Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 “Moralize two meanings” in one play: contrariety on the Tudor stage
- Chapter 2 Performance, game, and representation in Richard III
- Chapter 3 Mingling vice and “worthiness” in King John
- Chapter 4 Clowning: agencies between voice and pen
- Chapter 5 Clowning at the frontiers of representation
- Chapter 6 Cross-dressing and performance in disguise
- Chapter 7 Personation and playing: “secretly open” role-playing
- Chapter 8 Character/actor: the deep matrix
- Chapter 9 Character: depth, dialogue, page
- Chapter 10 King Lear: representations on stage and page
- Notes
- Index
- References
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 “Moralize two meanings” in one play: contrariety on the Tudor stage
- Chapter 2 Performance, game, and representation in Richard III
- Chapter 3 Mingling vice and “worthiness” in King John
- Chapter 4 Clowning: agencies between voice and pen
- Chapter 5 Clowning at the frontiers of representation
- Chapter 6 Cross-dressing and performance in disguise
- Chapter 7 Personation and playing: “secretly open” role-playing
- Chapter 8 Character/actor: the deep matrix
- Chapter 9 Character: depth, dialogue, page
- Chapter 10 King Lear: representations on stage and page
- Notes
- Index
- References
Summary
This book concludes a larger project on authority and representation in early modern discourse and theatre. Having previously discussed the conjuncture of playing and writing on Elizabethan stages, and in prologues delivered on them, we now shift focus to Shakespeare's plays themselves. Here we approach them through the confederation and dissension of the two media, dramatic language and performing bodies. Just as language in Shakespeare's theatre was used in myriad ways, so also did performing assume and extend multiple modes, styles, and functions – especially in the apparently impromptu range of its interaction with language. Still, there remained a gap even in the interdependence of the two media. Drawing on two different forms of cultural production, the plays in performance sought to overcome and yet allude to and use the rift between them. Shakespeare's achievement cannot be separated from his astonishing readiness not only to acknowledge but also to play with the difference between the meaning of words and the practice of their delivery. The gap between language and the body afforded the playwright a new reach, cogency, and mobility in the uses of embodied signs.
This gap and the ways to accommodate and exploit it were marked by highly particular circumstances. The latter arose as the late Renaissance culture of literacy and the new technology of print began to affect and to intermingle with traditional ways of delivering oral or nonverbal feats and skills.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare and the Power of PerformanceStage and Page in the Elizabethan Theatre, pp. 1 - 25Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
, Shakespeare and the Authority of Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 27.Google Scholar
, Shakespeare's America, America's Shakespeare (London and New York: Routledge, 1989), 105.Google Scholar
, The Actor's Freedom: Toward a Theory of Drama (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972), 7Google Scholar
in Gloria Brim Beckerman and William Coco, eds., Theatrical Presentation: Performer, Audience, and Act (New York: Routledge, 1990), 6–7Google Scholar
, Author's Pen and Actor's Voice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 8–10, 110–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Shakespeare the Actor and the Purpose of Playing (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1993), esp. 9–11, 57–63.Google Scholar
, The Idea of the Actor: Drama and the Ethics of Performance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, A Sociosemiotic Theory of Theatre (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
's earlier work, Shakespeare's Theatrical Notation: The Early Tragedies (Bern: Francke, 1989)Google Scholar
's important study, Action Is Eloquence: Shakespeare's Language of Gesture (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds., Refiguring Mimesis: Representation in Early Modern Literature (Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2005), 208–16
's Authority and Representation in Early Modern Discourse (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
's and 's Prologues to Shakespeare's Theatre: Performance and Liminality in Early Modern Drama (London and New York: Routledge, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Language and Stage in Medieval and Renaissance England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 217, 57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Literature and the Touch of the Real (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2004), 71Google Scholar
, “New Historicisms,” in and , eds., Redrawing the Boundaries (New York: MLA, 1982), 396Google Scholar
, Shakespeare and the Loss of Eden: The Construction of Family Values in Early Modern Culture (London: Macmillan, 1999), 7Google Scholar
, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. , trans. and (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981), 296, 293, 324Google Scholar
, Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 92, 20Google Scholar
, From Playhouse to Printing House: Drama and Authorship in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
and , “The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited,” Shakespeare Quarterly 56.1 (2005), 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Theatre of the Book, 1480–1880: Print, Text, and Performance in Europe (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 7Google Scholar
, Textual Shakespeare: Writing and the Word (Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2003), xiGoogle Scholar
, ed., William Shakespeare: The Complete Works (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), xxxviiiGoogle Scholar
, Shakespeare and the Book (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 6Google Scholar
, “The Word in the Theater,” in et al., eds., Shakespeare, Man of the Theater (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1983), 55–76Google Scholar
, “Acting Values and Shakespearean Meaning: Some Suggestions,” in and , eds., Shakespeare: Pattern of Excelling Nature (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1978), 190–7Google Scholar
, “Reversing the Hierarchy between Text and Performance,” European Review 9 (2001), 244–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Performance Theory and Textual Theory: A Retort Courteous,” Shakespeare 2.1 (2006), 47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Texts, Tools, and Technologies: A Quip Modest,” Shakespeare 2.2 (2006), 208–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Beyond the Floating Islands (New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications, 1968), 57Google Scholar
's The Protoliterary: Steps Toward an Anthropology of Culture (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
, Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater: Studies in the Social Dimension of Dramatic Form and Function (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978), 80, 86, 146–8Google Scholar
in Dawson and , The Culture of Playgoing in Shakespeare's England: A Collaborative Debate (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 15Google Scholar
, “Destined Livery? Character and Person in Shakespeare,” Shakespeare Survey 51 (1998), 147–58Google Scholar
, La Parola in Scena: La communicazione teatrale nell'età di Shakespeare (Turin: UTET, 2004)Google Scholar
, Gender in Play on the Shakespearean Stage: Boy Heroines and Female Pages (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994), 62Google Scholar
, Actor as Anti-Character: Dionysus, the Devil, and the Boy Rosalind (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2000), 3Google Scholar
, Theatres and Encyclopedias in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 129Google Scholar
, “Jacobean Playwrights and ‘Judicious’ Spectators,” in , ed., British Academy Lectures, 1980–1989 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 231–53Google Scholar
, Family, Lineage, and Civil Society: A Study of Society, Politics and Mentality in the Durham Region (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974), 98, 104–5Google Scholar
, Staging Reform, Reforming the Stage: Protestantism and Popular Theatre in Early Modern England (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
, “The Theatre and Literary Culture,” in and , eds., A New History of Early English Drama (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997), 213–15, 218Google Scholar