Abstract
Improved agronomic performance and nutritional profile are among the major objectives in pea breeding, but the narrow gene pool available in pea germplasm has slowed progress. Therefore, the objective of this work was to evaluate 169 diverse pea accessions from Eastern Europe, Western Europe, Australia and Canada for agronomic performance, Mycosphaerella blight resistance and nutritional profile under western Canadian growing conditions. In general, eastern European accessions required less days to flower, had higher protein, acid detergent fibre and neutral detergent fibre concentrations in the seeds, compared to western European and Canadian pea accessions, which had better lodging resistance, less days to maturity, higher grain yield and seed weight, greater resistance to Mycosphaerella blight and powdery mildew and higher starch concentration in the seeds. Significant correlations were observed between different traits. Principal component analysis revealed significant variation among traits with the first four principal components explaining 68 % of the total variation. The wide range of variation in agronomic performance, Mycosphaerella blight resistance and nutritional profile detected will provide useful parents for pea breeding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amelin AV, Parakhin NV (2003) Scientific grounds for pea selection for fodder production. CAB Abstract, AN: 20033049804, CAB International, Wallingford, UK
Arganosa GC, Warkentin TD, Racz VJ, Blade S, Hsu H, Philips C (2006) Prediction of crude protein content in field peas grown in saskatchewan using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Can J Plant Sci 86:157–159
Banniza S, Hashemi P, Warkentin TD, Vandenberg A, Davis A (2005) The relationship among lodging, stem anatomy, degree of lignification and susceptibility to Mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Can J Bot 83:954–967
Bhattacharyya M, Martin C, Smith A (1993) The importance of starch biosynthesis in the wrinkled seed shape character of peas studied by Mendel. Plant Mol Biol 22:525–531
Black RG, Brouwer JB, Mears C, Iyer L (1998) Variation in physico-chemical properties of field peas (Pisum sativum). Food Res Int 31:81–86
Borowska J, Zadernowski R, Konopka I (1996) Composition and some physical properties of different pea cultivars. Nahrung 40:74–78
Bretag TW, Keane PJ, Price TV (1995) Effect of Ascochyta blight on the grain yield of field pea (Pisum sativum L). Aust J Exp Agric 35:531–536
Diederichsen A, Tar’an B, Sobolev D, Warkentin TD (2006) Genetic diversity and potential use of pea germplasm from eastern Europe and Eurasia for genetic improvement of canadian peas. Final report to saskatchewan pulse growers
Dokken-Bouchard FL, Banniza S, Bassendowski KA, Chant S, Cruise D, Gross G, Ippolito J, Kutcher HR, Miller SG, Morrall RAA, Redlick C, Schemenauer I (2011) Survey of field pea diseases in saskatchewan, 2010. Can Plant Dis Surv 91:133–135
Ellis THN (2011) Pisum. In: Kole C (ed) Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources (legume crops and forages). Springer, New York, pp 237–248
Fondevilla S, Cubero JI, Rubiales D (2007) Inheritance of resistance to Mycosphaerella pinodes in two wild accessions of Pisum. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:53–58
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (2008) FAOStat http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/Desktop.Default.aspx, 2009
Kaur S, Singh N, Sodhi NS, Rana JC (2009) Genotypic diversity in physicochemical, hydrating, pasting and textural properties of kidney bean varieties. Food Chem 117:282–289
Lawyer SA (1984) Diseases caused by Ascochyta spp. In: Hargedon DJ (ed) Compendium of pea diseases. APS Press, St Paul, MA, pp 11–15
Lehmann CO (1954) Das morphologische System der Saaterbsen (Pisum sativum L. sens. lat. Gov. ssp. sativum) [The morphological system of pea (Pisum sativum L. sens. lat. Gov. ssp. sativum)]. (In German) Züchter 24:316–337
Martin-Sanz A, Caminero C, Jing R, Flavell AJ, Perez de la Vega M (2011) Genetic diversity among spanish pea (Pisum sativum L.) landraces, pea cultivars and the world Pisum sp. core collection assessed by retrotransposon-based insertion polymorphisms (RBIPs). Span J Agric Res 9:166–178
Maxted N, Ambrose MJ (2001) Peas (Pisum L.). In: Maxted N, Bennett SJ (eds) Plant genetic resources of legumes in the mediterranean. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 181–190
McPhee K (2007) Pea. In: Kole C (ed) Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, pp 33–47
Moussart A, Tivoli B, Lemarchand E, Deneufbourg F, Roi S, Sicard G (1998) Role of seed infection by the Ascochyta blight pathogen of dried pea (Mycosphaerella pinodes) in seedling emergence, early disease development and transmission of the disease to aerial plant parts. Eur J Plant Pathol 104:93–102
Nikolopoulou S, Grigorakis K, Stasini M, Alexis MN, Iliadis K (2007) Differences in chemical composition of field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars: effects of cultivation area and year. Food Chem 103:847–852
Obraztsov AS, Amelin AV (1990) Ideotype of pea plants in relation to their resistance to lodging in the south of the non-chernozem zone of the RSFSR. CAB Abstract, AN: 901696951, CAB International, Wallingford, UK
