Adams, H. B. and Wallace, B. (1990). Developing the potential of children in disadvantaged communities: the TASC Project: Thinking Actively in a Social Context. In The Challenge of Excellence: a vision splendid, eds. Braggett, S., Bailey, E. and Robinson, M.. Sydney: The Australian Association for the Education of the Gifted and Talented, 250–266.Google Scholar

Adams, H. B. and Wallace, B.(1991). TASC: a model for curriculum development. Gifted Education International, 7(3), 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adey, P. S. and Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards: cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Adey, P. S., Shayer, M. and Yates, C. (1989). Thinking Science: the curriculum materials of the CASE project. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar

Adey, P. S., Shayer, M. and Yates, C.(1995). Thinking Science: student and teachers' materials for the CASE intervention, second edn. London: Nelson.Google Scholar

Adhami, M., Johnson, D. C. and Shayer, M. (1998). Thinking Maths: the programme for accelerated learning in mathematics. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. and Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Ainscow, M. and Tweddle, D. (1988). Encouraging Success. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar

Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., Leibham, M. E. and DeBauge, C. (2004). Constructing domain-specific knowledge in kindergarten: relations among knowledge, intelligence and strategic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R. R., Feezel, J. D. and Kauffie, F. J. (1967). A taxonomy of concepts and critical abilities related to the evaluation of verbal arguments. Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning Occasional Paper No. 9. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar

Allinson, C. W., Chell, E. and Hayes, J. (2000). Intuition and entrepreneurial behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psycholog y, 9(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altshuller, G. (translated by L. Shulyak) (1996). And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.Google Scholar

Altschuller, G. (translated by L. Shulyak)(1999). 40 Principles: TRIZ keys to technical innovation. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.Google Scholar

Altschuller, G.(2000). The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.Google Scholar

Altshuller, G. S. and Shapiro, R. V. (in Russian) (1956). About a technology of creativity. Questions of Psychology, 6, 37–49.Google Scholar

Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. (eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. D. (1983). A consolidation and appraisal of science meta-analyses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, R., Costello, P. and Clarke, S. (1993). Improving the Quality of Argument, 5–16. Hull: The University of Hull.Google Scholar

Apter, M. J. (ed.) (2001). Motivational Styles in Everyday Life: a guide to Reversal Theory. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arter, J. A. and Jenkins, J. R. (1979). Differential diagnosis–prescriptive teaching: a critical appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 49, 517–555.Google Scholar

Ashman, A. F. and Conway, R. N. F. (1997). An Introduction to Cognitive Education: theory and applications. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ausubel, D. P. (1967). Learning Theory and Classroom Practice. OISE Bulletin No. 1. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar

Ausubel, D. P.(1968). Educational Psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Ausubel, D. P.(1978). Educational Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Ausubel, D. P. and Robinson, F. G. (1969). School Learning: an introduction to educational psycholog y. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Bachelor, P., Michael, W. B. and Kim, S. (1994). First-order and higher-order semantic and figural factors in structure-of-intellect divergent production measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 608–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The Psychology of Memory. New York: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D.(1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. VIII: Recent advances in research and theory, ed. Bower, G. H.. New York: Academic Press, 47–90.Google Scholar

Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and Taxonomies: an introduction to classification techniques. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailin, S. (1998). Education, knowledge and critical thinking. In Education, Knowledge and Truth, ed. Carr, D.. London: Routledge, 204–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. R. and Daniels, L. R. B. (1993). A Conception of Critical Thinking for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment. Province of British Columbia: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar

Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. R. and Daniels, L. R. B.(1999a). Common misconceptions of critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. R. and Daniels, L. R. B.(1999b). Conceptualizing critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkley, R. A. (1996). Linkages between attention and executive functions. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes, 307–325.Google Scholar

Baron, J. (1985). Rationality and Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). Essential Difference: men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Bartlett, F. C. (1958). Thinking. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. London: Paladin.Google Scholar

Baumfield, V. M. (2004). Thinking for yourself and thinking together: the community of inquiry as a pedagogy for self-regulated learning. In Thinking about Thinking: what educators need to know, eds. Ee, J., Chang, A. and Tan, O. S.. Singapore: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Baumfield, V., Higgins, S. and Lin, M. (2002). Thinking through teaching: professional development for innovation and autonomy. Education Review, London: National Union of Teachers, 61–67.

Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1987). The affective dimension of learning: faculty–student relationships that enhance intellectual development. College Student Journal, 21, 46–58.Google Scholar

Baxter Magolda, M. B.(1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: gender-related patterns in students' intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

Begab, M. J. (1980). Foreward. In Instrumental Enrichment: an intervention for cognitive modifiability, eds. R. Feuerstein, Y. Rand, M. Hoffman and R. Miller. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, xv.Google Scholar

Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R. and Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's Ways of Knowing: the development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bidell, T. R. and Fischer K. W. (1992). Beyond the stage debate: action, structure and variability in Piagetian theory and research. In Intellectual Development, eds. Sternberg, R. J. and Berg, C. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–140.Google Scholar

Biggs, J. (1995). Assessing for learning: some dimensions underlying new approaches to educational assessment. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Biggs, J.(1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar

Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning – the SOLO taxonomy, first edn. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. F.(1991). Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behaviour. In Intelligence: reconceptualization and measurement, ed. Rowe, H. A. H.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 57–66.Google Scholar

Blagg, N., Ballinger, M. and Gardner, R. (1988). Somerset Thinking Skills Course Handbook. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Blagg, N. R., Lewis, R. E. and Ballinger, M. P. (1993). Thinking and Learning at Work: A report on the development and evaluation of the thinking skills at work modules. Sheffield: Department of Employment.Google Scholar

Blatz, C. V. (1992). Contextual limits on reasoning and testing for critical thinking. In The Generalisability of Critical Thinking: multiple perspectives on an educational ideal, ed. Norris, S. P.. New York and London: Teachers College Press, 206–222.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: cognitive domain. New York: McKay.Google Scholar

Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boekaerts, M. and Niemivirta, M. (2000). Self-regulated learning: finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 417–450.Google Scholar

Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M. (eds.) (2000). Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Boekaerts, M. and Simons, P. R. J. (1993). Leren en Instructie. Psychologie van de leerling en het leerproces. Assen: Dekker van de Vegt.Google Scholar

Borkowski, J. E. (1985). Signs of intelligence: strategy generalization and metacognition. In The Growth of Reflective Thought in Children, ed. Yussen, R. S.. New York: Academic Press, 105–144.Google Scholar

Borkowski, J. G. and Burke, J. E. (1996). Theories, models, and measurements of executive functioning: an information processing perspective. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes, 235–261.Google Scholar

Borkowski, J. G. and Nicholson, J. (2004). Executive functioning: towards a research agenda on higher-level cognitive skills. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 4(2), 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borkowski, J. G., Weaver, C. M., Smith, L. E. and Akai, C. E. (2004). Metacognitive theory and classroom practices: links between motivation and executive functioning. In Thinking about Thinking: what educators need to know, eds. Ee, J., Chang, A. and Tan, O. S.. Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar

Boulton-Lewis, G. M. (1995). The SOLO taxonomy as a means of shaping and assessing learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 14(2), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, P. J. (1992). The Environmental Sciences. London: Fontana.Google Scholar

Brainerd, C. J. (2003). Jean Piaget, learning research, and American education. In Educational Psychology: A century of contributions, eds. Zimmerman, B. J. and Schunk, D. H.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 251–287.Google Scholar

Brody, N. (2003a). Construct validation of the Sternberg triarchic abilities test: comment and reanalysis. Intelligence, 31, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, N.(2003b). What Sternberg should have concluded. Intelligence, 31, 339–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronowski, J. (1967). Human and Animal Languages. Vol. I. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar

Bronowski, J.(1977). Human and animal languages. In A Sense of the future, ed. Bronowski, J.. Cambridge, MD: MIT Press, 104–131.Google Scholar

Brown, K. (2002). The Right to Learn: alternatives for a learning society. London: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Büchel, F. P., Schlatter, C. and Scharnhorst, U. (1997). Training and assessment of analogical reasoning in students with severe learning dificulties. In Educational and Child Psycholog y, 14, 109–120.Google Scholar

Burr, A. (1995). An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, D. L. and Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callahan, C. M., Tomlinson, C. A. and Plucker, J. (1997). Project START: using a multiple intelligences model in identifying and promoting talent in high risk students. University of Connecticut Technical Report. Storrs, CT: National Research Centre on the Gifted and Talented.Google Scholar

Campbell, L. and Campbell, B. (1999). Multiple Intelligences and Student Achievement: success stories from six schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Cardellini, L. and Pascual-Leone, J. (2004). On mentors. Cognitive development, education and constructivism: an interview with Juan Pascual-Leone. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 4(2), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. B.(2003). The higher-stratum structure of cognitive abilities: current evidence supports g and about ten broad factors. In The Scientific Study of General Intelligence, ed. Nyborg, H.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 5–21.Google Scholar

Case, R. (1985). Intellectual Development: birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Case, R. and Daniels, L. R. B. (eds.) (2000). Critical Challenges Across the Curriculum. Burnaby, BC: Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1971). Thinking. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Cohen, R. I. and Nealon, J. (1979). An analysis of short-term memory differences between retardates and nonretardates. Intelligence, 3, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M. and Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and Thought: a psychological introduction. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Collis, K. F. and Biggs, J. B. (1982). Developmental determinants of qualitative aspects of school learning. In Learning and Teaching Cognitive Skills, ed. Evans, G. T.. Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research, 185–207.Google Scholar

Collis, K. and Romberg, T. A. (1991). Assessment of mathematical performance: an analysis of open-ended test items. In Testing and Cognition, eds. Wittrock, M. C. and Baker, E. L.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 82–130.Google Scholar

Colom, R., Rebolloa, I., Palaciosa, A., Juan-Espinosa, M. and Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comte, A. (1830–42). Cours de philosophie positive (6 vols.). Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar

Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corno, L. and Randi, J. (1999). A design theory for classroom instruction in self-regulated learning? In Instructional Design Theory and Models: a new paradigm of instructional theory. Vol. II, ed. Reigeluth, C. M.. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 293–318.Google Scholar

Costa, A. L. (ed.) (1991). Developing minds: a resource book for teaching thinking(Vol. I). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Costa, A. L. (ed.)(2001) Developing Minds. Vol. I: a resource book for teaching thinking. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.Google Scholar

Costa, A. L. and Kallick, B. (2000a). Discovering and exploring habits of mind (Habits of Mind, Bk. 1). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Costa, A. L. and Kallick, B.(2000b). Activating and engaging habits of mind (Habits of Mind, Bk. 2). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Costa, A. L., Kallick, B. and Perkins, D. (2000). Assessing and reporting on habits of mind (Habits of Mind, Bk. 3). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Costanzo, M. and Paxton, D. (1999). Multiple assessments for multiple intelligences. Focus On Basics, 3(1) http://gseweb.harvard.edu/~ncsall/fob/1999/paxton.htmGoogle Scholar

Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the Grade: a self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and Memory: an integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the Primary Curriculum: framing and developing practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Craik, K. (1943). The Nature of Explanation. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Creer, T. L. (2000). Self-management of chronic illness. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. London: Academic Press, 601–629.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In Theories of creativity, eds. Runco, M. A. and Albert, R. S.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 190–212.Google Scholar

Damon, W. (1995). Greater Expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Dare, D. E. (2001). Learner-Centred Instructional Practices Supporting the New Vocationalism. New directions for community colleges, No.115. John Wiley, and Sons Inc, 81–91.CrossRef

Bono, E. (1976). Teaching Thinking. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar

Bono, E.(1983). The direct teaching of thinking as a skill. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 703–708.Google Scholar

Bono, E.(1985). Six Thinking Hats. New York: Key Porter Books.Google Scholar

Bono, E.(1987). Letters to Thinkers. London: Harrap.Google Scholar

de Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Corte, E., Verschaffel, L. and , de Ven A. (2001). Improving text comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: a design experiment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 531–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

de Landsheere, V. (1989). Taxonomies of objectives. In The International Encyclopaedia of Educational Technology, ed. Eraut, M.. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Demetriou, A. (1990). Structural and developmental relations between formal and post formal capacities: towards a comprehensive theory of adolescent and adult cognitive development. In Adult Development: Vol. II. Models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought, eds. Commons, M. L., Armon, C., Kohlberg, L., Richards, F. A., Grozer, T. A. and Sinnott, J. D.. New York: Praeger, 147–173.Google Scholar

Demetriou, A.(1993). On the quest of the functional architecture of developing mind. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demetriou, A.(1998a). Cognitive development. In Lifespan Developmental Psychology, eds. Demetriou, A., Doise, W. and Lieshout, K. F. M.. London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Demetriou, A.(1998b). A three-level theory of the developing mind: basic principles and implications for instruction and assessment. In Intelligence, Instruction, and Assessment: theory into practice, eds. Sternberg, R. J. and Williams, W. M.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 149–199.Google Scholar

Demetriou, A.(2000). Organization and development of self-understanding and self-regulation: toward a general theory. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. London: Academic Press, 209–251.Google Scholar

Demetriou, A., Christou, C., Spanoudis, G. and Platsidou, M. (2002). The Development of Mental Processing: Efficiency, working memory, and thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67 (1, Serial No. 268).

Demetriou, A. and Efklides, A. (1985). Structure and sequence of formal and post-formal thought: general patterns and individual differences. Child Development, 56, 1062–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demetriou, A., Efklides, A. and Platsidou, M. (1993). The Architecture and Dynamics of Developing Mind: experiential structuralism as a frame for unifying cognitive developmental theories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (5–6, Serial No. 234).CrossRef

Demetriou, A. and Kazi, S. (2001). Unity and Modularity in the Mind and the Self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Demetriou, A. and Raftopoulos, A. (1999). Modeling the developing mind: from structure to change. Developmental Review 19, 319–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denckla, M. B. (1996). A theory and model of executive function. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes, 263–278.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the reflective process, revised edn. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar

Dewey, J.(1938). Logic: the theory of inquiry. Troy, MO: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Dewey, J.(1958). Experience and Nature, second edn. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Dosher, B. A. (2003). Working memory. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, ed. Nadel, L.. London: Nature Publishing Group, 569–577.Google Scholar

Eisner, E. W. (2004). Multiple intelligences: its tensions and possibilities. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elder, L. and Paul, R. (1998). Critical thinking: developing intellectual traits. Journal of Developmental Education, 21(3), 34–35.Google Scholar

Eliasmith, C. (1996). The third contender: a critical examination of the dynamicist theory of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 9(4), 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, J. G. (2000). The psychological assessment of children with learning difficulties. British Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Endler, N. S. and Kocovski, N. L. (2000). Self-regulation and distress in clinical psychology. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. London: Academic Press, 569–599.Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H. (1962). A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 32, 81–111.Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H.(1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H.(1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In Teaching Thinking Skills: theory and practice, eds. Baron, J. B. and Sternberg, R. J.. New York: W. H. Freeman, 9–26.Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H.(1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ennis, R. H.(1991). Critical thinking: a streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 14(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ennis, R. H.(1996). Critical thinking dispositions: their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2 and 3), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ennis, R. H.(1998). Is critical thinking culturally biased? Teaching Philosophy, 21(1), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ennis, R. H. and Millman, J. (1985). Cornell Critical Thinking Test, level Z. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H. and Weir, E. (1985). The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.Google Scholar

Eslinger, P. J. (1996). Conceptualizing, describing, and measuring components of executive function: a summary. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes, 367–396.Google Scholar

Facione, P. A. (1990). The Delphi Report. Millbrae CA: California Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fashola, O. S., and Slavin, R. E. (1997). Effective and replicable programs for students placed at risk in elementary and middle schools (Grant No. R-117D-40005). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R. and Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment: intervention programme for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R, Falik, L. H., and Feuerstein, R. S. (1998). The learning propensity assessment device: an alternative approach to the assessment of learning potential. In Advances in Cross-cultural Assessment, eds. Samuda, R. J., Feuerstein, R., Kaufman, A. S., Lewis, J. E. and Sternberg, R. J.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 100–161.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R. and Jensen, M. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: theoretical basis, goals and instruments. The Educational Forum, 44, 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y. and Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: the learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Finster, D. (1989). Developmental instruction part 1: Perry's model of intellectual development. Journal of Chemical Education, 66, 659–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finster, D.(1991). Developmental instruction part 2: application of the Perry model to general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 68, 752–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: the control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87(6), 477–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishback, S. J. and Polson, C. J. (1998). The cognitive development of adult undergraduate students. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, eds. Wood, G. S. Jr. and Webber, M. M.. Muncie, IN: Ball State University, 81–86.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. (1998). Teaching Thinking. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In The Nature of Intelligence, ed. Resnick, L.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 231–236.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E. and Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers' self-sustaining generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 14(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, R. C. and Lee, S. W. (1996). Differentiating instructions for high-achieving/gifted children in regular classrooms: a field test of three gifted-education models. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19 (4), 405–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R. and Schroeter, K. (2003). Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 306–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fusco, E. T. (1983). The relationship between children's cognitive level of development and their response to literature. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Hofstra University, New York.

Gagné, R. M. (1965). Conditions of Learning, first edn. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Gagné, R. M.(1985). Conditions of Learning, second edn. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Gagné, R. M. and Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of Instructional Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: the theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H.(1993). Frames of Mind: the theory of multiple intelligence, second edn. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H.(1999). Intelligence Reframed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H.(2004). Audiences for the theory of multiple intelligences. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 212–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, H., Kornhaber, M. L., and Wake, W. K. (1996). Intelligence: multiple perspectives. Orlando: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E. (1998). The development of memory. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geiselman, R. E. and Fisher, R. P. (1985). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Research in Brief, National Institute of Justice, December, 1–4.Google Scholar

Gerlach, V. and Sullivan, A. (1967). Constructing Statements of Outcomes. Inglewood, CA: Southwest Regional Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar

Glatthorn, A. A. and Baron, J. (1991). The good thinker. In Developing Minds. Vol. I: a resource book for teaching thinking, ed. Costa, A. L.. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications, 49–53.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (2003a). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31, 343–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottredson, L. S.(2003b). On Sternberg's ‘Reply to Gottfredson’. Intelligence, 31, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gouge, K. and Yates, C. (2002) Creating a CA programme in the arts: the Wigan LEA arts project. In Learning Intelligence: cognitive acceleration across the curriculum from 5 to 15 years, eds. Shayer, M. and Adey, P.. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Govier, T. (1988). Ways of teaching reasoning directly. In Critical Thinking: proceedings of the first British conference on informal logic and critical thinking, ed. Fisher, A.. Norwich: University of East Anglia, 30–38.Google Scholar

Graham, S. and Harris, K. R. (1996). Addressing problems in attention, memory, and executive functioning. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes, 349–365.Google Scholar

Gregory, R. L. (ed.) (1987). The Oxford Companion to The Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gregson M. (2003). Learning to be reflective. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

Griffin, S. and Case, R. (1997). Re-thinking the primary school math curriculum: an approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 3(1), 1–49.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L. and Sternberg, R. J. (2002). School-based tests of the triarchic theory of intelligence: three settings, three samples, three syllabi. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 167–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groth-Marnat, G. (1997). Handbook of Psychological Assessment, third edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Gruber, H., Law, L. C., Mandl, H. and Renkl, A. (1999). Situated learning and transfer: implications for teaching. In Learners, Learning and Assessment, ed. Murphy, P.. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 214–30.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J. P.(1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J. P.(1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McKay.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P.(1977). Way Beyond the IQ: guide to improving intelligence and creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P.(1980). Cognitive styles: what are they? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 715–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P.(1982). Cognitive psychology's ambiguities: some suggested remedies. Psychological Review, 89, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P.(1983). Transformation abilities of functions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P.(1986). Creative Talents: their nature, uses and development. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Ltd.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. and Hoepfner, R. (1971). The Analysis of Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, J.-E. and Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In Handbook of Educational Psychology, eds. Berliner, D. C. and Calfer, R. C.. New York: MacMillan, 186–242.Google Scholar

Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, eds. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J. and Mahwah, A. C., NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1–23.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (1984). Thought and Knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Larwence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F.(1994). A national assessment of critical thinking skills in adults: taking steps toward the goal. In The National Assessment of College Student Learning: identification of the skills to be taught, learned and assessed, ed. Greenwood, A.. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, 24–64.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F.(1997). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: a brief edition of thought and knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F.(2002). Thinking Critically About Critical Thinking, fourth edn (workbook). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Hamers, J. H. M. and Overtoom, M. T. (1997). Teaching Thinking in Europe. Utrecht: Sardes.Google Scholar

Handley, S. J., Capon, A., Beveridge, M., Dennis, I. and Evans, J. St. B. T. (2004). Working memory, inhibitory control and the development of children's reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 10, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannafin, M. J., and Hooper, S. (1989). An integrated framework for CBI screen design and layout. Computers in Human Behavior, 5(3), 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannah, L. S. and Michaelis, J. U. (1977). A comprehensive framework for instructional objectives: a guide to systematic planning and evaluation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (2002). What are the attributes of excellent teachers? Paper presented at the New Zealand Council for Educational Research Annual Conference, the University of Auckland. http://www.nzcer.org.nz/pdfs/hattie02.pdf

Hattie, J., Biggs, J., and Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hauenstein, A. D. (1972). Curriculum planning for behavioral development. Worthington, OH: Charles A, Jones Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Hauenstein, A. D.(1998). A Conceptual Framework for Educational Objectives: a holistic approach to traditional taxonomies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Hawkins, W. and Hedberg, J. G. (1986). Evaluating LOGO: use of the SOLO taxonomy. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 103–109.Google Scholar

Hawley, W. E. (1967). Programmed Instruction. In Training and development handbook, eds. Craig, R. L. and Bittel, L. R.. New York: McGraw Hill, 225–250.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C., Brooks, P. H. and Burns, M. S. (1992). Bright Start: cognitive curriculum for young children. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge Publishing.Google Scholar

Herrmann, N. (1989). The Creative Brain. Lake Lure: NC: Brain Books, The Ned Herrmann Group.Google Scholar

Herrmann, N.(1996). The Whole Brain Business Book. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Higgins, S. and Baumfield, V. (1998). A defence of teaching general thinking skills. Journal of Philosophy of Education 32(3), 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, S., Baumfield, V., Lin, M., Moseley, D., Butterworth, M., Downey, G., Gregson, M., Oberski, I., Rockett, M. and Thacker, D. (2004). Thinking skills approaches to effective teaching and learning: what is the evidence for impact on learners. In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.Google Scholar

Hoerr, T. R. (2000). Becoming a multiple intelligences school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Hofer, B. and Pintrich, P. (1997).The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing in relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, J. and Knapp, J. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford's structure of intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W. and Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: reality or myth? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Illeris, K. (2004). The Three Dimensions of Learning, second edn. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press/Niace Publications.Google Scholar

Jarvis, P. (1992). Paradoxes of Learning: on becoming an individual in society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Jewell, P. (1996). A reasoning taxonomy for gifted children. Paper presented in Adelaide at the national conference of the Australian Association for the Education of the Gifted and Talented. http://www.nexus.edu.au/teachstud/gat/jewell1.htm

Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design model for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 45(1), 65–95.Google Scholar

Jonassen, D.(1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In Instructional Design Theories and Models: a new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II), ed. Reigeluth, C. M.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 215–239.Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H.(2000). Toward a meta-theory of problem solving. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K. and Yacci, M. (1993). Structural Knowledge: techniques for representing, conveying and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H., Hannum, W. H. and Tessmer, M. (1989). Handbook of Task Analysis Methods. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H., Prevish, T., Christy, D. and Stavurlaki, E. (1999). Learning to solve problems on the web: aggregate planning in a business management course. Distance Education: an International Journal, 20(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jonassen, D. H. and Tessmer, M. (1996/97). An outcomes-based taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation and research. Training Research Journal, 2, 11–46.Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M. and Hannum, W. H. (1999). Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. (1996). A capacity theory of comprehension, Psychological Review, 103, 773–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kail, R. and Pellegrino, J. W. (1985). Human Intelligence: perspectives and prospects. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Kallio, E. (1995). Systematic reasoning: formal or post formal cognition? Journal of Adult Development, 2(3) 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kavale, K. A. and Forness, S. R. (1987). Substance over style: assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children, 54(3), 228–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kepner, C. and Tregoe, B. (1965). The Rational Manager. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.Google Scholar

Kezar, A. (2001). Theory of Multiple Intelligences: implications for higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 26(2), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, P. M. and Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing Reflective Judgment: understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Kitchener, K. S. and King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: concepts of justifications and their relation to age and gender. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klauer, K. J. and Phye, G. D. (1994). Cognitive Training for Children. Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.Google Scholar

Klausmeier, H. J., Quilling, M. R., Sorenson, J. S., Way, R. S. and Glasrud, G. R. (1971). Individually Guided Education and the Multiunit Elementary School: guidelines for implementation. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning.Google Scholar

Klein, P. D. (2003). Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: alternatives to ‘learning styles’ and ‘multiple intelligences’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 45–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1990). Which postformal levels are stages? In Adult Development Vol. II: models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought, eds. Commons, M. L., Armon, C., Kohlberg, L., Richards, F. A., Grozer, T. A. and Sinnott, J. D.. New York: Praeger, 263–268.Google Scholar

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Koplowitz, H. (1984). A projection beyond Piaget's formal-operations stage: a general system stage and a unitary stage. In Beyond Formal Operations: late adolescent and adult cognitive development, eds. Commons, M., Richards, F. and Armon, C.. New York: Praeger, 272–295.Google Scholar

Koplowitz, H.(1987). Post-logical thinking. In Thinking: the second international conference, eds. Perkins, D. N., Lochhead, J. and Bishop, J.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 213–232.Google Scholar

Koplowitz, H.(1990). Unitary consciousness and the highest development of mind: The relation between spiritual development and cognitive development. In Adult Development: Vol. II. Models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought, eds. Commons, M. L., Armon, C., Kohlberg, L., Richards, F. A., Grozer, T. A. and Sinnott, J. D.. New York: Praeger, 105–111.Google Scholar

Kornhaber, M. L. (2004). Multiple intelligences: from the ivory tower to the dusty classroom – but why? Teachers College Record, 106(1), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornhaber, M. L., Fierros, E. and Veenema, S. (2004). Multiple Intelligences: Best ideas from theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Kornhaber, M. L. and Krechevsky, M. (1995). Expanding definitions of teaching and learning: Notes from the MI underground. In Transforming Schools, eds. Cookson, P. and Schneider, B.. New York: Garland Press, 181–208.Google Scholar

Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological Tools: a sociocultural approach to education. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kozulin, A.(2002). Sociocultural theory and the Mediated Learning Experience. School Psychology International, 23(1), 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krathwohl, D. B., Bloom, B. S. and Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar

Kreitzer, A. E. and Madaus, G. F. (1994). Empirical investigations of the hierarchical structure of the taxonomy. In Bloom's Taxonomy: a forty-year retrospective. Ninety-third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education Part II, eds. Anderson, L. W. and Sosniak, L. A.. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 64–81.Google Scholar

Kuhn, D., and Pearsall, S. (1998). Relations between metastrategic knowledge and strategic performance. Cognitive Development, 13, 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, R. D. and Nadel, L. (2000). Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawton, D. and Gordon, P. (2002). A History of Western Educational Ideas. London: Woburn Press.Google Scholar

Leat, D. (1998). Thinking through Geography. Cambridge: Chris Kington Publishing.Google Scholar

Leat, D. and Higgins, S. (2002). The role of powerful pedagogical strategies in curriculum development. The Curriculum Journal, 13, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in Education, first edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lipman, M.(1995). Caring as Thinking. Inquiry: Critical thinking across the disciplines. 15(1).Google Scholar

Lipman, M.(2003). Thinking in Education, second edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipman, M.(2004). Interview on Philosophy for Children. http://www.buf.no/e_resources/e_resources_c_3.html

Loehlin, J. C. (1992) Genes and Environment in Personality Development. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Losee, J. (1993). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, third edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Luna, B., Garver, K. E., Urban, T. A., Lazar, N. A. and Sweeney, J. A. (2004). Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Development, 75(5), 1357–1372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N. (eds.) (1996). Attention, Memory and Executive Function. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar

Madaus, G. F., Woods, E. N. and Nuttal, R. L. (1973). A causal model analysis of Bloom's taxonomy. American Educational Research Journal, 10, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mager, R. F. and Beach, K. H. (1967). Developing Vocational Instruction. Belmont, CA: Fearon Publishers.Google Scholar

Maltby, F. (1995). The use of TASC to develop a selection of tools for effective thinking. Gifted Education International, 11(1), 18–23.Google Scholar

Mann, D. (2001). TRIZ thinking hats. TRIZ Journal. http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2001/03/b/index.htm

Mann, D.(2002). Hands-on Systematic Innovation. Ieper, Belgium: CREAX Press.Google Scholar

Marchand, H. (2001). Some reflections on post-formal thought. The Genetic Epistemologist, 29(3).Google Scholar

Margolis, H. (1987). Patterns, Thinking and Cognition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1992). Critical thinking for a humane world. In The Generalisability of Critical Thinking: multiple perspectives on an educational ideal, ed. Norris, S. P.. New York and London: Teachers College Press, 163–180.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J. (1992). A Different Kind of Classroom: teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J.(1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory. www.mcrel.org/topics/productDetail.asp?topicsID=6&productID=83, 24 December 2002.

Marzano, R. J.(2001a). Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J.(2001b). A new taxonomy of educational objectives. In Developing Minds: a resource book for teaching thinking, third edn, ed. Costa, A. L.. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 181–188.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C. and Suhor, C (1988). Dimensions of Thinking: a framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (2002). A step toward redesigning Bloom's taxonomy. Contemporary Psychology APA Review of Books, 47(8), 551–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton: D. van Nostrand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R. R., Arenberg, D. and Costa, P. T. (1987) Declines in divergent thinking with age: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and cross-sequential analyses. Psychology and Aging. 2, 130–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGuinness, C., Curry, C., Greer, B., Daly, P. and Salters, M. (1997). Final Report on the ACTS project: Phase two. Belfast, Northern Ireland: Council for Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment.Google Scholar

McPeck, J. (1981). Critical Thinking and Education. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar

Meeker, M. N. (1969). The Structure of Intellect: its uses and interpretation. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar

Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., Dawes, L., Sams, C. and Higgins, S. (2002). Language, Thinking and ICT in the Primary Curriculum: final project report to the Nuffield Foundation. Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar

Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In Instructional Design Theories and Models: an overview of their current status, ed. Reigeluth, C. M.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 279–333.Google Scholar

Merrill, M. D.(2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, M. D., Jones, M. K. and Li, Zhongmin (1992). Instructional design theory: classes of transactions. Educational Technology, 32(6), 12–26.Google Scholar

Merrill, M. D., Li, Zhongmin and Jones, M. K. (1990a). Limitations of first generation instructional design (ID1). Educational Technology, 30(1), 7–11.Google Scholar

Merrill, M. D., Li, Zhongmin and Jones, M. K.(1990b). Second generation instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(2), 7–14.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1992). Multiple intelligences or multilevel intelligence? Psychological Inquiry, 3, 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, B. J. F., Young, C. J. and Bartlett, B. J. (1989). Memory Improved: reading and memory enhancement across the life span through strategic text structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Mezirow, J. (1978). Perspective transformation. Adult Education, 28, 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mezirow, J.(1998). On critical reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(3), 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P. and Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130(4), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moore, W. E. (1968). Creative and Critical Thinking. London: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Moore, W. S. (1988). The Measure of Intellectual Development: an instrument manual. Olympia, WA: Center for the Study of Intellectual Development.Google Scholar

Moore, W. S.(1989). The learning environment preferences: exploring the construct validity of an objective measure of the Perry scheme of intellectual development. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 504–514.Google Scholar

Morris, R. D. (1996). Relationships and distinctions among the concepts of attention, memory, and executive function. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore: Paul Brookes, 11–16.Google Scholar

Moseley, D. V., Baumfield, V., Higgins, S., Lin, M., Miller, J., Newton, D., Robson, S., Elliott, J. and Gregson, M. (2004). Thinking skill frameworks for post-16 learners: an evaluation. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre. http://www.lsda.org.uk/pubs/dbaseout/download.asp?code=1541

Moseley, D., Elliott, J., Gregson, M. and Higgins, S. (2005). Thinking skills frameworks for use in education and training. British Educational Research Journal, 17(3), 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murris, K. and Haynes, J. (2001). Storywise: Thinking through stories. Newport: Dialogue Works.Google Scholar

Nathan, P. E. (1987). What do behavioral scientists know – and what can they do – about alcoholism? In Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1986 (pp. 1–25). Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.

National Education Goals Panel (1991). The National Education Goals Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

Neber, H. and Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self regulated science learning with highly gifted students: the role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newton, D. P. (2000) Teaching for Understanding. London: Routledge-Falmer.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. A. (1966). The Sociological Tradition. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Noble, T. (2004). Integrating the revised Bloom's taxonomy with multiple intelligences: a planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, S. P. and Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating Critical Thinking. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Press and Software.Google Scholar

Nosich, G. M. (2000). Learning to think things through: a guide to critical thinking across the curriculum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Ohbayashi, M., Konishi, S. and Miyashita, Y. (2003). Executive function, models of. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, ed. Nadel, L.. London: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Ormell, C. P. (1974). Bloom's taxonomy and the objectives of education. Educational Research, 17, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palincsar, A. S. and Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica 32, 301–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J.(1988) Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: a dialectical causal account of cognitive development. In The Neo-Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development: towards an integration, ed. Demetriou, A.. Amsterdam, North-Holland, 25–64.Google Scholar

Paul, R. (1982) Teaching critical thinking in the strong sense: a focus on self-deception, world views, and a dialectical mode of analysis. Informal Logic Newsletter, 4(2), 2–7.Google Scholar

Paul, R. W. (1985). Bloom's taxonomy and critical thinking instruction. Educational Leadership, 42(8), 36–39.Google Scholar

Paul, R. (1987). Dialogical thinking: critical thought essential to the acquisition of rational knowledge and passions. In Teaching Thinking Skills: theory and practice, eds. Baron, J. and Sternberg, R. J.. New York: W. H. Freeman, 127–148.Google Scholar

Paul, R. W. (1991). Teaching critical thinking in the strong sense. In Developing Minds: a resource book for teaching thinking, Vol. I, ed. Costa, A. L.. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Paul, R. (1993). Critical Thinking – what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world, third edn. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.Google Scholar

Paul, R. and Elder, L. (2001). Critical Thinking: tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Pederson, N. L., Plomin, R. and McClearn, G. E. (1994). Is there a G beyond g? (Is there genetic influence on specific cognitive abilities independent of genetic influence on general cognitive ability?)Intelligence, 18, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peel, E. A. (1971). The Nature of Adolescent Judgement. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar

Perkins, D., Jay, E. and Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: a dispositional theory of thinking. The Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Perry, W. G. Jr. (1968). Patterns of Development in Thought and Values of Students in a Liberal Arts College: a validation of a scheme. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Bureau of Study Counsel.Google Scholar

Perry, W. G. Jr.(1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: a scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Petty, G. (1997). How to be Better at Creativity. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar

Petty, G.(1998). Teaching Today, second edn. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (first published in French, 1947) (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J.(1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 451–502.Google Scholar

Pintrich, P. R. and Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. and Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In Metacognitive Assessment, eds. Schraw, G. and Impara, J.. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute/The University of Nebraska, 43–97.Google Scholar

Pithers, R. T. and Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: a review. Educational Research, 42(3), 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: towards a postcritical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Posner, M. I. and Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of Mind. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar

Presseisen, B. Z. (1988). At-risk Students and Thinking: perspectives from research. Washington, DC: National Education Association Publications and Research for Better Schools, Inc.Google Scholar

Presseisen, B. Z.(1991). Thinking skills: meanings and models revisited. In Developing Minds: a resource book for teaching thinking, first edn, ed. Costa, A. L.. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications, 47–53.Google Scholar

Presseisen, B. Z.(2001).Thinking skills: meanings and models revisited. In Developing minds: a resource book for teaching thinking, third edn, ed. Costa, A. L.. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications, 47–53.Google Scholar

Pressley, M. (1986). The relevance of the good strategy user model to the teaching of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 21, 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pressley, M. and Associates (1990). Cognitive Strategy Instruction that Really Improves Children's Academic Performance. Cambridge, MD: Brookline.Google Scholar

Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.Google Scholar

Quellmalz, E. S. (1987). Developing reasoning skills. In Teaching Thinking Skills: theory and practice, eds. Baron, J. R. and Sternberg, R. J.. New York: W. H. Freeman, 86–105.Google Scholar

Quellmalz, E. S. and Hoskyn, J. A. (1988). Making a difference in Arkansas: the multicultural reading and thinking project. Educational Leadership, 45(7), 52–55.Google Scholar

Rabbit, P. (1997). Methodology of frontal and executive function. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Ree, M. J. and Earles, J. A. (1991) Predicting training success: not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). A new paradigm of ISD? Educational Technology, 36(3), 13–20.Google Scholar

Reigeluth, C. M.(1997). Instructional theory, practitioner needs, and new directions: some reflections. Educational Technology, 37(1), 42–47.Google Scholar

Reigeluth, C. M. (ed.) (1999). Instructional Design Theory and Models, Vol. II: a new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Reigeluth, C. and Stein, F. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In Instructional Design Theories and Models, ed. Reigeluth, C.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, 335–381.

Renzulli, J. S. (1975). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. In Psychology and Education of the Gifted, eds. Barbe, W. B. and Renzulli, J. S.. New York: Irvington, 55–65.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S.(1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: a developmental model for creative productivity. In Conceptions of Giftedness, eds. Sternberg, R. J. and Davidson, B. J. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–92.Google Scholar

Resnick, L. (ed.) (1989). Knowing, Learning, and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.Google Scholar

Richelle, M. and Feuerstein, R. (1957). Enfants Juifs Nord-Africains. Jerusalem: Youth Aliyah.Google Scholar

Ritchie, S. M. and Edwards, J. (1996). Creative thinking instruction for aboriginal children. Learning and Instruction, 6(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, A. C., Robbins, T. W. and Weiskrantz, L. (1998). The Prefrontal Cortex: executive and cognitive functions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Romine, C. B. and Reynolds, C. R. (2004). Sequential memory: a developmental perspective on its relation to frontal lobe functioning. Neuropsychological Review, 14, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing Instructional Systems: decision making in course planning and curriculum design. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar

Romiszowski, A. J.(1984). Producing Instructional Systems: lesson planning for individualized and group learning activities. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar

Romney, D. M. and Samuels, M. T. (2001). A meta-evaluation of Feuerstein's Instrumental Enrichment. Educational and Child Psychology, 18(4), 19–34.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1992). Children's divergent thinking and creative ideation. Developmental Review, 12, 223–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salamatov, Y. (1999). TRIZ: The right solution at the right time. Hattem, Netherlands: Insytec B.V.Google Scholar

Säljö, R. (1979a). Learning in the learner's perspective I – some common-sense conceptions. Reports from the Institute of Education No 76. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Department of Education.Google Scholar

Säljö, R.(1979b). Learning in the learner's perspective II – differences in awareness. Reports from the Institute of Education No 77. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Department of Education.Google Scholar

Salovey, P. and Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition and making sense in mathematics. In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, ed. Grouws, D. A.. New York: MacMillan, 334–370.Google Scholar

Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. In Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: issues and educational applications, eds. Schunk, D. H. and Zimmerman, B. J.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 75–99.Google Scholar

Schunk, D. H. and Zimmerman, B. J. (eds.) (1994). Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Seels, B. (1997). Taxonomic issues and the development of theory in instructional technology. Educational Technology, 37, 12–21.Google Scholar

Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: the art and practice of the learning organisation. London: Century.Google Scholar

Shayer, M. and Adey, P. (2002). Learning Intelligence. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Skuy, M., Dunn, M., Durbach, F., Mentis, M., Gibson, M., Muller, F. and Lazar, C. (1991). Cognitive Functions and Dysfunctions Working Manual. Johannesburg: Cognitive Research Programme, Division of Specialised Education, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar

Smith, E. (1979). Taxonomy in Britain. Report of the Review Group on Taxonomy (Chairman E. Smith). London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Smith, G. (2002). Thinking skills: the question of generality. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(6), 659–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, K. C. P. and Apter, M. J. (1975). A Theory of Psychological Reversals. Chippenham: Picton.Google Scholar

Smith, L. (1996). The social construction of rational understanding. In Piaget-Vygotsky: the social genesis of thought, eds. Tryphon, A. and Vonèche, J.. Hove: Psychology Press, 107–22.Google Scholar

Smith, M. K. (2002). ‘Howard Gardner and multiple intelligence’, the encyclopedia of informal education. http:www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm

Splitter, L. and Sharp, A. M. (1995). Teaching for Better Thinking: the classroom community of enquiry. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Spodak, R. (1999). Executive functioning – what is it and how does it affect learning? Washington Parent. http://www.washingtonparent.co.articles/9906/executive-functioning.htm

Stahl, R. J., and Murphy, G. T. (1981). The domain of cognition: An alternative to Bloom's cognitive domain within the framework of an information processing model. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 208 511.

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(1986). Critical thinking: its nature, measurement and improvement. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED272882.

Sternberg, R. J.(1997). Thinking Styles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(1998). Principles of teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychologist, 33, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(2001). Giftedness as developing expertise: a theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved excellence. High Ability Studies, 12(2), 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(2002a). Raising the achievement of all students: teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 14(4), 384–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(2002b). Review of ‘The Psychology of Intelligence’ by J. Piaget. Intelligence, 30, 482–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(2003a). Cognitive Psychology, third edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(2003b). Issues in the theory and measurement of successful intelligence: a reply to Brody. Intelligence, 31, 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(2003c). Our research program validating the triarchic theory of successful intelligence: reply to Gottfredson. Intelligence, 31, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(2003d). Teaching for successful intelligence: Principles, practices and outcomes. Educational and Child Psychology, 20(2), 6–18.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(2004a). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sternberg, R. J.(2004b). North American approaches to intelligence. In International Handbook of Intelligence, ed. Resnick, L.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J.(2004, submitted). The Rainbow project collaborators, and the University of Michigan Business School project collaborators. Theory-based university admissions testing for a new millennium. Educational Psychologist, 39, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. and Bhana, K. (1986). Synthesis of research on the effectiveness of intellectual skills programs. Intelligence 5, 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ferrari, M., and Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. and Grigorenko, E. L. (2000/2001). Guilford's structure of intellect model and model of creativity: contributions and limitations. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3 and 4), 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. S. and Grigorenko, E. L.(2002). Dynamic Testing: the nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stiggins, R. J., Rubel, E., and Quellmalz, E. S. (1988). Measuring Thinking Skills in the Classroom, revised edn. Washington, DC: NEA Professional Library.Google Scholar

Stott, D. H., Marston, N. C. and Neill, S. J. (1975). Taxonomy of Behaviour Disturbance. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar

Strand, P. S., Barnes-Holmes, Y. and Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Educating the whole child: implications of behaviorism as a science of meaning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(2), 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swanson, H. L. (1999). Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Swanson, H. L.(2000). Searching for the best cognitive model for instructing students with learning disabilities: a component and composite analysis. Educational and Child Psychology, 17(3), 101–120.Google Scholar

Swanson, H. L. and Sáez, L. (2003). Memory difficulties in children and adults with learning disabilities. In Handbook of Learning Disabilities, eds. Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R. and Graham, S.. New York: Guilford Press, 182–198.Google Scholar

Swartz, R. J. and Parks, S. (1994) Infusing the Teaching of Critical and Creative Teaching into Content Instruction: a lesson design handbook for the elementary grades. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Books and Software.Google Scholar

ten Dam, G. and Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14, 359–379.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. (1996). Mind: Introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Thayer-Bacon, B. (1998). Transforming and redescribing critical thinking: constructive thinking. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 17, 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, E. and Smith, L. B. (1994). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Torgensen, J. K. (1996). A model of memory from an information processing perspective: the special case of phonological memory. In Attention, Memory and Executive Function, eds. Lyon, G. R. and Krasnegor, N.. Baltimore: Paul Brookes, 157–184.Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. MacMillan: New York.Google Scholar

Trickey, S. and Topping, K. J. (2004). ‘Philosophy for children’: a systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van der Horst, H. (2000). A problem solving strategy for gifted learners in South Africa. Gifted Education International, 15(1), 103–110.CrossRef

Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be if not computation? Journal of Philosophy, 91, 345–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Gelder, T. and Port, R. (1995). It's about time: an overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In Mind as Motion: explorations in the dynamics of cognition, eds. Port, R. F. and Gelder, T.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

van Gelder, T. J. (2000). Learning to reason: a Reason!–Able approach. In Cognitive Science in Australia, 2000. Proceedings of the Fifth Australasian Cognitive Science Society Conference, eds. Davis, C., Gelder, T. J. and Wales, R.. Adelaide: Causal.Google Scholar

van Gelder, T. J.(2001). Critical thinking: some lessons learned. Adult Learning Australia, Adult Learning Commentary Number 12.

Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar

Velmans, M. (2000). Understanding consciousness. London: Routledge/Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vermunt, J. D. (1992). Learning styles and regulation of learning processes in higher education: towards a process-oriented instruction in independent thinking. Doctoral dissertation. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar

Vermunt, J. D.(1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: a phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vermunt, J. D.(1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vermunt, J. D. and Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline of General Systems Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1, 139–164.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S.(1978). The Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wallace, B. (2001). Teaching Thinking Skills across the Primary Curriculum: a practical approach for all abilities. London: David Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar

Wallace, B.(2003). What are the learning experiences that gifted and talented children need in order to develop life skills? Gifted and Talented, 7(2), 49–53.Google Scholar

Wallace, B., Adams, H. B., Maltby, F., and Mathfield, J. (1993). TASC: Thinking actively in a social context. Bicester: AB Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Weiner, B. (1986). An Attribution Theory of Motivation and Emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinert, F. E. and Weinert, S. (1998). History and systems of developmental psychology. In Life-span Developmental Psychology, eds. Demetriou, A., Doise, W. and Lieshout, C.. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1–33.Google Scholar

Welsh, M. C. and Pennington, B. F. (1988). Assessing frontal lobe functioning in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4, 199–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive Thinking (enlarged edn). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

White, J. (1998). Do Howard Gardner's multiple intelligences add up?London: Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar

Whyte, J. (2003). Bad Thoughts: a guide to clear thinking. London: Corvo.Google Scholar

Williams, F. E. (1970). Classroom Ideas for Encouraging Thinking and Feeling. Buffalo, NY: DOK Publishers.Google Scholar

Williams, F. E.(1972). A Total Creativity Program for Individualising and Humanising the Learning Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar

Williams, F.(1980). The Creativity Assessment Packet. Nerang East QLD: Pro-Ed Australia.Google Scholar

Williams, F. E.(1986). The cognitive–affective intervention model for enriching gifted programs. In Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented, ed. Renzulli, J. S.. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, 461–484.Google Scholar

Williams, W. M., Blythe, T., White, N., Li, J., Gardner, H., and Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Practical intelligence for school: developing metacognitive sources of achievement in adolescence. Developmental Review, 22, 162–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winne, P. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wong, B. Y. L. and Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., and Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wood, R. (1977). Multiple choice: a state of the art report. Evaluation in Education, 1, 191–280.Google Scholar

Zangwill, O. L. (1980). Kenneth Craik: the man and his work. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M. and Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Self-regulation: directions and challenges for future research. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. London: Academic Press, 750–769.Google Scholar

Zhang, L. F. (1999) A comparison of U.S. and Chinese university students' cognitive development: the cross-cultural applicability of Perry's theory. The Journal of Psychology, 133(4), 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 29, 217–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J.(1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In Self-Regulated Learning: from teaching to self-reflective practice, eds. Schunk, D. H. and Zimmerman, B. J.. New York: Guilford, 1–19.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R. and Zeidner, M.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 13–39.Google Scholar