[Optique adaptative multi-conjuguée pour les télescopes extrêmement grands (ELTs) : contraintes et limitations]
Nous discutons l'effet sur la complexité des systèmes d'optique adaptative, classique ou multi-conjuguée, du passage des télescopes actuels, de 10 mètres de diamètre, aux futurs ELTs pouvant atteindre 100 mètres de diamètre. Nous mettons en évidence certains élements et paramètres cruciaux qui imposent d'avoir recours à de nouveaux concepts et empêchent une simple mise à l'échelle des systèmes existants. Nous étudions finalement l'effet de l'augmentation de diamètre du télescope sur la densité spectrale de puissance du système, en distinguant les cas de l'optique adaptative « couche au sol » et multiconjuguée.
We present how enlarging the size of a telescope from the current 10 meter telescope to the future 100 meter Extremely Large Telescopes increases the complexity of a classical or multiconjugate adaptive optics instrument. We point out elements or parameters of the system for which it is critical to propose new ideas as solutions and we study the effect of the increase of the diameter on the point spread function of an MCAO and a Ground Layer AO system.
Mot clés : Optique adaptative multi-conjuguée, Télescopes extrêmement grands
@article{CRPHYS_2005__6_10_1081_0,
author = {Roberto Ragazzoni and Brice Le Roux and Carmelo Arcidiacono},
title = {Multi-Conjugate {Adaptive} {Optics} for {ELTs:} constraints and limitations},
journal = {Comptes Rendus. Physique},
pages = {1081--1088},
publisher = {Elsevier},
volume = {6},
number = {10},
year = {2005},
doi = {10.1016/j.crhy.2005.12.007},
language = {en},
}
TY - JOUR AU - Roberto Ragazzoni AU - Brice Le Roux AU - Carmelo Arcidiacono TI - Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics for ELTs: constraints and limitations JO - Comptes Rendus. Physique PY - 2005 SP - 1081 EP - 1088 VL - 6 IS - 10 PB - Elsevier DO - 10.1016/j.crhy.2005.12.007 LA - en ID - CRPHYS_2005__6_10_1081_0 ER -
Roberto Ragazzoni; Brice Le Roux; Carmelo Arcidiacono. Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics for ELTs: constraints and limitations. Comptes Rendus. Physique, Volume 6 (2005) no. 10, pp. 1081-1088. doi : 10.1016/j.crhy.2005.12.007. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/physique/articles/10.1016/j.crhy.2005.12.007/
[1] G. Rousset, P.-Y. Madec, J.-L. Beuzit, J.-G. Cuby, P. Gigan, P. Léna, F. Rigaut, C. Boyer, J.-P. Gaffard, J.-C. Richard, M. Vittot, E. Gendron, N. Hubin, F. Merkle, The COME-ON-PLUS Project: An adaptive optics system for a 4 meter class telescope, in: Progress in Telescope and Instrumentation Technologies, ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings, ESO Conference on Progress in Telescope and Instrumentation Technologies, 1992, p. 403
[2] R. Ragazzoni, A. Baruffolo, J. Farinato, A. Ghedina, E. Marchetti, S. Esposito, L. Fini, P. Ranfagni, F. Bortoletto, M. D'Alessandro, M. Ghigo, G. Crimi, Final commissioning phase of the AdOpt@TNG module, in: P. Wizinowich (Ed.), Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, vol. 4007, 2000, pp. 57–62
[3] G. Rousset, F. Lacombe, P. Puget, E. Gendron, N. Hubin, G. Zins, E. Stadler, J. Charton, P. Gigan, P. Feautrier, Status of the VLT Nasmyth adaptive optics system (NAOS), in: P.L. Wizinowich (Ed.), Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 4007, 2000, pp. 72–81
[4] J. Beckers, Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multiconjugate adaptive optics, in: M.-H. Ulrich (Ed.), Very Large Telescopes and Instrumentation, vol. 2, 1988, pp. 693–703
[5] First-order performance evaluation of adaptive-optics systems for atmospheric-turbulence compensation in extended-field-of-view astronomical telescopes, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Volume 11 (1994) no. 2, pp. 783-805
[6] Modal tomography for adaptive optics, Astron. Astrophys., Volume 342 (1999), pp. 53-56
[7] MAD: practical implementation of MCAO concepts, C. R. Physique, Volume 6 (2005) (this issue)
[8] LINC-NIRVANA: MCAO toward Extremely Large Telescopes, C. R. Physique, Volume 6 (2005) (this issue)
[9] M. Langlois, G. Moretto, K. Richards, S. Hegwer, T.R. Rimmele, Solar multiconjugate adaptive optics at the Dunn Solar Telescope: preliminary results, in: D. Bonaccini, B.L. Ellerbroek, R. Ragazzoni (Eds.), Advancements in Adaptive Optics, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 5490, 2004, pp. 59–66
[10] B.L. Ellerbroek, F.J. Rigaut, B.J. Bauman, C. Boyer, S.L. Browne, R.A. Buchroeder, J.W. Catone, P. Clark, C. d'Orgeville, D.T. Gavel, G. Herriot, M.R. Hunten, E. James, E.J. Kibblewhite, I.T. McKinnie, J.T. Murray, D. Rabaud, L.K. Saddlemyer, J. Sebag, J. Stillburn, J.M. Telle, J.-P. Veran, Multiconjugate adaptive optics for Gemini-South, in: P.L. Wizinowich, D. Bonaccini (Eds.), Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 4839, 2003, pp. 55–66
[11] E. Marchetti, R. Brast, B. Delabre, R. Donaldson, E. Fedrigo, C. Frank, N.N. Hubin, J. Kolb, M. Le Louarn, J.-L. Lizon, S. Oberti, R. Reiss, J. Santos, S. Tordo, R. Ragazzoni, C. Arcidiacono, A. Baruffolo, E. Diolaiti, J. Farinato, E. Vernet-Viard, MAD status report, in: D.B. Calia, B.L. Ellerbroek, R. Ragazzoni (Eds.), Advancements in Adaptive Optics, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 5490, 2004, pp. 236–247
[12] R. Soci, R. Ragazzoni, T.M. Herbst, J. Farinato, W. Gaessler, H. Baumeister, R.-R. Rohloff, E. Diolaiti, W.-L. Xu, D.R. Andersen, S.E. Egner, C. Arcidiacono, M. Lombini, M. Ebert, A. Boehm, N. Muench, M. Xompero, LINC-NIRVANA: mechanical challenges of the MCAO wavefront sensor, in: D.B. Calia, B.L. Ellerbroek, R. Ragazzoni (Eds.), Advancements in Adaptive Optics, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 5490, 2004, pp. 1286–1295
[13] R. Ragazzoni, J. Farinato, E. Marchetti, Adaptive optics for 100-m-class telescopes: new challenges require new solutions, in: P.L. Wizinowich (Ed.), Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 4007, 2000, pp. 1076–1087
[14] Applied LGS MCAO, C. R. Physique, Volume 6 (2005) (this issue)
[15] Analytical solution for the covariance and for the decorrelation time of the angle of arrival of a wave front corrugated by atmospheric turbulence, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A: Opt. Image Sci. Vision, Volume 17 (2000) no. 10, pp. 1807-1818
[16] F.J. Rigaut, B.L. Ellerbroek, R. Flicker, Principles, limitations, and performance of multiconjugate adaptive optics, in: P.L. Wizinowich (Ed.), Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 4007, 2000, pp. 1022–1031
[17] A. Riccardi, G. Brusa, M. Xompero, D. Zanotti, C. Del Vecchio, P. Salinari, P. Ranfagni, D. Gallieni, R. Biasi, M. Andrighettoni, S. Miller, P. Mantegazza, The adaptive secondary mirrors for the Large Binocular Telescope: a progress report, in: D.B. Calia, B.L. Ellerbroek, R. Ragazzoni (Eds.), Advancements in Adaptive Optics, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 5490, 2004, pp. 1564–1571
[18] F. Zamkotsian, H. Camon, N. Fabre, V. Conedera, G. Moreaux, Microdeformable mirror for next-generation adaptive optical systems, in: P.L. Wizinowich, D. Bonaccini (Eds.), Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 4839, 2003, pp. 711–720
[19] P. Dierickx, J. Beletic, B. Delabre, M. Ferrari, R. Gilmozzi, N. Hubin, The optics of the OWL 100-m adaptive telescope, in: T. Andersen, A. Ardeberg, R. Gilmozzi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Backaskog Workshop on Extremely Large Telescopes, ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings, vol. 57, 2000, p. 97
[20] S. Kellner, R. Ragazzoni, W. Gassler, E. Diolaiti, T.J. Morris, C.D. Saunter, R. Meyers, J. Farinato, C. Arcidiacono, A. Ghedina, PIGS: first results on sky, in: D. Bonaccini, B.L. Ellerbroek, R. Ragazzoni (Eds.), Advancements in Adaptive Optics, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 5490, 2004, pp. 989–997
[21] T. Butterley, D.F. Buscher, G.D. Love, T.J. Morris, R.M. Myers, R.W. Wilson, Sky-projected Shack–Hartmann laser guide star, in: D.B. Calia, B.L. Ellerbroek, R. Ragazzoni (Eds.), Advancements in Adaptive Optics, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 5490, 2004, pp. 966–973
Cité par Sources :
Commentaires - Politique
MAD: practical implementation of MCAO concepts
Enrico Marchetti; Roland Brast; Bernard Delabre; ...
C. R. Phys (2005)
Simulation of MCAO on (extremely) large telescopes
Miska Le Louarn; Christophe Verinaud; Visa Korkiakoski
C. R. Phys (2005)