Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designing Ecosystems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation Design

  • 4738 Accesses

Abstract

Meaningful innovations that provide sustainable value for people and society are often systems of various products and services. That means in most cases a number of organizations are needed to realize the innovation. Thus apart from the products and services themselves, the total ecosystem needs to be designed. This has to include all the relevant social and economic actors required for a successful launch of the innovation in the market, but also for sustained service in the long run. The design of the ecosystem needs to ensure a return on investment of tangible and intangible value for all the relevant business parties and other stakeholders. This chapter shows how new ecosystems can be designed for solutions that require combinations of products and services from different organizations. It presents a method to identify the relevant stakeholders and the important values for these stakeholders, and to balance the value in the total system. The method has proved to be valuable in enriching value propositions, but also in building commitment from the different business actors to make the investments required for implementation. An approach to visualize these value flows is presented that enables the balancing of value across the different parties to ensure sustainable value for all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adner, Ron. 2006. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, April 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adner, Ron, and Rahul Kapoor. 2010. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal 31(3): 306–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allee, Verna. 2008. Value network analysis and value conversion of tangible and intangible assets. Journal of Intellectual Capital 9(1): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allee, Verna. 2000. Reconfiguring the value network. Journal of Business Strategy 21(4): 36–39. July–Aug 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amit, Raphael, and Christoph Zott. 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal 22: 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andersson, Birger, Maria Bergholtz, and Paul Johannesson. 2009. Purpose driven value model design. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE workshop BUSITAL.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bäckstrand, K. 2006. Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment 16(5): 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ballantyne, David, and Richard J. Varey. 2006. Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: The exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory 6(3): 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballon, Pieter. 2007. Business modelling revisited: The configuration of control and value. Info 9(5): 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bartel, Caroline A., and Raghu Garud. 2009. The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization Science 20(1): 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Basole, R.C., and W.B. Rouse. 2008. Complexity of service value networks: Conceptualization and empirical investigation. IBM Systems Journal 47(1): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blankenburg-Holm, Desiree, Kent Eriksson, and Jan Johanson. 1999. Creating value through mutual commitments to business network relationships. Strategic Management Journal 20: 467–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blau, Benjamin, Christof Weinhart, Clemens van Dinther, Tobias Conte, and Yongchun Xu. 2009. How to coordinate value generation in service networks— a mechanism design approach. Business & Information Systems Engineering 5: 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bourne, Lynda, and Derek H.T. Walker. 2006. Using a visualisation tool to study stakeholder influence—two Australian examples. Project Management Journal 37(1): 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brandenburger, Adam M., and Barry J. Nalebuff. 1997. Co-opetition: 1. A revolutionary mindset that redefines competition and cooperation; 2. The game theory strategy that’s changing the game of business. New York: Crown Business Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brugha, Ruairi, and Zsuzsa Varvasovszky. 2000. Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning 15(3): 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bstieler, Ludwig. 2006. Trust formation in collaborative new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bunn, Michele D., Grant T. Savage, and Betsy B. Holloway. 2002. Stakeholder analysis for multi-sector innovations. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 17(2/3): 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chesbrough, Henry. 2006. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clarkson, Max B.E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cova, Bernard, and Robert Salle. 2008. Marketing solutions in accordance with the S-D logic: Co-creating value with customer network actors. Industrial Marketing Management 37(3): 270–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cravens, David W., Nigel F. Piercy, and Shannon H. Shipp. 1996. New organizational forms for competing in highly dynamic environments: The network paradigm. British Journal of Management 7: 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dahlander, Linus, and David M. Gann. 2010. How open is innovation? Research Policy 39: 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. De Boever, Jorn. Value networks of P2P TV: An analysis of actors and their roles. 3rd International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, June 8–13, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. De Reuver, Mark, Harry Bouwman, and Timber Haaker. Capturing value from mobile business models: Design issues that matter. 21st Bled eConference eCollaboration: Overcoming Boundaries through Multi-Channel Interaction, Bled, Slovenia, June 15–18, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. De Rond, Mark, and Hamid Bouchikhi. 2004. On the dialectics of strategic alliances. Organization Science 15(1): 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Den Ouden, Elke, and Rianne Valkenburg. Value models in social open innovation. Proceedings of the 21st ISPIM Conference, Bilbao, Spain, June 6–9, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Doganova, Liliana, and Marie Eyquem-Renault. 2009. What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 38: 1559–1570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Donaldson, Thomas, and Lee E. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dovey, Ken. 2009. The role of trust in innovation. The Learning Organization 16(4): 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Doz, Yves L. 1996. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal 17: 55–83. Special Issue: Evolutionary Perspectives on Strategy, Summer.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Doz, Yves L., and Mikko Kosonen. 2010. Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning 43: 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Doz, Yves, Jose Santos, and Peter Williamson. 2001. From global to metanational: How companies win in the knowledge economy. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Emden, Zeynep, Roger J. Calantone, and Cornelia Droge. 2006. Collaborating for new product development: Selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 330–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Etemad, Hamid, Richard W. Wright, and Leo Paul Dana. 2001. Symbiotic international business networks: Collaboration between small and large firms. Thunderbird International Business Review 43(4): 481–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Florida, Richard. 2002. The rise of the creative class:… and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community, and everyday life. New York: Persues Books.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Freel, Mark, and Jeroen P.J. De Jong. 2009. Market novelty, competence-seeking and innovation networking. Technovation 29: 873–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Freeman, R.Edward. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Freeman, R.Edward, Andrew C. Wicks, and Bidhan Parmar. 2004. Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science 15(3): 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Freeman, R.Edward, Jeffrey S. Harrison, and Andrew C. Wicks. 2010. Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Geels, Frank W. 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33: 897–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gloor, Peter A. 2006. Swarm creativity: Competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gordijn, Jaap, and Hans Akkermans. 2001. Designing and evaluating e-business models. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16: 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gordijn, Jaap, Hans Akkermans, and Hans van Vliet. 2000. Business modelling is not process modelling. In conceptual modeling for e-business and the web, lecture notes in computer science, 40–51. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Grumbine, R.Edward. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology 8(1): 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Haaker, Timber, Edward Faber, and Harry Bouwman. 2006. Balancing customer and network values in business models for mobile services. International Journal of Mobile Communications 4(6): 645–661.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hakansson, Hakan, and David Ford. 2002. How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research 55(2): 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hakansson, Hakan, David Ford, Lars-Erik Gadde, Ivan Snehota, and Alexandra Waluszewski. 2009. Business in networks. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Haksever, Cengiz, Radha Chaganti, and Ronald G. Cook. 2004. A model of value creation: Strategic view. Journal of Business Ethics 49: 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Haldane, Andrew G., and Robert M. May. 2011. Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature 469: 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hansen, John D., and Michele D. Bunn. 2009. Stakeholder relationship management in multi-sector innovations. Journal of Relationship Marketing 8: 196–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hansen, Morten T., Henry W. Chesborough, Nitin Nohria, and Donald N. Sull. 2000. Networked incubators. Hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review 78: 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Harrison, Jeffrey S., and R.Edward Freeman. 1999. Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 479–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hearn, Greg, and Cassandra Pace. 2006. Value-creating ecologies: Understanding next generation business systems. Foresight 8(1): 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Iansiti, Marco, and Roy Levien. 2004. The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Iansiti, Marco, and Roy Levien. 2004. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review 82(3): 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ihlstrom Eriksson, C., M. Akesson, M. Bergquist, and J. Ljungberg. Forming a value network-analyzing the negotiation between actors in the e-newspaper case. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawai‘i International Conference on System Sciences HICSS-42, Big Island, HI, USA, January 5–8, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Johnson, Mark W., Clayton M. Christensen, and Henning Kagermann. 2008. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review 86: 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jonas, W., Morelli, N. and Munch, J. Designing a product service system in a social framework - methodological and ethical considerations. Proceedings of Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference, Sheffield Hallam University, United Kingdom, July 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kao, John. 2009. Tapping into the world’s innovation hotspots. Harvard Business Review 87: 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kroes, Peter, Maarten Franssen, Ibo van de Poel, and Maarten Ottens. 2006. Treating socio-technical systems as engineering systems: Some conceptual problems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23(6): 803–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Krucken, Lisa, and Anna Meroni. 2006. Building stakeholder networks to develop and deliver product-service-systems: Practical experiences on elaborating pro-active materials for communication. Journal of Cleaner Production 14: 1502–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Le Cardinal, Gilles, Jean-Francois Guyonnet, Bruno Poauzoullic, and Julie Rigby. 2001. Intervention methodology for complex problems: The FAcT-mirror method. European Journal of Operational Research 132: 694–702.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Ledwith, Ann, and Paul Coughlan. 2005. Splendid isolation: Does networking really increase new product success? Creativity and Innovation Management 14(4): 366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lee, Sungjoo, Gwangman Park, Byungun Yoon, and Jinwoo Park. 2010. Open innovation in SMEs: An intermediated network model. Research Policy 39: 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Li, Feng, and Jason Whalley. 2002. Deconstruction of the telecommunications industry: From value chains to value networks. Telecommunications Policy 26(9–10): 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Logan, Robert K., and Greg Van Alstyne. 2007. Design ecology: designing for emergence and innovation II. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Moore, James F. 1993. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review 71: 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Moore, James F. 1996. The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Morelli, Nicola. 2007. Social innovation and new industrial contexts: Can designers “industrialize” socially responsible solutions? Design Issues 23(4): 3–21. Autumn 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Nambisan, Satish, and Mohanbir Sawhney. 2008. The global brain: Your roadmap for innovating faster and smarter in a networked world. NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Osterwalder, Alexander, and Yves Pigneur. 2010. Business model generation: A handbook for visionairies, game changers, and challengers. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ottens, Maarten, Maarten Franssen, Peter Kroes, and Ibo Van De Poel. 2006. Modelling infrastructures as socio-technical systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures 2(2–3): 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Oxley Green, Abigail, and Lynsey Hunton-Clarke. 2003. A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision-making. Business Strategy and the Environment 12: 292–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Parameswaran, Lekshmy, and Jeroen Raijmakers. 2010. People-focused innovation in healthcare. How philips design supports development of solutions for the ever-changing healthcare landscape. Philips Design. http://www.design.philips.com/philips/shared/assets/design_assets/pdf/nvbD/july2010/people_focused_innovation_in_healthcare.pdf.

