Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing the Social Knowledge Construction and Online Searching Behavior of High School Learners During a Collaborative Problem Solving Learning Activity: a Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Pattern Analysis

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aims to explore the behavioral patterns of the social knowledge construction process and the online searching behaviors in a collaborative problem solving learning activity for high school students, and further compares the different behavioral patterns of the high- and low-performing teams. A total of 78 high school students from two schools participated. This study applied sequential analysis to analyze the students’ social knowledge construction and online searching behavior from a large amount of screen-recording data. Interestingly, the results indicate that social interaction that is irrelevant to the discussion task is significantly correlated with academic-related discussion content. Reaching a higher cognitive level of social knowledge construction (e.g., reaching agreement or applying newly constructed meaning) contributes to a successful team project. For online searching behavior, the high-performing teams exhibited systematic online searching behavior and concentrated on the task, while the low-performing teams displayed chaotic searching behavior and were distracted from the task at hand, and seemed to rarely propose their searched results or ideas in their discussions. Based on the results, several possible explanations and suggestions are proposed including the need to promote more adaptive motivation and to provide scaffolding for collaborative skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Chiu, M. M., & Wang, Z. (2012). Social metacognition and the creation of correct, new ideas: a statistical discourse analysis of online mathematics discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 868–880. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H., & Kang, M. (2010). Applying an activity system to online collaborative group work analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 776–795. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00978.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wever, B., Keer, H. V., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: the differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 516–523. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: a review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiDonato, N. C. (2012). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: an analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41(1), 25–47. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9206-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, N. (2009). Visualizing the sequential process of knowledge elaboration in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. Computers & Education, 52(2), 509–519. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldma, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from internet sources: processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 356–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinee, K., Eagleton, M. B., & Hall, T. E. (2003). Adolescents’ internet search strategies: drawing upon familiar cognitive paradigms when accessing electronic information sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 397–431.

  • Heo, H., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1383–1392. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Chernobilsky, E., & Jordan, R. (2008). Understanding collaborative learning processes in new learning environments. Instructional Science, 36(5–6), 409–430. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9063-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, H. T. (2011). A case study of online instructional collaborative discussion activities for problem solving using situated scenarios: an examination of content and behavior cluster analysis. Computers & Education, 56(3), 712–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, H. T. (2012). Analyzing the learning process of an online role-playing discussion activity. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: a case study. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1459–1468. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. M., & Saxon, T. F. (2009). Negotiation of meaning and co-construction of knowledge: an experimental analysis of asynchronous online instruction. Computers & Education, 52(3), 624–639. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B. J., & Pooch, U. (2001). A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2007). Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 439–459. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9045-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiili, C., Laurinen, L., Marttunen, M., & Leu, D. J. (2012). Working on understanding during collaborative online reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(4), 448–483. doi:10.1177/1086296x12457166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P. A., & Janssen, J. (2011). Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 587–599. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49(2), 176–192. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, F. R., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). A five-phase learning cycle approach to improving the web-based problem-solving performance of students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, Y. F., Tsai, P. W., Yang, S. H., & Hung, C. L. (2012). Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e/m-learning environments. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1122–1135. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 57–87. doi:10.1007/s11412-006-6844-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., McVerry, J. G., O’Byrne, W. I., Kiili, C., Zawilinski, L., Everett-Cacopardo, H., et al. (2011). The new literacies of online reading comprehension: expanding the literacy and learning curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(1), 5–14. doi:10.1598/jaal.55.1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, P. C., Hou, H. T., Wang, S. M., & Chang, K. E. (2013). Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course. Computers & Education, 60(1), 110–121. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, W. W. K., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2011). Understanding online knowledge sharing: an interpersonal relationship perspective. Computers & Education, 56(1), 210–219. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2009). Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: are students epistemically active? Instructional Science, 38(6), 607–633. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9089-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mat-Hassan, M., & Levene, M. (2005). Associating search and navigation behavior through log analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 913–934. doi:10.1002/asi.20185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Busstra, M. C., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2011). Differences in learning processes between successful and less successful students in computer-supported collaborative learning in the field of human nutrition and health. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 309–318. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in multidisciplinary CSCL environments. Learning and Instruction, 25, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, I., Tinoca, L., & Pereira, A. (2011). Online group work patterns: how to promote a successful collaboration. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1348–1357. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oztok, M., Zingaro, D., Brett, C., & Hewitt, J. (2013). Exploring asynchronous and synchronous tool use in online courses. Computers & Education, 60(1), 87–94. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing collaborative interactions: divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 47(3), 332–351. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers & Education, 46(4), 349–370. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serçe, F. C., Swigger, K., Alpaslan, F. N., Brazile, R., Dafoulas, G., & Lopez, V. (2011). Online collaboration: collaborative behavior patterns and factors affecting globally distributed team performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 490–503. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Y., & Tombros, A. (2014). Investigating collaborative sensemaking behavior in collaborative information seeking. Computer, 47(3), 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, M. J., Hsu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Investigation of high school students’ online science information searching performance: the role of implicit and explicit strategies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 246–254. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9307-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veerman, A., & Veldhuis-Diermanse, E.. (2001). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education. Paper presented at the In Euro CSCL 2001 (pp. 625–632).

  • Verdugo, R., Barros, L., Albornoz, D., Nussbaum, M., & McFarlane, A. (2014). Scripting for collaborative search computer-supported classroom activities. Educational Technology and Society, 17(3), 308–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2009). Design and evaluation of a collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1138–1146. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2012). The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Computers & Education, 58(2), 679–687. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M. M., & Derous, E. (2011). Investigating effects of problem-based versus lecture-based learning environments on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 101–113. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, K., Miller, N. C., & Allison, J. R. (2013). Toward a social conflict evolution model: examining the adverse power of conflictual social interaction in online learning. Computers & Education, 63, 404–415. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap, K. C., & Chia, K. P. (2010). Knowledge construction and misconstruction: a case study approach in asynchronous discussion using knowledge construction—message map (KCMM) and knowledge construction—message graph (KCMG). Computers & Education, 55(4), 1589–1613. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zydney, J. M., deNoyelles, A., & Kyeong-Ju Seo, K. (2012). Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: an exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions. Computers & Education, 58(1), 77–87. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the projects from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of China, under contract numbers: MOST-103-2511-S-011-003-MY3, MOST-104-2511-S-011-003-MY3, MOST-105-2511-S-011-006-MY3, MOST-104-2511-656-001, MOST-105-2511-656-001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huei-Tse Hou.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Z scores of online searching behavior for all participating teams

Table 6

Appendix 2: Z scores of online searching behavior for high-performing teams

Table 7

Appendix 3: Z scores of online searching behavior for low-performing teams

Table 8

Appendix 4: Z scores of social knowledge construction for all participating teams

Table 9

Appendix 5: Z scores of social knowledge construction for high-performing teams

Table 10

Appendix 6: Z scores of social knowledge construction for low-performing teams

Table 11

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, CL., Hou, HT. & Tsai, CC. Analyzing the Social Knowledge Construction and Online Searching Behavior of High School Learners During a Collaborative Problem Solving Learning Activity: a Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Pattern Analysis. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 25, 893–906 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0317-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0317-y

Navigation