Abstract
Earthquakes exhibit clear clustering on the earth. It is important to explore the spatial-temporal characteristics of seismicity clusters and their spatial heterogeneity. We analyze effects of plate space, tectonic style, and their interaction on characteristic of cluster. Based on data of earthquakes not less than moment magnitude (MW) 5.6 from 1960 to 2014, this study used the spatial-temporal scan method to identify earthquake clusters. The results indicate that seismic spatial-temporal clusters can be classified into two types based on duration: persistent clusters and burst clusters. Finally, we analysed the spatial heterogeneity of the two types. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) Ninety percent of the persistent clusters last for 22–38 yr and show a high clustering likelihood; ninety percent of the burst clusters last for 1–1.78 yr and show a high relative risk. 2) The persistent clusters are mainly distributed in interplate zones, especially along the western margin of the Pacific Ocean. The burst clusters are distributed in both intraplate and interplate zones, slightly concentrated in the India-Eurasia interaction zone. 3) For the persistent type, plate interaction plays an important role in the distribution of the clusters’ likelihood and relative risk. In addition, the tectonic style further enhances the spatial heterogeneity. 4) For the burst type, neither plate activity nor tectonic style has an obvious effect on the distribution of the clusters’ likelihood and relative risk. Nevertheless, interaction between these two spatial factors enhances the spatial heterogeneity, especially in terms of relative risk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berryman K R, Cochran U A, Clark K J et al., 2012. Major earthquakes occur regularly on an isolated plate boundary fault. Science, 336(6089): 1690–1693. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218959
Copley A, Avouac J P, Royer J Y, 2010. India-Asia collision and the Cenozoic slowdown of the Indian plate: implications for the forces driving plate motions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 115(B3): B03410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006634
Faenza L, Marzocchi W, Serretti P et al., 2008. On the spatio-temporal distribution of M 7.0+ worldwide seismicity with a non-parametric statistics. Tectonophysics, 449(1–4): 97–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.11.066
Gao Junqin, Ouyang Hua, Lei Guangchun et al., 2011. Effects of temperature, soil moisture, soil type and their interactions on soil carbon mineralization in Zoigê alpine wetland, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Chinese Geographical Science, 21(1): 27–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-011-0439-3
Hall T R, Nixon C W, Keir D et al., 2018. Earthquake clustering and energy release of the African-Arabian rift system. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(1): 155–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160343
Hanks T C, Kanamori H, 1979. A moment magnitude scale. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 84(B5): 2348–2350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB05p02348
Iaffaldano G, Husson L, Bunge H P, 2011. Monsoon speeds up Indian plate motion. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 304(3–4): 4–510. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.026
Jagoutz O, Royden L, Holt A F et al., 2015. Anomalously fast convergence of India and Eurasia caused by double subduction. Nature Geoscience, 8(6): 475–478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2418
Jiang C S, Wu Z L, 2005. Test of the preshock accelerating moment release (AMR) in the case of the 26 December 2004 M W 9.0 Indonesia earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95(5): 2016–2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050018
Kagan Y Y, Jackson D D, 2000. Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes. Geophysical Journal International, 143(2): 438–453. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2000.01267.x
Kagan Y Y, Jackson D D, 2010. Earthquake forecasting in diverse tectonic zones of the globe. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 167(6–7): 4–719. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0074-4
Kagan Y Y, Jackson D D, 2012. Whole earth high-resolution earthquake forecasts. Geophysical Journal International, 190(1): 677–686. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05521.x
Kulldorff M, Heffernan R, Hartman J et al., 2005. A space-time permutation scan statistic for disease outbreak detection. PLoS Medicine, 2(3): e59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020059
Lay T, 2015. The surge of great earthquakes from 2004 to 2014. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 409: 133–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.10.047
Leat P T, Jordan T A, Flowerdew M J et al., 2018. Jurassic high heat production granites associated with the Weddell Sea rift system, Antarctica. Tectonophysics, 722: 249–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.11.011
Liu M, Stein S, 2016. Mid-continental earthquakes: spatiotemporal occurrences, causes, and hazards. Earth-Science Reviews, 162: 364–386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.09.016
Loveless J P, Allmendinger R W, Pritchard M E et al., 2010. Normal and reverse faulting driven by the subduction zone earthquake cycle in the northern Chilean fore arc. Tectonics, 29(2): TC2001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2009TC002465
Luo W, Jasiewicz J, Stepinski T et al., 2016. Spatial association between dissection density and environmental factors over the entire conterminous United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(2): 692–700. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066941
Main I, 1996. Statistical physics, seismogenesis, and seismic hazard. Reviews of Geophysics, 34(4): 433–462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/96RG02808
Mukhopadhyay B, Acharyya A, Dasgupta S, 2011. Potential source zones for Himalayan earthquakes: constraints from spatial-temporal clusters. Natural Hazards, 57(2): 369–383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9618-2
Mulargia F, Stark P B, Geller R J, 2017. Why is Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) still used?. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 264: 63–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2016.12.002
Parsons T, Geist E L, 2014. The 2010–2014.3 global earthquake rate increase. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(13): 4479–4485. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060513
Rehman K, Burton P W, Weatherill G A, 2014. K-means cluster analysis and seismicity partitioning for Pakistan. Journal of seismology, 18(3): 401–419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-013-9415-y
Schorlemmer D, Hirata N, Ishigaki Y et al, 2018. Earthquake detection probabilities in Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(2): 702–717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170110
Scholz C H, 2002. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharma A S, Baker D N, Bhattacharyya A et al., 2013. Complexity and extreme events in geosciences: an overview. In: Sharma A S, Bunde A, Dimri V P, et al. (eds). Extreme Events and Natural Hazards: the Complexity Perspective. Washington: American Geophysical Union, 1–16.
Shen S, Cheng C X, Song C Q et al., 2018. Spatial distribution patterns of global natural disasters based on biclustering. Natural Hazards, 92(3): 1809–1820. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3279-y
Stadler G, Gurnis M, Burstedde C et al., 2010. The dynamics of plate tectonics and mantle flow: from local to global scales. Science, 329(5995): 1033–1038. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1191223
Storchak D A, Di Giacomo D, Bondár I et al., 2013. Public release of the ISC-GEM global instrumental earthquake catalogue (1900–2009). Seismological Research Letters, 84(5): 810–815. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220130034
Wang C L, Liang C T, Deng K et al., 2018. Spatiotemporal distribution of micro-earthquakes and implications around the seismic gap between the Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes. Tectonics, 37(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC004979
Wang J F, Li X H, Christakos G et al., 2010. Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun Region, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(1): 107–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802443457
Wu C Q, Guyer R, Shelly D et al., 2015. Spatial-temporal variation of low-frequency earthquake bursts near Parkfield, California. Geophysical Journal International, 202(2): 914–919. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv194
Zaliapin I, Ben-Zion Y, 2013. Earthquake clusters in southern California I: identification and stability. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(6): 2847–2864. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50179
Zaliapin I, Ben-Zion Y, 2013. Earthquake clusters in southern California II: classification and relation to physical properties of the crust. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(6): 2865–2877. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50178
Zaliapin I, Ben-Zion Y, 2016. A global classification and characterization of earthquake clusters. Geophysical Journal International, 207(1): 608–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw300
Zhang T, Gordon R G, Mishra J K et al., 2017. The Malpelo Plate Hypothesis and implications for nonclosure of the Cocos-Nazca-Pacific plate motion circuit. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(16): 8213–8218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073704
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41771537), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, J., Cheng, C., Song, C. et al. Spatial-temporal Distribution Characteristics of Global Seismic Clusters and Associated Spatial Factors. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 29, 614–625 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1059-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1059-6