31:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolte, J., Chen, Y., Ritsema, C. J., van den Elsen, E., Reijnders, J. and Thompson, J. (2002) Calibration and up-scaling of an erosion model as a tool for farmers involvement to define alternative land use. ISCO 2002, 26–31, May, Beijing, China, pp. 218–221
Stone, J. J., Lane, L. J., Shirley, E. D. and Hernandez, M. (1995). Ch. 4 hillslope surface hydrology. In D. C. Flanagan and M. A. Nearing (ed.) USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project: Hillslope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation. NSERL Report No. 10. West Lafayette, Ind.: USDA-ARS Nat. Soil Erosion Research Laboratory
Su, N., Basher, L., Barringer, J. and Doscher, C. (1999). Reconstructing the patterns of sediment transport and related hydrological processes using the WEPP model. In MODSIM 1999, 6–9 December 1999, University of Waikato, New Zealand, pp. 209–213
Takken, I., Beuselinck, L., Nachtergaele, J., Govers, G., Poesen, J. and Degraer, G. (1999) Spatial evaluation of a physically-based distributed erosion model LISEM. Catena, 37:431–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takken, I. and Govers, G. (2000) Hydraulics of interrill overland flow on rough, bare soil surfaces. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25:1387–14023.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, A. K., Risse, L. M., Nearing, M. A. (2000) Evaluation of WEPP and its comparison with USLE and WEPP. Trans ASAE 43:1129–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deursen, W. P. A. (1995) Geographical information systems and dynamic models. Netherlands Geogr. Studies, 190, 198 ppGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, A. I. J. M. (2002) Water and sediment dynamics in bench-terraced agricultural steeplands in West-Java, Indonesia. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis. Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherland
Dijk, A. I. J. M. and Bruijinzeel, L. A. (2001) Modelling runoff and soil loss from bench terraced hillslope in the volcanic uplands of west Java, Indonesia. MODSIM 2001, 233–238Google Scholar
Dijk, A. I. J. M., Bruijnzeel, L. A. and Meesters, A. G. C. H. (2002) Exponential distribution theory applied to splash detachment and transport experiments. Soi. Sci. Soc. Amer. J., in pressGoogle Scholar
Vertessy, R. A., Wilson, C. J., Silburn, D. M., Connoy, R. D. and Ciesiolka, C. A. A. (1990) Predicting erosion hazard areas using digital terrain analysis. IASH Proc. Int Symposium on Research Needs and Applications to Reduce Erosion and Sedimentation in Tropical Steeplands. Suva, Fiji. Pp. 298–308Google Scholar
Wen, D. (1993) Soil erosion and conservation in China. In: World Erosion and Conservation, D. Pimentel (ed.), Cambridge University Press. pp. 63–107
Wesseling, C. G., Karssenberg, D., P. A.Burrough, P. A. and Deursen, W. P. A. (1996). Integrating dynamic environmental models in GIS: The development of a dynamic modelling language. Transactions in GIS 1:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willgoose, G. R., Bras, R. L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1991). A physically based coupled network growth and hillscope evolution model: 1. Theory. Water Resour. Res. 27:1671–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. R. (1975) Sediment-yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor. In ‘Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yields and Sources’. pp. 244–52. (USDA-ARS-S-40)
Williams, J. R., Renard, K. G. and Dyke, P. T. (1983) A new method for assessing the effect of erosion on productivity – The Epic model. J. Soil Water Conserv. 38: 381–383Google Scholar
Wilson, C. J., Carey, J. W., Beeson, P. C., Gard, M. O. and Lane, L. J. (2001). A GIS-based hillslope erosion and sediment delivery model and its application in the Cerro Grande burn area. Hydrol. Processe. 15:2995–3010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wischmeier, W. H. and Smith, D. D. (1965) Predicting Rainfall-Erosion Losses from Cropland east of the Rocky Mountains: Guide for Selection of practices for Soil and Water Conservation. USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 282. US Gov. Print. Office: Washington DC
Wischmeier, W. H. and Smith, D. D. (1978) Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning. USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 537. US Gov. Print. Office: Washington DC
Woolhiser, D. A., Smith, R. E. and Goodrich, D. C., (1990) KINEROS: A kinematic runoff and erosion model: documentation and user manual, USDA Agricultural Service, ARS-77
Yalin, M. S. (1963) An expression for bed-load transportation. J. Hydraulic Div., ASCE, 98(HY3):221–250Google Scholar
Young, R. A., Onstad, C. A., Bosch, D. D. and Anderson, W. P. (1989) AGNPS: a nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J. Soil Water Cons. 44:168–173Google Scholar
Yu, B. (1997) GOSH: A Program for Calculating Runoff Rates Given Rainfall Rates and Runoff Amount, User Guide and Reference Manual. ENS Working Paper, 2/97. (Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University: Brisbane.)
Yu, B. (2003) A unified framework for water erosion and deposition equations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67: 251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B., Cakurs, U. and Rose, C. W. (1998) An assessment of methods for estimating runoff rates at the plot scale. Trans. ASAE 41:653–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B, Ciesiolka, C. A. A., Rose, C. W. and Coughlan, K. J. (2000) A validation test of WEPP to predict runoff and soil loss from a pineapple farm on a sandy soil in subtropical Queensland, Australia. Aust. J. of Soil Res. 38:537–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B. and Rose, C. W. (1997) GUEPS: A Program for Calculating the Soil Erodibility Parameter β and Predicting the Amount of Soil Loss Using GUEST Methodology. ENS Working Paper 3/97. (Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University: Brisbane
Yu, B. and Rose, C. W. (1999) Application of a physically based soil erosion model in the absence of data on runoff rates: I. Theory and methodology. Aust. J. Soil Res. 37:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B., Rose, C. W., Ciesiolka, C. C. A., Coughlan, K. J. and Fentie, B. (1997a). Toward a framework for runoff and soil loss prediction using GUEST technology, Aust. J. Soil Res., 35:1191–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B., Rose, C. W., Coughlan, K. J. and Fentie, B. (1997b). Plot-scale rainfall-runoff characteristics and modelling at six sites in Australia and South East Asia, Trans. ASAE 40:1295–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B. and Rosewell, C. J. (2001) Evaluation of WEPP for runoff and soil loss prediction at Gunnedah, NSW, Australia. Aust. J. Soil. Res. 38: 1131–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B., Sajjapongse, A., Yin, D., Eusof, Z., Anecksamphant, C., Rose, C. W. and Cakurs, U. (1999) Application of a physically based soil erosion model in the absence of data on runoff rates: II. Four case studies from China, Malaysia and Thailand. Aust. J. Soil Res. 37:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. C., Nearing, M. A., Risse, L. M. and McGregor, K. C. (1996) Evaluation of WEPP runoff and soil loss predictions using natural runoff plot data. Trans. ASAE 39:855–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×