Alam, Yokiko Sasaki. 1983. A two-level morphological analysis of Japanese. Texas Linguistic Forum 22, 229–52.Google Scholar

Al-Najem, Salah R. 2007. Inheritance based approach to Arabic verbal root and pattern morphology. In Soudi, Abdelhadi, Neumann, Günter, and Van den Bosch, Antal (eds.), Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-based and Empirical Methods, 67–88. Dordrecht: Kluwer/Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barg, Petra. 1996. Automatic inference of DATR theories. In Bock, H.-H. and Polasek, W. (eds.), Data Analysis and Information Systems: Statistical and Conceptual Approaches, 506–15. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Bird, Steven, and Klein, Ewen. 1990. Phonological Events. Journal of Linguistics 26.01, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Dunstan. 1998. The General and the Exceptional in Russian Nominal Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Surrey.Google Scholar

Brown, Dunstan, and Hippisley, Andrew. 1994. Conflict in Russian genitive plural assignment: A solution represented in DATR. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 2.1, 48–76.Google Scholar

Brown, D., and Hippisley, Andrew. 2012. Network Morphology: A Defaults-based Theory of Word Structure. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckwalter, Tim. 2001. Arabic Transliteration. www.qamus.org/transliteration.htm (accessed June 21, 2015).Google Scholar

Buckwalter, Tim. 2004. Buckwalter Arabic Morphological Analyzer Version 2.0 LDC2004L02. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar

Cahill, Lynne 2007. A syllable-based account of Arabic morphology. In Soudi, Abdelhadi, Neumann, Günter, and Van den Bosch, Antal (eds.), Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-based and Empirical Methods, 45–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer/Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cahill, Lynne. 2010. A syllable-based approach to verbal morphology in Arabic. In LREC10 Workshop on Semitic Languages, 19–26. Malta: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar

Cahill, Lynne, and Gazdar, Gerald. 1999. German noun inflection. Journal of Linguistics 35.1, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, Violetta, and Soudi, Abdelhadi. 2007. Arabic Computational Morphology: A trade-off between multiple operations and multiple stems. In Soudi, Abdelhadi, Neumann, Günter, and Van den Bosch, Antal (eds.), Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-based and Empirical Methods, 89–114. Dordrecht: Kluwer/Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures, The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, P. (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar

Clark, Alex. 2002. Memory-based learning of morphology with stochastic transducers. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 513–20. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Hamish; Maynard, Diana, Bontcheva, Kalina, Tablan, Valentin, Aswani, Niraj, Roberts, Ian, Gorrell, Genevieve, Funk, Adam, Roberts, Angus, Damljanovic, Danica, Heitz, Thomas, Greenwood, Mark A., Saggion, Horacio, Petrak, Johann, Li, Yaoyong, and Peters, Wim. 2011. Text Processing with GATE (Version 6). University of Sheffield Department of Computer Science.Google Scholar

De Pauw, Gu; De Schryver, Gilles-Maurice, and van de Loo, Janneke. 2012. Resource-light Bantu part-of-speech tagging. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Technology for Normalisation of Less-resourced Languages (SaLTMiL 8—AfLaT 2012), 85–92. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar

Dichy, Joseph, and Farghaly, Ali. 2007. Grammar-lexis relations in the computational morphology of Arabic. In Soudi, Abdelhadi, Neumann, Günter, and Van den Bosch, Antal (eds.), Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-based and Empirical Methods, 115–40. Dordrecht: Kluwer/Springer.Google Scholar

Elwell, Robert. 2008. Finite State methods for Bantu morphology. In Gaylord, Nicholas, Hilderbrand, Stephen, Lyu, Heeyoung, Palmer, Alexis, and Ponvert, Elias (eds.), Texas Linguistics Society 10: Computational Linguistics for Less-studied Languages. Standford: CSLI.Google Scholar

Evans, Roger. 2013. The extended lexicon: Language processing as lexical description In Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP), Hissar, Bulgaria, September 7–13. INCOMA.Google Scholar

Evans, Roger, and Gazdar, Gerald. 1996. DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics 22.2, 167–216.Google Scholar

Evans, Roger; Piwek, Paul, Cahill, Lynne, and Tipper, Neil. 2008. Natural language processing in CLIME, a multilingual legal advisory system. Natural Language Engineering 14, 101–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, Norman, and Corbett, Greville. 1997. Defaults in Arapesh. Lingua 103, 25–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaizauskas, Robert; Cahill, Lynne J., and Evans, Roger. 1992. POETIC: A system for gathering and disseminating traffic information. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Transportation Engineering, San Buenaventura, California, June. Irvine, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies.Google Scholar

Garside, R., and Smith, N. 1997. A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In Garside, R., Leech, G., and McEnery, A. (eds.), Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora, 102–21. London: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, John. 2000. Linguistica: An automatic morphological analyser. In Okrent, Arika and Boyle, John (eds.), Proceedings from the Main Session of the Chicago Linguistic Society’s 36th Meeting, 125–39. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, John. 2001. Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Computational Linguistics 27, 153–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, John. 2006. An algorithm for the unsupervised learning of morphology. Natural Language Engineering 12.4, 353–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grishman, Ralph, and Sundheim, Beth. 1996. Message Understanding Conference - 6: A Brief History. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Copenhagen, Denmark, 466–71. International Committee on Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Habash, Nizar. 2010. An Introduction to Arabic Natural Language Processing. San Rafael: Morgan and Claypool.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafer, Margaret A., and Weiss, Stephen F.. 1974. Word segmentation by letter successor varieties. Information Storage and Retrieval 10.11–12, 371–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, Zellig. 1955. From phoneme to morpheme. Language 31.2, 190–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausser, R. 1996. Linguistische Verifikation: Dokumentation zur Ersten Morpholympics. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Herring, Jon 2006. Orthography in Inheritance Lexicons. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Brighton.Google Scholar

Hurskainen, Arvi. 1992. A two-level computer formalism for the analysis of Bantu morphology: An application to Swahili. Nordic Journal of African Studies 1.1, 87–119.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Ron, and Kay, Martin. 1981. Phonological rules and finite state transducers. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America in New York City.Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri, and Wittenburg, Kent. 1983. A two-level analysis of English. Texas Linguistic Forum 22, 217–28.Google Scholar

Kartunnen, Lauri; Koskenniemi, Kimmo, and Kaplan, Ron. 1987. A compiler for two-level phonological rules. In Dalrymple, Mary, Kaplan, Ronald M., Karttunen, Lauri, Koskenniemi, Kimmo, Shaio, Sami, and Wescoat, Michael T. (eds.), CSLI Report No. 87-108, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Kay, Martin. 1987. Non-concatenative finite-state morphology. In Proceedings of 3rd Conference of The European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), Copenhagen, Denmark, 2–10. International Committee on Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Khaliq, Bilal, and Carroll, John 2013. Unsupervised induction of Arabic root and pattern lexicons using machine learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP), Hissar, Bulgaria, 350–6. INCOMA.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Kimmo. 1983. A Two-level Morphological Processor. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar

Kurimo, Mikko; Virpioja, Sami, Turunen, Ville, and Lagus, Krista. 2010. Morpho Challenge competition 2005–2010: Evaluations and results. In Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the ACL-SIGMORPHON, ACL 2010, Uppsala, Sweden, 15 July, 87–95. International Committee on Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Luengen, Harald 1992. A DATR Description of Turkish Noun Inflection. Unpublished paper. University of BielefeldGoogle Scholar

Lun, S. 1983. A two-level morphological analysis of French. Texas Linguistic Forum 22, 271–8.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John. 1981. A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 373–418.Google Scholar

Oliver, Antoni; Castellón, Irene, and Màrquez, Luís. 2003. Automatic lexical acquisition from raw corpora: An application to Russian. In Proceedings of the 2003 EACL Workshop on Morphological Processing of Slavic Languages, Budapest, Hungary, 17–24. International Committee on Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Petrie, Helen; Jones, Sarah Rees, Power, Christopher, Evans, Roger, Cahill, Lynne, Knobbe, Arno, Gervers, Michael, Sutherland-Harris, Robin, Kosto, Adam, and Crump, Jon. 2013. ChartEx: A project to extract information from the content of medieval charters and create a virtual workbench for historians to work with this information. Paper presented at Digital Humanities 2013, Lincoln, Nebraska, July 2013.Google Scholar

Sagot, Benoît. 2007. Automatic acquisition of a Slovak lexicon from a raw corpus. In Matoušek, V. and Mautner, P. (eds.), Proceedings of Text, Speech and Dialogue, 156–63. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Sagot, Benoît. 2009. Building a morphosyntactic lexicon and a pre-syntactic processing chain for Polish. In Zygmunt Vetulani and Hans Huszkoreit (eds.), Language and Technology Conference, Poznań, Poland (2007), Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Human Language Techology: Challenges of the Information Society. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santos, Diana; Costa, Luís, and Rocha, Paulo. 2003. Cooperatively evaluating Portuguese morphology. In Mamede, Nuno J., Baptista, Jorge, Trancoso, Isabel, and Nunes, Maria das Graças Volpe (eds.), Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language, 6th International Workshop, PROPOR 2003, Faro, 26–27 June, 259–66. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Soudi, Abdelhadi; Neumann, Günter, and Van den Bosch, Antal (eds.) 2007. Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-based and Empirical Methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer/Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spencer, Andrew. 2000. Inflection and the lexeme. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47. 1–4, 335–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sproat, Richard, and Emerson, Thomas. 2003. The First International Chinese Word Segmentation Bakeoff. Proceedings of the Second SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, Sapporo, Japan, 133–43. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Wong, Kam-Fai; Li, Wenji, Xu, Ruifeng, and Zhang, Zheng-sheng. 2009. Introduction to Chinese Natural Language Processing. San Rafael: Morgan and Claypool.Google Scholar