Skip to main content
Log in

Magnesium Oxide and Silicon-Assisted Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor for Gas Detection: A Performance Analysis

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
Plasmonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor with better sensitivity and gas detection capabilities is reported in this paper. It is based on a hybrid layer of silver (Ag)/magnesium oxide (MgO)/silicon (Si). For numerical analysis, the finite element technique (FEM) was employed. The attenuated total reflection (ATR) approach has been used for diagnosing various types of hazardous gas. The increase in the refractive index of various hazardous gases, ranging from 1.327 to 1.38 for four different types of gas, caused the resonance angle to shift. The obtained sensitivities were 86.12 deg/RIU, 164.54 deg/RIU, 199.59 deg/RIU, and 253.68 deg/RIU, respectively, for cyanogen, phosgene, ethanol, and propane gas. Additionally, the values of the detection accuracy (DA), the figure of merits (FoM), and full-width at half-maximum (FWHM), which are 0.17 deg−1, 43.30 RIU−1, and 5.86 deg, respectively, were also obtained. The proposed structure’s distribution of the electric field propagation under resonant conditions was also depicted. Further tests were done to see how the thickness of the Ag and other layers affected the overall sensitivity sensor for the four different gas types. The proposed layered Ag/MgO/Si arrangement had the highest overall sensitivity in distinguishing propane gas from other hazardous gases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

No data available.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Naresh V, Lee N (2021) A review on biosensors and recent development of nanostructured materials-enabled biosensors. Sensors (Switzerland) 21(4):1–35. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Uniyal A, Srivastava G, Pal A, Taya S, Muduli A (2023) Recent advances in optical biosensors for sensing applications: a review. Plasmonics 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-01803-2

  3. Kitenge D, Joshi RK, Hirai M, Kumar A (2009) Nanostructured silver films for surface plasmon resonance-based gas sensors. IEEE Sens J 9(12):1797–1801. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2009.2031168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Raether H (1988) Intro_contents. Intro_surface plasmons on smooth and rough surfaces and on gratings. 78:1988

  5. Nylander C, Liedberg B, Lind T (1982) Gas detection by means of surface plasmon resonance. Sens Actuators 3:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0250-6874(82)80008-5

  6. Karki B, Jha A, Pal A, Srivastava V (2022) Sensitivity enhancement of refractive index-based surface plasmon resonance sensor for glucose detection. Opt Quantum Electron 54(9):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-04004-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Uniyal A et al. (2023) Surface plasmon resonance biosensor sensitivity improvement employing of 2D materials and BaTiO 3 with bimetallic layers of silver. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-09821-w

  8. Shivangani et al. (2022) Numerical study to enhance the sensitivity of a surface plasmon resonance sensor with BlueP/WS2-covered Al2 O3-nickel nanofilms. Nanomaterials 12:13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132205

  9. Singh S, Sharma AK, Lohia P, Dwivedi DK (2021) Theoretical analysis of sensitivity enhancement of surface plasmon resonance biosensor with zinc oxide and blue phosphorus/MoS2 heterostructure. Optik (Stuttg) 244:167618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167618

  10. Chen S, Lin C (2019) Sensitivity comparison of graphene based surface plasmon resonance biosensor with Au, Ag and Cu in the visible region 0–6

  11. Bijalwan A, Rastogi V (2017) Sensitivity enhancement of a conventional gold grating assisted surface plasmon resonance sensor by using a bimetallic configuration. Appl Opt 56(35):9606. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.56.009606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shakya AK, Singh S (2023) State of the art alliance of refractive index sensing and spectroscopy techniques for household oils analysis. Plasmonics 1–18

  13. Shakya AK, Singh S (2022) Design of a novel refractive index BIOSENSOR for heavy metal detection from water samples based on fusion of spectroscopy and refractive index sensing. Optik (Stuttg)270:169892

  14. Shakya AK, Singh S (2023) Novel merger of spectroscopy and refractive index sensing for modelling hyper sensitive hexa-slotted plasmonic sensor for transformer oil monitoring in near-infrared region. Opt Quantum Electron 55(9):764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shakya AK, Singh S (2022) Design of novel Penta core PCF SPR RI sensor based on fusion of IMD and EMD techniques for analysis of water and transformer oil. Measurement 188:110513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shakya AK, Singh S (2023) Performance analysis of a developed optical sensing setup based on the Beer-Lambert law. Plasmonics 1–9

  17. Shakya AK, Singh S (2022) Design of biochemical biosensor based on transmission, absorbance and refractive index. Biosens Bioelectron X 10:100089

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shakya AK, Singh S (2022) State of the art in fiber optics sensors for heavy metals detection. Opt Laser Technol 153:108246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh Y, Kumar M, Sanjeev P, Raghuwanshi K (2021) Sensitivity enhancement of SPR sensor with the black phosphorus and graphene with Bi ‑ layer of gold for chemical sensing. Plasmonics 1781–1790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-020-01315-3

  20. Panda A, Pukhrambam PD (2022) Design and modelling of reconfigurable surface plasmon resonance refractive index sensor employing graphene and Sb2S3 for detection of dengue virus. Phys B Condens Matter 638:413965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2022.413965

  21. Almawgani AHM, Sarkar P, Pal A, Srivastava G, Uniyal A (2021) Titanium disilicide, black phosphorus – based surface plasmon resonance sensor for dengue detection. Plasmonics 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-01856-3

  22. Yadav A, Kumar S, Kumar A, Sharan P (2023) Effect of 2-D nanomaterials on sensitivity of plasmonic biosensor for efficient urine glucose detection. Front Mater 9(January):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.1106251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh S, Sharma AK, Lohia P, Dwivedi DK, Singh PK (2022) Design and modelling of high-performance surface plasmon resonance refractive index sensor using BaTiO3, MXene and nickel hybrid nanostructure. Plasmonics 17(5):2049–2062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-022-01692-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sadri-Moshkenani P et al (2020) Effect of magnesium oxide adhesion layer on resonance behavior of plasmonic nanostructures. Appl Phys Lett 116:24

  25. Verma A, Prakash A, Tripathi R (2016) Sensitivity improvement of graphene based surface plasmon resonance biosensors with chaclogenide prism. Optik (Stuttg) 127(4):1787–1791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ouyang Q et al (2016) Sensitivity enhancement of transition metal dichalcogenides/silicon nanostructure-based surface plasmon resonance biosensor. Sci Rep 6(March):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Srivastava A, Prajapati YK (2019) Performance analysis of silicon and blue phosphorene/MoS2 hetero-structure based SPR sensor. Photonic Sensors 9(3):284–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13320-019-0533-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen Y, Ren R, Pu H, Chang J, Mao S, Chen J (2017) Field-effect transistor biosensors with two-dimensional black phosphorus nanosheets. Biosens Bioelectron 89:505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.03.059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cho SY et al (2016) Superior chemical sensing performance of black phosphorus: comparison with MoS2and graphene. Adv Mater 28(32):7020–7028. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201601167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee G, Kim S, Jung S, Jang S, Kim J (2017) Suspended black phosphorus nanosheet gas sensors. Sensors Actuators, B Chem 250:569–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.04.176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Srivastava A, Verma A, Prajapati YK (2021) Theoretical study of hazardous carbon-di-oxide gas sensing using MIM structure-based SPR sensing scheme. IET Optoelectron 15(4):167–177. https://doi.org/10.1049/ote2.12035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh Y, Raghuwanshi SK (2019) Sensitivity enhancement of the surface plasmon resonance gas sensor with black phosphorus. IEEE Sensors Lett 3(12):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2019.2954052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Maurya JB, Prajapati YK, Raikwar S, Saini JP (2018) A silicon-black phosphorous based surface plasmon resonance sensor for the detection of NO2 gas. Optik (Stuttg) 160:428–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.02.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Srivastava T, Jha R (2018) Black phosphorus: a new platform for gaseous sensing based on surface plasmon resonance. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 30(4):319–322. https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2017.2787057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu L et al (2017) Sensitivity enhancement by using few-layer black phosphorus-graphene/TMDCs heterostructure in surface plasmon resonance biochemical sensor. Sensors Actuators, B Chem 249:542–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.04.110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kumar R, Pal S, Verma A, Prajapati YK, Saini JP (2020) Effect of silicon on sensitivity of SPR biosensor using hybrid nanostructure of black phosphorus and MXene. Superlattices Microstruct 145:106591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106591

  37. Almawgani AHM, Daher MG, Taya SA, Mashagbeh M, Colak I (2022) Optical detection of fat concentration in milk using MXene-based surface plasmon resonance structure. Biosensors (12):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12070535

  38. Uniyal A, Chauhan B, Pal A, Tomar S, Uniyal PD (2023) Surface plasmon resonance sensor for enhancement of sensitivity. J Graph Era Univ 11:177–190. https://doi.org/10.13052/jgeu0975-1416.1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Singh S, Sharma AK, Lohia P, Dwivedi DK, Kumar V, Singh PK (2023) Simulation study of reconfigurable surface plasmon resonance refractive index sensor employing bismuth telluride and MXene nanomaterial for cancer cell detection. Phys Scr 98:2. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/acb023

  40. Ghorbanpour M (2015) Fabrication of a new amine functionalised bi-layered gold/silver SPR sensor chip. J Phys Sci 26(2):1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ansari G, Pal A, Srivastava AK, Verma G (2023) Detection of hemoglobin concentration in human blood samples using a zinc oxide nanowire and graphene layer heterostructure based refractive index biosensor. Opt Laser Technol 164(2):111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-3992(80)90045-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Homola J, Koudela I, Yee SS (1999) Surface plasmon resonance sensors based on diffraction gratings and prism couplers: sensitivity comparison. Sensors Actuators, B Chem 54(1):16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(98)00322-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Karki B, Uniyal A, Chauhan B, Pal A (2022) Sensitivity enhancement of a graphene, zinc sulfide-based surface plasmon resonance biosensor with an Ag metal configuration in the visible region. J Comput Electron. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10825-022-01854-4

  44. Karki B, Uniyal A, Sarkar P, Pal A, Yadav RB (2023) Sensitivity improvement of surface plasmon resonance sensor for glucose detection in urine samples using heterogeneous layers: an analytical perspective. J Opt1–11

  45. Pandey S, Singh S, Agarwal S, Sharma AK, Lohia P, Dwivedi DK (2022) Simulation study to improve the sensitivity of surface plasmon resonance sensor by using ferric oxide, nickel and antimonene nanomaterials. Optik (Stuttg) 267:169757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169757

  46. Uniyal A, Pal A, Chauhan B (2022) Long-range Spr sensor employing platinum diselenide and cytop nanolayers giving improved performance. Phys B Condens Matter 649:414487. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4230023

  47. Uniyal A, Gotam S, Ram T, Chauhan B, Jha A, Pal A (2022) Next generation ultra-sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensors. In: Khare, N., Tomar, D.S., Ahirwal, M.K., Semwal, V.B., Soni, V. (eds) Machine learning, image processing, network security and data sciences”. MIND 2022. Commun Comput Inf Sci 1762. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24352-3_31

  48. Uniyal A, Srivastava G, Sarkar P, Kumar M, Singh S (2023) Fluorinated graphene and CNT-based surface plasmon resonance sensor for detecting the viral particles of SARS-CoV-2. Phys B Condens Matter 669:415282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2023.415282

  49. Pal A et al. (2023) Detecting binary mixtures of sulfolane with ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, and polyethylene glycol in water using surface plasmon resonance sensor: a numerical investigation. Plasmonics 1–11

  50. M. S. Rahman, M. S. Anower, M. R. Hasan, and K. A. Rikta, “Sensitivity enhancement of MoS2-graphene hybrid structure based surface plasmon resonance biosensor using air gap,” Sens. Lett., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 510–516, 2017.

  51. M. S. Rahman, M. S. Anower, M. R. Hasan, M. B. Hossain, and M. I. Haque, “Design and numerical analysis of highly sensitive Au-MoS2-graphene based hybrid surface plasmon resonance biosensor,” Opt. Commun., vol. 396, pp. 36–43, 2017.

  52. A. S. Kushwaha, A. Kumar, R. Kumar, and S. K. Srivastava, “A study of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) based biosensor with improved sensitivity,” Photonics Nanostructures - Fundam. Appl., vol. 31, no. March, pp. 99–106, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.photonics.2018.06.003.

Download references

Funding

The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University for funding this work under the Research Groups Funding program grant code (NU/RG/SERC/12/3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Abdulkarim H. M. Almawgani: conceptualization and software. Arun Uniyal: conceptualization. Partha Sarkar: writing—review and editing. Gaurav Srivastava: writing. Adam R. H. Alhawari: writing—original draft. Gaurav Dhiman: writing—review and editing, response to review preparation. Debashish Pal: formal analysis. Arjuna Muduli: formal analysis. Sandeep Sharma: Supervision. Amrindra Pal: supervision. All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amrindra Pal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable. The work presented in this manuscript is mathematical modeling only for the proposed biosensor. No experiment was performed on the human body and living organisms/animals. So, ethical approval from an ethical committee is not required.

Consent to Participate

I am willing to participate in the work presented in this manuscript.

Consent for Publication

The author has given their consent to publish this work.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almawgani, A.H.M., Uniyal, A., Sarkar, P. et al. Magnesium Oxide and Silicon-Assisted Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor for Gas Detection: A Performance Analysis. Plasmonics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-02174-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-02174-4

Keywords

Navigation