Habitat evaluation of wild Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) and conservation priority setting in north-eastern China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The Amur Tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) is one of the world’s most endangered species. Recently, habitat fragmentation, food scarcity and human hunting have drastically reduced the population size and distribution areas of Amur tigers in the wild, leaving them on the verge of extinction. Presently, they are only found in the north-eastern part of China. In this study, we developed a reference framework using methods and technologies of analytic hierarchy process (AHP), remote sensing (RS), geographic information system (GIS), GAP analysis and Natural Break (Jenks) classification to evaluate the habitat and to set the conservation priorities for Amur tigers in eastern areas of Heilongjiang and Jilin Provinces of northeast China. We proposed a Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) incorporating 7 factors covering natural conditions and human disturbance. Based on the HSI values, the suitability was classified into five levels from the most to not suitable. Finally, according to results of GAP analysis, we identified six conservation priorities and designed a conservation landscape incorporating four new nature reserves, enlarging two existing ones, and creating four linkages for Amur tigers in northeast China. The case study showed that the core habitats (the most suitable and highly suitable habitats) identified for Amur tigers covered 35,547 km2, accounting for approximately 26.71% of the total study area (1,33,093 km2). However, existing nature reserves protected only (7124 km2 or) 20.04% of the identified core habitats. Thus, enlargement of current reserves is necessary and urgent for the tiger’s conservation and restoration. Moreover, the establishment of wildlife corridors linking core habitats will provide an efficient reserve network for tiger conservation to maintain the evolutionary potential of Amur tigers facing environmental changes.

Introduction

Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) is the largest of the five tiger subspecies. They are currently distributed mainly in the eastern mountainous areas of Heilongjiang and Jilin provinces, the Russian Far East and North Korea (Sun et al., 2005). The tiger was ranked as one of the top ten endangered species by the Wildlife Conservation Society in 1994 and was listed as the first-rank protected animal in China. In recent years, habitat degradation and fragmentation, damage to ecosystems, food scarcity, geographical isolation and large scale human hunting have drastically reduced the habitat and number of Amur tigers in the wild, leaving them now on the verge of extinction with a population of only 360–450 individuals (Zhang et al., 2005, Zhou, 2008). They are now in danger of extinction and need immediate protection. Furthermore, being at the top level of the food chain, these animals directly or indirectly control the herbivorous primary consumers and play an extremely important role in the balance of the ecosystem (Li, 2004). This threatened species effectively function as an umbrella species for the remaining mammals (Graham et al., 2003). Recently, many countries have embarked on enlarging nature reserves and linking separate habitats to enhance the survival of tigers, such as the wildlife corridors connecting Heilongjiang province, Jilin province and Russia. Effective protection and management of these eco-corridors are critical in safeguarding and recovering the population of Amur tigers (Sun, 2006). The traditional methods of tiger conservation have included roughly identifying the number of tigers, changes in distribution and the relationship between food density and tiger activity patterns by selecting monitoring areas, establishing monitoring points or monitoring transects (Sun et al., 2005). However, these methods are labor intensive, expensive and are inefficient. With the development of spatial and cyber technologies, remote sensing and geographic information systems provide powerful tools for environmental and habitat assessment on a landscape scale (Store and Jokimäki, 2003, Krivtsov, 2004, Wang et al., 2008). An important feature of remote sensing and geographic information systems is the ability to generate new information by integrating the existing diverse datasets sharing a compatible spatial referencing system (Goodchild, 1993). Recently, these technologies have been used for gathering information on physical parameters of wildlife habitats, geospatial modeling for wildlife habitat evaluation and nature reserve design (Huang et al., 1998, Kushwaha and Roy, 2002). Use of these technologies provides for more effective data collection and analysis enhancing the protection of Amur tigers.

Previous landscape level analyses of tiger distributions using modern technologies have identified parts of Northeast China as priority areas for tiger conservation (Sanderson et al., 2006). The current study takes a closer look at the already identified priority areas, examining factors that might influence their distribution at the local level, and identifying core habitats and linkages within the tiger conservation landscape.

An important aspect in species conservation is habitat protection, which is defined as the necessary living units for a given wild species, including space, food, water, etc. Habitat suitability models are useful habitat evaluation tools that have been extensively used by conservation planners to estimate the likelihood of occurrence and abundance of threatened wildlife species in terrestrial ecosystems (Carvalho and Gomes, 2003). Based on the extensive data collected, we developed a habitat suitability model incorporating vegetation types, food density, topography (elevation, slope and aspect) and human disturbance (human population density and distance from roads) as effective factors to evaluate tiger habitat. Then we conducted a GAP analysis by comparing the results with the pattern of existing reserves, prioritized the conservation gaps for on-ground implementation and finally put forward suggestions for conservation planning (Scott et al., 1993, Prendergast et al., 1999).

The methods and technologies used in the study were remote sensing (RS), geographic information system (GIS), analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Natural Break (Jenks) classification. A Habitat Suitability model was developed using these methods and technologies to identify suitable sites and conservation priorities for Amur tigers in the study area. In this paper, we aim to provide the scientific basis and references for effective habitat evaluation, priority setting and conservation planning for the Amur tiger.

Section snippets

Study area

The study area is part of the eastern region of Heilongjiang and Jilin provinces. The total extent of this area is approximately 1,33,093 km2. It is located at latitude 41°58′51″N–47°34′54″N and longitude 126°19′25″E–134°20′57″E (Fig. 1). The main topographic features are high and steep mountain areas in the southwest, low mountain areas and flat gradient regions in the northeast. Wanda Mountain and Laoyeling extend up to approximately 1000 m in elevation and are characterized as hilly with

Methods

Based on the results of the two latest large scale surveys carried out by an international team of Chinese, Russian and American experts in 1998 and 1999 (Sun et al., 1999, Li et al., 2001), we identified the Amur tiger’s basic ecological preferences from data of tracks on survey points and line-transects. Vegetation types, prey density, topography (elevation, slope and aspect) and human disturbance (human population density and distance from roads) were used as factors to evaluate Amur tiger’s

Suitability level of habitats

The classified HSI showed that the most suitable habitats cover 3908 km2, accounting for 2.94% of the study area and the total extent of the most suitable and highly suitable habitats (core habitats) is about 35,547 km2, 26.71% of the total study area. The core habitats are mainly located in four areas including Wanda Mountain area, Zhangguoangcailing area, Dalongling–Laoyeling area, and Changbai Mountain–Mudanling–Wuhuling area. The percentage of each level calculated from HSI values were

Necessity of conservation area expansion

In recent years, due to misuse of natural resources such as clearing and logging for agricultural expansion, the area of intact forest has decreased drastically, and habitats and corridors for wildlife have been fragmented to the extent that wild tigers cannot maintain or expand viable populations. Coupled with human population stress, industrial pollution, de-forestation and poaching, the number of Amur tigers has decreased so rapidly that it is urgent to build large conservation areas to

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Key Scientific and Technological Project 2008BADBOB. Sincere thanks for the great support by World Wide Fund for Nature and the research data from Wildlife Conservation Society. We are also grateful to G. Davison, P. Riordan and D.M. Spada for careful editing and linguistic help with the manuscript and their useful comments.

References (55)

  • J.H. Brown

    On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species

    The American Naturalist

    (1984)
  • S.L. Caicco et al.

    A gap analysis of the management status of the vegetation of Idaho (U.S.A.)

    Conservation Biology

    (1995)
  • C. Carroll et al.

    Spatial viability analysis of Amur tiger Panthera tigris altaica in the Russian Far East: the role of protected areas and landscape matrix in population persistence

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    (2006)
  • J.C. Carvalho et al.

    Habitat suitability model for European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with implications for restocking

    Game and Wildlife Science

    (2003)
  • F.S. Clark et al.

    Using spatial analysis to drive reserve design: a case study of national wildlife refuge in Indiana and Illinois (USA)

    Landscape Ecology

    (2000)
  • C.A. Duberstein et al.

    Development of a Habitat Suitability Index Model for the Sage Sparrow on the Hanford Site

    (2008)
  • J.R. Eastman et al.

    Raster procedures for muti-criteria/muti-objectives decisions

    Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote and Sensing

    (1995)
  • Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), 2007. ArcGIS Desktop Help 9.2,...
  • M.F. Goodchild

    The state of GIS for environmental problem solving

  • I.H. Graham et al.

    Options for the conservation of large and medium-sized mammals in the Cape Floristic Region hotspot. South Africa

    Biological Conservation

    (2003)
  • Q.X. Guo et al.

    Simulation on spatiotemporal dynamics of main prey populations of Panthera tigris in East Wanda Mountains

    Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

    (2008)
  • S. Heinanen et al.

    Modelling species distribution in complex environments: an evaluation of predictive ability and reliability in five shorebird species

    Diversity and Distributions

    (2009)
  • K.M. Hiscock et al.

    Groundwater vulnerability assessment: two case studies using GIS methodology

    The Geological Society

    (1995)
  • Z.F. Huang et al.

    Applying GIS to design a habitat reserve for South-China tiger

    Wildlife

    (1998)
  • G.F. Jenks

    The data model concept in statistical mapping

    International Yearbook of Cartography

    (1967)
  • L. Kerley et al.

    Effects of roads and human disturbance on Amur tigers

    Conservation Biology

    (2002)
  • Cited by (63)

    • A flagship species-based approach to efficient, cost-effective biodiversity conservation in the Qinling Mountains, China

      2022, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Occurrence and richness patterns for threatened species have been widely used to establish conservation priorities and designate in-situ conservation networks to conserve biodiversity (Myers et al., 2000; Brooks et al., 2006), but the spatial congruence among species is often ignored (Orme et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2021). Past conservation priority efforts have often focused on a single species or a single dimension of ecosystem functioning (Luan et al., 2011; Ren et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2018), but more recent efforts have examined the umbrella-like protection offered by flagship species, such as the giant panda, in conserving habitat for a host of other species or retaining regionally important ecosystem services (Li and Pimm, 2015; Nicholson E. et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020). Conservation efforts in the Qinling Mountains require research that is focused on the relative spatial distributions of the flagship species that inhabit the area, assessing the effectiveness of current protection efforts, and determining if a flagship species-based scheme can efficiently preserve biodiversity and ecosystem services.

    • Interferon-beta, interferon-gamma and their fusion interferon of Siberian tigers (Panthera tigris altaica) in China are involved in positive-feedback regulation of interferon production

      2021, Developmental and Comparative Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Effective protection and management are essential for maintaining and restoring the population of them. In recent years, many countries have set about enlarging nature reserves to improve the survival rate of tigers (Luan et al., 2011). Direct vaccination has been adopted, however, protecting Siberian tigers from viral diseases remains an arduous and urgent task (Seimon et al., 2013).

    • Priority areas identified through spatial habitat suitability index and network analysis: Wild boar populations as proxies for tigers in and around the Hupingshan and Houhe National Nature Reserves

      2021, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      HSIs combine expert opinions and/or ecological research, using factors like land cover and elevation to assess habitat quality. These factors are crucial for the existence or enrichment of target species (López-López et al., 2007; Luan et al., 2011). However, the identification of priority conservation areas or reintroduction sites based on HSI ignores the spatial configuration of suitable habitats (Morato et al., 2014; Duflot et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text