Santalla M, Amurrio JM, De Ron AM (2001) Food and feed potential breeding value of green, dry and vegetable pea germplasm. Can J Plant Sci 81:601–610
SAS Institute Inc (1997) SAS/STAT user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary
Schatz B, Endres G (2009) Field pea production. NDSU extension service A-1166 (revised), pp 1–8
Sefa-Dedeh S, Stanley DW (1979) Textural implications of the microstructure of legumes. Food Technol 33:77–83
Smy'kal P, Kenicer G, Flavell AJ, Kosterin O, Redden RJ, Ford R, Zong X, Coyne CJ, Maxted N, Ambrose MJ, Ellis THN (2011) Phylogeny, phylogeography and genetic diversity of the Pisum genus. Plant Genet Resour 9:4–18
Stoughton-Ens MD, Hatcher DW, Wang N, Warkentin TD (2010) Influence of genotype and environment on the dietary fiber content of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown in Canada. Food Res Int 43:547–552
Tar’an B, Warkentin T, Somers DJ, Miranda D, Vandenberg A, Blade S, Woods S, Bing D, Xue A, DeKoeyer D, Penner G (2003) Quantitative trait loci for lodging resistance, plant height and partial resistance to Mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor Appl Genet 107:1482–1491
Tar’an B, Warkentin T, Somers DJ, Miranda D, Vandenberg A, Blade S, Bing D (2004) Identification of quantitative trait loci for grain yield, seed protein concentration and maturity in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 136:297–306
Tar’an B, Zhang C, Warkentin T, Tullu A, Vandenberg A (2005) Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L.) based on molecular markers, and morphological and physiological characters. Genome 48:257–272
Tivoli B, Beasse C, Lemarchand E, Masson E (1996) Effect of ascochyta blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes) on yield components of single pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants under field conditions. Annu Appl Biol 129:207–216
Tzitzikas EN, Vincken JP, De Groot J, Gruppen H, Visser RGF (2006) Genetic variation in pea seed globulin composition. J Agric Food Chem 54:425–433
Ubayasena L, Bett K, Tar’an B, Vijayan P, Warkentin T (2010) Genetic control and QTL analysis of cotyledon bleaching resistance in green field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Genome 53:346–359
Ubayasena L, Bett K, Tar’an B, Warkentin T (2011) Genetic control and identification of QTLs associated with visual quality traits of field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Genome 54:261–272
Wallen VR (1965) Field evaluation of the importance of the Ascochyta complex of peas. Can J Plant Sci 45:27–33
Wang N, Daun JK (2004) Effect of variety and crude protein content on nutrients and certain antinutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum). J Sci Food Agric 84:1021–1029
Wang TL, Bogracheva TY, Hedley CL (1998) Starch: as simple as A, B, C? J Exp Bot 49:481–502
Wang TF, Gossen BD, Slinkard AE (2006) Lodging increases severity and impact of Mycosphaerella blight on field pea. Can J Plant Sci 86:855–863
Wang N, Hatcher DW, Gawalko EJ (2008) Effect of variety and processing on nutrients and certain anti-nutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum). Food Chem 111:132–138
Wang N, Hatcher DW, Warkentin TD, Toews R (2010) Effect of cultivar and environment on physicochemical and cooking characteristics of field pea (Pisum sativum). Food Chem 118:109–115
Warkentin TD, Sloan AG, Ali-Khan ST (1997) Proximate and mineral composition of field peas. Can J Plant Sci 77:101–103
Xue AG, Warkentin TD, Greeniaus MT, Zimmer RC (1996) Genotypic variability in seedborne infection of field pea by Mycosphaerella pinodes and its relation to foliar disease severity. Can J Plant Pathol 18:370–374
Xue AG, Warkentin TD, Kenaschuk EO (1997) Effect of timings of inoculation with Mycosphaerella pinodes on yield and seed infection on field pea. Can J Plant Sci 77:685–689
Yan M, Liu Z, Guan C, Chen S, Yuan M, Liu X (2009) Inheritance and molecular markers for the seed coat color in Brassica juncea. Front Agric China 3:1–6
Yepez E, Villasmil FF, Nouel GE, Espejo MA (2004) Intake and digestibility of Acacia glomerosa and Leucaena leucocephala mixed with ammoniated rice straw in rations for growing goats. J Anim Feed Sci 13:255–258
Zimmer MC, Sabourin D (1986) Determining resistance reaction of field pea cultivars at the seedling stage to Mycosphaerella pinodes. Phytopathology 76:878–881
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the Agricultural Development Fund of the Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture is gratefully acknowledged. We are grateful to the University of Saskatchewan Pulse Research Field and Grain Chemistry Laboratories personnel for field and technical assistance. Technical expertise of Kamal Bandara is particularly noted. We thank Prof. Margarita Vishnyakova, N.I. Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry at St. Petersburg, Russia, and Tony Leonforte, Victorian Department of Primary Industries, Horsham, Australia for contributing germplasm for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jha, A.B., Arganosa, G., Tar’an, B. et al. Characterization of 169 diverse pea germplasm accessions for agronomic performance, Mycosphaerella blight resistance and nutritional profile. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60, 747–761 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9871-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9871-1