Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T01:46:31.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Accelerator Dating at the Early Village of Abu Hureyra on the Euphrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

A. M. T. Moore
A. M. T. Moore*
Affiliation:
Yale University, Graduate School, 1504A Yale Station, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-7425 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The early village of Abu Hureyra is significant because of its great size (ca. 11.5 ha) and long sequence of occupation (ca. 11,500–7000 bp) that spans the transition from late Pleistocene hunting and gathering to early Holocene farming, and the cultural change from Epipaleolithic to Neolithic. The 40 accelerator dates obtained for Abu Hureyra provide new information on the development of agriculture in Southwest Asia. The dates have demonstrated that the site was inhabited for much longer than the few conventional radiocarbon dates for the site had suggested. The gap between the Epipaleolithic and Neolithic villages seems to have been brief. A change in climate and vegetation, dated at ca. 10,600 BP, during the span of occupation of the Epipaleolithic village, precipitated an adjustment in the foraging way of life of its inhabitants just before the inception of agriculture. Dating of individual bones and seeds has shown that the wild progenitors of sheep and several cereals were present near Abu Hureyra in the late Pleistocene and early Holocene, well outside their present areas of distribution. This has implications for where those species may have been domesticated. A rapid switch from exploitation of the gazelle to herding of sheep and goats during the Neolithic occupation occurred ca. 8300 bp.

Type
V. Archaeological Applications
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 34 , Issue 3: Proceedings of the 14th International Radiocarbon Conference , 1992 , pp. 850 - 858
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Baruch, U. and Bottema, S. 1991 Palynological evidence for climatic changes in the Levant ca. 17,000–9,000 bp. In Bar-Yosef, O. and Valla, F. R., eds., The Natufian Culture in the Levant. Ann Arbor, Michigan, International Monographs in Prehistory: 11–20.Google Scholar
Bowman, S. G. E., Ambers, J. C. and Leese, M. N. 1990 Re-evaluation of British Museum radiocarbon dates issued between 1980 and 1984. Radiocarbon 32(1): 59–79.Google Scholar
Burleigh, R., Ambers, J. and Matthews, K. 1982 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XV. Radiocarbon 24(3): 262–290.Google Scholar
Burleigh, R., Matthews, K. and Ambers, J. 1982 British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XIV. Radiocarbon 24(3): 229–261.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V. 1969 Origins and ecological effects of early domestication in Iran and the Near East. In Ucko, P. J. and Dimbleby, G. W., eds., The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals. London, Gerald Duckworth: 73–100.Google Scholar
Goudie, A. 1983 Environmental Change, 2nd edition. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 258 p.Google Scholar
Gowlett, J. A. J., Hedges, R. E. M., Law, I. A. and Perry, C. 1987 Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 5. Archaeometry 29(1): 125–155.Google Scholar
Hedges, R. E. M., Housley, R. A., Bronk, C. R. and van Klinken, G. J. 1990 Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 11. Archaeometry 32(2): 211–237.Google Scholar
Hillman, G. C., Colledge, S. M. and Harris, D. R. 1989 Plant-food economy during the Epipalaeolithic period at Tell Abu Hureyra, Syria: Dietary diversity, seasonality, and modes of exploitation. In Harris, D. R. and Hillman, G. C., eds., Foraging and Farming. London, Unwin Hyman: 240–268.Google Scholar
Hopf, M. 1983 Jericho plant remains. In Kenyon, K. M. and Holland, T. A., eds., Excavations at Jericho Volume 5, Appendix B. London, British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem: 576–621.Google Scholar
Iversen, J. 1954 The late-glacial flora of Denmark and its relation to climate and soil. Dansmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse II(80): 87–119.Google Scholar
Legge, A. J. and Rowley-Conwy, P. A. 1986 New radiocarbon dates for early sheep at Tell Abu Hureyra, Syria. In Gowlett, J. A. J. and Hedges, R. E. M., eds., Archaeological Results from Accelerator Dating. Oxford, Oxford University Committee for Archaeology: 23–35.Google Scholar
Legge, A. J. and Rowley-Conwy, P. A. 1987 Gazelle killing in Stone Age Syria. Scientific American 257(2): 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. M. T. 1975 The excavation of Tell Abu Hureyra in Syria: A preliminary report. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 41: 50–77.Google Scholar
Moore, A. M. T. 1991 Abu Hureyra 1 and the antecedents of agriculture on the Middle Euphrates. In Bar-Yosef, O. and Valla, F. R., eds., The Natufian Culture in the Levant. Ann Arbor, Michigan, International Monographs in Prehistory: 277–294.Google Scholar
Moore, A. M. T., Gowlett, J. A. J., Hedges, R. E. M., Hillman, G. C., Legge, A. J. and Rowley-Conwy, P. A. 1986 Radiocarbon accelerator (AMS) dates for the Epipaleolithic settlement at Abu Hureyra, Syria. Radiocarbon 28(3): 1068–1076.Google Scholar
Moore, A. M. T. and Hillman, G. C. 1992 The Pleistocene to Holocene transition and human economy in Southwest Asia: The impact of the Younger Dryas. American Antiquity 57(3): 482–494.Google Scholar
Redman, C. L. 1978 The Rise of Civilization. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman: 367 p.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. 1984 Sheep. In Mason, I. L., ed., Evolution of Domesticated Animals. London, Longmans: 63–85.Google Scholar
van Zeist, W. and Bakker-Heeres, J. A. H. 1982 Archaeobotanical studies in the Levant 1. Neolithic sites in the Damascus Basin: Aswad, Ghoraifé, Ramad. Palaeohistoria 24: 165–256.Google Scholar