Introduction

The consumer sector, which consists of the residential and tertiary industrial sectors, accounts for a substantial portion of the final energy consumption in major countries, and its growth over time is significant. For example, the energy consumption density in Tokyo, the capital of Japan, is approximately 8.4 times higher than the national average (Agency for Natural Resources and Energy 2020), and there are concerns regarding the effects on atmospheric environment from the enormous energy consumption in the city. Energy consumption and anthropogenic heat are closely related, but their pathways and characteristics are diverse. Therefore, understanding the actual situation, including the qualitative breakdown of local anthropogenic heat from buildings and traffic, to evaluate its effect on the atmospheric environment is important (Ashie et al. 2004).

Various studies have revealed the effects of heat damage on human health. Breitner et al. (2014) quantified the relationship between temperature and mortality in several German cities using time-series analysis combined with Poisson regression and distributed lag non-linear models and reported that very high air temperature increased cause-specific mortality. Basu (2009) examined the mortality evidence from elevated ambient temperatures in epidemiological studies and found a clear independent effect of temperature on mortality. Baccini et al. (2008) reported associations between maximum apparent temperature and mortality using daily data during the warm season in 15 European cities and found significant mortal effect of heat across Europe from June to August. Madaniyazi et al. (2016) evaluated the associations between temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure among 47,591 Chinese adults and reported that hot temperatures may have short-term effects on the heart rate and blood pressure. Ho et al. (2018) analyzed the short-term mortality risk using Poisson regression model to daily mortality data from 2007 to 2014 in Hong Kong and showed that a combined influence of haze, extreme weather/air quality, and the urban environment can result in extremely high mortality due to mental/behavioral disorders or diseases of the nervous system. Lin et al. (2022) evaluated the long-term health effects of anthropogenic heat exposure on blood pressure and hypertension and associated long-term anthropogenic heat exposure with elevated blood pressure and higher risk of hypertension. With the increasing population density in urban areas and global elderly population (United Nations 2022), these findings suggest that mitigation strategies for outdoor temperature rise and urban anthropogenic heat should be considered to curb health hazards. The number of health emergencies due to heat stroke is also increasing in Japan’s aging population, and the heat stroke incidences have increased in years with many days of high temperatures or the occurrence of unusually high temperature days (Ministry of the Environment 2022). Therefore, reduction in anthropogenic heat is necessary for preventing heat stroke.

Furthermore, there have been several studies on anthropogenic heat from buildings. Ichinose et al. (1999) drew elaborate maps of anthropogenic heat in Tokyo using energy statistics data and a detailed digital geographic land use dataset, and discussed how reductions in energy consumption could mitigate the impacts on urban thermal environment. Yuan et al. (2022) proposed evidence-based strategies to improve residential building design in Singaporean residential neighborhoods to mitigate the negative effects of anthropogenic heat using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. Their numerical simulation indicated that the largest indoor temperature increment in naturally ventilated apartments caused by anthropogenic heat at the neighborhood scale was 4.2 °C. Li et al. (2019) reviewed the literature and observed that urban heat islands (UHI) can increase the cooling energy consumption in buildings. Considering the possibility that anthropogenic heat increases the UHI intensity (Kimura and Takahashi 1991), these findings suggest that anthropogenic heat has a spiraling effect that promotes energy consumption for building cooling in UHIs, which further intensifies UHI effect.

Various studies have developed methods for estimating the anthropogenic heat. Sailor (2011) suggested a roadmap for including anthropogenic heat and moisture in the urban environment modeling based on a literature survey on the anthropogenic heating and opined that a combined inventory approach for industrial and transportation emissions and building energy modeling approach are ideal for including anthropogenic heat in atmospheric models. Jin et al. (2019) developed a new global gridded anthropogenic heat flux dataset with long-term time series using population density data and a top-down inventory-based approach. Their new global gridded dataset covers 1970–2050 and supports the simulation of climate change induced by anthropogenic heat. Chen and Hu (2017) estimated the high-resolution grid-scale anthropogenic heat flux over the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region in 2015 based on a developed parameterization scheme. The proposed parameterization scheme uses multisource remote sensing data to simplify the labor-intensive county-scale inventory approach. Bonifacio-Bautista et al. (2022) determined the main sources of anthropogenic heat flux based on vehicle classification, electricity consumption surveys, and population density in Mexico City and showed that vehicular traffic and electricity consumption contributed the most to anthropogenic heat flux. Hsieh et al. (2011) using a building energy program showed that heat rejection from air conditioners worsens the thermal environment below the urban canopy, thereby increasing building energy use. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Ministry of the Environment (2004) also prepared inventory data on anthropogenic heat in Tokyo and showed the hourly anthropogenic heat intensity in August for offices, stores, hotels, and other buildings. Thus, various approaches, such as building energy modeling and energy consumption inventory, have been developed to estimate man-made heat emissions. In particular, the building energy modeling approach explicitly calculates the energy consumption of different building types and evaluates heat emissions based on energy consumption models. Using this method, the artificial heat exhaust from buildings has been accurately estimated (Heiple and Sailor 2008; Sailor 2011).

Because air conditioning systems contribute to the process of generating heat exhaust from buildings, several studies, as mentioned above, have analyzed the anthropogenic heat characteristics of these systems; however, the results are inadequate. To quantify the anthropogenic heat from building air conditioning in an area, understanding the regional configuration of air conditioning systems in the area, estimating the cooling demand and operation of air conditioning equipment based on the usage of each building, and accumulating the anthropogenic heat from each air conditioning system by considering outdoor air conditions are necessary. The current trends in global warming and expanding urban areas indicate a future in which heat risk reduction in urban areas will be earnestly considered.

Therefore, this study aims to incorporate artificial anthropogenic heat from surrounding buildings into the heat risk assessment of a specific area. We developed a method for estimating air-conditioning heat emissions from cooling, which accounts for the majority of artificial anthropogenic heat from buildings in urban commercial areas, and quantified the artificial anthropogenic heat from each building in the area subjected to calculation. The novelty of this study is the development of a methodology to calculate detailed sensible and latent heat quantities for each building in a commercial district through a building energy modeling method that integrates an estimation method of cooling demand considering building operating hours based on human flow data analysis and an operation simulation method based on the installed configuration of air conditioning heat source equipment. The estimated latent and sensible heat data can be input into a CFD tool that evaluates the air and experienced temperatures of a city block to assess the heat risk to outdoor pedestrians (National institute for land and infrastructure management 2014; Ashie 2016).

Materials and methods

Study design

We developed a method for determining anthropogenic heat at five-minute intervals for each building using geographic information, human flow, and meteorological data. This method is based on that of a previous study (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Ministry of the Environment 2004) along with updated configuration for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning equipment efficiency, load characteristics, and reflected weather data for the target year 2019. Figure 1 shows the methodology used in this study. The estimation of anthropogenic heat is performed in three steps: cooling heat source equipment configuration, cooling demand estimation, and calculation of energy consumption and anthropogenic heat by cooling.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Three-step determination of anthropogenic heat for buildings in Nishi-Shinjuku 2-chome area using geographic information, human flow, and meteorological data

Nishi-Shinjuku area in Tokyo, which is included among the three major subcenters in Japan, was considered as the study area because it is a high-density commercial area with substantial air-conditioning anthropogenic heat emission. Table 1 summarizes the Nishi-Shinjuku 2-chome area, and Fig. 2 shows the gross floor area by building use. Figure 3 shows a map of the study area, which mainly consists of offices, stores, and hotels in the commercial districts. However, the percentage of residential buildings is small. Because 2019 was before the COVID-19 pandemic, telecommuting was not widespread and the number of people living in the homes during daytime was expected to be low. Therefore, the air conditioning anthropogenic heat generated from residential buildings in the target area was considered to be minimal compared to that from non-residential buildings; thus, this study deals only with air conditioning anthropogenic heat from non-residential buildings.

Table 1 Summary of the Nishi-Shinjuku 2-chome area
Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage total floor area by building use in Nishi-Shinjuku 2-chome

Fig. 3
figure 3

Map showing the Nishi-Shinjuku area

Composition of cooling heat source equipment

This section establishes the air conditioning heat source equipment configuration for each building based on the gross floor area and building use in the 2019 GIS data. Figure 4 shows the capacity intensity curves for the air-conditioning heat source equipment for each building use (Ueno et al. 2019). These curves show the cooling capacity of the heat source per unit gross floor area of the building. The air-conditioning equipment in non-residential buildings in this study were defined as absorption chillers (RHA), air-cooled electric chillers (AHP), and individually distributed packaged air conditioners (VRF). The composition of the cooling heat source equipment by building use was obtained from the data in a previous study (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Ministry of the Environment 2004).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Characteristic equations of the capacity curves of air-conditioning heat source equipment in various building use types

Cooling demand

Based on the basic start and end times set for each building use, the start and end times for non-residential buildings were set based on the number of commuters passing by each sidewalk at different times of the day using the current population data, linking each building to the nearest sidewalk using GIS software, and the number of people passing by each building daily during the target period.

We then estimated the five-minute interval heat source cooling demand for each building using a method developed in a previous study (Ueno et al. 2019), classified non-residential buildings in the city block into seven building types—hospital, hotel, office, store, school, restaurant, and others—and calculated the following equation for each building and time of the day to reproduce cooling demand fluctuations.

$${E}_{Co (t)}={Ey}_{Co}\cdot {R}_{Co(t)}/{ N}_{d}\cdot A\cdot C(A)\cdot \mathrm{Ry}\cdot R(temp)$$
(1)

where ECo (t) is the cooling demand (MJ), EyCo is the annual cooling demand (MJ/m2/year) by industry, RCo (t) is the ratio of annual cooling demand to time demand, Nd is the number of days of the week by month, A is the gross floor area (m2) of the building, C(A) is the annual demand correction value by gross floor area, Ry is annual demand (MJ], and R(temp) is the cooling demand blip factor with outdoor temperature.

Energy consumption

Based on the air-conditioning heat source equipment model in the Building Energy Conservation Law (“Heisei 25nen jutaku・kenchikubutsu no shoenerugikijun kaisetsusho henshu iinkai” (2014); Fujii et al. 2009; Yanai et al. 2011), a model was constructed and used in this study to calculate the time-specific energy consumption of each building in the study area. The air-conditioning heat source equipment model first calculates the load factor of each air-conditioning heat source equipment based on cooling demand at five-minute intervals using Eq. 2. Because the rated capacity during actual operation increases or decreases depending on the cooling water temperature and outdoor air temperature, a quadratic function equation was set for each heat source model as the rated capacity characteristics from moment to moment in this calculation model. Second, energy consumption with time was calculated by inputting the load factor into the load characteristic formula set for each heat source model and multiplying the calculation result by the rated energy consumption (Eq. 3). Finally, Eq. 4 converts the electrical power to primary energy consumption and adds it with that of gas.

Similar to the rated capacity, the rated energy consumption quantity also increases or decreases depending on the cooling water temperature, water supply temperature, and outdoor air temperature. Figure 5(a) shows the capacity characteristic of heat source equipment depending on the outdoor temperature or cold-water temperature. Rated capacity, input, and refrigerant temperature characteristic equation has a range, and the value outside the range is constant at the range end, as shown by the dashed line in each figure. The rated capacity coefficient decreased as the temperature increased. Figure 5(b) shows the load characteristics. As the load factor decreased, the percentage energy consumption also decreased; however, the decreasing tendency differed depending on the heat source equipment. Figure 5(c) shows the input characteristics depending on the outdoor temperature or cold-water temperature. The rated input characteristics increased as the temperature increased. Figure 5(d) shows the refrigerant temperature characteristics of the heat-source equipment. The characteristics of the RHA increased by lowering the refrigerant temperature. However, the characteristics of the AHP and VRF were constant even when the refrigerant temperature changed. In the calculations, the refrigerant temperature was set to 7 °C according to the Building Energy Conservation Law. The system primary energy coefficient of performance (COP), which is the cooling demand of the entire building divided by the primary energy consumption of the entire air-conditioning heat source equipment, was calculated using Eq. 5 as an indicator of the heat source equipment efficiency.

$${L}_{l,i,t}=\frac{{Q}_{i,t}}{{q}_{i,rated}\times {C}_{q,correct}\times {C}_{q,cool,i,t}}$$
(2)
$$E_{ele,i,t}\;\mathrm{or}\;E_{gas,i,t}=\frac{Q_{i,t}\times C_{p,correct}}{{L_{e,i,rated}\times C}_{p,load,i,t}\times C_{p,cool,i,t}\times C_{p,outlet,i,t}}$$
(3)
$$E_{prim,t}=C_{prim}\times{\textstyle\sum_i}E_{ele,i,t}+{\textstyle\sum_i}E_{gas,i,t}$$
(4)
$${COP}_{t}=\frac{\sum_{i}{Q}_{i,t}}{{E}_{prim,t}}$$
(5)

where Ll,i,t is the load ratio of heat source equipment i at time t, Qi,t is the cooling demand at time t (MJ), qi,rated is the rated cooling capacity of heat source equipment i (MJ), Cq,correct is the correction coefficient in capacity of heat source equipment (= 0.95), Cq,cool,i,t is the capacity characteristic of heat source equipment i depending on outdoor temperature/cold water temperature at time t, Eele,i,t is the electricity consumption of heat source equipment i at time t (MJ), Egas,i,t is the gas consumption of heat source equipment i at time t (MJ), Cp,correct is the correction coefficient in energy consumption of heat source equipment (= 1.2), Le,i,rated is the rated cooling efficiency of heat source equipment i (AHP = 3.7, RHA = 1.08, VRF = 2.67), Cp,load,i,t is the load characteristic of heat source equipment i at time t, Cp,cool,i,t is the input characteristic of heat source equipment i depending on outdoor temperature/cold water temperature at time t, Cp,outlet,i,t is the refrigerant temperature characteristic of heat source equipment i at time t, Eprim,t is the primary energy consumption at time t (MJ), and Cprim is the coefficient of primary energy conversion (= 2.71) [-], COPt: system primary energy COP at time t [-].

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Rated capacity, b load, c input, and d refrigerant temperature characteristic trends of the air conditioning heat source equipment

Anthropogenic heat

The amount of anthropogenic heat transferred to the atmosphere by air conditioning was calculated from the air-conditioning energy consumption of each building in terms of sensible heat and latent heat. Figure 6 shows the heat transport flow of the air-conditioning heat source. In the calculations, exhaust heat from the AHP and VRF were calculated as sensible heat, as it is derived from the power input and cooling demand (Eq. 6). For the RHA, the amount of heat from the exhaust gas was estimated from the combustion efficiency of the boiler and divided into sensible heat and latent heat (Eqs. 7 and 8).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Heat transport flow of the air conditioning heat source

The heat transferred from the RHA to the cooling tower was calculated as sensible heat and latent heat using a cooling tower model based on a previous study (Ashie et al. 1999). The cooling towers were all open-type counter-current cooling towers, and the inlet/outlet water temperatures of the cooling towers were calculated based on the circulating water quantity, air flow rate, and atmospheric conditions, corresponding to changes in the cooling load. The quantity of circulating water was set for each building according to the capacity of the air-conditioning heat source equipment, and the airflow rate of the cooling tower was also set for each building based on the amount of circulating water and the water–air ratio. The cooling tower characteristics for each building were set using the results of calculations based on Chebyshev's formula according to the Japanese Industrial Standards (Japanese Standards Association 2008). To quantify heat loss from the cooling tower, the temperature difference between the cooling water inlet and outlet and specific enthalpy of the outlet air were determined using Eq. 9. Furthermore, the operating line was drawn on the T∙h diagram and the U/N value was calculated using Eq. 10. Subsequently, the combination of inlet/outlet temperatures of the cooling water that achieves the design value was obtained by iterative calculations based on the U/N value. The breakdown of the sensible and latent heat was obtained from Eqs. 11 and 12, respectively.

$${Q}_{s,i,t}={{Q}_{i,t}+E}_{ele,i,t}$$
(6)
$${Q}_{s,i,t}=\delta \times {(1-\zeta )\times E}_{gas,i,t}$$
(7)
$${Q}_{l,i,t}=(1-\delta ){\times (1-\zeta )\times E}_{gas,i,t}$$
(8)
$$\left({{Q}_{i,t}+\zeta \times E}_{gas,i,t}\right)=G\left({h}_{G,out,t}-{h}_{G,in,t}\right)={C}_{l} L({T}_{l,in,t}-{T}_{l,out,t})$$
(9)
$$U/N={\int }_{{T}_{l,out,t}}^{{T}_{l,in,t}}\frac{{C}_{l} dT}{{h}_{s}-{h}_{l}}$$
(10)
$${Q}_{s,i,t}=G\left({C}_{G,out,t}{T}_{G,out,t}-{C}_{G,in,t}{T}_{G,in,t}\right)$$
(11)
$${Q}_{l,i,t}=\left({{Q}_{i,t}+\zeta \times E}_{gas,i,t}\right)-{Q}_{s,i,t}$$
(12)

where Qs,i,t is the load ratio of heat source equipment i at time t [-], Qi,t is the cooling demand at time t [MJ], Eele,i,t is the electricity consumption of heat source equipment i at time t [MJ], Ql,i,t is the load ratio of heat source equipment i at time t [-], ζ is the cooling tower load ratio (= 0.83) [-], δ is the percentage of sensible heat in combustion exhaust gas (= 0.54) [-], Egas,i,t is the gas consumption of heat source equipment i at time t [MJ], G is the cooling tower airflow volume[kg/h], hG,out,t is the specific enthalpy of cooling tower outlet air at time t [kJ/kg(DA)], hG,in,t is the specific enthalpy of cooling tower inlet air at time t [kJ/kg(DA)], Cl is the specific heat of water (= 4.217) [kJ/kg⋅K], L is the cooling tower water volume [kg/h], Tl,in,t is the temperature of cooling tower inlet water at time t [℃], Tl,out,t is the temperature of cooling tower outlet water at time t [℃], U/N is the number of transfer units [-], hs is the specific enthalpy of operating line [kJ/kg(DA)], hl is the saturated specific enthalpy [kJ/kg(DA)], CG,out,t is the specific heat of moist air at cooling tower outlet at time t [kJ/kg⋅K], TG,out,t is the temperature of cooling tower outlet air at time t [℃], CG,in,t is the specific heat of moist air at cooling tower inlet at time t [kJ/kg⋅K], and TG,in,t is the temperature of cooling tower inlet air at time t [℃].

Results

Composition of cooling heat source equipment

This section describes the calculation results of each step in the estimation of anthropogenic heat based on human flow data. By setting the air conditioning heat source equipment configuration for each building, the capacity of central heat source equipment, such as RHA and AHP, was confirmed to be approximately 90% of the total capacity of the area in Nishi-Shinjuku 2-chome area (Fig. 7). The total heat-source cooling capacity for the entire region was 133 MW (= 479 GJ/h).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Composition of cooling heat source equipment in Nishi-Shinjuku 2-chome area

Cooling demand

The results of setting the start and end times of each building in this area based on human flow data indicated that there were some non-residential buildings in each area whose start and end times were approximately one–two hours ahead or behind the basic time. Figure 8 shows the results of the cooling demand estimation. By estimating the total daily district cooling demand in these areas, we confirmed that there were substantial differences between weekdays and holidays and between daytime and nighttime.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Five-minute interval cooling demand during a representative week

Primary energy consumption

Figure 9 shows the results of primary energy consumption. By estimating the total daily district cooling demand in these areas, we confirmed that there were substantial differences between weekdays and holidays and between daytime and nighttime. The average primary energy consumption was 5.7 TJ/day. The primary energy COP was 0.79 for the total calculation period.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Five-minute interval energy consumption during a representative week

Anthropogenic heat

Figure 10 shows the temporal variations in the sensible heat and latent heat. During daytime in summer, 79 GJ/h of sensible heat was generated. The total daily sensible heat on weekdays was 11 TJ/day. The latent heat generated by the air-conditioning heat source equipment and related equipment was 355 GJ/h during the daytime, accounting for approximately 82% of the total heat during the day.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Anthropogenic heat in five-minute intervals during a representative week

Discussion

Summary of findings

We developed a method for calculating the air-conditioning anthropogenic heat in buildings and estimated it for commercial areas. Sensible and latent heat in August were calculated for a commercial area in Japan by setting up air-conditioning heat source equipment in each building. The results showed the following:

  1. 1)

    RHAs accounted for most of the heat source capacity in the target area.

  2. 2)

    The total time-specific cooling demand and energy consumption in the region differed substantially between daytime and nighttime and between weekdays and holidays. The primary energy COP of the system for the calculation period was 0.79.

  3. 3)

    District exhaust heat also exhibited similar time-series differences in cooling demand and energy consumption. During weekdays, 5 TJ/day of air-conditioning anthropogenic heat was released into the atmosphere.

  4. 4)

    The ratio of sensible to latent heat was approximately 1:4, with latent heat accounting for most of the air-conditioning anthropogenic heat during the day.

Cooling characteristics and energy conservation measures in the study area

Cooling demand to Anthropogenic heat showed large differences between the data on weekdays and weekends, and between daytime and nighttime. These differences were due to the building type, majority of which were office buildings, in the commercial districts. Therefore, the cooling demand, cooling energy consumption, and cooling anthropogenic heat during night and holidays, which are after-hours for office buildings, were lower than those during the working hours.

As a large proportion of the consumer sector uses thermal comfort in commercial and residential buildings, improvement of the overall efficiency of air-conditioning systems in buildings is of positive significance in reducing the total energy consumption of society (Chua et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2014). Energy-saving options for air conditioning in the target area include the introduction of thermal energy storage systems, such as heat storage tanks, and more efficient air-conditioning equipment. Thermal energy storage systems offer advantages such as increased overall efficiency and reliability, improved economics, and lower operating costs (Navarro et al. 2016). In this area, a thermal storage system can improve the operating efficiency of air conditioning by using heat stored at night or early in the morning, when outdoor air temperatures are low, for daytime use. District heating and cooling systems are also effective options for this area. They are considered more efficient than individual air-conditioning systems and energy-saving solutions for space heating and cooling in high-demand density areas (European Union 2010, 2012). The peak cooling demand density in this area, the total demand during peak cooling hours divided by area, was 15.5 GJ/ha-h, which meets or exceeds 8 GJ/ha-h and is adequate to establish a heat supply business (Japan District Heating and Cooling Association 2013). The introduction of these technologies is expected to improve the energy efficiency in this area.

Comparison of the method with existing methods for anthropogenic heat estimation

To validate the accuracy of the model, we compared the calculated values of this calculation method with those estimated using the existing estimation methods (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Ministry of the Environment 2004). The calculated values are the results of five-minute interval calculations for each building in the Nishi-Shinjuku 2-chome area from August 1 to 31, which were combined into hourly values for the total area and averaged into monthly values for each time. In contrast, estimated value from the previous study is the value obtained by multiplying the August time-specific air conditioning heat emission intensity by building use and total floor area shown in the previous study with the data for each building in the Nishi-Shinjuku 2-chome area and adding them with the area total. Figure 11 shows the comparison of the anthropogenic heat calculated using the present method and previous method. The comparison showed no major difference in the order during daytime. Improvements in the performance of air-conditioning heat source equipment are the reason for the smaller value in the present method compared to that of previous method during the daytime; further, because overtime hours have been extended, the value from the present method is larger than that from the previous method during the nighttime.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Comparison of the anthropogenic heat estimation using the present developed method and that of the previous study

Primary energy consumption and system primary energy COP

Figure 12 shows the hourly system COP. The system COP shows time-series changes for all days; however, the pattern of change differs with days. The monthly average system COP increased during the morning and decreased during the day. On the highest temperature day of the month, the system COP appeared high during the nighttime because the heat source system operates at high efficiency, but the value during the daytime declined owing to the adverse conditions of high temperatures. On the lowest temperature day of the month, the COP is high due to the lower temperatures increasing the heat source equipment efficiency.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Time-series system COP on the highest and lowest temperature days

Breakdown of building use with respect to anthropogenic heat

To indicate the breakdown of building use in anthropogenic heat, we averaged the five-minute interval calculation values for each building in the Nishi-Shinjuku 2-chome area from August 1 to 31 into the monthly average five-minute interval value and added for each building use. Figure 13 shows temporal variations in the building use. During the daytime, offices discharged the highest amount of heat, approximately 122 GJ/h of waste heat, while commercial buildings generated the largest amount of anthropogenic heat among building uses from 21:25 to 22:15; after 22:20, hotels dominated the heat discharge. From midnight to 06:00, anthropogenic heat was generated almost exclusively from the hotels, accounting for 3% of the daily value. Thus, the building use that generates the most exhaust heat differs according to the time of the day.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Breakdown of building use in average monthly five-minute interval anthropogenic heat

Temperature Effects

Figure 14 shows the relationship between the outdoor air temperature and heat dissipation. The overall trend is that as the outdoor air temperature increased, the air-conditioning anthropogenic heat increased. The anthropogenic heat during building operating hours (10:00 to 22:00) can be roughly divided into two groups: daytime and weekday, each of which linearly increased with outdoor air temperature. The anthropogenic heat during non-operating hours had a greater dispersion than that during operating hours, but it also tended to be proportional to the outdoor air temperature.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Relationship between outdoor air temperature and anthropogenic heat

The phenomenon of an increase in air-conditioning anthropogenic heat due to rising summer temperatures is an important issue to consider when studying measures to reduce UHIs. Therefore, although there are various other possible influencing factors, such as the thermal capacity of each building and indoor heat generation conditions, studying the relationship between the amount of air-conditioning anthropogenic heat in a city block and the outdoor temperature is necessary to reduce the heat risk for pedestrians during the summer.

Conclusions

We developed a method for estimating anthropogenic heat from air conditioning, which accounts for most of the artificial heat from buildings during summer, to include artificial anthropogenic heat from surrounding buildings for the local heat risk assessment. The estimation results for commercial areas in Japan using the developed method showed that latent heat from air conditioning was several times higher than sensible heat in the study area and there was a difference in the heat generated between daytime and nighttime and between weekdays and holidays. A comparison of the calculation results of our method and those of previous studies showed no major differences in the orders of magnitude. Regarding the change in the amount of air-conditioning anthropogenic heat in the region, a direct proportional relationship was found between the outdoor temperature and amount of air-conditioning anthropogenic heat. These results are useful for assessing the summer heat risk in urban areas. In the future, we intend to assess anthropogenic heat due to road traffic. Based on the aforementioned results, we plan to develop a pattern of summer anthropogenic heat from traffic and incorporate it into a CFD-based thermal environment assessment tool to evaluate thermal risk considering artificial anthropogenic heat and to study measures to reduce exposure to anthropogenic heat, such as securing urban airways and building layouts and application of covering materials as heat countermeasures.