Skip to main content
Log in

Displacement and force analyses of piles in the pile-caisson composite structure under eccentric inclined loading considering different stratum features

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel anchorage for long-span suspension bridges, called pile-caisson composite structures, was recently proposed by the authors in an attempt to reduce the construction period and costs. This study aims to investigate the displacement and force behavior of piles in a pile-caisson composite structure under eccentric inclined loading considering different stratum features. To this end, both 1g model tests and three-dimensional numerical simulations were performed. Two groups of 1g model tests were used to validate the finite-element (FE) method. Parametric studies were then performed to investigate the effects of groundwater level, burial depth of the pile-caisson composite structure, and distribution of soil layers on the performance of the pile-caisson composite structure. The numerical analyses indicated that the influence of the groundwater level on the stability of the caisson was much greater than that of the piles. In addition, increasing the burial depth of the pile-caisson composite structure can assist in reducing the displacements and improving the stability of the pile-caisson composite structure. In addition, the distribution of soil layers can significantly affect the stability of the pile-caisson composite structure, especially the soil layer around the caisson.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

1/n :

geometric similarity ratio

1/i :

similarity ratio of the soil density

G s :

specific gravity

w :

moisture content

ρ :

density

e max :

maximum void ratio

e min :

minimum void ratio

D r :

relative density

d 50 :

average particle size

φ :

friction angle

E p :

Young’s modulus of real bored piles in prototype

E m :

Young’s modulus of hollow piles in model tests

E n :

Young’s modulus of embedded piles

I p :

area moment of inertia of real bored piles in prototype

I m :

area moment of inertia of hollow piles in model tests

I n :

area moment of inertia of embedded piles

EI :

bending stiffness of piles

E p I p :

bending stiffness of real bored piles in prototype

E m I m :

bending stiffness of hollow piles in model tests

E n I n :

bending stiffness of embedded piles

d :

diameter of the embedded pile

l :

length of the embedded pile

γ :

unit weight

e :

void ratio

E s :

compression modulus

E refoed :

tangent stiffness from oedometer primary loading

E ref50 :

secant stiffness in standard drained triaxial tests

E refur :

loading–unloading stiffness

c′:

effective cohesion

φ′:

effective angle of internal friction

ψ :

dilatancy angle

m :

power of stress-level dependency of stiffness

F a :

applied load

F d :

designed load

R :

ratio of applied load on main cables to designed load on main cables

N SPT :

value of standard penetration test

σ 3 :

effective confining pressure

p ref :

referential pressure

H :

magnitude of groundwater level

z s :

burial depth of the pile-caisson composite structure

References

  1. Frandsen J B. Simultaneous pressures and accelerations measured full-scale on the Great Belt East suspension bridge. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2001, 89(1): 95–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitagawa M. Technology of the Akashi Kaikyo bridge. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2004, 11(2): 75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen J, Xu Y L, Zhang R C. Modal parameter identification of Tsing Ma suspension bridge under Typhoon Victor: EMD-HT metod. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2004, 92(10): 805–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brownjohn J M W, Magalhaes F, Caetano E, Cunha A. Ambient vibration re-testing and operational modal analysis of the Humber Bridge. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(8): 2003–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tao T Y, Wang H, Gao Y Q. Parametric analysis on flutter performance of a long-span quadruple-tower suspension bridge. Structures, 2020, 28: 1108–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giaccu G F, Caracoglia L. A gyroscopic stabilizer to improve flutter performance of long-span cable-supported bridges. Engineering Structures, 2021, 240: 112373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qin X, Liang M Z, Xie X L, Song H L. Mechanical performance analysis and stiffness test of a new type of suspension bridge. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(5): 1160–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamagata M, Yasuda M, Nitta A, Yamamoto S. Effects on the Akashi Kaikyo bridge. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(Special): 179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y S. Experimental study on the north anchorage of the Jiangyin Yangtze Bridge. Journal of Tongji University, 1995, 23: 134–140 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu X, Shao G J, Huang J S, Su J B, Xu H Z. Stability analysis of gravity anchorage: A case study of Taizhou Yangtze River Bridge. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2021, 25(6): 1002–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao X Q, Gong X N, Guo P P. Caisson-bored pile composite anchorage foundation for long-span suspension bridge: Feasibility study and parametric analysis. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2022, 27(12): 04022117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun Y, Su J B, Xia X H, Xu Z L. Numerical analysis of soil deformation behind the reaction wall of an open caisson induced by horizontal parallel pipe-jacking construction. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2015, 52(12): 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang B N, Wang M T, Chen T, Zhang L L, Ma J L. Experimental study on the migration regularity of sand outside a large, deep-water, open caisson during sinking. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 193: 106601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lai F, Liu S Y, Deng Y F, Sun Y X, Wu K, Liu H X. Numerical investigations of the instalation process of giant deep-buried circular open caissons in undrained clay. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 118: 103322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Royston R, Sheil B, Byrne W. Monitoring the construction of a large-diameter caisson in sand. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 175(3): 323–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li J, Chen S X, Yu F, Dai Z J, Luo H M, Zhang Y, Wang B. Mechanics and deformation characteristics of an oversized inclined caisson foundation when being reused. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 248: 110780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang A H, Zhang Y F, Xia F, Luo R P, Wang N. Study of the lateral bearing capacity and optimization reinforcement scheme of an open caisson with consideration of soil disturbance. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(11): 5498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang J, Prader J, Grimmelsman K A, Moon F, Aktan A E, Shama A. Experimental vibration analysis for structural identification of a long-span suspension bridge. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 139(6): 748–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gu M, Kong L G, Chen R P, Chen Y M, Bian X C. Response of 1×2 pile group under eccentric lateral loading. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 57: 114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kong L G, Chen R P, Wang S H, Chen Y M. Response of 3×3 pile groups in silt subjected to eccentric lateral loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2015, 141(7): 04015029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chanda D, Saha R, Haldar S. Behaviour of piled raft foundation in sand subjected to combined V M-H loading. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 216: 107596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Basack S, Karami M, Karakouzianc M. Pile-soil interaction under cyclic lateral load in loose sand: Experimental and numerical evaluations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 162: 107439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. di Laora R, de Sanctis L, Aversa S. Bearing capacity of pile groups under vertical eccentric load. Acta Geotechnica, 2019, 14(1): 193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Padmavathi M, Padmavathi V, Madhav M R. Response of two-pile group subjected to vertical eccentric load. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 1(6): 626–635

    Google Scholar 

  25. Azizkandi A S, Taherkhani R. Experimental study on connected and non-connected piled raft foundations subjected to eccentric loading. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 18(7B): 743–761

    Google Scholar 

  26. de Sanctis L, Di Laora R, Garala T K, Madabhushi S P G, Viggiani G M B, Fargnoli P. Centrifuge modelling of the behaviour of pile groups under vertical eccentric load. Soil and Foundation, 2021, 61(2): 465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meyerhof G G. Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1963, 1(1): 16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nimbalkar S, Basack S. Pile group in clay under cyclic lateral loading with emphasis on bending moment: Numerical modelling. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2022, 41(3): 269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yavari N, Tang A M, Pereira J M, Hassen G. Mechanical behaviour of a small-scale energy pile in saturated clay. Geotechnique, 2016, 66(11): 878–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liang X, Cheng Q G, Wu J J, Chen J M. Mode test of the group piles foundation of a high-speed railway bridge in mined-out area. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2016, 10(4): 488–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang X Y, Yang Z H, Chen X C, Guan J D, Pei W S, Luo T. Experimental study of frozen soil effect on seismic behavior of bridge pile foundations in cold regions. Structures, 2021, 32: 1752–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rizvi S M F, Wang K, Jalal F E. Evaluating the response of piles subjected to static and multiple dynamic axial loads. Structures, 2022, 40: 187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mroueh H, Shahrour I. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the interaction between tunneling and pile foundations. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2002, 26(3): 217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Achmus M, Kuo Y S, Abdel-Rahman K. Behavior of monopile foundations under cyclic lateral load. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(5): 725–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lam S Y, Ng C W W, Leung C F, Chan S H. Centrifuge and numerical modeling of axial load effects on piles in consolidating ground. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(1): 10–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cui M Z, Ren W X, Yin Y G. Numerical analysis and field load testing of a suspension bridge with a root pile anchorage. Structures, 2021, 34: 1373–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang Q Q, Liu S W, Feng R F, Qian J G, Cui C Y. Finite element prediction on the response of non-uniformly arranged pile groups considering progressive failure of pile-soil system. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(4): 961–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu X R, Han Y F, Yu C T, Xiong F, Zhou X H, Deng Z Y. Reliability assessment on stability of tunnel-type anchorages. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 125: 103661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou Z, Chen C, Wang L, Tian Y, Feng H, Wang K. Stability analysis of the gravity anchorage of a suspension bridge based on large-scale field tests. Stavební obzor-Civil Engineering Journal, 2021, 30(1): 282–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Baca M, Brzakala W, Rybak J. Bi-directional static load tests of pile models. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(16): 5492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baca M, Rybak J. Pile base and shaft capacity under various types of loading. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(8): 3396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hettler A, Gudehus G. A pressure-dependent correction for displacement results from 1g model tests with sand. Geotechnique, 1985, 35(4): 497–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chu L M, Zhang L M. Centrifuge modeling of ship impact loads on bridge pile foundations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2011, 137(4): 405–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu W X, Gu L L, Mei S, Nagasaki K, Chino N, Zhang F. 1g model tests of piled-raft foundation subjected to high-frequency vertical vibration loads. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 141: 106486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stewart J P, Taciroglu E, Wallace J W, Ahlberg E R, Lemnitzer A, Rha C, Tehrani P, Keowen S, Nigbor R L, Salamanca A. Full Scale Cyclic Large Deflection Testing of Foundation Support Systems for Highway Bridges. I: Drilled Shaft Foundations. Rep.No UCLA SGEL-01. 2007

  46. Schanz T, Vermeer P A, Bonnier P. Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics—10 Years of PLAXIS. London: Routledge, 1999, 281–296

    Google Scholar 

  47. Finno R J, Calvello M. Supported excavations: The observational method and inverse modeling. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(7): 826–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nguyen D D C, Kim D S, Jo S B. Settlement of piled rafts with different pile arrangement schemes via centrifuge tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(10): 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang W G, Li Y Q, Goh A T C, Zhang R H. Numerical study of the performance of jet grout piles for braced excavations in soft clay. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 124: 103631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang W D, Wang H R, Xu Z H. Experimental study of parameters of hardening soil model for numerical analysis of excavations of foundation pits. Rock and Soil Mechanies, 2012, 31(1): 258–264 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Brinkgreve R B J, Kumarswamy S, Swolfs W M. Plaxis 3D 2017 User’s Manual, 2017

  52. Zhang W, Li H, Li Y Q, Zhang R H, Goh A T C, Liu H L. Effects of jet grouting slabs on responses for deep braced excavations. Underground Space, 2021, 6(2): 185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Larkela A. Modeling of a pile group under static lateral loading. Thesis of the Master’s Degree. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technolog, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  54. Law H K, Lam I P. Application of periodic boundary for large pile group. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(10): 889–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Brown D A, Morrison C, Reese L. Lateral load behavior of pile group in sand. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 114(11): 1261–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Fayyazi M S, Taiebat M, Finn W D L. Group reduction factors for analysis of laterally loaded pile groups. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2014, 51(7): 758–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Dong X C, Guo M W, Wang S L. Advanced prediction of the sinking speed of open caissons based on the spatial-temporal characteristics of multivariate structural stress data. Applied Ocean Research, 2022, 127: 103330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51778575, 52078457).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinchang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, X., Wang, J., Guo, P. et al. Displacement and force analyses of piles in the pile-caisson composite structure under eccentric inclined loading considering different stratum features. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 17, 1517–1534 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0957-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0957-y

Keywords

Navigation