Skip to main content
Log in

A water quality monitoring network design using fuzzy theory and multiple criteria analysis

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A proper water quality monitoring design is required in a watershed, particularly in a water resource protected area. As numerous factors can influence the water quality monitoring design, this study applies multiple criteria analysis to evaluate the suitability of the water quality monitoring design in the Taipei Water Resource Domain (TWRD) in northern Taiwan. Seven criteria, which comprise percentage of farmland area, percentage of built-up area, amount of non-point source pollution, green cover ratio, landslide area ratio, ratio of over-utilization on hillsides, and density of water quality monitoring stations, are selected in the multiple criteria analysis. The criteria are normalized and weighted. The weighted method is applied to score the subbasins. The density of water quality stations needs to be increased in priority in the subbasins with a higher score. The fuzzy theory is utilized to prioritize the need for a higher density of water quality monitoring stations. The results show that the need for more water quality stations in subbasin 2 in the Bei-Shih Creek Basin is much higher than those in the other subbasins. Furthermore, the existing water quality station in subbasin 2 requires maintenance. It is recommended that new water quality stations be built in subbasin 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Kader, M. G., Dugdale, D., & Taylor, P. (1998). Investment decisions in advanced manufacturing technology—a fuzzy set theory approach. USA: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, B. S., & Park, K. S. (2008). Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights. Computers & Operations Research, 35, 1660–1670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basnyat, P., Teeter, L. D., Flynn, K. M., & Lockaby, B. G. (1991). Relationships between landscape characteristics and nonpoint source pollution inputs to coastal estuaries. Environmental Management, 23(4), 539–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, B. C., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Wu, S., & Palutikof, J. P. (2008) (Eds). Climate change and water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, 210.

  • Chang, C. L. (2013). Evaluation of basin environmental vulnerability: the weighted method compared to the compromise method. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10(5), 1051–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. L., & Hsu, C. H. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis via the VIKOR method for prioritizing land-use restraint strategies in the Tseng-Wen reservoir watershed. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(11), 3226–3230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. L., & Hsu, C. H. (2011). Applying a modified VIKOR method to classify land subdivisions according to watershed vulnerability. Water Resources Management, 25(1), 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. L., & Lin, Y. T. (2014). Using the VIKOR method to evaluate the design of a water quality monitoring network in a watershed. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(2), 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilundo, M., Kelderman, P., & Okeeffe, J. H. (2008). Design of a water quality monitoring network for the Limpopo River Basin. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, 655–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, B. T., & Labadie, J. W. (2001). River basin network model for integrated water quantity/quality management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(5), 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guh, Y. Y. (1997). Introduction to a new weighting method—Hierarchy consistency analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 102, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, C. E., & Keenleyside, A. A. (1995). To normalize or not to normalize? Fat is the question. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 14(5), 801–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, G. F. (1967). The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography, 7, 186–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir, G., & Floger, T. A. (1988). Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. S., Yu, S. L., & Lee, T. C. (2000). Managing Taiwan’s reservoir watersheds by zoning approach. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36(5), 989–1001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, S. L., Kuo, J. T., & Wang, S. M. (1996). Water quality monitoring network design of Keelung river, northern Taiwan. Water Science & Technology, 34(12), 49–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, D. P. (2000). Sustainable water resources management. Water International, 25(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, S. Y., Cheng, J. D., & Brooks, K. N. (2001). Managing forests for watershed protection in Taiwan. Forest Ecology and Management, 143, 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luan, X. F., Qu, Y., Li, D. Q., Liu, S. R., Wang, X. L., Wu, B., & Zhu, C. Q. (2011). Habitat evaluation of wild Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) and conservation priority setting in north-eastern China. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nare, L., Love, D., & Hoko, Z. (2006). Involvement of stakeholders in the water quality monitoring and surveillance system: the case of Mzingwane Catchment, Zimbabwe. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 31, 707–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, E. E., & Sanchez, P. P. (1993). A note on the information content of a consistent pairwise comparison judgment matrix of an AHP decision maker. Theory and Decision, 34(2), 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, H. T., Yu, H., Lu, C. H., & Luo, Y. H. (2008). Design optimization of river sampling network using genetic algorithms. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 134(1), 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pegram, G. C., & Bath, A. J. (1995). Role of non-point sources in the development of a water quality management plan for the Mgeni River Catchment. Water Science and Technology, 32, 5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, G. E. (1998). Sustainable development requires the full cooperation of water users. Water International, 23(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telci, I. T., Nam, K., Guan, J., & Aral, M. M. (2009). Optimal water quality monitoring network design for river systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2987–2998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., Nan, J., & Sun, D. (2008). An online water quality monitoring and management system developed for the Liming River basin in Daqing, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(2), 318–325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zampella, R. A., Procopio, N. A., Lathrop, R. G., & Dow, C. L. (2007). Relationship of land-use/land-cover patterns and surface-water quality in the Mullica River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(3), 594–604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China for financially supporting this research under Contract no. NSC 100-2221-E-035-072-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chia-Ling Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, CL., Lin, YT. A water quality monitoring network design using fuzzy theory and multiple criteria analysis. Environ Monit Assess 186, 6459–6469 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3867-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3867-6

Keywords

Navigation