Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:00:12.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The effects of modality on BSL development in an exceptional learner

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Gary Morgan
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Developmental Psychology City University, London
Neil Smith
Affiliation:
Professor of Linguistics University College London
Ianthi Tsimpli
Affiliation:
Associate Professor at the English Department Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Bencie Woll
Affiliation:
Chair in Sign Language and Deaf Studies City University London
Richard P. Meier
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Kearsy Cormier
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
David Quinto-Pozos
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter reports on the findings of an experiment into the learning of British Sign Language (BSL) by Christopher, a linguistic savant, and a control group of talented second language learners. The results from tests of comprehension and production of morphology and syntax, together with observations of his conversational abilities and judgments of grammaticality, indicate that despite his dyspraxia and visuo-spatial impairments, Christopher approaches the task of learning BSL in a way largely comparable to that in which he has learned spoken languages. However, his learning of BSL is not uniformly successful. Although Christopher approaches BSL as linguistic input, rather than purely visuo-spatial information, he fails to learn completely those parts of BSL for which an intact nonlinguistic visuo-spatial domain is required (e.g. the BSL classifier system). The unevenness of his learning supports the view that only some parts of language are modality-free.

Accordingly, this case illuminates crossmodality issues, in particular, the relationship of sign language structures and visuo-spatial skills. By exploring features of Christopher's signing and comparing it to normal sign learners, new insights can be gained into linguistic structures on the one hand and the cognitive prerequisites for the processing of signed language on the other.

In earlier work (see Smith and Tsimpli 1995 and references therein; also Tsimpli and Smith 1995; 1998; Smith 1996; Smith and Tsimpli 1996; 1997; Morgan, Smith, Tsimpli, and Woll 2002), we have documented the unique language learning abilities of a polyglot savant, Christopher (date of birth: January, 6 1962).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellugi, Ursula, Diane Lillo-Martin, Lucinda O'Grady, and Karen van Hoek. 1990. The development of spatialized syntactic mechanisms in American Sign Language. In The Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, ed. William H. Edmonson and Fred Karlsson, 16–25. Hamburg: Signum-Verlag
Benton, Arthur L., Kerry Hamsher, Nils R. Varney, and Otfried Spreen. 1983. Contributions to neuropsychological assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Fodor, Jerry. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Gangel-Vasquez, J. 1997. Literacy in Nicaraguan Sign Language: Assessing word recognition skills at the Escuelita de Bluefields. Manuscript, University of California, San Diego, CA
Goodglass, Harold, and Edith Kaplan. 1983. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger
Kimura, Doreen. 1982. Left-hemisphere control of oral and brachial movements and their relation to communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal ociety of London ser. B, 298:135–149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Doreen. 1993. Neuromotor mechanisms in human communication. New York: Oxford University Press
Morgan, Gary, Neil, V. Smith, Ianthi-Maria, Tsimpli, and Bencie, Woll. 2002. Language against the odds: The learning of British Sign Language by a polyglot savant. Journal of Linguistics 39:1–41Google Scholar
Morgan. Gary, Neil V. Smith, Ianthi-Maria Tsimpli, and Bencie Woll. In preparation a. Autism in signed language learning. Manuscript, University College London
Morgan. Gary, Neil V. Smith, Ianthi-Maria Tsimpli, and Bencie Woll. In preparation b. Learning to talk about space with space. Manuscript, University College London
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan, and Robert G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
O'Connor, Neil and , B. Hermelin. 1991. A specific linguistic ability. American Journal of Mental Retardation 95:673–680Google ScholarPubMed
Petitto, Laura A. 1987. On the autonomy of language and gesture: Evidence from the acquisition of personal pronouns in American Sign Language. Cognition 27:1–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzuto, Elena, and Virginia Volterra. 2000. Iconicity and transparency in sign languages: A cross-linguistic cross-cultural view. In The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, ed. Karen Emmorey and Harlan Lane, 261–286. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Poizner, Howard, Edward S. Klima, and Ursula Bellugi. 1987. What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Smith, Neil V. 1996. A polyglot perspective on dissociation. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 19:648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neil V., and Ianthi-Maria Tsimpli. 1995. The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell
Smith, Neil V., and Ianthi-Maria, Tsimpli. 1996. Putting a banana in your ear. Glot International 2:28Google Scholar
Smith, Neil V., and Ianthi-Maria, Tsimpli. 1997. Reply to Bates. International Journal of Bilingualism 2:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, Rachel L. and Bencie Woll. 1999. The linguistics of BSL: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria and Neil V. Smith. 1991. Second language learning: Evidence from a polyglot savant. In UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3:171–183. Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London
Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria and Neil V. Smith. 1995. Minds, maps and modules: Evidence from a polyglot savant. In Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics, 2, 1–25. Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge
Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria and Neil, V. Smith. 1998. Modules and quasi-modules: Language and theory of mind in a polyglot savant. Learning and Individual Differences 10:193–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrington, E. K. 1984. Recognition memory test. Windsor: NFER Nelson

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×