Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:51:37.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - The Scope of Irony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2023

Edited by
Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr  and
Herbert L. Colston
Herbert L. Colston
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought , pp. 15 - 78
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Angeleri, R., & Airenti, G. (2014). The development of joke and irony understanding: A study with 3- to 6-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(2), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, W. (1974). A rhetoric of irony. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. (1944). Sophoclean drama. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, A., Cappelen, H., & Plunkett, D. (Eds.) (2020). Conceptual engineering and conceptual ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. (2020). What is conceptual engineering and what should it be? Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1817141.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D., & Clark, A. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretence theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, G. (2006). Why irony is pretence. In Nichols, S. (Ed.), The architecture of the imagination: New essays on pretence, possibility, and fiction (pp. 111–133). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Currie, G. (2010). Narratives and narrators. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, G. (2011) The irony in pictures, British Journal of Aesthetics, 51, 149–167.Google Scholar
Dane, J. A. (2011) The critical mythology of irony. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Fabry, R. E. (2021). Getting it: A predictive processing approach to irony comprehension. Synthese, 198, 6455–6489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (2008). Socratic irony as pretence. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 34, 1–33.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (2017). The messages we send: Social signals and storytelling. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Filik, R., Leuthold, H., Wallington, K., & Page, J. (2014). Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 811–828.Google Scholar
Foley, H. (1985). Ritual irony, poetry and sacrifice in Euripides. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., O’Brien, J. E., & Doolittle, S. (1995) Inferring meanings that are not intended: Speakers’ intentions and irony comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20(2), 187–203.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2009). Undoing in Sophoclean drama: “Lusis” and the analysis of irony. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 139(1), 21–52. www.jstor.org/stable/40212095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2012). Sophocles and the language of tragedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. (1979). Irony in the medieval romance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Handwerk, G. (2000). Romantic irony. In Brown, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge history of literary criticism, vol. 5 (pp. 203–225). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Happé, F. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–109.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. (2002). From reduction to type-type identity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65, 644–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, H. (1989). A leader on the Left meets a follower of the Left Behind: Michael & me Film Comment, 25(6), 16–18, 20, 22–26.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. K. (1928). Some aspects of dramatic irony in Sophoclean tragedy. Classical Review, 42, 209–214.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, G. M. (1958). A study of Sophoclean drama. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, M. (2011). Reconsidering Socratic irony. In Morrison, D. R. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Socrates (pp. 237–259). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. (1986). Divine and human action in Euripides’ Ion. Antike und Abendland, 32, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, N. J. (1996) Tragic and Homeric ironies: Response to Rosenmeyer. In Silk, M. S. (Ed.), Tragedy and the tragic (pp. 520–533). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucariello. (1994). Situational irony: A concept of events gone awry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 129–145.Google Scholar
MacDowell, J. (2016). Irony in film. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maine, B. (2016). Bring the bodies up: Excavating Washington Square. American Literary Realism, 48, 209–231.Google Scholar
Miller, G. D. (2012). An intercalation revisited: Christology, Discipleship, and dramatic irony in Mark 6.6b-30. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 35. https://doi-org.libproxy.york.ac.uk/10.1177/0142064X12462659.Google Scholar
Muecke. (1969). The compass of irony. Methuen.Google Scholar
Paltin, J. (2014). Problems with theory of mind in “Victory”. Conradiana, 46, 95–107.Google Scholar
Rey, G. (2022). The innocuousness of folieism and the need of intentionality where transduction fails. Mind & Language, 37, 274–282.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. (1996). Ironies in serious drama. In Silk, M. S. (Ed.), Tragedy and the tragic (pp. 497–519). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rush, F. (2016). Irony and idealism: Rereading Schlegel, Hegel, and Kierkegaard. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B. (2012). Greek tragic style. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schier, F. (1986). Deeper into pictures. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, M. S. (1996). Greek tragedy and “tragedy as a whole.” In Silk, M. S. (Ed.), Tragedy and the tragic (pp. 351–357). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretence or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Cole, P. (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thirlwall, C. (1833). On the irony of Sophocles. The Philological Museum, 2. Reprinted in Remains literary and theological of Connop Thirlwall (Vol. 3), ed. J. J. Stewart Perowne. Daldy, Isbister & Co. 1878. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Philological_Museum_vol_2/On_the_Irony_of_Sophocles.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. A. K. (1927). Irony. An historical introduction. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, K. (1994). Morals in fiction and fictional morality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 68, 27–66.Google Scholar
Warren, C., & Mohr, G. S. (2019). Ironic consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 246–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2005). Euripides’ escape-tragedies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Aguert, M., Le Vallois, C., Martel, K., & Laval, V. (2018). “That’s really clever!” Ironic hyperbole understanding in children. Journal of Child Language, 45(1), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications. Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. Rask – International Journal of Language and Communication, 12(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
Banasik-Jemielniak, N., & Bokus, B. (2019). Children’s comprehension of irony: Studies on Polish-speaking preschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 1217–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09654-sGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Booth, W. C. (1974). A rhetoric of irony. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bussmann, H. (1996). Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H., & Gibbs, R. W. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1701_5Google Scholar
Colston, H., & Gibbs, R. W. (2007). A brief history of irony. In Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, Herbert (Eds.), Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader (pp. 3–21). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2005). Sarcasm and the space structuring model. In Coulson, S., & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (Eds.), The literal and the nonliteral in language and thought (pp. 129–144). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dynel, M. (2014). Linguistic approaches to (non)humorous irony. Humor, 27(4), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0097Google Scholar
Falkum, I. L., Recasens, M., & Clark, E. V. (2017). “The moustache sits down first”: On the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language, 44(1), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000915000720Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–255.Google Scholar
Galera, A. (2020). The role of echoing in meaning construction and interpretation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00049.masGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Introspection and cognitive linguistics: Should we trust our intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.06gibGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139168779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O. (2015). Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30, 290–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1074804Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1995). Isomorphism in the grammatical code. In Simone, R. (Ed.), Iconicity in language (pp. 47–76). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2002). Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(4), 327–356. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2002.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In Gibbs, R. W., & Steen, G. (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.06graCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. (1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. Springer.Google Scholar
Handwerk, G. J. (1986). Irony and ethics in narrative: From Schlegel to Lacan. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 37–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books.Google Scholar
McDonald, Russ (2001). Shakespeare and the arts of language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Muecke, D. C. (1982). Irony and the ironic. Methuen.Google Scholar
Newen, A. (2017). What are cognitive processes? An example-based approach. Synthese, 194, 4251–4268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0812-3Google Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (2004). Hyperbole, extreme case formulation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(9), 1727–1739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.006Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2014). Pretence and echo: Towards and integrated account of verbal irony. International Review of Pragmatics, 6(1), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00601007Google Scholar
Pouscoulous, N. (2014). The elevator’s buttocks: Metaphorical abilities in children. In Matthews, D. (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 239–259). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10.14pouGoogle Scholar
Ramonda, K. (2019). The role of encyclopedic world knowledge in semantic transparency intuitions of idioms. English Language and Linguistics, 23(1), 31–53. https://doi.10.1017/S1360674317000284Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In Barcelona, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In Benczes, R., Barcelona, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–123). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2014). On the nature and scope of metonymy in linguistic description and explanation: Towards settling some controversies. In Littlemore, J., & Taylor, J. (Eds.), Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 143–166). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2017a). Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: From basicity to complexity. In Hampe, B. (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition, and discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.009Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2017b). Cognitive modeling and irony. In Colston, H., & Athanasiadou, A. (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 179–200). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1.09demGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2020). Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication, 71, 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.12.002Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2021). Ten lectures on cognitive modeling. In Between Grammar and Language-Based Inferencing. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004439221Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Lozano, I. (2019a). A cognitive-linguistic approach to complexity in irony: Dissecting the ironic echo. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1611714Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Lozano, I. (2019b). Unraveling irony: From linguistics to literary criticism and back. Cognitive Semantics, 5, 147–173 https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00501006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Lozano, I. (2021). On verbal and situational irony: Towards a unified approach. In Soares da Silva, A. (Ed.), Figurative language: Intersubjectivity and usage (pp. 249–276). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Pérez, L. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.583189Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). The building blocks of cognition. In Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. C., & Brewer, W. F. (Eds.), theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.xGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell. https://doi.org//10.1017/s004740450001318xGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1998) Irony and relevance: A reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In Carston, R. and Uchida, S. (Eds.), Relevance Theory (pp. 283–293). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Kesteren, M. T. R., & Meeter, M. (2020). How to optimize knowledge construction in the brain. npj Science of Learning, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0064-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Kesteren, M. T. R., Ruiter, D. J., Fernandez, G., & Henson, R. N. (2012) How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends in Neurosciences, 35, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2012.02.001Google Scholar
Veale, T. (2012). Exploding the creativity myth. The computational foundations of linguistic creativity. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472541659Google Scholar
Walton, D. N. (2007). Dialog theory for critical argumentation. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.5Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87, 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-eGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Explaining irony. In Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (Eds.), Meaning and Relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139028370.008Google Scholar
Žegarac, V. (2006). Believing in: A pragmatic account. Lingua 116, 1703–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.02.005Google Scholar

References

Colston, H. (1997). “I’ve never seen anything like it”: Overstatement, understatement, and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12, 43–58.Google Scholar
Colston, H. (2015). Using figurative language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dalgleish, T., Yiend, J., Schweizer, S., & Dunn, B. D. (2009). Ironic effects of emotion suppression when recounting distressing memories. Emotion, 9, 744.Google Scholar
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning a social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 10, 3–19.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Filik, R., & Moxey, L. (2010). The on-line processing of written irony. Cognition, 116, 421–436.Google Scholar
Filik, R., Hunter, C., & Lethhold, H. (2015). When language gets emotional: Irony and the embodiment of affect in discourse. Acta Psychologia, 156, 114–125.Google Scholar
Garmendia, J. (2018). Irony. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 5–27.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2002). Irony in the wake of tragedy. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 145–153.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2007). Why irony sometimes come to mind: Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15, 229–251.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2011). Are ironic acts deliberate? Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 104–115.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2021). “Holy cow, my irony detector just exploded!” Calling out irony during the coronavirus pandemic. Metaphor and Symbol, 36, 45–60.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Colston, H. (Eds.). (2007). Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Colston, H. (2019). What psycholinguistics ignores about literary experience. Scientific Study of Literature, 9, 72–103.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Gerrig, R. (1989). How context makes metaphor comprehension seem special. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4, 145–158.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Izett, C. (2005). Irony as persuasive communication. In Colston, H. & Katz, A. (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural factors (pp. 131–152). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Samermit, P. (2017). How does irony arise in experience? In Athanasiadou, A. & Colston, H. (Eds.) Irony in language use and communication (pp. 43–60). Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., O’Brien, J., & Doolittle, S. (1995). Inferring meanings that are not intended: Speakers’ intentions and irony comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 187–203.Google Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gitlin, T. (1989). The postmodern predicament. Wilson Quarterly, 13, 67–76.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, volume 3 (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddon, M. (2015). Paul Anka sings “Smells Like Teen Spirit.” In Turner, K. (Ed.), This is the sound of irony: Music, politics and popular culture (pp. 157–182). Ashgate.Google Scholar
Henry, O. (1997). The gift of the magi. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. (2020). Irony and sarcasm. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leggitt, J., & Gibbs, R. (2000). Emotional reactions to verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 29, 1–24.Google Scholar
Lucariello, J. (1994). Situational irony: A concept of events gone awry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 129–145.Google Scholar
McCoy, C., & Scarborough, R. (2014). Watching ‘bad’ television: Ironic consumption, camp, and guilty pleasures. Poetics, 47, 41–59.Google Scholar
McGraw, A., & Warner, J. (2014). The humor code: A global search for what makes things funny. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Pessoa, F. (2017). The book of disquietude. New Directions.Google Scholar
Piotrowska, A. (2015). “Ironic consciousness” in early Polish punk music. In Turner, K. (Ed.), This is the sound of irony: Music, politics and popular culture (pp. 131–144). Ashgate.Google Scholar
Samermit, P., & Gibbs, R. (2016). Humor, the body, and cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 3, 32–49.Google Scholar
Scherer, K., Shorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (Ed.). (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shelley, C. (2001). The bicoherence theory of situational irony. Cognitive Science, 25, 775–818.Google Scholar
Sontag, S. (1999). Notes on camp. In Cleto, F. (Ed.), Camp, queer aesthetics and the performing subject: A reader (pp. 53–62). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tobin, V., & Israel, M. (2012). Irony as viewpoint phenomena. In Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E. (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 25–46). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.Google Scholar
Wegner, D., Schneider, D., Carter, S., & White, T. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13.Google Scholar
Wegner, D., Erber, R., Bowerman, R., & Shelton, J. (1996). On trying not to be sexist. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×