Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: are students epistemically active?

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Students are making an increased use of the Web as a source for solving information problems for academic assignments. To extend current research about search behavior during navigation on the Web, this study examined whether students are able to spontaneously reflect, from an epistemic perspective, on the information accessed, and whether their epistemic metacognition is related to individual characteristics, such as prior knowledge of the topic and the need for cognition. In addition, we investigated whether Internet-based learning is influenced by the activation of spontaneous epistemic metacognition in the search context. Forty-six psychology and engineering university students were asked to research information about a controversial subject in order to write an essay. They were also asked to think aloud during their research. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed. As revealed by their spontaneous reflections, all participants were epistemically active, although to different extents and levels. As expected, there was evidence that students activated beliefs about the four epistemic dimensions identified in the literature, especially about the credibility of an electronic source and the criteria for justification of knowledge. Prior knowledge was not related to activation of epistemic beliefs in the search context, while the need for cognition significantly associated with aspects of source and its content evaluation. Two patterns of epistemic metacognition were identified and they significantly influenced Internet-based learning. Students who spontaneously generated more sophisticated reflections about the sources as well as the information provided, outperformed students who were active only at the first epistemic level. Educational implications are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agosto, D. E. (2002). A model of young people’s decision-making in using the Web. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 311–341. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(02)00131-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2003). Learning from traditional and alternative texts: New conceptualizations for the information age. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 199–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Adi Fine, O. K. (2007). The effect of need for cognition on Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 880–891. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning? Metacognition and Learning, 3, 39–58. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9009-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilal, D. (2000). Children’s use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: I. Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 646–665. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:7<646::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilal, D. (2001). Children’s use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: II. Cognitive and physical behaviors on research task. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 118–136. doi:10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1038>3.0.CO;2-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 487–508. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., Gil, L., Storey, J., Strømsø, H. I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Britt, M. A.(2008, March). Personal epistemology across cultures: Exploring the dimensionality of topic-specific epistemic beliefs in Norway, Spain, and the United States. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, USA.

  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2006). Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1027–1042. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (in press). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes.

  • Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2005). The relationship between Internet-specific epistemological beliefs and learning within Internet technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 141–171. doi:10.2190/E763-X0LN-6NMF-CB86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brem, S. K., Russell, J., & Weems, L. (2001). Science on the Web: Student evaluations of scientific arguments. Discourse Processes, 32, 191–213. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Stahl, E. (2008). Knowledge and epistemological beliefs: An intimate but complicate relationship. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 399–416). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 687–726. doi:10.3102/00028312042004697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 415–449. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. B., & Slotta, J. D. (2000). Evaluating media-enhancement and source authority on the Internet: the Knowledge Integration Environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 859–871. doi:10.1080/095006900412310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56, 458–464. Retrieved from http://www.readingonline.org/electronic/rt/2-03

  • Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, J., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186–204. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornoldi, C., & Soresi, S. (1980). Psychological diagnosis of learning difficulties [La diagnosi psicologica delle difficoltà di apprendimento]. Pordenone, Italy: ERIP. (in Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, D., & Gresty, K. (2006). Reflecting on the think-aloud method for evaluating e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 45–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00521.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y., & Wang, X. (2007). The role of need for cognition and reader beliefs in text comprehension and interest development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 332–347. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A., Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2003). J’s epistemological stance and strategies. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 237–290). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominowski, R. L. (1998). Verbalization and problem solving. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 25–45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (2000). The BIG6 collection: The best of the Big6 newsletter. Worthington, OH: Linworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis. Verbal reports as data (revised edition). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidel, R., Davies, R. K., Douglass, M. H., Holder, J. K., Hopkins, C. J., Kurshner, E. J., et al. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behaviour of high school student. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 50, 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30, 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, B. (1999). Graduate student cognition during information retrieval using the World Wide Web: A pilot study. Computers & Education, 33, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, S. (1999). Children’s relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1265–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Reading Association. (2001). Integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum: A position statement. Retrieved from http://www.reading.org/downloads/positions/ps1048_technology.pdf

  • Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 301–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y., & Bates, M. J. (1997). Internet Web-searching instruction in the elementary classroom: Building a foundation for information literacy. School Library Media Quarterly (Winter), 103–111.

  • Karabenick, S., & Moosa, S. (2005). Culture and personal epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern students’ beliefs about scientific knowledge and knowing. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issue. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. A., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. A., & Kitchener, K. S. (2002). The reflective judgment model: Twenty years of research on epistemic cognition. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 37–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition. Human Development, 26, 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, 16–25. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The web as an information resource in K-12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75, 285–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). Domain knowledge, interest, and hypertext navigation: A study of individual differences. Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J. (2002). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 743–770). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). A “navigation flow map” method of representing students’ searching behaviors and strategies on the Web. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 689–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39, 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, R., & Stanovich, K. E. (2007). Cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, and instructional set as predictors of critical thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MaKinster, J. G., Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Why can’t I find Newton’s third law? Case studies of students’ use of the Web as a Science Resource. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchionini, G., Dwiggins, S., Katz, A., & Lin, X. (1993). Information seeking in full-text and user oriented search systems: The role of domain and search expertise. Library and Information Science Research, 15, 35–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L. (2000). Role of anomalous data and epistemological beliefs in middle students’ theory change on two controversial topics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., & Boldrin, A. (2008). Epistemic metacognition in the context of information searching on the Web. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 377–404). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., & Boscolo, P. (2004). Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., & Gava, M. (2007). Effects of epistemological beliefs and learning text structure on conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 165–197). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topic by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16, 492–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, B. (1971). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bullettin, 27, 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K. R. (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: Examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 177–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuckles, M., & Bromme, R. (2002). Internet experts’ planning of explanations for laypersons: A Web experimental approach in the Internet domain. Experimental Psychology, 49, 292–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., & Black, J. B. (2007). Identifying the impact of domain knowledge and cognitive style on Web-based information search behaviour. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helpleness in secondary school student’ leaning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D., & Swan, K. (2004). Self-regulated learning and Internet searching. Teachers College Record, 106, 1804–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, J., Chung, G., & Dorr, A. (1998). Children’s Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analyses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 840–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (1995). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southerland, S. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Learning about biological evolution: A special case of intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 317–345). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs and metacognitive calibration: An exploratory study. Journal of Computing Research, 35, 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies in individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple-text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18, 513–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2001). A review and discussion of epistemological commitments, metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestions on their enhancement in Internet-Assisted Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 970–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2004a). Beyond cognitive and metacognitive tools: The use of Internet as an “epistemological” tool for instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 525–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2004b). Information commitments in Web-based learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2008). The use of Internet-based instruction for the development of epistemological beliefs: A case study in Taiwan. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 273–285). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C., & Chuang, S. C. (2005). The correlation between epistemological beliefs and preferences toward Internet-based learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Y. W., Shih, M., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Eighth graders’ web searching strategies and outcomes: The role of task types, web experiences and epistemological beliefs. Computers & Education, 51, 1142–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. M., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 75–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, M., Neuman, Y., & Tabak, I. (2004). Missing the point or missing the norms? Epistemological norms as predictors of students’ ability to identify fallacious arguments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmire, E. (2003). Epistemological beliefs and the information-seeking behaviour of undergraduates. Library and Information Science Research, 25, 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., & Duke, N. K. (2005). Strategies of Internet reading with different reading purposes. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study presented in this paper, which is part of a wider research program, was partially supported by the Jacobs Foundation, Zurich (Switzerland), under a dissertation grant to the second author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology (DPSS), University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy

    Lucia Mason, Angela Boldrin & Nicola Ariasi

Authors
  1. Lucia Mason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angela Boldrin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicola Ariasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia Mason.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason, L., Boldrin, A. & Ariasi, N. Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: are students epistemically active?. Instr Sci 38, 607–633 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9089-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9089-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation