Abstract
A perfect storm of political and ethical challenges may be brewing up through 2025. First, the chapter constructs two opposed scenarios. The utopian or optimistic scenario is progressive and globalizing in orientation and expects the future to transform corporate sustainability radically to social advantage. The dystopian or pessimistic scenario is conservative and even nationalistic and populist in orientation and expects the future to be chaotic for corporate sustainability to social disadvantage. These designed extremes frame a dialogue. Second, each citizen chooses a political and ethical stance in light of expectations about the future and capacity to influence that future. The analysis details three stances at individual citizens and aggregating political party levels. The greater social division increases the importance of a neutral median voter perspective but increases the likelihood of a centrist party disappearing. A business manager assesses how corporate social responsibility (CSR) views and political criticism of capitalism and wealth affect corporate sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, K., & Booth, W. (2018, November 16). Immigration worries drove the Brexit vote. Then attitudes changed. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/immigration-worries-drove-the-brexit-vote-then-attitudes-changed/2018/11/16/c216b6a2-bcdb-11e8-8243-f3ae9c99658a_story.html
Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 855–879). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079.
Arnon, Y., & Guzansky, Y. (2018, July 11). A conventional arms race. Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) Insight No. 1074. https://www.inss.org.il/publication/conventional-arms-race/
Augustine, G., Soderstrom, S., Milner, D., & Weber, K. (2019). Constructing a distant future: Imaginaries in geoengineering. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1930–1960. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0059.
Barlow, J. P. (1996, February 8). A declaration of the independence in cyberspace. Davos: John Perry Barlow. https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence
BBC. (2016). EU referendum results – BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/politics/eu_referendum/results
Bednarz, D., Reuter, C., & Zand, B. (2015, April 3). Proxy war in Yemen: Saudi Arabia and Iran view for regional supremacy. https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/saudi-arabia-and-iran-fighting-proxy-war-in-yemen-a-1027056.html
Benson, C. (2019, May 14). Trump adviser Peter Navarro defends tariffs against China. https://www.tmj4.com/news/local-news/trump-adviser-peter-navarro-defends-tariffs-against-china
Berghoff, H. (2018). “Organised irresponsibility”? The Siemens corruption scandal of the 1990s and 2000s. Business History, 60(3), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2017.1330332.
Binder, S. A. (1996, September 1). The disappearing political center: Congress and the incredible shrinking middle.https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-disappearing-political-center-congress-and-the-incredible-shrinking-middle/
Boettke, P. J., & Thompson, H. A. (2019, in press). Identity and off-diagonals: How permanent winning coalitions destroy democratic governance. Public Choice.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00683-7.
Borenstein, S. (2019, September 26). ‘We’re all in big trouble’: Panel discerns direct future in oceans. Houston Chronicle, 118(348), A9.
Bove, V., & Elia, L. (2017, April 18). Why mass migration is good for long-term growth. https://hbr.org/2017/04/why-mass-migration-is-good-for-long-term-economic-growth
Business Roundtable. (2019, August 19). Statement on the purpose of a corporation. https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans
Carroll, A. B. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857692.
Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.
Casselman, B. (2019, October 1). Court upholds state, local deduction cap. Houston Chronicle, 118(353), B6 (Business).
Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity (CLTC), University of California Berkeley. (2019, February). Cybersecurity futures 2025: Insights and findings. https://cltc.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Cybersecurity-Futures-2025-Insights-and-Findings.pdf
Cillizza, C. (2019, September 24). Bernie Sanders wants to get rid of billionaires. All of them. https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/24/politics/bernie-sanders-ultra-wealth-tax-billionaires/index.html
Clausen, B., Kraay, A., & Nyiri, Z. (2011). Corruption and confidence in public institutions: Evidence from a global survey. The World Bank Economic Review, 25(2), 212–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhr018.
Congleton, R. D. (2004). The median voter model. In C. Rowley & F. Schneider (Eds.), The encyclopedia of public choice (pp. 707–712). Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_142 and https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-0-306-47828-4_142
Diffenbaugh, N. S., & Burke, M. (2019). Global warming has increased global economic inequality. Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences (PNAS), 116(20), 9808–9813. https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2019/04/16/1816020116.full.pdf
Dionne, E. J. (2019, September 6). Historic democracies showing up as duds: E. J. Dionne says the Brexit mess and stalled progress on America’s gun laws should force us to focus on making the system work again. Houston Chronicle, 118(328), A13.
Dixon, H. (2018, April 16). Brexit looks bad on all fronts. That’s why we’re pushing for a people’s vote. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/16/brexit-second-vote-nhs-trade-facts
Dorning, M. (2019, July 4). Hopefuls aim at corporate giants. Houston Chronicle, 118(264), B4 (Business).
Downs, A. (1965). A theory of bureaucracy. American Economic Review, 55(1/2), 439–446. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1816286.
Duke, R. (2019, May 19). Leaving the Paris Agreement is a bad deal for the United States. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/05/19/leaving-the-paris-agreement-is-a-bad-deal-for-the-united-states/
Economic report of the President together with the annual report of the council of economic advisors. (2019, March). Ch. 8, Markets versus Socialism (pp. 381–426). https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ERP-2019.pdf
Epstein, G., & Herz, S. K. (2019). Who is in favor of immigration: The wealthy or the poor? The old or the young? Economics Bulletin, 39(2), 1424–1434. http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2019/Volume39/EB-19-V39-I2-P135.pdf
Foster, H. W. (2014, September 5). Why more immigration is bad for America. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/why-more-immigration-bad-america-11210
Freedom House. (2019, February.) Freedom in the World 2018: Democracy in Crisis. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2018
Friedman, T. L. (2018, March 27). How Mark Zuckerberg can save Facebook — and us. The New York Times.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/zuckerberg-facebook-digital-bullies.html
Gerber, E. R., & Lewis, J. B. (2004). Beyond the median: Voter preferences, district heterogeneity, and political representation. Journal of Political Economy, 112(6), 1364–1383.
Gerhold, L., & Steinmüller, K. (2018). Security 2025: Scenarios as an instrument for dialogue. In R. Peperhove, K. Steinmüller, & H.-L. Kienel (Eds.), Envisioning uncertain futures: Scenarios as a tool in security, privacy and mobility research (pp. 69–82). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Goldberg, M. (2019, February 6). America’s standing takes another drop: Michelle Goldberg says the recent Freedom House report could be viewed as an early warning indicator of problems in our democracy. Houston Chronicle, 118(116), A17.
Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2019). Does direct democracy hurt immigrant minorities? Evidence from naturalization decisions in Switzerland. American Journal of Political Science, 63(3), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12433.
Hall, A. (2019). Unboxing CRISPR. Colloquy (Harvard University, The Graduate School of Arts & Sciences), Summer, 10–15.
Hall, J., Levendis, J., & Scarcioffolo, A. R. (2020). The efficient corruption hypothesis and the dynamics between economic freedom, corruption, and national income. The Journal of Developing Areas, 54(3), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2020.0031
Hardin, G. (1974, September). Lifeboat ethics: The case against helping the poor. Psychology Today. http://www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles/art_lifeboat_ethics_case_against_helping_poor.html
Holcombe, R. G. (2006). Public sector economics. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Husted, T. A., & Kenny, L. W. (1997). The effect of the expansion of the voting franchise on the size of government model. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 54–82. https://doi.org/10.1086/262065.
Huxley, A. (1932). Brave new world. London: Chatto & Windus.
Ingram, D. (n.d.). Examples of legal but unethical situations in business. Retrieved January 9, 2020, from https://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/examples-legal-but-unethical-situations-business-21719.html
Jenkins, S. (2016, July 6). Ignore the prophets of doom. Brexit will be good for Britain. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/06/brexit-britain-property-bubble
Kaplan, S. (2020). Beyond the business case for social responsibility. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0220.
Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.1.51.
Krugman, P. (2019, December 16). How Trump lost his trade war: On speaking loudly and carrying a small stick. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/16/opinion/trump-china-trade.html
Leicester, J. (2017, March 10). Fear of immigration drives populism in Netherlands, too. https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2017/03/10/fear-immigration-drives-populism-netherlands-too
Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016, December 1). Corporate donations and shareholder value (European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) – Finance Working Paper No. 491/2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2885936
Lipman, M., & Petrov, N. (Eds.). (2013). Russia 2025: Scenarios for the Russian future. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lombardi, R., Trequattrini, R., Cuozzo, B., & Cano-Rubio, M. (2019). Corporate corruption prevention, sustainable governance and legislation: First exploratory evidence from the Italian scenario. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 666–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.214.
Mainwaring, S. (2001). Two models of democracy. Journal of Democracy, 12(3), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2001.0051.
Martin, C. (Bloomberg News). (2019, September 18). Duke Energy pledges to slash carbon pollution by 2050. Houston Chronicle, 118(340), B7 (Business).
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2020). Reflections on the 2018 decade award: The meaning and dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 45 (1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0348.
Midgley, D., Venaik, S., & Christopoulos, D. (2019). Diversity and unity of the global mosaic: Reimagining national culture in the 21st century (INSEAD working paper No. 2019/03/MKT). https://sites.insead.edu/facultyresearch/research/doc.cfm?did=64581& or https://ssrn.com/abstract=3314029 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3314029
Milanovic, B. (2000). The median-voter hypothesis, income inequality, and income redistribution: An empirical test with the required data. European Journal of Political Economy, 16(3), 367–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(00)00014-8.
Newport, F. (2018, August 13). Democrats more positive about socialism than capitalism. https://news.gallup.com/poll/240725/democrats-positive-socialism-capitalism.aspx
Novak, J. (2017, May 31). Trump’s Paris accord exit will save the environmental movement from itself. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/31/trump-paris-accord-exit-is-good-for-the-environment-commentary.html
Olmstead, G. (2018, August 31). The vanishing political center. https://theweek.com/articles/793028/vanishing-political-center
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four. London: Secker & Warburg.
Osborne, J. (2019, September 30). The political math on climate change. Houston Chronicle, 118(351), B23 (TEXAS INC., Business).
OZY. (2019, April 16). The West’s first climate election leaves Finland deeply divided. https://www.ozy.com/need-to-know/the-wests-first-climate-election-leaves-finland-deeply-divided/93869?
Pisani, J., & Sapra, B. (Associated Press). (2019, September 20). Amazon pledges to reduce its vast carbon footprint. Houston Chronicle, 118(342), B2 (Business).
Pitts, L. (2019, September 1). ‘Normal’ is what got us here; we’ve got to be bravely divergent. Houston Chronicle, 118(323), A29.
Polls: U.S. split on impeachment. (2019, October 1). Houston Chronicle, 118(353), A7.
Rappeport, A., & Kaplan, T. (New York Times). (2019, October 2). Dems’ taxes on rich would alter economy. Houston Chronicle, 118(354), B9 (Business).
Rice, T. W. (1985). An examination of the median voter hypothesis. Western Political Quarterly, 38, 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298503800204.
Sanders, B. (n.d.). Tax on extreme wealth. https://berniesanders.com/issues/tax-extreme-wealth/
Schanes, K., Jäger, J., & Drummond, P. (2019). Three scenario narratives for a resource-efficient and low-carbon Europe in 2050. Ecological Economics, 155, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.009.
Schatzker, E. (2019, April 6). Billionaire [Ray Dalio] warns of flaws in American capitalism. Houston Chronicle, 118(175), B5 (Business).
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x.
Schofield, N., & Sened, I. (2005). Modeling the interaction of parties, activists and voters: Why is the political center so empty? European Journal of Political Research, 44(3), 355–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00231.x.
Sciutto, J. (2019). The shadow war: Inside Russia’s and China’s secret operations to defeat America. New York: Harper.
Semuels, A. (2019). As corporate American booms, workers demand their fair share. Time, 194(13), 19.
Shell Scenarios. (n.d.). https://www.shell.com/energy-and-innovation/the-energy-future/scenarios.html and https://www.shell.com/energy-and-innovation/the-energy-future/scenarios/new-lenses-on-the-future/earlier-scenarios/_jcr_content/par/expandablelist/expandablesection_225706646.stream/1519772556546/cd967c4faeb8747dbfc234b3f6d9f10c88b4bfb7/supp-glo-sc.pdf
Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review, 86(1). http://www.ibrc.indiana.edu/ibr/2011/spring/article2.html
Stein, J. (2019, October 1). Sanders’ plan ties tax rates to CEOs’ pay. Houston Chronicle, 118(353), B5 (Business).
Telford, T. (Washington Post). (2019, September 27). Income inequality in the U.S. reaches its highest level. Houston Chronicle, 118(348), B1, B5 (Business).
Thatcher, M. (1976, February 5). TV Interview for Thames TV This Week (Llew Gardner). https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/102953
Thomas, C. (2019, August 16). Socialism’s deficiencies need to be understood. Houston Chronicle, 118(307), A13.
Timberg, C. (Associated Press). (2019, October 2). Facebook’s Zuckerberg, Warren exchange ‘fighting’ words. Houston Chronicle, 118(354), B9 (Business).
Tomlinson, C. (2019, September 29). Rich get richer and poor get poorer. Houston Chronicle, 118(351), B1, B2 (Business).
Traub, J. (2013, June 21). The tyranny of the majority: How John Quincy Adams explains the protests in Turkey and Brazil. https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/06/21/the-tyranny-of-the-majority/
Waisbord, S. (2018). Why populism is troubling for democratic communication. Communication, Culture and Critique, 11(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcx005.
Whittington, M. R. (2019, August 23). Solve climate change, world hunger at the same time. Houston Chronicle, 118(314), A13.
Wimmer, A. (2019, March/April). Why nationalism works and why it isn’t going away. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2019-02-12/why-nationalism-works
Windsor, D. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility: A positive theory approach. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1937–1944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.016.
Windsor, D. (2018a). Environmental dystopia versus sustainable development utopia: Roles of businesses, consumers, institutions, and technologies. In M. Espina, P. H. Phan, & G. D. Markman (Eds.), Social innovation and sustainable entrepreneurship (pp. 9–24). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Windsor, D. (2018b). Multi-level social institutions in conflict over sustainable development. Critical Sociology, 44(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517708338.
Windsor, D. (2019a). Accountable capitalism, responsible capitalism, and political capitalism: The Warren proposal for an Accountable Capitalism Act. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society (IABS), 30 (in press), San Diego, CA, March 21–24.
Windsor, D. (2019b). Economic nationalism and corporate social responsibility. In H. C. Chandan & B. Christiansen (Eds.), International firms’ economic nationalism and trade policies in the globalization era (pp. 217–243). Hershey: IGI Global.
Windsor, D. (2019c). Influencing MNC strategies for managing corruption and favoritism in Pacific Asia countries: A multiple-theory configurational perspective. Asia Pacific Business Review, 25(4), 501–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1589769.
Windsor, D. (2020, in press). An AI and robotic world: Which implications for social responsibility? In A. Stachowicz & W. Amann (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and its impacts on business (pp. 117–141). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Wright, G., Cairns, G., O’Brien, F. A., & Goodwin, P. (2019). Scenario analysis to support decision making in addressing wicked problems: Pitfalls and potential. European Journal of Operational Research, 278(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.08.035.
Xing, K., Wiedmann, T., Newton, P., Huang, B., & Pullen, S. (2019). Development of low-carbon urban forms—Concepts, tools and scenario analysis. In P. Newton, D. Prasad, A. Sproul, & S. White (Eds.), Decarbonising the built environment (pp. 227–244). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yu, S., Zheng, S., Li, X., & Li, L. (2018). China can peak its energy-related carbon emissions before 2025: Evidence from industry restructuring. Energy Economics, 73, 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.012.
Zhang, C., Su, B., Zhou, K., & Yang, S. (2019). Decomposition analysis of China’s CO2 emissions (2000–2016) and scenario analysis of its carbon intensity targets in 2020 and 2030. Science of the Total Environment, 668, 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.406.
Zuboff, S. (2019, June 17). The threat of big other. TIME, 193(23), 17–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Windsor, D. (2021). Political and Ethical Challenges of 2025: Utopian and Dystopian Views. In: Park, S.H., Gonzalez-Perez, M.A., Floriani, D.E. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Sustainability in the Digital Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42412-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42412-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42411-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42412-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)