Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:51:06.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Effects of Superovulation on the Endometrium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2019

By
Natalie Hannan  and
Jemma Evans
Edited by
Gabor Kovacs  and
Lois Salamonsen
Gabor Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash IVF, Victoria
Lois Salamonsen
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How to Prepare the Endometrium to Maximize Implantation Rates and IVF Success , pp. 43 - 53
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Evans, J, Salamonsen, LA, Winship, A et al. Fertile ground: human endometrial programming and lessons in health and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2016; 12:654–67.Google Scholar
Aplin, JD, Ruane, PT. Embryo-epithelium interactions during implantation at a glance. J Cell Sci 2017; 130:15–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Z, Liu, J, Collins, GS et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet 2012; 5:24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maybin, JA, Critchley, HO. Menstrual physiology: implications for endometrial pathology and beyond. Hum Reprod Update 2015; 21:748–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fauser, BC, Devroey, P. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and luteal phase consequences. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2003; 14:236–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, DL, Breheny, S, Halliday, J et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:265–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J, Hannan, NJ, Edgell, TA et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20:808–21.Google Scholar
Venetis, CA, Kolibianakis, EM, Bosdou, JK, Tarlatzis, BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19:433–57.Google Scholar
Evans, J, Hannan, NJ, Hincks, C, Rombauts, LJ, Salamonsen, LA. Defective soil for a fertile seed? Altered endometrial development is detrimental to pregnancy success. PLoS One 2012; 7:e53098.Google Scholar
Pereira, N, Elias, RT, Christos, PJ et al. Supraphysiologic estradiol is an independent predictor of low birth weight in full-term singletons born after fresh embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2017; 32:1410–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, AJ, Baird, DD, Weinberg, CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1796–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horcajadas, JA, Riesewijk, A, Polman, J et al. Effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF on endometrial gene expression profiles. Mol Hum Reprod 2005; 11:195–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macklon, NS, van der Gaast, MH, Hamilton, A, Fauser, BC, Giudice, LC. The impact of ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH in combination with GnRH antagonist on the endometrial transcriptome in the window of implantation. Reprod Sci 2008; 15:357–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boomsma, CM, Kavelaars, A, Eijkemans, MJ et al. Ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization alters the intrauterine cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor milieu encountered by the embryo. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:1764–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Licht, P, Fluhr, H, Neuwinger, J, Wallwiener, D, Wildt, L. Is human chorionic gonadotropin directly involved in the regulation of human implantation? Mol Cell Endocrinol 2007; 269:85–92.Google Scholar
Paiva, P, Hannan, NJ, Hincks, C et al. Human chorionic gonadotrophin regulates FGF2 and other cytokines produced by human endometrial epithelial cells, providing a mechanism for enhancing endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:1153–62.Google Scholar
Chan, CC, Ng, EH, Chan, MM et al. Bioavailability of hCG after intramuscular or subcutaneous injection in obese and non-obese women. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:2294–7.Google Scholar
Licht, P, Losch, A, Dittrich, R et al. Novel insights into human endometrial paracrinology and embryo-maternal communication by intrauterine microdialysis. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4:532–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherwin, JR, Sharkey, AM, Cameo, P et al. Identification of novel genes regulated by chorionic gonadotropin in baboon endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinology 2007; 148:618–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J, Catalano, RD, Brown, P et al. Prokineticin 1 mediates fetal-maternal dialogue regulating endometrial leukemia inhibitory factor. FASEB J 2009; 23:2165–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameo, P, Szmidt, M, Strakova, Z et al. Decidualization regulates the expression of the endometrial chorionic gonadotropin receptor in the primate. Biol Reprod 2006; 75:681–9.Google Scholar
Evans, J, Salamonsen, LA. Too much of a good thing? Experimental evidence suggests prolonged exposure to hCG is detrimental to endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:1610–9.Google Scholar
Menon, KM, Menon, B. Structure, function and regulation of gonadotropin receptors – a perspective. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 356:88–97.Google Scholar
Harada, M, Peegel, H, Menon, KM. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A during ligand-induced down-regulation of luteinizing hormone receptor in the ovary. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2010; 328:28–33.Google Scholar
Bermejo, A, Iglesias, C, Ruiz-Alonso, M et al. The impact of using the combined oral contraceptive pill for cycle scheduling on gene expression related to endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1271–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×