  76. Payne, Adrian, David Ballantyne, and Martin Christopher. 2005. A stakeholder approach to relationship marketing strategy: The development and use of the “six markets” model. European Journal of Marketing 39(7/8): 855–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Peltoniemi, Mirva, and Elisa Vuori. 2004. Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. Proceedings of the eBusiness Research Forum, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Peppard, Joe, and Anna Rylander. 2006. From value chain to value network: Insights for mobile operators. European Management Journal 24(2–3): 128–141. April-June 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Pickett, S.T.A., and M.L. Cadenasso. 2002. The ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: Meaning, model, and metaphor. Ecosystems 5: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Pisano, Gary P., and Roberto Verganti. 2008. Which collaboration is right for you? Harvard Business Review 86: 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Polonsky, Michael Jay, Les Carlson, and Marie-Louise Fry. 2003. The harm chain: A public policy development and stakeholder perspective. Marketing Theory 3(3): 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Poot, Tom, Dries Faems, and Wim Vanhaverbeke. 2009. Toward a dynamic perspective on open innovation: A longitudinal assessment of the adoption of internal and external innovation strategies in the Netherlands. International Journal of Innovation Management 13(2): 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Porter, Michael E., and Mark R. Kramer. 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review 89(1/2): 62–77. January.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Post, James E., Lee E. Preston, and Sybille Sachs. 2002. Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review 45(1): 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Powell, Walter W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 12: 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ramírez, R. 1999. Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal 20: 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Riedl, Christoph, Tilo Boehmann, Jan Marco Leimeister and Helmut Krcmar. 2009. A framework for analysising service ecosystem capabilities to innovate. 17th European Conference on Information Systems ECIS, Verona, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Ritala, Paavo, and Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen. 2009. What’s in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition. Technovation 29(12): 819–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Rowley, Timothy J. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review 22(4): 887–910.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  90. Sawhney, Mohanbir, and Emanuela Prandelli. 2000. Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. California Management Review 42(4): 24–54.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Stathel, Stephan, Jan Finzen, Christoph Riedl, and Norman May. 2008. Service innovation in business value networks. 18th International RESER Conference, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Swink, Morgan. 2006. Building collaborative innovation capability. Research Technology Management 49(2): 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Tapscott, D., A. Lowy, and D. Ticoll. 2000. Digital capital: Harnessing the power of business webs. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Thompson, James D., and Ian C. MacMillan. 2010. Business models: Creating new markets and societal wealth. Long Range Planning 43(2–3): 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Vanhaverbeke, W., and M Cloodt. 2007 Open innovation in value networks. Chapter in Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 258–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Van Marrewijk, Marcel. 2004. A value based approach to organisation types: Towards a coherent set of stakeholder-oriented management tools. Journal of Business Ethics 55: 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Verganti, Roberto. 2008. Design, meanings and radical innovation: A meta-model and a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management 25(5): 436–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Verstraete, Thierry, and Estele Jouison. 2006. Connecting stakeholders theory and conventions theory to highlight the adhesion of stakeholders to the business model of a start-up. International Council for Small Business, 51st World Conference, Melbourne, Australia, June 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Von Bertalanffy, Ludwig. 1972. The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of Management Journal 15(4): 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Ward, Stephen, and Chris Chapman. 2008. Stakeholders and uncertainty management in projects. Construction Management and Economics 26: 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Weigand, Hans. 2009. Value Encounters–Modeling and Analyzing Co-Creation of Value. IFIP Conference e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, Nancy, September 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  102. West, Joel. 2007. Value capture and value networks in open source vendor strategies. Proceedings of the Hawai‘i International Conference on System Sciences HICSS-40, Waikola, Hawai‘i, January 3–7, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Yunus, M., B. Moingeon, and L. Lehmann-Ortega. 2010. Building social business models: Lessons from the grameen experience. Long Range Planning 43: 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Zott, C., and R. Amit. 2010. Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning 43: 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Building HG3.34, Den Dolech 2, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Elke den Ouden

Authors
  1. Elke den Ouden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elke den Ouden .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

den Ouden, E. (2012). Designing Ecosystems. In: Innovation Design. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2268-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2268-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2267-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2268-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation