Next Article in Journal
An Integrated Algorithmic MADM Approach for Heart Diseases’ Diagnosis Based on Neutrosophic Hypersoft Set with Possibility Degree-Based Setting
Next Article in Special Issue
A Bocage Landscape Restricts the Gene Flow of Pest Vole Populations
Previous Article in Journal
A Critical Analysis of the Automated Hematology Assessment in Pregnant Women at Low and at High Altitude: Association between Red Blood Cells, Platelet Parameters, and Iron Status
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geographic Mosaic of Extensive Genetic Variations in Subterranean Mole Voles Ellobius alaicus as a Consequence of Habitat Fragmentation and Hybridization

by
Valentina Tambovtseva
1,
Irina Bakloushinskaya
1,*,
Sergey Matveevsky
2 and
Aleksey Bogdanov
1
1
Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia
2
Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(5), 728; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12050728
Submission received: 16 April 2022 / Revised: 3 May 2022 / Accepted: 11 May 2022 / Published: 13 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Population Genetics of Small Mammals)

Abstract

:
Restricted mobility, sociality, and high inbreeding—characteristic for subterranean mammals—lead to rapid changes in their genome structure. Up to now, the Alay mole vole Ellobius alaicus was a data-deficient species; its spatial and phylogenetic relationships with a sibling species, E. tancrei, were not clarified. We carried out a genetic analysis including differential G-banding of chromosomes and mitochondrial (cytb) and nuclear gene (XIST and IRBP) sequencing. The phylogenetic reconstruction based on cytb represented the expected phylogenetic relationships of two species. Using the XIST, we revealed two new lineages among E. alaicus from the Alay Valley (Southern Kyrgyzstan). Analysis of IRBP demonstrated presence of the specific genotype in most of E. alaicus specimens, but also revealed the haplotype, typical for E. tancrei, in some Alay mole voles. The results may be explained as persistence of ancestral gene polymorphism in E. alaicus or limited interspecific hybridization with E. tancrei. Several chromosomal forms were revealed in E. alaicus in the Alay Valley. We propose that ‘mosaic’ genetic polymorphism might appear in E. alaicus due to fragmentation of their habitats in highlands of the Alay Valley, Tien Shan, and Pamir-Alay as well as due to hybridization with E. tancrei or persistence of ancestral polymorphisms.

1. Introduction

Subterranean animals are characterized by a number of significant peculiarities. Convergent similarity of morphological and physiological features originated due to digging activity and living underground in burrows [1,2]. Moreover, extensive intraspecific chromosomal variability has been described for many subterranean rodents [3,4]. The most chromosomally diverse genera (such as Ctenomys, Oryzomys, Fukomys, Nannospalax, Ellobius, etc.) are highly specialized; underground habitations limit their dispersal and shape foraging, mating, and breeding patterns [5,6,7]. The ranges of subterranean species are commonly represented as systems of isolated populations, which are characterized by high variability in the spatial genetic structure, small effective population sizes, low dispersal rates, high inbreeding, recurrent “bottleneck” events, limitations of genetic drift, etc. [8,9]. Chromosomal speciation has been suggested to occur in small demes, which are characterized by a succession of isolation and secondary contacts with neighboring groups of demes [10,11]. The strict environmental conditions of underground habitation and small effective population size can act as antagonistic factors, which are manifested in different rates of changes in the studied traits [12].
In the mountains, the compartmentalization of habitats (i.e., the mosaic of external conditions) may result in mosaic changes in the genome. Rodents are convenient for studying both chromosomal and molecular polymorphism—an evolutionarily young group with rapid alternation of generations, high population size, reproduction rate, and ecological lability. Species whose habitats are characterized by a significant variety of landscapes, climatic conditions, and other environmental factors are of primary interest. We consider the mole voles of the genus Ellobius (subfamily Arvicolinae) as a promising subject for studying this evolutionary problem and related mechanisms. Three sibling species of the subgenus EllobiusE. talpinus, E. tancrei, and E. alaicus—show interesting differences in evolutionary pathways, including a unique sex chromosome system (XX in males and females). No chromosomal variability is known for E. talpinus s. str. (2n = NF = 54) [13,14], while for E. tancrei, high variability (2n = 54–30, NF = 56) was found in the Pamir-Alay [15,16]. Also, several chromosomal forms (2n = 52–48, NF = 56) were revealed in E. alaicus [17,18]. Moreover, the unique phenomenon of various types of meiotic contacts of non-homologous chromosomes (including fusions) forming dicentric chromosomes was discovered in E. alaicus [19].
For decades, E. alaicus had the status of a data-deficient species; its range was considered to be limited to a small area of the Alay Valley (Southern Kyrgyzstan). Recently, we demonstrated that this species is distributed not only throughout the Alay Valley but also in the valleys of the Naryn and Aksai Rivers (Kyrgyzstan), as well as on the territory of Tajikistan, in the upper Surkhob River area (Kyzylsu and Muksu River valleys) [18].
Here, we aimed to assess genetic variations by analysis of some mtDNA (cytb, cytochrome b gene) and nDNA genes (XIST, X-inactive specific transcript, and IRBP, interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein) as well as karyotype structure (differential G-banding) to study more thoroughly E. alaicus from the Alay Valley (the terra typica region, Kyrgyzstan), and Pamir-Alay (Tajikistan). We also evaluated the possible evolutionary input of natural hybridization between sibling species, E. alaicus and E. tancrei. We can suggest a more complex picture of genetic polymorphism in both species than is currently known, considering the extremely diverse landscape and climatic conditions of these mountainous regions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

Tissue samples and chromosome suspensions were obtained from mole voles collected during our field trips in 1981–1983, 2008, 2010, 2013, and 2015–2021. Information about the material used in the study is presented in Table S1. The total number of specimens used for the molecular analyses was 60, from which 56 mole voles were karyotyped. Geographical locations of capture points of the mole voles are shown in Figure 1. The samples are deposited in the Joint Wild Animal Tissue Collection for Basic, Applied, and Conservation Research of the Core Centrum of the Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology RAS, state registration number 6868145.
Animals were treated according to established international protocols, as in the Guidelines for Humane Endpoints for Animals Used in Biomedical Research. All the experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research of the Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology RAS in accordance with the Regulations for Laboratory Practice in the Russian Federation; the most recent protocol is numbered 37-25.06.2020. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

2.2. Karyotyping

Chromosomes were prepared from bone marrow according to [20] for all animals listed with chromosome numbers in Table S1. G-banding was achieved using trypsin digestion [21]. In total, we studied chromosomes for 59 specimens. Routine stained and G-banded metaphase plates were captured with a CMOS camera, mounted on an Axioskop 40 (Zeiss) microscope. Images were processed using Paint Shop Pro X2 (Corel).

2.3. Sequencing

Total DNA was isolated by phenol-chloroform deproteinization after treatment of shredded tissues (heart, muscle, or kidney) with proteinase K [22]. Primers used for amplification and sequencing of three overlapping fragments of the complete cytb gene [13,23], two overlapping fragments of the IRBP gene, exon 1 [24], and two non-overlapping fragments of the XIST gene [18] are listed in Table S2. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in a mixture containing 25–35 ng DNA, 2 μL 10 × Taq-buffer, 1.6 μL 2.5 mM dNTP solution, 4 pM of each primer, 1 unit of Taq-polymerase (Syntol, Russia, Moscow), and deionized water to a final volume of 20 μL. Amplification was as follows: preheating at 94 °C for 3 min, then 35 cycles in a sequential mode of 30 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 55–67 °C depending on the applied pair of primers (see the Table S2), and 1 min at 72 °C; the reaction was completed by a single final elongation of PCR products at 72 °C for 6 min. Automatic sequencing was carried out using a ABI PRISM® BigDyeTM Terminator v. 3.1 Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA, MA, Waltham) with AB 3500 genetic analyzer at the Core Centrum of the Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology RAS. All sequences have been deposited to the GenBank. Accession numbers were as follows: ON333901–ON333931 for the cytb gene, ON333848–ON333900 for the IRBP gene, ON314941–ON314990 for the XIST gene first fragment, and ON314885–ON314940 for the XIST gene second fragment. We also used some of the earlier published sequences [14,18] deposited by us to the GenBank (MG264318–MG264322, MG264324, MG264326–MG264330, MG264345, MG264346, MK544901, MK544903, MK544904, MK544906–MK544917, and MT468380 for the cytb gene; MT478768–MT478770 for the IRBP gene; and MK544921–MK544926 for the XIST gene first fragment; see the Table S1). A total of 60 specimens were used for the mitochondrial cytb gene sequencing, with 56 specimens for the IRBP gene and the XIST gene sequencing.

2.4. Molecular Evolutionary Analyses

DNA sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm [25] in MEGA X software [26]. After alignment, the length of the cytb gene nucleotide sequence (determined in all mole voles) was equal to 1143 bp, the IRBP gene fragment was 1404 bp, and the two non-overlapping parts of the XIST gene comprised 444–448 and 525–526 bp (969–973 bp in total). Differences in the length of the latter gene fragments were related to deletions. The aligned fragments of the XIST gene were joined and analyzed as one sequence. The sequences of the protein-coding genes (cytb and IRBP) were presented by entire codons. Marginal codon boundaries (i.e., the first nucleotide of the initial codon and the third nucleotide of the last codon) in the IRBP gene fragment were determined from its sequences in genomes of house mice [27] and pine voles of the Terricola subgenus [28]. Sites in which two overlapping peaks were reproducibly registered in chromatograms were coded and treated as heterozygous.
Dendrograms were built based on the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method using IQTree software, version 2.0-rc2 [29,30]; the ModelFinder option [31] was applied to achieve optimal model evaluation of nucleotide substitutions for each gene. Before statistical analysis, non-extended deletions (revealed in the XIST gene sequences of several specimens) were filled in by random nucleotides which were absent in the total mole voles’ sample; this approach was used in analysis of the XIST gene variability in pine voles of the Terricola subgenus [28]. Final images of phylogenetic trees rooted on the genetically remotest group (i.e., mole voles from Mongolia) in all cases were rendered in FigTree 1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 25 November 2018)) and processed in Inkscape (https://inkscape.org/ (accessed on 27 September 2021)).
Along with phylogenetic analysis, haplotype networks (haplowebs) were built in the HaplowebMaker program (https://eeg-ebe.github.io/HaplowebMaker/ (accessed on 11 July 2020)) [32]. In the networks, the lengths of connecting lines correspond to genetic distances, whilst curves illustrate alleles that were found to be co-occurring in heterozygous individuals. In this way, a group of alleles linked together by heterozygotes represents an exclusive allele pool, and the corresponding groups of individuals are called a field for recombination (FFR). Such haplowebs have proven themselves to be useful in recent mammalian phylogenetic studies [33], but, as far as we know, they were tested on rodents for the first time in this work. The phasing of polymorphic loci in heterozygous genotypes was carried out based on combinations of alleles in the corresponding loci in homozygotes. For each case, we analyzed the known haplotypes of the surrounding populations to exclude random alternation of heterozygous sites [34].

3. Results

3.1. Chromosome Variability

New data include material collected from Gulcha vicinities in the north to the Pamir Highway in the south, as well as throughout almost the entire Alay Valley—from the areas bordering China in the east to Daroot-Korgon in the west. All the animals studied from this territory had 2n = 50–53. A re-collection was carried out near Gulcha (#1), where interspecific hybrids of E. alaicus and E. tancrei were discovered in 1983 [18]. Animals from there mainly had 2n = 52, with the exception of one female with 2n = 53, heterozygous for the E. alaicus species-specific chromosome Rb(2.11). This karyotype was identical to the one expected for the F1 hybrid of E. tancrei and E. alaicus (Figure 2a and [18]). All animals from the central and eastern part of the Alay Valley (#3–6) turned out to be the most typical homozygotes, with 2 Rb(2.11), 2n = 52. Further to the west, there is an interesting picture of chromosomal variability. Animals caught near Sary-Mogol (#7) in two cases had karyotypes 2n = 50, 2Rb(2.11), 2Rb(4.9), and in one case had 2n = 51, 2Rb(2.11), 1 Rb(4.9). A similar pattern was observed for samples from the vicinity of Daroot-Korgon, the westernmost collection points on the territory of Kyrgyzstan (#9, 10). Animals with 2n = 50, 2Rb(2.11), 2Rb(3.10) and 2n = 51, 2Rb(2.11), 1Rb(3.10) and a somatic mosaic with 2n = 50–51, 2Rb(2.11), 1-2Rb(3.10), were found there (Table S1, Figure 2). Thus, to the south of Gulcha and in the Alay Valley, we have described different variants of the karyotype of the Alay mole vole with variations in Rb(2.11), Rb(3.10), and Rb(4.9).
Most of E. tancrei specimens studied in this work had 2n = 54; others exhibited several chromosomal forms with 2n = 30, 32, 34, with two animals from the contact zone of different chromosomal forms showing 2n = 51 and 52 (for descriptions see [16,35,36,37]). Unless these specimens of E. tancrei had the same 2n, as some E. alaicus (2n = 51–52), their karyotype structures were distinct due to non-homologous Rb translocations.

3.2. Sequencing Results

3.2.1. Cytb Gene Variability

The complete cytb gene analysis, which was carried out by the Maximum Likelihood (ML) approach, revealed no the specific clusters for two Ellobius species (Figure 3). Specimens of E. tancrei from Mongolia form the more distant clade in relation to all other mole voles of both species, whose haplotypes are distributed in two closer sister clades in accordance with species belonging. The similar results were described earlier, and mole voles from western and central parts of Mongolia were proposed to belong to a new cryptic species; however, these individuals are currently considered as E. tancrei s. str. [14]. Within the main E. tancrei clade, joining mole voles from the Central Asia, specimens from Uzbekistan (#27) and from the southwestern regions of Tajikistan, remote from the Surkhob and Alay Valleys (#26), appeared to be isolated. In the E. alaicus clade, the animals from Gulcha vicinities (#1), which turned out to be basal, attract attention. Along with them, two mole voles from the Taldyk Pass (#3), both individuals from Taunmuruk (#5), and one mole vole from Sary-Tash vicinities (#6)—which have three common substitutions, unique for the total mole vole sample—differ from other examples to the greatest extent. Another single substitution distinguished all Alay mole voles from Kyrgyzstan (the eastern group on ML-tree) from representatives of the same species from Tajikistan (the western group). However, in general, cytb gene variability in E. alaicus and in Central Asian populations of E. tancrei is weakly expressed and demonstrates no clear relation with chromosomal polymorphism.
On the haplotype networks, shades of green and blue mark haplotypes typical of E. tancrei, and shades of purple and red-yellow show haplotypes typical of E. alaicus (see Figure 4a). A haploweb was built on the basis of data on cytb and visualizes the genetic distances between clades and the pattern of nucleotide polymorphism. In particular, it demonstrates that the Mongolian population of E. tancrei is separated from the rest of the studied mole voles by a greater genetic distance than that between Central Asian E. tancrei and E. alaicus. The complex, mesh structure of E. alaicus haplotypes and its lower resolution compared to Central Asian E. tancrei should also be noted.

3.2.2. XIST Gene Variability

Analysis of the XIST gene variability demonstrated differentiation E. tancrei to some intraspecific groups: from Mongolia, Tashkent, South-Western Tajikistan, and the rest of the populations from Tajikistan (Figure 5). As in the case with the cytb gene, mole voles from Mongolia formed the most remote clade in the ML-tree, and other clades and branches (including ones related to the Alay mole vole) composed a star-like structure. Unexpectedly, we revealed two distinct lineages in the Alay mole vole, using the XIST gene. The first variant of this gene was more widely distributed; it was registered in specimens from almost all studied parts of E. alaicus range, and in Tajikistan populations, it was the single. Another XIST variant that was firstly discovered by us in the work significantly differs from the first variant by several substitutions and three-nucleotide deletion near the start of the analyzed sequence. This was diagnosed in many Kyrgyzstan populations of mole voles, from Gulcha vicinities to Daroot-Korgon, both in homozygous (specimens 27353, 27487, 27488, 27493, 27494, 27500, and 27505) and heterozygous states (specimens 27495, 27496, 27351, 27497, 27489, 27491, 27354, and 27498). Mosaic and wide spreading of the variant across the Alay Valley indicates that it is specific for E. alaicus rather than for E. tancrei. Genetic p-distance between two variants of the XIST gene of E. alaicus (0.003) is similar with p-distances between the common, more distributed variant of E. alaicus and variants of Central Asian E. tancrei specimens (0.003–0.004), which makes species determination by the XIST gene fragments more complex.
Conventionally, the common XIST gene variant can be designated as “Western” (W) and variant with deletion as “Eastern” (E), since homozygous individuals with the W haplotype were not found to the east of Sary-Mogol (#7), and the E-variant was not found (either in homozygous or heterozygous states) to the west of Daroot-Korgon.
Identity of homozygous genotypes (including ones with a deletion) in Alay mole voles from different localities allowed us to propose its invariability in all mole voles from the Alay Valley and adjacent territories and determine a hypothetical second haplotype in heterozygous specimens, “deducting” the haplotype with deletion from heterozygous sequences. In almost all mole voles, heterozygous genotypes were presented by a haplotype common in E. alaicus, and a haplotype with deletion. However, in three mole voles from Gulcha vicinities (27491, 27497, and 27498), the heterozygous genotypes included a haplotype with deletion and a tancrei-like haplotype (Figure 5). This result supports the idea of a hybrid zone between E. alaicus and E. tancrei in this locality, but further study using other nuclear genes is required.
On the haplotype network (‘haploweb’), two haplotypes were clearly distinguished within E. alaicus too (Figure 4b). Five hybrid animals—from the Taldyk pass (#3), Sary-Tash and its vicinities (#4, 6), and Taunmuruk (#5)—were shown in arcs. At the intersection of the network lines, a blue dot indicated a possible hybrid haplotype of mole voles from the Gulcha vicinities (#1), the hybrid zone described earlier [18]. As can be seen from the length of the lines corresponding to the genetic distances, this haplotype is shifted closer to E. tancrei.

3.2.3. IRBP Gene Variability

The ML-dendrogram and haplotype network built for the IRBP gene significantly differed from reconstructions based on other markers. Three main clades, which formed a star-like structure, are obvious in the ML-dendrogram. The first clade included mole voles from Mongolia, the second clade included all Central Asian E. tancrei and some E. alaicus specimens, and the third one included the majority of Alay mole voles (Figure 6). Genotypes which compose the clades presented by Mongolian and Central Asian E. tancrei and the clade joining almost all E. alaicus specimens were characterized by three fixed substitutions; for several more sites, the differences between these groups were traced, but they were not absolute because of mole voles from Mongolia and Tashkent. One of the clades (including almost all Alay mole voles, both from Tajikistan and the Alay Valley) was actually presented by the same variant of the IRBP gene (excluding one specimen, which was heterozygotic for one site). The clade including Central Asian E. tancrei individuals was significantly more variable; up to six distinct subclades and branches may be traced in it. Among these specimens, the mole vole from Tashkent differed to the greatest extent. It is extremely interesting that three Alay mole voles (two specimens from Sary-Mogol (27493 and 27503) and one from Taunmuruk (27495)) and two mole voles from proposed hybrid zone of E. alaicus and E. tancrei in Gulcha vicinities (27491 and 27497) came to join this clade, demonstrating no differences from E. tancrei specimens from Aivadj, Sarinai, and Obi-Kaboud (Tajikistan). Moreover, along with homozygous genotypes, several mole voles (simultaneously heterozygous for all three sites) demonstrated fixed differences between two main clades (two specimens from Gulcha vicinities (27488 and 27498) and two mole voles from Daroot-Korgon, point 2). The presence of two genetically discrete groups, the invariability of one of them, and the lack of intermediate variants allowed us to divide heterozygous genotypes into haplotypes; a similar approach was successfully used earlier for determination of haplotype combination in hybrid house mice [38]. Haplotypes which were hypothetically determined in heterozygous mole voles occupied the same positions in the ML-tree as different homozygous genotypes.
The haplotype network built according to the IRBP gene sequences (Figure 4c) demonstrated low polymorphism; sibling species were represented by two haplotypes, which corresponded to almost all animals from the entire sample. The exceptions were some populations of E. tancrei: Shilbili (#21), Tashkent (#27), and Mongolia (#28–30). The populations from Tashkent and Mongolia occupied an intermediate position on the net between E. tancrei and E. alaicus. It is important to note that the ‘pure’ E. tancrei haplotype was presented in several individuals identified by other characters as E. alaicus, the same as in the ML-tree. These were animals from Taunmuruk (#5) and Sary-Mogol (#7). Hybrid genotypes were found in specimens from Daroot-Korgon (#9) and Gulcha (#1).

3.2.4. Multigenic Haplowebs

A consensus network based on nuclear genes (XIST + IRBP) demonstrated the compactness of a group of E. tancrei populations from Tajikistan (Figure 7a). Only the southern locality of Aivaj (#26) and the eastern one of Shilbili (#21) showed slightly different haplotypes. E. tancrei individuals from Tashkent and Mongolia turned out to be closer in genetic distances to interspecific hybrids from the Gulcha vicinities (#1). Combining data on two nuclear genes allowed us to evaluate a complex system of E. alaicus hybrids—interspecific with E. tancrei as well as intraspecific between “E” and “W” lineages. Special attention should be paid to the mole voles from Gulcha vicinities (#1)—the scale of polymorphism in this locality and the high degree of differences between the involved haplotypes becomes visible on this network. As can be seen, in this locality, there is a single di-heterozygote for the two nuclear genes studied (specimen 27488).
The consensus network for three genes, including data on cytb, had a higher resolution due to mitochondrial polymorphism (Figure 7b). Three main branches are clearly distinguished on it—the Central Asian E. tancrei (from Tajikistan and Uzbekistan), the Mongolian E. tancrei, and E. alaicus. There was a high degree of genetic polymorphism within E. alaicus and an abundance of hybrids of varying degrees of remoteness. There was also a complex pattern of hybridization in individuals from Taunmuruk (the easternmost point of the collections (#5)) despite the extremely small representation of this locality (only two individuals). It should also be noted that there were no hybrid forms among individuals from Muksu (#15) to Achek-Alma (#11), where the chromosomal form 2n = 48 was described.

4. Discussion

The genetic variability of E. alaicus in the Alay Valley (the large territory originating at the junction of Tien Shan and Pamir Mountain systems) appeared to be unexpectedly high and complicated due to mito-nuclear discordances. Our results, which were obtained from the analyses of karyotypes and molecular markers, revealed that distinctive variability ‘layers’ and the spectra of polymorphism partly coincide with each other.
E. alaicus demonstrated variable chromosome numbers (2n = 48–52) with four variants of Robertsonian translocations: Rb(2,11), Rb(1,3), Rb(4,9), and Rb(3,10) [18]. The chromosome Rb(2.11) was found in all E. alaicus (with one exception for interspecific hybrids outside the Alay Valley, Naryn region) and some forms of E. tancrei, in which, as we hypothesized [16,18], this translocation originated independently from E. alaicus. Therefore, the translocation is considered typical for E. alaicus. Here, using routine staining and G-banding, we revealed six cytotypes in the studied specimens. We confirmed 2n = 52, NF = 56, XX—typical for E. alaicus in the new points (see Table S1, #3–6, and Figure 1). We also found a heterozygous specimen (2n = 53, NF = 56; 27491; see Table S1, #1, and Figure 1 and Figure 2a) at a point close to the area previously described as a contact zone with E. tancrei [18]. The most fascinating issues were new chromosomal variants (2n = 50–51) in points located in the western part of the Alay Valley. It should be emphasized that the decrease in the diploid number was due to the appearance of two Robertsonian translocations (Rb(3.10) and Rb(4.9)) which had previously been observed in samples from the Pamir-Alay (see Table S1, #11) [18]. These Rbs were revealed in homo- and heterozygous variants (see Table S1, #9, 10, and Figure 2). Thus, all verified translocations were previously described for E. alaicus [18].
Concerning molecular data, the cytb, XIST, and IRBP genes provided phylogenetic reconstructions with different topologies, various genetic distances, and interpositions of clades related to intraspecific forms of E. tancrei and E. alaicus. It is very interesting that, in contrast to the general belief that the mitochondrial cytb gene is evolving more rapidly, the nuclear XIST gene allowed us to distinguish two cryptic lineages within E. alaicus, and the use of the IRBP gene revealed the typical E. tancrei haplotype to be present in some Alay mole voles from those localities, where it would be difficult to propose interspecific hybridization. Thus, the most noticeable and debatable result of the molecular data analysis appeared to be their inconsistency with chromosomal data, as well as discrepancies in phylogenetic reconstructions for different markers. The generalization of the results obtained here is a non-trivial task, since it requires accurate information about the modern and historical ranges of mole voles, as well as a deep analysis of their genomes. Unfortunately, there are many blank spots in these areas, so some conclusions remain at the level of hypotheses awaiting further elaboration. Nevertheless, we consider it possible to note the following facts.
Phylogenetic reconstruction based on the cytb gene confirmed the proposed distribution of individuals between species. Morphologically and cytogenetically detected E. alaicus and Central Asian E. tancrei corresponded to two distinct clades in the cytb ML phylogenetic tree (Figure 3). The consistent distinctiveness of E. tancrei samples from Mongolia may indicate the need to clarify the phylogenetic and taxonomic status of the Mongolian populations of the eastern mole voles. The structure of the Central Asian E. tancrei clade, being weakly expressed, nevertheless reflected the geographic distribution of the samples. All animals originating from the same locality were clustered together. In contrast, in the clade E. alaicus, animals from the same localities were often distributed into different subclusters. It is noteworthy that these were individuals from parts of the range remote from the contact zone with E. tancrei, namely, the localities Daroot-Korgon (# 8–10) and the pass Taldyk (#2, 3). Such variety suggested that these samples were carriers of ancestral polymorphism and/or secondary intensive hybridization of E. alaicus intraspecific forms. In the case of mole voles from Gulcha vicinities (#1), the interpretation of their basal position in relation to the other haplotypes in E. alaicus clade is ambiguous. On the one hand, although this locality is situated in the previously described zone of contact and hybridization with E. tancrei, and we found one specimen with the hybrid karyotype (27491, Figure 2a), haplotypes of mole voles from Gulcha clearly belonged to the E. alaicus clade. On the other hand, overall, the E. alaicus haplotypes were most closely related to Central Asian E. tancrei, which cannot be assertively interpreted as haplotype change due to interspecific hybridization. Possibly, territories to the north from the Alay Ridge were the place of E. alaicus origin. Although the single substitution supported to some extent the separation of E. alaicus populations from Tajikistan and the Alay Valley (i.e., 48 chromosomal form from others), specimens with 2n = 50–52 did not show clear correspondence to the cytb gene data.
We assumed that for the reconstruction of the sibling species phylogeny, data on the XIST gene (one of the actively used sex-linked markers) would be valuable [14,18,28,39]. Indeed, the analysis of the sequences of its two fragments transformed and added details to the above picture. Even though the phylogenetic signal is rather weak, the XIST data confirm a number of general trends. As can be seen from the haplotype network (Figure 4b), E. tancrei and E. alaicus again turned out to be isolated, with interspecific hybrids near Gulcha (#1). It is easy to notice that most E. tancrei individuals had one typical haplotype, from which only the sequences of animals from Mongolia (#28–30), Uzbekistan (#27) and southern Tajikistan (#26) differed. It is noteworthy that samples of E. tancrei from Mongolia and Uzbekistan turned out to be closer to interspecific hybrids from Gulcha vicinities than to the majority of Central Asian E. tancrei specimens.
Within E. tancrei, the main clades (obtained with the use of the XIST gene fragments) in general corresponded to ones in reconstructions built on the cytb gene; however, within E. alaicus, two cryptic lineages were clearly distinguished. Genotypes and haplotypes with deletion revealed in many localities of the Alay Valley seem to be evolutionarily new because analogous variants have not been registered in any species of the subgenus Ellobius yet. Taking into consideration significant differences between the common genotype of E. alaicus and the genotype with deletion as well as an absence of intermediate variants, we presumed their independent origin and evolution in different areas of the Alay Valley and the Pamir-Alay. Factors which lead to the separation of the two E. alaicus lineages remain unknown; intensive development of glaciers might be such unfavorable circumstances. Later, when fit conditions had been restored, and Alay mole voles began to actively occupy new areas, the two lineages might have entered introgressive hybridization and formed mixed populations on almost all territories of the Alay Valley. The ‘mosaic’ character of the XIST gene variability in E. alaicus was similar to the cytb gene polymorphism. If we are to assume that factors which lead to similar variability of both the genes are the same, the idea of two discrete intraspecific forms hybridized in E. alaicus seems to be preferable over the idea of wide ancestral polymorphism presence. The absence of the XIST haplotype with a deletion in E. alaicus populations from Tajikistan confirmed their isolation from populations from the Alay Valley, similarly to the results of cytb gene analysis.
ML-reconstruction based on the IRBP gene analysis showed the most unexpected structure of phylogenetic relationships. Some E. alaicus individuals had ‘pure’ E. tancrei genotypes for this gene and were placed in the corresponding clade. These were animals from different parts of the Alay Valley remote from each other (Sary-Mogol, #7; Taunmuruk, #5) and from the hybrid zone (Figure 6). ‘Hybrid’ genotypes were found in individuals from Gulcha vicinities (#1), which is not surprising; however, the same genotypes were revealed in two specimens from Daroot-Korgon (#9), the locality in the Alay Valley most distant from Gulcha vicinities (#1). No presumable hybrids were found with the use of the IRBP gene at the border of the ranges of the two species in north-eastern Tajikistan, in the Muksu-Shilbili-Kashat-Utol-Poyon region: there was neither E. alaicus with the E. tancrei IRBP genotype, nor vice versa. At the same time, such animals were found in remote parts of the range of the Alay mole vole, where we did not previously assume recent contact between E. alaicus and E. tancrei. The haplotype network demonstrated only two haplotypes for the sibling species, which corresponded to almost all animals from the sample, and highlighted hybrid interspecific genotypes in specimens from Daroot-Korgon (#9) and Gulcha vicinities (#1).
There are two possible explanations for this paradox.
The first possible interpretation is based on the existence of ancestral polymorphism. A clear division of mole voles by the IRBP in the contact zone in Tajikistan and the preservation of the ‘pure’ E. tancrei haplotype to the east, within the range of E. alaicus, fit the hypothesis of ancestral polymorphism. As we noted above, E. alaicus populations, habiting territories to the north of the Alay Ridge, may be considered as ancestral in comparison with E. alaicus from the Alay Valley and North-Eastern Tajikistan. Thus, it is possible that some Alay mole voles, which settled further to the east, carry the ancestral IRBP gene variants in their genotypes. This proposition is supported by chromosomal data, too. Western populations of E. alaicus, from Muksu (#15) to Achek-Alma (#11), had 2n = 48 and three Rb translocations in the homozygous state [18]. The absence of interspecific hybrids noted according to molecular data in the Muksu-Shilbili-Kashat-Utol-Poyon area indicated a reliable reproductive barrier between E. alaicus with 2n = 48 and E. tancrei with 2n = 54. The populations of E. alaicus from the territory of Kyrgyzstan possessed 2n = 50–53 were karyotypically closer to E. tancrei than the western ones, which was also confirmed by all molecular markers to varying degrees. Nevertheless, there are contradictions in the details. For example, in Daroot-Korgon (#9) specimens had different karyotypes (27490, 2n = 50, 2Rb(2.11), 2Rb(3.10) and 27499, 2n = 51, 2Rb(2.11) 1Rb(3.10)), but were identical in the analyzed gene sequences. In the part of the range of E. alaicus, considering there to be an active process of speciation, we therefore inevitably encounter incomplete lineage sorting and ancestral polymorphism.
However, there are some drawbacks to this explanation. While E. alaicus has its own IRBP genotype, distributed across almost all the species range, it is not likely that some E. alaicus specimens in several populations would keep an ancestral genotype without any changes. Moreover, ancestral polymorphism is expected to be more widely distributed, but the extrinsic IRBP variant was found only in two localities in the western part of the Alay Valley and at the easternmost point of the collections, in Taunmuruk. The presence of characteristic E. tancrei IRBP genotypes and haplotypes in genomes of some E. alaicus individuals can also be explained by recent secondary contacts and hybridization. However, this assumption explains well only the presence of interspecific hybrids. It remains unclear where E. tancrei specimens come from. Still, we do not exclude the possibility of E. tancrei migration across the Alay or Ferghana Ridges along mountain canyons and even passes (we found colonies of mole voles at an altitude of about 4000 m above sea level; see Figure 1). In particular, we have previously shown that the Ferghana Ridge delimits the ranges of two species of mole voles [18]. It is possible that E. tancrei living on the northern slopes settled along the small river valleys (Isfairam-Sai, Kek-suu, etc.); overcame the ridges; and went south to Daroot-Korgon, Sary-Mogol, and Taunmuruk (Figure 1, #5, 9, 10).
Experimental hybridization in sibling species of the subgenus Ellobius was studied earlier for E. tancrei and E. talpinus. We only obtained the F1 generation, and revealed the cytogenetic mechanisms which corrupted meiotic nuclear architecture. Formations of chromosome chains, stretched centromeres, and distorted recombination in meiotic prophase I lead to hybrid sterility [40]. In another study, we obtained hybrids of E. tancrei and E. alaicus. In this case, chromosome chains due to partial homology of Rbs were also found in meiosis of hybrids, but their presence only led to low fertility of the first generation; in the later generations, the fertility gradually restored [41]. We supposed that in contrast to E. tancrei and E. alaicus, the second pair of species (E. tancrei and E. talpinus) possessed complete reproductive barriers. Apparently, in the contact zone, each species maintains the integrity of the gene pool, which is an essential species criterion according to the concept of biological species [42]. There were no data for E. tancrei–E. talpinus contact zones in nature. In the case of E. tancrei–E. alaicus, we described a contact zone previously [18]. One more assumption might be that within the range of E. alaicus exists currently undiscovered refugia of E. tancrei. The expansion of possible contact zones could significantly affect the gene pool of the surrounding E. alaicus, for example, in the Sary-Mogol region and Taunmuruk (Figure 1, #5, 7). Even if we have not observed any mixed colonies of the two species in the studied area in southwestern Kyrgyzstan, the hypothesis that hybridization took place in the rather recent past can be suggested.
Implementation of karyological data along with molecular markers has added an important layer to the multidimensional picture of the evolution of mole voles. Comparing molecular and chromosomal data, we again turn to the hypothesis of ancestral polymorphism. Western populations of E. alaicus, from Muksu to Achek-Alma (Figure 1, #11–15), have 2n = 48 and carry three Rb translocations in the homozygous state. We were unable to find interspecific hybrids in the Shilbili-Kashat-Muksu-Utol-Poyon area between E. alaicus with 2n = 48 and E. tancrei with 2n = 54. The eastern populations of E. alaicus from Alay Valley have 2n = 50–53 and demonstrate unevenness of Rbs distribution, with a high number of specimens with heterozygous chromosomal sets. The meiotic chromosome contacts detected in E. alaicus [19] can be considered as plausible mechanisms for Rbs origin and might explain both the formation of Rb(2.11) (which is typical for this species) and the rapid de novo formation of the rearrangements that we detected throughout the species range [18]. We are probably dealing with an active process of speciation taking place before our eyes, and therefore we inevitably encounter incomplete lineage sorting, ancestral polymorphism, and chromosomal speciation.
Thus, in both mole vole species, karyotypic changes did not fully correspond to nDNA marker (fragments of XIST and IRBP genes) variability, which, in turn, differed in their patterns both each from other and from the cytb variability. This genetic discordance in the subterranean mole vole E. alaicus confirmed our earlier suggestion that this species undergoes rapid evolution. An analogous situation was observed in a sibling species of mole voles, E. tancrei. The character of E. alaicus and E. tancrei intraspecific differentiation, which is significant and territorially wide, indicates that it might originate due to habitat fragmentation. High altitudes (2500 m and over) and a continental climate, characterizing this cold semi-arid region distinguished by low precipitation (average ca. 200–400 mm per year) [43], contribute to the sparse vegetation. Mole voles mostly feed on roots of ephemeroid plants, so the distribution of these animals is mosaic and highly correlated with vegetation. Separation of the range into small isolated populations creates conditions for accelerated evolutionary processes because of low effective population sizes and isolation. In result, in isolated populations, different mutations might occasionally fix in chromosomes and mitochondrial or nuclear genes; that is, ‘evolutionary potential’ may be realized by diverse ways. This factor together with possible hybridization of intraspecific forms and species has resulted in the complicated genetic variability of E. alaicus and E. tancrei.
Fixation of new chromosomal re-arrangements seems to be common in species of the genus Ctenomys (2n = 10–70) and, as a rule, is not accompanied by sterility, decreased fitness, or negative heterosis of heterozygous carriers [44]. The hypothesis of the leading role of chromosomal evolution in Ctenomys [45] was not supported by mtDNA and microsatellite data. Attempts to find a correlation between morphological and chromosomal variability in Ctenomys have also not been successful [46,47].
Similar examples of ‘mosaic’ intraspecific polymorphism were described in African mole rats of the genus Fukomys, which are hypervariable in karyotypic characteristics and demonstrate relatively small polymorphism in molecular markers, and vice versa [48]. This example is important, since mole rats of the genus Fukomys have amazing convergent similarity with mole voles of the genus Ellobius in a number of characteristics: subterranean living, morphological features, the abundance of chromosomal forms, and the complex social structure of families.
One of the most striking examples is a group of pine voles of the subgenus Terricola (genus Microtus), which includes several species with different patterns of chromosomal polymorphism. As demonstrated in a recent work involving molecular markers [28], in the Caucasus pine vole M. daghestanicus, along with a wide Robertsonian chromosome fan, significant variability of mitochondrial cytb gene and even nuclear BRCA1 gene was observed, where their different variants existed in the same chromosome form and even the same population. It should be noted that the wide molecular polymorphism was explained by ecological peculiarities of Caucasus pine voles, inhabiting alpine meadows (likely mole voles) and evolving in small isolated populations. Along with the Caucasus pine vole, significant DNA variability was discovered in common pine voles (M. subterraneus) from Asia Minor, although they belong to the same chromosomal form.
It is likely that such examples of inconsistent evolutionary rates of different traits, in particular, morphology, chromosomes, and the structure of nDNA and mDNA genes, could be indicative for the explosive nature of speciation in these groups. Subterranean living, limited mobility, and mosaic habitats could drive rapid fixation of genetic changes, which we may consider as a discrepancy simply because we describe a snapshot of the speciation process.

5. Conclusions

Our results, despite the seeming inconsistency, perfectly illustrate the processes accompanying explosive genetic diversification in such a unique model of subterranean rodents represented by mole voles. At each of the studied genome levels, we observed a continuum of different forms, chromosomal and molecular, whose origin was apparently due to extremely varied conditions and habitat fragmentation in mountains. It should not be excluded that the exclusive feature of E. alaicus chromosomes, ‘contacts first in meiosis’, was one of causes of karyotype variability in this species.
Phylogenetic reconstructions based on some nuclear and mitochondrial loci allowed us to observe diverse ways in which the species gene pool can change: a clear division into E. alaicus and E. tancrei species according to cytb and signs of ancestral polymorphism or hybridization according to nuclear markers. Possible hybridization in the secondary contact zone could lead to the presence of heterozygotes and even homozygous genotypes, characteristic for the sibling species E. tancrei, in the distinct parts of the E. alaicus range. These processes created the most complex geographical mosaic on the studied part of the area. However, they are a kind of “time sweep” of the evolutionary process, which we can rarely observe on species with lower rates of evolution in less specific habitat conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life12050728/s1. Table S1: Material, localities and GenBank accession numbers; Table S2: List of used primers for amplification and sequencing of cytb, XIST, and IRBP genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.T., I.B., S.M. and A.B.; methodology, V.T., I.B. and A.B.; software, V.T. and A.B.; validation, V.T., I.B. and A.B.; formal analysis, V.T., I.B., and A.B.; investigation, V.T., I.B., S.M. and A.B.; resources, V.T., I.B., S.M. and A.B.; data curation, A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, V.T., I.B., S.M. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, V.T., I.B., S.M. and A.B.; visualization, V.T., I.B. and A.B.; supervision, A.B.; project administration, I.B.; funding acquisition, V.T., I.B., S.M. and A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by research grants from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, 20-04-00618 (V.T., I.B. and A.B.); the Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology Russian Academy of Sciences Government basic research program, No. 0088-2021-0019 (V.T., I.B. and A.B.); and VIGG RAS State Assignment Contract No. 0112-2019-0002 (S.M.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animals were treated according to the Guidelines for Humane Endpoints for Animals Used in Biomedical Research. All the experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research of the Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology RAS in accordance with the Regulations for Laboratory Practice in the Russian Federation; the most recent protocol is number 37-25.06.2020. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

GenBank accession numbers were as follows: ON333901–ON333931 for cytb gene, ON333848–ON333900 for IRBP gene, ON314941–ON314990 for XIST gene first fragment, and ON314885–ON314940 for XIST gene second fragment.

Acknowledgments

The research was conducted using equipment from the Core Centrum of Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology RAS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Davies, K.T.; Bennett, N.C.; Faulkes, C.G.; Rossiter, S.J. Limited evidence for parallel molecular adaptations associated with the subterranean niche in mammals: A comparative study of three superorders. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 2544–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Du, K.; Yang, L.; He, S. Phylogenomic analyses reveal a molecular signature linked to subterranean adaptation in rodents. BMC Evol. Biol. 2015, 15, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Nevo, E. Adaptive convergence and divergence of subterranean mammals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1979, 10, 269–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. de Freitas, T.R.O.; Gonçalves, G.L.; Maestri, R. (Eds.) Tuco-Tucos: An Evolutionary Approach to the Diversity of a Neotropical Subterranean Rodent; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Freitas, T.R.O.D. Speciation within the genus Ctenomys: An Attempt to Find Models. In Tuco-Tucos; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 43–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moreira, C.D.N.; Percequillo, A.R.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y.; Ventura, K. Chromosomal evolution of tribe Oryzomyini (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae). Mamm. Biol. 2022, 102, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Visser, J.H.; Bennett, N.C.; van Vuuren, B.J. Phylogeny and biogeography of the African Bathyergidae: A review of patterns and processes. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lande, R. Effective deme sizes during long-term evolution estimated from rates of chromosomal rearrangement. Evolution 1979, 33, 234–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Visser, J.H.; Bennett, N.C.; Jansen van Vuuren, B. Spatial genetic diversity in the Cape mole-rat, Georychus capensis: Extreme isolation of populations in a subterranean environment. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wilson, A.C.; Bush, G.L.; Case, S.M.; King, M.C. Social structuring of mammalian populations and rate of chromosomal evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1975, 72, 5061–5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bush, G.L.; Case, S.M.; Wilson, A.C.; Patton, J.L. Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 3942–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Woolfit, M. Effective population size and the rate and pattern of nucleotide substitutions. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Bogdanov, A.S.; Lebedev, V.S.; Zykov, A.E.; Bakloushinskaya, I.Y. Variability of cytochrome b gene and adjacent part of tRNA-Thr gene of mitochondrial DNA in the northern mole vole Ellobius talpinus (Mammalia, Rodentia). Russ. J. Genet. 2015, 51, 1243–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lebedev, V.; Bogdanov, A.; Brandler, O.; Melnikova, M.; Enkhbat, U.; Tukhbatullin, A.; Abramov, A.; Surov, A.; Bakloushinskaya, I.; Bannikova, A. Cryptic variation in mole voles Ellobius (Arvicolinae, Rodentia) of Mongolia. Zool. Scr. 2020, 49, 535–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lyapunova, E.A.; Vorontsov, N.N.; Korobitsina, K.V.; Ivanitskaya, E.Y.; Borisov, Y.M.; Yakimenko, L.V.; Dovgal, V.Y. A Robertsonian fan in Ellobius talpinus. Genetica 1980, 52, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Romanenko, S.A.; Lyapunova, E.A.; Saidov, A.S.; O’Brien, P.; Serdyukova, N.A.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; Graphodatsky, A.S.; Bakloushinskaya, I. Chromosome translocations as a driver of diversification in mole voles Ellobius (Rodentia, Mammalia). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Lyapunova, E.A.; Vorontsov, N.N. Genetics of Ellobius (Rodentia). I. Karyological characteristics of four Ellobius species. Genetika 1978, 1, 2012–2024. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  18. Bakloushinskaya, I.; Lyapunova, E.A.; Saidov, A.S.; Romanenko, S.A.; O’Brien, P.C.; Serdyukova, N.A.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; Matveevsky, S.; Bogdanov, A.S. Rapid chromosomal evolution in enigmatic mammal with XX in both sexes, the Alay mole vole Ellobius alaicus Vorontsov et al., 1969 (Mammalia, Rodentia). Comp. Cytogenet. 2019, 13, 147–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Matveevsky, S.; Kolomiets, O.; Bogdanov, A.; Alpeeva, E.; Bakloushinskaya, I. Meiotic chromosome contacts as a plausible prelude for Robertsonian translocations. Genes 2020, 11, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ford, C.E.; Hamerton, J.L. A colchicine, hypotonic citrate, squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain. Technol. 1956, 31, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seabright, M. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 1971, 2, 971–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  23. Conroy, C.J.; Cook, J.A. MtDNA evidence for repeated pulses of speciation within arvicoline and murid rodents. J. Mamm. Evol. 1999, 6, 221–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lebedev, V.S.; Bannikova, A.A.; Neumann, K.; Ushakova, M.V.; Ivanova, N.V.; Surov, A.V. Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomy of dwarf hamsters Cricetulus Milne-Edwards, 1867 (Cricetidae, Rodentia): Description of a new genus and reinstatement of another. Zootaxa 2018, 4387, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Stanhope, M.J.; Czelusniak, J.; Si, J.S.; Nickerson, J.; Goodman, M. A molecular perspective on mammalian evolution from the gene encoding interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein, with convincing evidence for bat monophyly. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 1992, 1, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bogdanov, A.S.; Khlyap, L.A.; Kefelioğlu, H.; Selçuk, A.Y.; Stakheev, V.V.; Baskevich, M.I. High molecular variability in three pine vole species of the subgenus Terricola (Microtus, Arvicolinae) and plausible source of polymorphism. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2021, 59, 2519–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nguyen, L.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating Maximum-Likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Minh, B.Q.; Trifinopoulos, J.; Schrempf, D.; Schmidt, H.A. IQ-TREE Version 2.0: Tutorials and Manual Phylogenomic Software by Maximum Likelihood. 2019. Available online: http://www.iqtree.org (accessed on 15 August 2019).
  31. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Spöri, Y.; Flot, J.F. HaplowebMaker and CoMa: Two web tools to delimit species using haplowebs and conspecificity matrices. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2020, 11, 1434–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Petzold, A.; Hassanin, A. A comparative approach for species delimitation based on multiple methods of multi-locus DNA sequence analysis: A case study of the genus Giraffa (Mammalia, Cetartiodactyla). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0217956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, J.; Bennett, J.; Flouri, T.; Leaché, A.D.; Yang, Z. Phase resolution of heterozygous sites in diploid genomes is important to phylogenomic analysis under the multispecies coalescent model. Syst. Biol. 2022, 71, 334–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lyapunova, E.A.; Bakloushinskaya, I.Y.; Saidov, A.S.; Saidov, K.K. Dynamics of chromosome variation in mole voles Ellobius tancrei (Mammalia, Rodentia) in Pamiro-Alai in the Period from 1982 to 2008. Russ. J. Genet. 2010, 46, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bakloushinskaya, I.; Romanenko, S.; Serdukova, N.; Graphodatsky, A.; Lyapunova, E. A new form of the mole vole Ellobius tancrei Blasius, 1884 (Mammalia, Rodentia) with the lowest chromosome number. Comp. Cytogenet. 2013, 7, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Bakloushinskaya, I.Y.; Lyapunova, E.A. History of study and evolutionary significance of wide Robertsonian variability in mole voles Ellobius tancrei s.l. (Mammalia, Rodentia). In Problems of Evolution; Kryukov, A.P., Ed.; Dalnauka: Vladivostok, Russia, 2003; Volume 5, pp. 114–126. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bogdanov, A.S.; Maltsev, A.N.; Kotenkova, E.V.; Malikov, V.G.; Lissovsky, A.A.; Stakheev, V.V.; Darvish, J.; Castiglia, R. Variability of fragments of nuclear Brca1 gene, exon 11, and mitochondrial Cox1 gene in house mice Mus musculus. Mol. Biol. 2020, 54, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nesterova, T.B.; Slobodyanyuk, S.Y.; Elisaphenko, E.A.; Shevchenko, A.I.; Johnston, C.; Pavlova, M.E.; Rogozin, I.B.; Kolesnikov, N.N.; Brockdorff, N.; Zakian, S.M. Characterization of the genomic Xist locus in rodents reveals conservation of overall gene structure and tandem repeats but rapid evolution of unique sequence. Genome Res. 2001, 11, 833–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Matveevsky, S.; Tretiakov, A.; Kashintsova, A.; Bakloushinskaya, I.; Kolomiets, O. Meiotic nuclear architecture in distinct mole vole hybrids with Robertsonian translocations: Chromosome chains, stretched centromeres, and distorted recombination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lyapunova, E.A.; Baklushinskaya, I.Y.; Kolomiets, O.L.; Mazurova, T.F. Analysis of fertility of hybrids of multi-chromosomal forms in mole-voles of the super-species Ellobius tancrei differing in a single pair of Robertsonian metacentrics. Proc. USSR Acad. Sci. 1990, 310, 26–29. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  42. Mayr, E. Populations, Species, and Evolution; The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  43. Nowak, A.; Świerszcz, S.; Nowak, S.; Nobis, M. Classification of tall-forb vegetation in the Pamir-Alai and western Tian Shan Mountains (Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, Middle Asia). Veg. Classif. Surv. 2020, 1, 191–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tomasco, I.H.; Lessa, E.P. Phylogeography of the tuco–tuco Ctenomys pearsoni: mtDNA variation and its implication for chromosomal differentiation. In The Quintessential Naturalist: Honoring the Life and Legacy of Oliver P. Pearson; Kelt, D.A., Lessa, E.P., Salazar-Bravo, J.A., Patton, J.L., Eds.; University of California Publications in Zoology: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2007; pp. 859–882. [Google Scholar]
  45. Reig, O.; Busch, C.; Contreras, J.; Ortells, M. An overview of evolution, systematic, population biology and molecular biology. In Biology of Subterranean Mammals; Nevo, E., Reig, O.A., Eds.; Wiley-Liss: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 71–96. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fernandes, F.A.; Fornel, R.; Cordeiro-Estrela, P.; Freitas, T.R.O. Intra- and interespecific skull variation in two sister species of the subterranean rodent genus Ctenomys (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae): Coupling geometric morphometrics and chromosomal polymorphism. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 155, 220–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Fornel, R.; Cordeiro-Estrela, P.; Freitas, T.R.O. Skull shape and size variation within and between mendocinus and torquatus groups in the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae) in chromosomal polymorphism context. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2018, 41, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Van Daele, P.A.; Verheyen, E.; Brunain, M.; Adriaens, D. Cytochrome b sequence analysis reveals differential molecular evolution in African mole-rats of the chromosomally hyperdiverse genus Fukomys (Bathyergidae, Rodentia) from the Zambezian region. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2007, 45, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Map of localities studied for E. alaicus (triangles), E. tancrei (circles), and proposed hybrid zone (square) in Gulcha vicinities (Kyrgyzstan). Colors of the incorporated table correspond to the numbers of studied localities (see Table S1). Points 24–30 were beyond the map.
Figure 1. Map of localities studied for E. alaicus (triangles), E. tancrei (circles), and proposed hybrid zone (square) in Gulcha vicinities (Kyrgyzstan). Colors of the incorporated table correspond to the numbers of studied localities (see Table S1). Points 24–30 were beyond the map.
Life 12 00728 g001
Figure 2. Chromosomes of E. alaicus and a hybrid with E. tancrei, G-banded karyotypes: (a) 27491, 2n = 53, hybrid, #1; (b) 27487, 2n = 51, #10; (c) 27503, 2n = 50, #7.
Figure 2. Chromosomes of E. alaicus and a hybrid with E. tancrei, G-banded karyotypes: (a) 27491, 2n = 53, hybrid, #1; (b) 27487, 2n = 51, #10; (c) 27503, 2n = 50, #7.
Life 12 00728 g002
Figure 3. The maximum-likelihood tree as inferred from the cytb gene data on 60 specimens of E. tancrei and E. alaicus. The dendrogram was rooted on the group of mole voles from Mongolia. Numbers above nodes correspond to bootstrap support (>70%). The names of the samples are presented in the form of “locality number—individual number”. The color selection corresponds to haplowebs: cyan marks Mongolian E. tancrei (#28–30); green marks Central Asian E. tancrei; blue marks probable interspecific hybrids from Gulcha vicinities (#1); purple and yellow mark “eastern” and “western” haplotypes of E. alaicus, respectively.
Figure 3. The maximum-likelihood tree as inferred from the cytb gene data on 60 specimens of E. tancrei and E. alaicus. The dendrogram was rooted on the group of mole voles from Mongolia. Numbers above nodes correspond to bootstrap support (>70%). The names of the samples are presented in the form of “locality number—individual number”. The color selection corresponds to haplowebs: cyan marks Mongolian E. tancrei (#28–30); green marks Central Asian E. tancrei; blue marks probable interspecific hybrids from Gulcha vicinities (#1); purple and yellow mark “eastern” and “western” haplotypes of E. alaicus, respectively.
Life 12 00728 g003
Figure 4. Haplowebs generated by HaplowebMaker for cytb (a), XIST (b), and IRBP (c) genes of studied mole voles (see Table S1). The circles represent alleles with sizes proportional to their frequency in the populations. The investigated taxonomic hypotheses are distinguished by different colors (d). The length of the branches is proportional to the number of mutations. The curves connect individuals sharing one unique pool of alleles. The thickness of the curves is proportional to the number of hybrids.
Figure 4. Haplowebs generated by HaplowebMaker for cytb (a), XIST (b), and IRBP (c) genes of studied mole voles (see Table S1). The circles represent alleles with sizes proportional to their frequency in the populations. The investigated taxonomic hypotheses are distinguished by different colors (d). The length of the branches is proportional to the number of mutations. The curves connect individuals sharing one unique pool of alleles. The thickness of the curves is proportional to the number of hybrids.
Life 12 00728 g004
Figure 5. The maximum-likelihood tree as inferred from the XIST gene data on 56 specimens of E. tancrei and E. alaicus. The dendrogram was rooted on the group of mole voles from Mongolia. Numbers above nodes correspond to bootstrap support (>70%). The names of the samples are presented in the form of “locality number—individual number”. Haplotypes, which were hypothetically deduced from heterozygous genotypes, are designated by asterisks: the new haplotype with deletion is marked by one asterisk, whilst another haplotype is marked by two asterisks. The color selection corresponds to haplowebs: cyan marks Mongolian E. tancrei (#28–30); green marks Central Asian E. tancrei specimens; blue marks probable interspecific hybrids from Gulcha vicinities (#1); purple and yellow mark “eastern” and “western” haplotypes of E. alaicus, respectively.
Figure 5. The maximum-likelihood tree as inferred from the XIST gene data on 56 specimens of E. tancrei and E. alaicus. The dendrogram was rooted on the group of mole voles from Mongolia. Numbers above nodes correspond to bootstrap support (>70%). The names of the samples are presented in the form of “locality number—individual number”. Haplotypes, which were hypothetically deduced from heterozygous genotypes, are designated by asterisks: the new haplotype with deletion is marked by one asterisk, whilst another haplotype is marked by two asterisks. The color selection corresponds to haplowebs: cyan marks Mongolian E. tancrei (#28–30); green marks Central Asian E. tancrei specimens; blue marks probable interspecific hybrids from Gulcha vicinities (#1); purple and yellow mark “eastern” and “western” haplotypes of E. alaicus, respectively.
Life 12 00728 g005
Figure 6. The maximum-likelihood tree as inferred from the IRBP gene data on 56 specimens of E. tancrei and E. alaicus. The dendrogram was rooted on the group of mole voles from Mongolia. Numbers above nodes correspond to bootstrap support (>70%). The names of the samples are presented in the form of “locality number—individual number”. Haplotypes, which were hypothetically deduced from heterozygous genotypes, are marked by asterisks: the haplotype typical for E. tancrei is marked by one asterisk, whilst the haplotype typical for the majority of E. alaicus specimens is marked by two asterisks. The color selection corresponds to haplowebs: cyan marks Mongolian E. tancrei (#28–30); green marks Central Asian E. tancrei specimens; blue marks probable interspecific hybrids from Gulcha vicinities (#1); purple and yellow mark E. alaicus specimens with “eastern” and “western” XIST haplotypes, respectively.
Figure 6. The maximum-likelihood tree as inferred from the IRBP gene data on 56 specimens of E. tancrei and E. alaicus. The dendrogram was rooted on the group of mole voles from Mongolia. Numbers above nodes correspond to bootstrap support (>70%). The names of the samples are presented in the form of “locality number—individual number”. Haplotypes, which were hypothetically deduced from heterozygous genotypes, are marked by asterisks: the haplotype typical for E. tancrei is marked by one asterisk, whilst the haplotype typical for the majority of E. alaicus specimens is marked by two asterisks. The color selection corresponds to haplowebs: cyan marks Mongolian E. tancrei (#28–30); green marks Central Asian E. tancrei specimens; blue marks probable interspecific hybrids from Gulcha vicinities (#1); purple and yellow mark E. alaicus specimens with “eastern” and “western” XIST haplotypes, respectively.
Life 12 00728 g006
Figure 7. Haplowebs for two nuclear markers (a) and three markers, including cytb (b), of studied mole voles (see Table S1). The investigated taxonomic hypotheses are distinguished by different colors (c). The circles represent alleles with sizes proportional to their frequency in the populations. The length of the branches is proportional to the number of mutations. The curves connect individuals sharing one unique pool of alleles. The thickness of the curves is proportional to the number of hybrids.
Figure 7. Haplowebs for two nuclear markers (a) and three markers, including cytb (b), of studied mole voles (see Table S1). The investigated taxonomic hypotheses are distinguished by different colors (c). The circles represent alleles with sizes proportional to their frequency in the populations. The length of the branches is proportional to the number of mutations. The curves connect individuals sharing one unique pool of alleles. The thickness of the curves is proportional to the number of hybrids.
Life 12 00728 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tambovtseva, V.; Bakloushinskaya, I.; Matveevsky, S.; Bogdanov, A. Geographic Mosaic of Extensive Genetic Variations in Subterranean Mole Voles Ellobius alaicus as a Consequence of Habitat Fragmentation and Hybridization. Life 2022, 12, 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12050728

AMA Style

Tambovtseva V, Bakloushinskaya I, Matveevsky S, Bogdanov A. Geographic Mosaic of Extensive Genetic Variations in Subterranean Mole Voles Ellobius alaicus as a Consequence of Habitat Fragmentation and Hybridization. Life. 2022; 12(5):728. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12050728

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tambovtseva, Valentina, Irina Bakloushinskaya, Sergey Matveevsky, and Aleksey Bogdanov. 2022. "Geographic Mosaic of Extensive Genetic Variations in Subterranean Mole Voles Ellobius alaicus as a Consequence of Habitat Fragmentation and Hybridization" Life 12, no. 5: 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12050728

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop