Abstract
In Chap. 7, the reader is invited to understand that the capacity to see the world in three dimensions, that is, of perceiving depth, is based on the availability and contribution of several cues. The main cues for perceiving depth could be based on binocular viewing (e.g., retinal disparity) or monocular viewing (e.g., occlusion or perspective). A mechanism called perceptual constancy, by which almost everything seems to maintain basic characteristics, is then explained. An outstanding question is whether or not size constancy requires distance to be taken into account. An old experimental attempt for responding to the question, which reported by Holway and Boring, is described. The last part of the chapter is dedicated to special cases, optical illusions, where an observer is misled by the cues contained in a visual scene. Several illusions are described, emphasizing the case of the moon illusion and the interpretation of it proposed by Kaufman and Rock.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Coren, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coren, S., Girgus, J. S., Ehrlichman, H., & Hakstian, A. R. (1976). An empirical taxonomy of visual illusions. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 129–137.
Epstein, W. (Ed.). (1977). Perceptual stability and constancy: Mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gregory, R. L. (1997). Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 352, 1121–1128.
Hershenson, M. (Ed.). (1989). The moon illusion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Holway, A. H., & Boring, E. G. (1941). Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. American Journal of Psychology, 54, 21–37.
Kaufman, L., & Rock, I. (1962). The moon illusion. Scientific American, 207, 120–132.
Kilpatrick, F. P., & Ittelson, W. H. (1953). The size-distance invariance hypothesis. Psychological Review, 60, 223–231.
Piaget, J. (1961). Les mécanismes perceptifs. Paris: PUF.
Prinzmetal, W., & Gettleman, L. (1993). Vertical-horizontal illusion: One eye is better than two. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 81–88.
Rock, I., & Kaufman, L. (1962). The moon illusion, II: The moon’s apparent size is a function of the presence or absence of terrain. Science, 136, 1023–1031.
Ross, H., & Plug, C. (2002). The mystery of the moon illusion: Exploring size perception. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Shepard, R. N. (1990). Mind sight. New York: Freeman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grondin, S. (2016). Depth Perception. In: Psychology of Perception. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31791-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31791-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31789-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31791-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)