Elsevier

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volume 217, 20 April 2019, Pages 666-675
Journal of Cleaner Production

Corporate corruption prevention, sustainable governance and legislation: First exploratory evidence from the Italian scenario

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.214Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the main issues and drivers of sustainable corporate governance to prevent corruption, analysing the interaction between the principal governance body–Board of Directors–and the implementation and application of corruption prevention plans by pointing out exploratory evidence from the company sample. This paper is built upon two steps. First, the content analysis research method is applied, selecting a sample of Italian companies and analysing information from the corruption prevention plans to establish the role of the Board of Directors in the management of company's system. Second, the level of the implication of Board of Directors in drafting through the identification of the Global Indicator is investigated, measuring the degree of the Board of Directors' involvement and making use of the content analysis's results. Additionally, a linear regression between the Global Indicator, companies dimensional indicator and performance indicators is carried out with the aim to define variables affecting this process. The paper proposes exploratory evidence which shows a deep understanding of the governance body in the construction and application of the corporate corruption prevention plans, taking into consideration crucial information from: the anti-corruption national legislation (Law 190/2012), risk management and organization model (Legislative Decree 231/2001), corporate sustainability and compliance programs adopted by companies. The originality of the findings derives from the need to establish an integrated sustainable corporate governance model directed at preventing corruption. Thus, this paper proposes not only the analysis of the Italian companies' compliance sustainable models to prevent corruption in their corporate governance but shows the path for future research on the topic.

Introduction

In recent years, the phenomenon of corruption (ACFE, 2018, Joseph et al., 2016, Podolniy and Podolnaya, 2016) has increased with both the birth of sustainable strategies for corruption prevention in company systems and the attention of legislation at the international level (Manacorda et al., 2014). Particularly, the adoption of anti-corruption business models is strictly connected to each national legislation and integrated into their corporate governance system through a specific compliance program, by involving both internal actors, such as the board of directors (BoD) and internal auditors, and external actors such as stakeholders. Thus, companies and their main internal actors, to avoid briberies and establish a good corporate governance model (Yoshikawa and Rasheed, 2009, Wijayati et al., 2015), are deputed to proactively manage anti-corruption principles and disclosure (Hahn and Kiihnen, 2013, Joseph et al., 2016), safeguarding corporate sustainability (Adnan et al., 2018, Allais et al., 2017, Elkington, 2002, Fuente et al., 2017, Lozano, 2012; Schrippe, Duarte Robert et al., 2013, Stacchezzini et al., 2016) and avoiding a negative impact on the environment and society (Elkington, 2002).

In this context, this paper presents the investigation of the role played by the BoD as the principal governance body and as an internal business actor (Allegrini et al., 2006, Melville, 2003, Sarens et al., 2012) that promotes corporate corruption prevention with the company system. Thus, the proposition of exploratory evidence, from a selected sample of 20 Italian companies operating in several economic fields, derives from the main issues and drivers of corporate governance and their relationship with the interaction between the BoD and the implementation and application of corruption prevention plans (Aguilera, 2005) and the disclosure of their information (Joseph et al., 2016, Saenz and Brown, 2018). Additionally, a new integrated sustainable corporate governance model in the Italian scenario has surfaced.

Adopting the theoretical framework of institutional theory (Adegbite, 2015, Aguilera, 2005, Dacin et al., 2002, Meyer and Rowan, 1977, Scott, 1987, Tolbert and Zucker, 1999), this research has been carried out in two steps. Firstly, content analysis was the chosen methodology (Krippendorff, 2013), applied to the corporate corruption prevention plans of the selected sample. The investigation was founded on the examination of information included in the corruption prevention plans under the primary key indicators (PKI) analysed through a coding score system that allowed us to set up the real accountability role of the BoD compared to the control activities in the management of company system. Starting from the hypothesis that the increasing involvement of the BoD in the drafting of anti-corruption plans increases their effectiveness, the second step aimed to investigate the level of the BoD's implication in drafting the prevention plans, which are variables affecting its involvement. Thus, we identified the global indicator (GY), measuring the degree of the BoD's involvement in the content analysis's result. Additionally, to identify which variables affect this process, a linear regression analysis between the GY, company dimensional indicator and performance indicators was carried out. Findings propose the main issues and factors of sustainable corporate governance in the relationship between the BoD and the control function (Sarens and De Beelde, 2006, Sarens et al., 2012) in the anti-corruption model. As a pioneering study, this paper presents a deep understanding of the role of the main governance body in the construction and application of the corporate corruption prevention plans, in light of the anti-corruption national legislation (Law 190/2012), risk management and organization model (Legislative Decree 231/2001), corporate responsibility and related compliance programs adopted by Italian companies under the corporate governance models filling the existing literature gap. Thus, results should serve as a useful integrated sustainable corporate governance model to prevent corruption on the basis of a corporate sustainability system (Lozano and Huisingh, 2011) and a specific compliance program (Lopatta et al., 2017).

Additionally, following the debate on corporate sustainability, corruption and its prevention in the economic system of several states (Manacorda et al., 2014, Mendelshon, 2017), this paper contributes to the institutional theory (Aguilera, 2005), proposing a new discussion for academics, practitioners and policymakers about the companies' compliance path that should be modeled to prevent corruption in their sustainable corporate governance model. Moreover, the paper and its results aim to provide an answer to the call for research launched by Di Pietra and Melis (2016) in their study inviting scholars to invest “in contributions to this highly promising field”. Lastly, this paper's results lead the way for future researches paths on the topic.

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 examines relevant literature. Section 3 presents the research methodology. Section 4 presents the findings and discussion from the corruption prevention plans. Lastly, Section 5 presents conclusions, limitations and future research approaches.

Section snippets

The institutional theory

The institutional theory (Adegbite, 2015, Aguilera, 2005, Dacin et al., 2002, Meyer and Rowan, 1977, Scott, 1987, Tolbert and Zucker, 1999) has been the theoretical lens. The justificatory reasons why we adopted this theoretical lens are explained in the study by Aguilera (2005), which focused on the institutional impact on corporate governance and directors’ accountability. Thus, the institutional theory is used to investigate sustainable corporate governance specifically based on the role of

Methodology

This research was carried out in two steps. In the first, a qualitative research method (Krippendorff, 2013) was used to answer the research question. Within these qualitative methodologies, the chosen technique was content analysis. This tool is particularly useful to immediately understand inclusion versus exclusion of information in selected search documents, allowing researchers to propose some investigation considerations. Although content analysis has some limits (e.g., subjectivity in

Findings and discussion

The findings of this paper come from a set of primary key indicators (PKI) tested through the content analysis application on the corruption prevention plan's sample. Thus, results allowed us to understand the role of the BoD compared both to internal audit and other control functions, and in corporate corruption prevention (Joseph et al., 2016, Podolniy and Podolnaya, 2016), as proposed in the following sub-sections.

Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 summarise the research findings from the first part

Conclusions, limitations and future research

This paper presents pioneering findings about the role played by the BoD in terms of control functions and corporate corruption prevention in the companies' systems that safeguard corporate sustainability (Allais et al., 2017, Elkington, 2002, Fuente et al., 2017, Lozano, 2012, Schrippe and Duarte Ribeiro, 2019) and avoiding negative impacts on the environment and societies (Elkington, 2002). This analysis has been carried out following the institutional theory on the role played by the Italian

Declaration of interest

“Declarations of interest: none.”

References (81)

  • R. Lozano

    Towards better embedding sustainability into companies' systems: an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2012)
  • R. Lozano et al.

    Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2011)
  • C. Saenz et al.

    The disclosure of anti-corruption aspects in companies of the construction sector: main companies worldwide and in Latin America

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • P. Schrippe et al.

    Preponderant criteria for the definition of corporate sustainability based on Brazilian sustainable companies

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2019)
  • B.S. Silvestre et al.

    Challenges for sustainable supply chain management: when stakeholder collaboration becomes conducive to corruption

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • R. Stacchezzini et al.

    Sustainability management and reporting: the role of integrated reporting for communicating corporate sustainability management

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2016)
  • S.R. Ulman

    Corruption and national competitiveness in different stages of country development

    Procedia Economics and Finance

    (2013)
  • ACFE - Association of Certified Fraud Examiners

    Bribery and corruption

  • S.M. Adnan et al.

    The influence of culture and corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure: a cross country analysis

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • P. Aghion et al.

    Inequality and economic growth: the perspective of the new growth theories

    J. Econ. Literature.

    (1999)
  • R. Aguilera

    Corporate governance and director accountability: an institutional comparative perspective

    Br. J. Manag.

    (2005)
  • M. Allegrini et al.

    Le frodi aziendali, frodi amministrative, alterazioni di bilancio e computer crime

    (2003)
  • M. Allegrini et al.

    The European literature review on internal auditing

    Manag. Audit J.

    (2006)
  • Proposed Revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code, Appendix A – Revised UK Corporate Governance Code, 2017. The...
  • H. Atangana Ondoa

    The determinants of corporate corruption in Cameroon

    Econ. Bull.

    (2014)
  • Z. Belay

    A study on effective implementation of internal audit function to promote good governance in the public sector

  • A. Berle et al.

    The Modern Corporation and Private Property

    (1932)
  • M. Bertocchi

    Transparency in local state-owned enterprises in Italy

    Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management

    (2017)
  • E. Borgonovi et al.

    Integrity management and policy in Italy

    Symphony

    (2017)
  • M.C. Branco et al.

    Research on corporate social responsibility and disclosure in Portugal

    Soc. Responsib. J.

    (2011)
  • D. Cormier et al.

    Does a firm's exposure to ethical failures matter to financial markets? A governance perspective

    J. Manag. Govern.

    (2017)
  • D. Cormier et al.

    Corporate governance and information asymmetry between managers and investors

    Corp. Govern.: The international journal of business in society

    (2010)
  • M.T. Dacin et al.

    Institutional theory and institutional change: introduction to the special research forum

    Acad. Manag. J.

    (2002)
  • R. Di Pietra et al.

    Governance and corruption: is history repeating itself?’’ Fostering a debate and inviting contributions from a multidisciplinary perspective

    J. Manag. Govern.

    (2016)
  • T. Donaldson et al.

    The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications

    Acad. Manag. Rev.

    (1995)
  • D. Dunphy et al.

    Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability

    (2003)
  • M.A. Eisenberg

    The board of directors and internal control

    Cardozo Law Rev.

    (1997)
  • K.M. Eisenhardt

    Agency theory: an assessment and review

    Acad. Manag. Rev.

    (1989)
  • J. Elkington

    Cannibals with Forks

    (2002)
  • J. Elkington

    Governance for sustainability

    Corp. Govern. Int. Rev.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (64)

    • A cross-regional investigation of institutional quality and sustainable development

      2023, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
    • Corruption and Bank Risk-Taking in Dual Banking Systems

      2024, Corporate Governance: An International Review
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text