Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:11:39.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Wayne Martin
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Theories of Judgment
Psychology, Logic, Phenomenology
, pp. 174 - 181
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Henry. 1983: Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Politics; citations refer to translation by H. Rackham (Cambridge, Mass.: Loeb Classical Library, 1932)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Gordon and Hacker, Peter. 1984: Frege: Logical Excavations (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Baker, Gordon and Hacker, Peter.1989: “Frege's Anti-Psychologism” in Notturno, M. (ed.) Perspectives on Psychologism (Leiden: Brill), 75–127Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael. 1997: The Frege Reader (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1889: Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience (Paris: Alcan); translated by F. L. Pogson as Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness (London: Allen and Unwin, 1971)Google Scholar
Biedermann, Gottfried. 1981: “Die Paris-Urteile Lukas Cranach d.ÄPantheon 39: 310–13Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making it Explicit (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 2000. Articulating Reasons (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. 1989: Die Urteilstafel, Kritik der reinen Vernunft A67–76; B92–101 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag); English translation by Eric Watkins (Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview Publishing, 1995)Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. 1870–77: Die Lehre vom Richtigen Urteil, published posthumously in an edition edited by Mayer-Hillebrand, Franziska (Bern: Francke, 1956)Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz.1874: Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt (Leipzig: Dunker und Humblot); citations refer to the pagination of the English translation by L. McAlister et al. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973)Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2003: Heidegger's Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolph. 1930: “The Old and the New Logic” Erkenntnis 1; citations refer to reprint in Ayer, A. J. (ed.), Logical Positivism (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1959), 133–46Google Scholar
Castañeda, Hector-Neri. 1969: “On the Phenomeno-Logic of the I” in Proceedings of the 14th Annual Congress of Philosophy (Vienna: University of Vienna), 260–66; reprint in Cassam, Q. (ed.), Self-Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 160–66Google Scholar
Cerbone, David. 2003: “Phenomenology: Straight and Hetero” in Prado, C. G. (ed.), A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books)Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick. 1976: “Brentano's Non-Propositional Theory of JudgmentMidwest Studies in Philosophy 1: 91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick.1982: “Brentano's Theory of Judgment” in Brentano and Meinong Studies (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press), 17–36; first published in Haller, R. (ed.), Studien zur Österreichischen Philosophie vol. III (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1982)Google Scholar
Colonne, Guido della. 1287: Historia Destructionis Troiae; translated from Latin by Mary Elizabeth Meek (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1974)Google Scholar
Courtine, Jean-François. 1997: “Martin Heidegger's Logical Investigations: From the Theory of Judgment to the Truth of BeingGraduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 19/20: 103–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Steven Galt. 1981: Truth and Reflection: The Development of Transcendental Logic in Lask, Husserl, and Heidegger (University Microfilms International, Yale University Ph.D Dissertation)Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven Galt.1992: “Lask, Heidegger and the Homelessness of LogicJournal of the British Society for Phenomenology 23: 222–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Steven Galt.2001: Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press)Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio R. 1994: Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (New York: Putnam)Google Scholar
Damisch, Hubert. 1992: Le Jugement de Pâris: Iconologie analytique (Paris: Flammarion); citations refer to the translation by John Goodman, The Judgment of Paris (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. 1991: Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert and Dreyfus, Stuart. 1980: “A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition”, Operations Research Center Report 80:2 (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California)Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert and Hall, Harrison. 1982: Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Drobisch, Moritz Wilhelm. 1836 (1st edn), 1851 (2nd edn), 1863 (3rd edn): Neue Darstellung der Logik nach ihren einfachsten Verhältnissen, mit Rücksicht auf Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft (Leipzig: Voss)Google Scholar
Drobisch, Moritz Wilhelm.1876: Ueber die Fortbildung der Philosophie durch Herbart: Akademische Vorlesung zur Mitfeier seines hundertjährigen Geburtstags gehalten zu Leipzig am 4. Mai 1876 (Leipzig: Voss)Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1993: Origins of Analytical Philosophy (London: Duckworth)Google Scholar
Ehrhart, Margaret J. 1987: The Judgment of the Trojan Prince Paris in Medieval Literature (Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press)Google Scholar
Fay, Thomas. 1974: “Heidegger on Logic: A Genetic Study of His Thought on LogicJournal of the History of Philosophy 12: 77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, Thomas.1977: Heidegger: The Critique of Logic (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1796: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Jena: Gabler); translated by Michael Bauer as Foundations of Natural Right (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb.1812: Ueber das Verhältniß der Logik zur Philosophie oder Transscendentale Logik; citations refer to the pagination of vol. I of Fichte, I. H. (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichtes Nachgelassene Werke (Bonn: Adolph-Marcus, 1834–35); photo-mechanically reprinted as vol. IX of Fichtes Werke (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971)Google Scholar
Fischer, Kurt and Miller, Leon. 1976: “Notes on Terrell's ‘Brentano's Logical Innovations’Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1: 95–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, Richard. 1898: “Neue Cranachs in SchlesienSchlesiens Vorzeit in Bild und Schrift 7: 265–69Google Scholar
Freeman, Anthony. 1999: “Fear of Mechanism: A Compatibilist Critique of the Volitional BrainJournal of Consciousness Studies 6: 279–93Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1879: Begriffsschrift: A Formula Language of Pure Thought Modelled upon the Formula Language of Arithmetic (Halle: Nebert Verlag); citations refer to the section number and to the pagination of the translation by Terrell Ward Bynum in Gottlob Frege: Conceptual Notation and Related Articles (Oxford: Clarendon, 1972)Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob.1880–81: “Boole's Logical Calculus and the Begriffsschrift” in Frege 1969; translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 9–52
Frege, Gottlob.1891: “Comments on Sense and Reference” in Frege 1969: 128–36; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 118–25
Frege, Gottlob.1897a: “Logic” in Frege 1969: 137–63; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 126–49
Frege, Gottlob.1897b: “On Mr. Peano's Conceptual Notation and My Own” Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig 48: 362–68; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Victor Dudman in Frege 1984: 234–48
Frege, Gottlob.1906: “What May I Regard as the Result of my Work?” in Frege 1969: 200; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 184
Frege, Gottlob.1915: “My Basic Logical Insights” in Frege 1969: 271–72; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 251–52
Frege, Gottlob.1918–19: “The Thought” Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 58–77; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Geach and R. H. Stoothoff in Frege 1984: 351–72
Frege, Gottlob.1919: “Notes for Ludwig Darmstädter” in Frege 1969: 273–77; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 251–53
Frege, Gottlob.1969: Nachgelassene Schriften, edited by Hermes, Hans, Kambartel, Friedrich, and Kaulbach, Friedrich (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1969)Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob.1979: Posthumous Writings (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979)Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob.1984: Collected Papers, edited by McGuinness, Brian (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar
Friedländer, Max and Rosenberg, Jakob. 1978: The Paintings of Lucas Cranach (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press); revised and translated edition of Die Gemälde von Lucas Cranach (Berlin: Deutsche Verein für Kunstwissenschaft, 1932)Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2000: A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger (Chicago, Ill.: Open Court)Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. 1965: “AssertionThe Philosophical Review 74: 449–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilden, L., Vaughan, H. G., and Costa, L. D. 1966: “Summated Human EEG Potentials with Voluntary MovementsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 20: 433–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greimann, Dirk. 2000: “The Judgement-Stroke as Truth Operator: A New Interpretation of the Logical Form of Sentences in Frege's Scientific LanguageErkenntnis 52: 213–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumppenberg, Rudolph. 1974: “Die tranzendentalphilosophische Urteils- und Bedeutungsproblematik in M. Heideggers ‘Fruhe Schriften’” in Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Teil II.2: 751–61Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1912: “Neuere Forschungen über Logik” in Literarische Rundschau für das Katolische Deutschland vol. 38; citations refer to the reprint in Martin Heidegger, Gesamtausgabe vol. 1 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1978), 17–43
Heidegger, Martin.1913: Die Lehre vom Urteil im Psychologismus: Ein kritisch-positiver Beitrag zur Logik; citations refer to the pagination of Martin Heidegger: Frühe Schriften (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1972), 1–129Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin.1927a: Sein und Zeit translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson as Being and Time (New York: Harper and Row, 1962)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin.1927b: The Basic Problems of Phenomenology; German text first published in Heidegger, Martin, Gesamtausgabe vol. 24 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1975); citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Albert Hofstadter (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin.1929–30: The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude; German text first published in Heidegger, Martin, Gesamtausgabe vol. 29/30 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1975); citations refer to the pagination of the translation by William McNeill and Nicholas Walker (Indianapolis, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin.1952: “Die Zeit des Weltbildes” in Holzwege (Frankfurt: Klostermann); translated by William Lovitt as “The Age of the World Picture” in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (New York: Harper, 1977)Google Scholar
Herbart, Johann Friedrich. 1813: Lehrbuch zur Einleitung in die Philosophie (Königsberg: Unzer)Google Scholar
Hillebrand, Franz. 1891: Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüsse (Vienna: Holber)Google Scholar
Hobe, Konrad. 1971: “Zwischen Rickert und Heidegger: Versuch über eine Perspektive des Denkens von Emil LaskPhilosophisches-Jahrbuch 78: 360–76Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1739: A Treatise of Human Nature (London: John Noon); citations refer to the pagination of Hume's Treatise of Human Nature, edited and with an Analytical Index by L. A. Selby-Bigge, second edition revised by P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978)Google Scholar
Hume, David.1748: An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding (London: Millar); citations refer to the pagination of An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, edited and with an introduction by Charles Hendel (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1955)Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1900–1901: Logische Untersuchungen; citations refer to translation by J. N. Findlay, Logical Investigations (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970)
Husserl, Edmund1911: “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft” Logos 1: 289–341; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by S. J. Quentin Lauer in Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy (New York: Harper, 1965)
Husserl, Edmund1913: Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie; citations refer to translation by R. Boyce-Gibson, Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1931)
Kant, Immanuel. 1902ff: Kants Gesammelte Schriften (Berlin: Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschften); citations preceded by the abbreviation “Ak.” refer to volume and page of this editionGoogle Scholar
Käufer, Stephan. 1998: Heidegger's Philosophy of Logic (University Microfilms International, Stanford University Ph.D Dissertation)Google Scholar
Käufer, Stephan.2001: “On Heidegger on LogicContinental Philosophy Review 34: 455–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1995: Frege (London: Penguin Books)Google Scholar
King, Jeffrey. 2003: “Complex Demonstratives, a Quantificational AccountMind 112: 734–40Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 1993: The Genesis of Heidegger's Being and Time (Berkeley Calif.: University of California Press)Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. 1990: Kant's Transcendental Psychology (Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press)Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1992: “The Naturalists ReturnPhilosophical Review 101: 53–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneale, William and Kneale, Martha. 1962: The Development of Logic (Oxford: Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Koepplin, Dieter. 2003: “Ein Cranach-Prinzip” in Schade, W. (ed.), Lucas Cranach: Glaube, Mythologie und Moderne (Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz), 144–65Google Scholar
Koepplin, Dieter and Falk, Tilman. 1976: Lukas Cranach: Gemälde, Zeichnungen, Druckgraphik: Zur Ausstellung im Kunstmuseum, Basel, 15. Jun ibis 8. September 1974 (Basel and Stuttgart: Birkhäuser), two volsGoogle Scholar
Kornhuber, Hans and Deecke, Lüder 1965: “Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente PotentialePflügers Archiv für Gesamte Physiologie 284: 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Kuroda, S. Y. 1972: “The Categorical and Thetic JudgmentFoundations of Language 9: 153–85Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 1995: Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul)Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1994: “Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong” in Proceedings of the Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory vol. 4 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 220–29Google Scholar
Libet, Benjamin. 1965: “Cortical Activation in Conscious and Unconscious ExperiencePerspectives in Biology and Medicine 9: 77–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libet, Benjamin.1966: “Brain Stimulation and the Threshold of Conscious Experience” in Eccles, J. C. (ed.), Brain and Conscious Experience (New York: Springer), 165–81Google Scholar
Libet, Benjamin.1985: “Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary ActionBehavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 529–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libet, Benjaminet al. 1982: “Readiness-Potentials Preceding Unrestricted ‘Spontaneous’ vrs. Pre-planned Voluntary ActsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 54: 322–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libet, Benjaminet al.1983: “Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activities (Readiness-Potential): The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary ActBrain 106: 623–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libet, Benjamin, Freeman, Anthony, and Sunderland, Keith (eds.). 1999: The Volitional Brain: Toward a Neuroscience of Free Will; published as a double issue of Journal of Consciousness Studies 6
Lipps, Theodor. 1880: “Die Aufgabe der Erkenntnistheorie und die Wundtsche LogikPhilosophische Monatshefte 16: 28–58, 198–226, 427–45Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1883: Grundtatsachen des Seelenlebens (Bonn: Cohen)Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1891: Die Streit über die Tragödie (Hamburg: Voss)Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1893 (1st edn), 1912 (2nd edn), 1923 (3rd edn): Grundzüge der Logik (Hamburg and Leipzig: Voss)Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1894: “Subjektive Kategorien in objektiven UrteilenPhilosophische Monatshefte 30: 97–128Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1898: Komik und Humor: Eine Psychologisch-Ästhetische Untersuchung (Hamburg: Voss)Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1903, 19062, 19093: Leitfaden der Psychologie (Leipzig: Engelmann)Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1905a: “Bewuβtsein und GegenständePsychologische Untersuchungen 1: 1–203Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1905b: “Inhalt und Gegensatand; Psychologie und Logik” in Separat-Abdruck aus den Sitzungsberichten der Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 4: 511–669Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. 1993: Kant et le pouvoir de juger: sensibilité et discursivité dans l'analytique transcendantale de la critique de la raison pure (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France); translated from the French by Charles T. Wolfe as Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Lotze, Hermann. 1874: Logik; drei Bücher, vom Denken, vom Untersuchen und vom Erkennen (Leipzig: Hirzel); citations refer to the reprint of the translation by Bernard Bosanquet (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888; reprinted New York: Garland, 1980)Google Scholar
Lotze, Hermann 1883: Grundzüge der Logik und Enzyklopädie der Philosophie (Leipzig: Hirzel)Google Scholar
Maddy, Penelope. 2002: “A Naturalistic Look at Logic” in Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 76(2): 61–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Heinrich. 1900: “Logik und Erkenntnistheorie” in Erdmann, Bennoet al. (eds.), Philosophische Abhandlungen: Christoph Sigwart zu Seinem Siebzigsten Geburtstage 28. März 1900 Gewidmet (Tübingen: Mohr)
Maier, Heinrich.1908: Psychologie des emotionalen Denkens (Tübingen: Mohr)Google Scholar
Maier, Heinrich.1914: “Logik und Psychologie” in Festschrift für Alois Riehl (Halle: Niemeyer), 311–78Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne. 1999: “Husserl's Relapse? Concerning a Fregean Challenge to PhenomenologyInquiry 42: 3–4, 343–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Wayne.2005: “Bubbles and Skulls: The Phenomenology of Self-Consciousness in Dutch Still Life Painting” in Wrathall, Mark (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism (Oxford: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Marty, Anton. 1908: Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie vol. 1 (Halle: Niemeyer)Google Scholar
McCrone, John. 1999: Going Inside: A Tour Round a Single Moment of Consciousness (London: Faber and Faber)Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 1997: A Semantics for the English Existential Construction (New York: Garland)Google Scholar
McNally, Louise.1998: “Stativity and Theticity” in Rothstein, S. (ed.), Events and Grammar (Kluwer: Dordrecht), 293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1843: A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation (London: Parker)Google Scholar
Mohanty, J. N. 1988: “Heidegger on LogicJournal of the History of Philosophy 26: 107–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, Helmut. 1981: “The Judgment of Paris by Lucas Cranach the Elder: Nature, Allegory, and AlchemyMetropolitan Museum Journal 16: 117–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olafson, Frederick. 1993: “The Unity of Heidegger's Thought” in Guignon, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 97–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Hugo. 1988: Martin Heidegger: Unterwegs zu seiner Biographie (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag)Google Scholar
Owen, David. 2003: “Locke and Hume on Belief, Judgment and AssentTopoi 22: 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peano, Giuseppe. 1895: “Review of Frege's GrundgesetzeRevista di Matematica 5: 122–28; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Victor Dudman in Southern Journal of Philosophy 9: 25–37 (1971)Google Scholar
Pinder, Tillmann. 1998: Immanuel Kant, Logik-Vorlesung: Unveröffentlichte Nachschriften (Hamburg: Meiner)Google Scholar
Poli, Roberto. 1993: “Ontologia e logica in Franz Brentano: giudizi categorici e giudizi teticiEpistemologia 16: 39–76Google Scholar
Poli, Roberto.1998: “La teoria del giudizio di Franz Brentano e Anton Marty: giudizi tetici e giudizi doppiEpistemologia 21: 41–59Google Scholar
Reich, Klaus. 1932: Die Vollständigkeit der Kantischen Urteilstafel (Berlin); English translation by J. Kneller and M. Losonsky as The Completeness of Kant's Table of Judgments (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Royal Collections Trust, Trustees of the. 2004: Annual Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 March 2004 (London: Royal Collection)
Russell, Bertrand. 1903: Principles of Mathematics (New York: Norton)Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand.1914: “Logic as the Essence of Philosophy” in Our Knowledge of the External World (London: George Allen and Unwin)Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand.1945: A History of Western Philosophy (New York: Simon and Schuster)Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans Jürgen. 1987: “The Thetic/Categorical Distinction RevisitedLinguistics 25/3: 511–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Arthur. 1903–1906: Die Psychologie Alberts des Grossen (Münster: Aschendorff)Google Scholar
Schröder, Ernst. 1880: “Review of Frege's BegriffsschriftZeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 25: 81–94; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Victor Dudman in Southern Journal of Philosophy 7: 139–50 (1969)Google Scholar
Shadlen, Michaelet al. 2001: “Neural Computations that Underlie Decisions about Sensory StimuliTrends in Cognitive Science 5/1: 10–16Google Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas. 1988: “Heidegger's Lehrjahr” in Sallis, Johnet al. (eds.), The Collegium Phaenomenologicum (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 77–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigwart, Christoph. 1873 (1st edn), 1895 (2nd edn): Logik (Freiburg: Mohr); citations refer to the pagination of Helen Dendy's translation of the second edition (New York: Macmillan, 1980)Google Scholar
Simons, Peter. 1984: “A Brentanian Basis for Lesniewskian LogicLogique et Analyse 27: 297–308Google Scholar
Simons, Peter.1987: “Brentano's Reform of LogicTopoi 6: 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluga, Hans. 1980: Frege (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul)Google Scholar
Smith, Barry. 1994: Austrian Philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano (Chicago, Ill.: Open Court)Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas. 2000: “Frege's Judgment StrokeAustralasian Journal of Philosophy 78: 153–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1960: The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction (The Hague: Nijhoff)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Roderick M. 1977: Psychologism, Sinn and Urteil in the Early Writings of Heidegger (Syracuse University Doctoral Dissertation)
Stewart, Roderick M. 1979: “The Problem of Logical Psychologism for Husserl and the Early HeideggerJournal of the British Society for Phenomenology 10: 184–93Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 1977: Hume. Arguments of the Philosophers Series (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrell, Burnham. 1976: “Franz Brentano's Logical InnovationsMidwest Studies in Philosophy 1: 81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrell, Burnham.1978: “Quantification and Brentano's Logic” in Chisholm, R. and Haller, R. (eds.), Die Philosophie Franz Brentano: Beiträge zur Brentano-Konferenz Graz, 4–8 September 1977 (Amsterdam: Rodopi), 45–65Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, Adolph. 1870: Logische Untersuchungen (Leipzig: Hirzel, third edition)Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas. 1972: “The Paradox of Logical Psychologism: Husserl's Way OutPhilosophical Review 9: 94–100Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas.1984: Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge: A Study in Husserl's Early Philosophy (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press)Google Scholar
Witherspoon, Edward. 2002: “Logic and the Inexpressible in Frege and HeideggerJournal of the History of Philosophy 40: 89–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1921: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus; first published in Annalen der Naturphilosophie 14
Young, J. Michael (ed.). 1992: Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Logic (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. 1983: Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Politics; citations refer to translation by H. Rackham (Cambridge, Mass.: Loeb Classical Library, 1932)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Gordon and Hacker, Peter. 1984: Frege: Logical Excavations (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Baker, Gordon and Hacker, Peter.1989: “Frege's Anti-Psychologism” in Notturno, M. (ed.) Perspectives on Psychologism (Leiden: Brill), 75–127Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael. 1997: The Frege Reader (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1889: Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience (Paris: Alcan); translated by F. L. Pogson as Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness (London: Allen and Unwin, 1971)Google Scholar
Biedermann, Gottfried. 1981: “Die Paris-Urteile Lukas Cranach d.ÄPantheon 39: 310–13Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making it Explicit (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 2000. Articulating Reasons (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. 1989: Die Urteilstafel, Kritik der reinen Vernunft A67–76; B92–101 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag); English translation by Eric Watkins (Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview Publishing, 1995)Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. 1870–77: Die Lehre vom Richtigen Urteil, published posthumously in an edition edited by Mayer-Hillebrand, Franziska (Bern: Francke, 1956)Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz.1874: Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt (Leipzig: Dunker und Humblot); citations refer to the pagination of the English translation by L. McAlister et al. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973)Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2003: Heidegger's Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolph. 1930: “The Old and the New Logic” Erkenntnis 1; citations refer to reprint in Ayer, A. J. (ed.), Logical Positivism (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1959), 133–46Google Scholar
Castañeda, Hector-Neri. 1969: “On the Phenomeno-Logic of the I” in Proceedings of the 14th Annual Congress of Philosophy (Vienna: University of Vienna), 260–66; reprint in Cassam, Q. (ed.), Self-Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 160–66Google Scholar
Cerbone, David. 2003: “Phenomenology: Straight and Hetero” in Prado, C. G. (ed.), A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books)Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick. 1976: “Brentano's Non-Propositional Theory of JudgmentMidwest Studies in Philosophy 1: 91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick.1982: “Brentano's Theory of Judgment” in Brentano and Meinong Studies (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press), 17–36; first published in Haller, R. (ed.), Studien zur Österreichischen Philosophie vol. III (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1982)Google Scholar
Colonne, Guido della. 1287: Historia Destructionis Troiae; translated from Latin by Mary Elizabeth Meek (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1974)Google Scholar
Courtine, Jean-François. 1997: “Martin Heidegger's Logical Investigations: From the Theory of Judgment to the Truth of BeingGraduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 19/20: 103–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Steven Galt. 1981: Truth and Reflection: The Development of Transcendental Logic in Lask, Husserl, and Heidegger (University Microfilms International, Yale University Ph.D Dissertation)Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven Galt.1992: “Lask, Heidegger and the Homelessness of LogicJournal of the British Society for Phenomenology 23: 222–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Steven Galt.2001: Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press)Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio R. 1994: Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (New York: Putnam)Google Scholar
Damisch, Hubert. 1992: Le Jugement de Pâris: Iconologie analytique (Paris: Flammarion); citations refer to the translation by John Goodman, The Judgment of Paris (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. 1991: Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert and Dreyfus, Stuart. 1980: “A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition”, Operations Research Center Report 80:2 (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California)Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert and Hall, Harrison. 1982: Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Drobisch, Moritz Wilhelm. 1836 (1st edn), 1851 (2nd edn), 1863 (3rd edn): Neue Darstellung der Logik nach ihren einfachsten Verhältnissen, mit Rücksicht auf Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft (Leipzig: Voss)Google Scholar
Drobisch, Moritz Wilhelm.1876: Ueber die Fortbildung der Philosophie durch Herbart: Akademische Vorlesung zur Mitfeier seines hundertjährigen Geburtstags gehalten zu Leipzig am 4. Mai 1876 (Leipzig: Voss)Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1993: Origins of Analytical Philosophy (London: Duckworth)Google Scholar
Ehrhart, Margaret J. 1987: The Judgment of the Trojan Prince Paris in Medieval Literature (Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press)Google Scholar
Fay, Thomas. 1974: “Heidegger on Logic: A Genetic Study of His Thought on LogicJournal of the History of Philosophy 12: 77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, Thomas.1977: Heidegger: The Critique of Logic (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1796: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Jena: Gabler); translated by Michael Bauer as Foundations of Natural Right (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb.1812: Ueber das Verhältniß der Logik zur Philosophie oder Transscendentale Logik; citations refer to the pagination of vol. I of Fichte, I. H. (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichtes Nachgelassene Werke (Bonn: Adolph-Marcus, 1834–35); photo-mechanically reprinted as vol. IX of Fichtes Werke (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971)Google Scholar
Fischer, Kurt and Miller, Leon. 1976: “Notes on Terrell's ‘Brentano's Logical Innovations’Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1: 95–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, Richard. 1898: “Neue Cranachs in SchlesienSchlesiens Vorzeit in Bild und Schrift 7: 265–69Google Scholar
Freeman, Anthony. 1999: “Fear of Mechanism: A Compatibilist Critique of the Volitional BrainJournal of Consciousness Studies 6: 279–93Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1879: Begriffsschrift: A Formula Language of Pure Thought Modelled upon the Formula Language of Arithmetic (Halle: Nebert Verlag); citations refer to the section number and to the pagination of the translation by Terrell Ward Bynum in Gottlob Frege: Conceptual Notation and Related Articles (Oxford: Clarendon, 1972)Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob.1880–81: “Boole's Logical Calculus and the Begriffsschrift” in Frege 1969; translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 9–52
Frege, Gottlob.1891: “Comments on Sense and Reference” in Frege 1969: 128–36; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 118–25
Frege, Gottlob.1897a: “Logic” in Frege 1969: 137–63; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 126–49
Frege, Gottlob.1897b: “On Mr. Peano's Conceptual Notation and My Own” Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig 48: 362–68; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Victor Dudman in Frege 1984: 234–48
Frege, Gottlob.1906: “What May I Regard as the Result of my Work?” in Frege 1969: 200; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 184
Frege, Gottlob.1915: “My Basic Logical Insights” in Frege 1969: 271–72; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 251–52
Frege, Gottlob.1918–19: “The Thought” Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 58–77; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Geach and R. H. Stoothoff in Frege 1984: 351–72
Frege, Gottlob.1919: “Notes for Ludwig Darmstädter” in Frege 1969: 273–77; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Peter Long and Roger White in Frege 1979: 251–53
Frege, Gottlob.1969: Nachgelassene Schriften, edited by Hermes, Hans, Kambartel, Friedrich, and Kaulbach, Friedrich (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1969)Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob.1979: Posthumous Writings (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979)Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob.1984: Collected Papers, edited by McGuinness, Brian (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar
Friedländer, Max and Rosenberg, Jakob. 1978: The Paintings of Lucas Cranach (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press); revised and translated edition of Die Gemälde von Lucas Cranach (Berlin: Deutsche Verein für Kunstwissenschaft, 1932)Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2000: A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger (Chicago, Ill.: Open Court)Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. 1965: “AssertionThe Philosophical Review 74: 449–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilden, L., Vaughan, H. G., and Costa, L. D. 1966: “Summated Human EEG Potentials with Voluntary MovementsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 20: 433–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greimann, Dirk. 2000: “The Judgement-Stroke as Truth Operator: A New Interpretation of the Logical Form of Sentences in Frege's Scientific LanguageErkenntnis 52: 213–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumppenberg, Rudolph. 1974: “Die tranzendentalphilosophische Urteils- und Bedeutungsproblematik in M. Heideggers ‘Fruhe Schriften’” in Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Teil II.2: 751–61Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1912: “Neuere Forschungen über Logik” in Literarische Rundschau für das Katolische Deutschland vol. 38; citations refer to the reprint in Martin Heidegger, Gesamtausgabe vol. 1 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1978), 17–43
Heidegger, Martin.1913: Die Lehre vom Urteil im Psychologismus: Ein kritisch-positiver Beitrag zur Logik; citations refer to the pagination of Martin Heidegger: Frühe Schriften (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1972), 1–129Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin.1927a: Sein und Zeit translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson as Being and Time (New York: Harper and Row, 1962)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin.1927b: The Basic Problems of Phenomenology; German text first published in Heidegger, Martin, Gesamtausgabe vol. 24 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1975); citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Albert Hofstadter (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin.1929–30: The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude; German text first published in Heidegger, Martin, Gesamtausgabe vol. 29/30 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1975); citations refer to the pagination of the translation by William McNeill and Nicholas Walker (Indianapolis, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin.1952: “Die Zeit des Weltbildes” in Holzwege (Frankfurt: Klostermann); translated by William Lovitt as “The Age of the World Picture” in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (New York: Harper, 1977)Google Scholar
Herbart, Johann Friedrich. 1813: Lehrbuch zur Einleitung in die Philosophie (Königsberg: Unzer)Google Scholar
Hillebrand, Franz. 1891: Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüsse (Vienna: Holber)Google Scholar
Hobe, Konrad. 1971: “Zwischen Rickert und Heidegger: Versuch über eine Perspektive des Denkens von Emil LaskPhilosophisches-Jahrbuch 78: 360–76Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1739: A Treatise of Human Nature (London: John Noon); citations refer to the pagination of Hume's Treatise of Human Nature, edited and with an Analytical Index by L. A. Selby-Bigge, second edition revised by P. H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978)Google Scholar
Hume, David.1748: An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding (London: Millar); citations refer to the pagination of An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, edited and with an introduction by Charles Hendel (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1955)Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1900–1901: Logische Untersuchungen; citations refer to translation by J. N. Findlay, Logical Investigations (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970)
Husserl, Edmund1911: “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft” Logos 1: 289–341; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by S. J. Quentin Lauer in Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy (New York: Harper, 1965)
Husserl, Edmund1913: Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie; citations refer to translation by R. Boyce-Gibson, Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1931)
Kant, Immanuel. 1902ff: Kants Gesammelte Schriften (Berlin: Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschften); citations preceded by the abbreviation “Ak.” refer to volume and page of this editionGoogle Scholar
Käufer, Stephan. 1998: Heidegger's Philosophy of Logic (University Microfilms International, Stanford University Ph.D Dissertation)Google Scholar
Käufer, Stephan.2001: “On Heidegger on LogicContinental Philosophy Review 34: 455–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1995: Frege (London: Penguin Books)Google Scholar
King, Jeffrey. 2003: “Complex Demonstratives, a Quantificational AccountMind 112: 734–40Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 1993: The Genesis of Heidegger's Being and Time (Berkeley Calif.: University of California Press)Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. 1990: Kant's Transcendental Psychology (Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press)Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1992: “The Naturalists ReturnPhilosophical Review 101: 53–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneale, William and Kneale, Martha. 1962: The Development of Logic (Oxford: Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Koepplin, Dieter. 2003: “Ein Cranach-Prinzip” in Schade, W. (ed.), Lucas Cranach: Glaube, Mythologie und Moderne (Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz), 144–65Google Scholar
Koepplin, Dieter and Falk, Tilman. 1976: Lukas Cranach: Gemälde, Zeichnungen, Druckgraphik: Zur Ausstellung im Kunstmuseum, Basel, 15. Jun ibis 8. September 1974 (Basel and Stuttgart: Birkhäuser), two volsGoogle Scholar
Kornhuber, Hans and Deecke, Lüder 1965: “Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente PotentialePflügers Archiv für Gesamte Physiologie 284: 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Kuroda, S. Y. 1972: “The Categorical and Thetic JudgmentFoundations of Language 9: 153–85Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 1995: Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul)Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1994: “Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong” in Proceedings of the Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory vol. 4 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 220–29Google Scholar
Libet, Benjamin. 1965: “Cortical Activation in Conscious and Unconscious ExperiencePerspectives in Biology and Medicine 9: 77–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libet, Benjamin.1966: “Brain Stimulation and the Threshold of Conscious Experience” in Eccles, J. C. (ed.), Brain and Conscious Experience (New York: Springer), 165–81Google Scholar
Libet, Benjamin.1985: “Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary ActionBehavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 529–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libet, Benjaminet al. 1982: “Readiness-Potentials Preceding Unrestricted ‘Spontaneous’ vrs. Pre-planned Voluntary ActsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 54: 322–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libet, Benjaminet al.1983: “Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activities (Readiness-Potential): The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary ActBrain 106: 623–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libet, Benjamin, Freeman, Anthony, and Sunderland, Keith (eds.). 1999: The Volitional Brain: Toward a Neuroscience of Free Will; published as a double issue of Journal of Consciousness Studies 6
Lipps, Theodor. 1880: “Die Aufgabe der Erkenntnistheorie und die Wundtsche LogikPhilosophische Monatshefte 16: 28–58, 198–226, 427–45Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1883: Grundtatsachen des Seelenlebens (Bonn: Cohen)Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1891: Die Streit über die Tragödie (Hamburg: Voss)Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1893 (1st edn), 1912 (2nd edn), 1923 (3rd edn): Grundzüge der Logik (Hamburg and Leipzig: Voss)Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1894: “Subjektive Kategorien in objektiven UrteilenPhilosophische Monatshefte 30: 97–128Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1898: Komik und Humor: Eine Psychologisch-Ästhetische Untersuchung (Hamburg: Voss)Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1903, 19062, 19093: Leitfaden der Psychologie (Leipzig: Engelmann)Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1905a: “Bewuβtsein und GegenständePsychologische Untersuchungen 1: 1–203Google Scholar
Lipps, Theodor.1905b: “Inhalt und Gegensatand; Psychologie und Logik” in Separat-Abdruck aus den Sitzungsberichten der Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 4: 511–669Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. 1993: Kant et le pouvoir de juger: sensibilité et discursivité dans l'analytique transcendantale de la critique de la raison pure (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France); translated from the French by Charles T. Wolfe as Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Lotze, Hermann. 1874: Logik; drei Bücher, vom Denken, vom Untersuchen und vom Erkennen (Leipzig: Hirzel); citations refer to the reprint of the translation by Bernard Bosanquet (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888; reprinted New York: Garland, 1980)Google Scholar
Lotze, Hermann 1883: Grundzüge der Logik und Enzyklopädie der Philosophie (Leipzig: Hirzel)Google Scholar
Maddy, Penelope. 2002: “A Naturalistic Look at Logic” in Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 76(2): 61–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Heinrich. 1900: “Logik und Erkenntnistheorie” in Erdmann, Bennoet al. (eds.), Philosophische Abhandlungen: Christoph Sigwart zu Seinem Siebzigsten Geburtstage 28. März 1900 Gewidmet (Tübingen: Mohr)
Maier, Heinrich.1908: Psychologie des emotionalen Denkens (Tübingen: Mohr)Google Scholar
Maier, Heinrich.1914: “Logik und Psychologie” in Festschrift für Alois Riehl (Halle: Niemeyer), 311–78Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne. 1999: “Husserl's Relapse? Concerning a Fregean Challenge to PhenomenologyInquiry 42: 3–4, 343–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Wayne.2005: “Bubbles and Skulls: The Phenomenology of Self-Consciousness in Dutch Still Life Painting” in Wrathall, Mark (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism (Oxford: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Marty, Anton. 1908: Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie vol. 1 (Halle: Niemeyer)Google Scholar
McCrone, John. 1999: Going Inside: A Tour Round a Single Moment of Consciousness (London: Faber and Faber)Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 1997: A Semantics for the English Existential Construction (New York: Garland)Google Scholar
McNally, Louise.1998: “Stativity and Theticity” in Rothstein, S. (ed.), Events and Grammar (Kluwer: Dordrecht), 293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1843: A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation (London: Parker)Google Scholar
Mohanty, J. N. 1988: “Heidegger on LogicJournal of the History of Philosophy 26: 107–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, Helmut. 1981: “The Judgment of Paris by Lucas Cranach the Elder: Nature, Allegory, and AlchemyMetropolitan Museum Journal 16: 117–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olafson, Frederick. 1993: “The Unity of Heidegger's Thought” in Guignon, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 97–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Hugo. 1988: Martin Heidegger: Unterwegs zu seiner Biographie (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag)Google Scholar
Owen, David. 2003: “Locke and Hume on Belief, Judgment and AssentTopoi 22: 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peano, Giuseppe. 1895: “Review of Frege's GrundgesetzeRevista di Matematica 5: 122–28; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Victor Dudman in Southern Journal of Philosophy 9: 25–37 (1971)Google Scholar
Pinder, Tillmann. 1998: Immanuel Kant, Logik-Vorlesung: Unveröffentlichte Nachschriften (Hamburg: Meiner)Google Scholar
Poli, Roberto. 1993: “Ontologia e logica in Franz Brentano: giudizi categorici e giudizi teticiEpistemologia 16: 39–76Google Scholar
Poli, Roberto.1998: “La teoria del giudizio di Franz Brentano e Anton Marty: giudizi tetici e giudizi doppiEpistemologia 21: 41–59Google Scholar
Reich, Klaus. 1932: Die Vollständigkeit der Kantischen Urteilstafel (Berlin); English translation by J. Kneller and M. Losonsky as The Completeness of Kant's Table of Judgments (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Royal Collections Trust, Trustees of the. 2004: Annual Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 March 2004 (London: Royal Collection)
Russell, Bertrand. 1903: Principles of Mathematics (New York: Norton)Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand.1914: “Logic as the Essence of Philosophy” in Our Knowledge of the External World (London: George Allen and Unwin)Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand.1945: A History of Western Philosophy (New York: Simon and Schuster)Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans Jürgen. 1987: “The Thetic/Categorical Distinction RevisitedLinguistics 25/3: 511–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Arthur. 1903–1906: Die Psychologie Alberts des Grossen (Münster: Aschendorff)Google Scholar
Schröder, Ernst. 1880: “Review of Frege's BegriffsschriftZeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 25: 81–94; citations refer to the pagination of the translation by Victor Dudman in Southern Journal of Philosophy 7: 139–50 (1969)Google Scholar
Shadlen, Michaelet al. 2001: “Neural Computations that Underlie Decisions about Sensory StimuliTrends in Cognitive Science 5/1: 10–16Google Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas. 1988: “Heidegger's Lehrjahr” in Sallis, Johnet al. (eds.), The Collegium Phaenomenologicum (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 77–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigwart, Christoph. 1873 (1st edn), 1895 (2nd edn): Logik (Freiburg: Mohr); citations refer to the pagination of Helen Dendy's translation of the second edition (New York: Macmillan, 1980)Google Scholar
Simons, Peter. 1984: “A Brentanian Basis for Lesniewskian LogicLogique et Analyse 27: 297–308Google Scholar
Simons, Peter.1987: “Brentano's Reform of LogicTopoi 6: 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluga, Hans. 1980: Frege (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul)Google Scholar
Smith, Barry. 1994: Austrian Philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano (Chicago, Ill.: Open Court)Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas. 2000: “Frege's Judgment StrokeAustralasian Journal of Philosophy 78: 153–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1960: The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction (The Hague: Nijhoff)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Roderick M. 1977: Psychologism, Sinn and Urteil in the Early Writings of Heidegger (Syracuse University Doctoral Dissertation)
Stewart, Roderick M. 1979: “The Problem of Logical Psychologism for Husserl and the Early HeideggerJournal of the British Society for Phenomenology 10: 184–93Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 1977: Hume. Arguments of the Philosophers Series (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrell, Burnham. 1976: “Franz Brentano's Logical InnovationsMidwest Studies in Philosophy 1: 81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrell, Burnham.1978: “Quantification and Brentano's Logic” in Chisholm, R. and Haller, R. (eds.), Die Philosophie Franz Brentano: Beiträge zur Brentano-Konferenz Graz, 4–8 September 1977 (Amsterdam: Rodopi), 45–65Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, Adolph. 1870: Logische Untersuchungen (Leipzig: Hirzel, third edition)Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas. 1972: “The Paradox of Logical Psychologism: Husserl's Way OutPhilosophical Review 9: 94–100Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas.1984: Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge: A Study in Husserl's Early Philosophy (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press)Google Scholar
Witherspoon, Edward. 2002: “Logic and the Inexpressible in Frege and HeideggerJournal of the History of Philosophy 40: 89–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1921: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus; first published in Annalen der Naturphilosophie 14
Young, J. Michael (ed.). 1992: Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Logic (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Wayne Martin, University of Essex
  • Book: Theories of Judgment
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487613.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Wayne Martin, University of Essex
  • Book: Theories of Judgment
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487613.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Wayne Martin, University of Essex
  • Book: Theories of Judgment
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487613.008
Available formats
×