Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T06:16:38.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Conspiracy

from Part V - Inchoate and Preparatory Acts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2019

Jérôme de Hemptinne
Affiliation:
Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights
Robert Roth
Affiliation:
Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights
Elies van Sliedregt
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Marjolein Cupido
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Manuel J. Ventura
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University
Lachezar Yanev
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Tom Gal
Affiliation:
Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights
Thomas Van Poecke
Affiliation:
KU Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Summary

In theory, the mode of liability of conspiracy to commit large-scale atrocities could be considered an essential means of sanctioning the collective action of persons, in political or military leadership positions, who are involved in designing such atrocities. However, there is a growing tendency in ICL to limit the scope of application of conspiracy to the crime of genocide and to recognize it only under stringent conditions. This trend is based on the fact that criminalizing conspiracy could easily lead to collective punishment and possibly ‘guilt by association’, thereby violating the fundamental principle that criminal responsibility must be personal and individualized.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Ambos, K., ‘Joint Criminal Enterprise and Command Responsibility’, 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2007) 159.Google Scholar
Barrett, R. P., Little, L. E., ‘Lessons of Yugoslav Rape Trials: A Role for Conspiracy Law in International Tribunals’, 88 Minnesota Law Review (2003) 30.Google Scholar
Chesney, R. M., ‘Beyond Conspiracy? Anticipatory Prosecution and the Challenge of Unaffiliated Terrorism’, 80 South California Law Review (2007) 425.Google Scholar
Donnedieu de Vabres, H., ‘Le procès de Nuremberg devant les principes modernes du droit pénal international’, 70 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international (1947-I) 481.Google Scholar
Fichtelberg, A., ‘Conspiracy and International Criminal Justice’, 17 Criminal Law Forum (2006) 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G., ‘The Hamdan Case and Conspiracy as War Crime. A New Beginning for International Law in the US’, 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2006) 442.Google Scholar
Obote-Odora, A., ‘Conspiracy to Commit Genocide: Prosecutor v Jean Kambanda and Prosecutor v Alfred Musema’, 8 Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law (2001) 1.Google Scholar
Ohlin, J., ‘Incitement and Conspiracy to Commit Genocide’, in Gaeta, P. (ed.), The UN Genocide Convention: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 186.Google Scholar
Ohlin, J., ‘Conspiracy’, in Cassese, A. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 279.Google Scholar
Okoth, J. R., The Crime of Conspiracy in International Criminal Law (The Hague: Asser Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Pomorski, S., ‘Conspiracy and Criminal Organisation’, in Ginsburgs, G. and Kudriavtsev, V. N. (eds.), The Nuremberg Trial and International Law (Nijhoff: Dordrecht, 1990) 229.Google Scholar
Schabas, W., Genocide in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, E., The Criminal Responsibility of Individuals for Violations of International Humanitarian Law (The Hague: Asser Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wala, R., ‘From Guantanamo to Nuremberg and Back: An Analysis of Conspiracy to Commit War Crimes under International Humanitarian Law’, 41 Georgetown Journal of International Law (2010) 683.Google Scholar
Yanev, L., ‘A Janus-Faced Concept: Nuremberg’s Law on Conspiracy vis-à-vis the Notion of Joint Criminal Enterprise’, 26 Criminal Law Forum (2015) 419.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×