Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

331-334


Authors Details

Pavitra Reddy Nalamaru*


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 833

PDF Downloaded: 867


Comparative study of 25 mg oral and 25 mg vaginal misoprostol administration for induction of labour at term


Original Article

Author Details : Pavitra Reddy Nalamaru*

Volume : 7, Issue : 3, Year : 2020

Article Page : 331-334

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2020.071



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Introduction: A successful induction of labour includes adequate uterine contraction after the addition
of the inducing agent, and progressive dilatation of the cervix, thereby resulting in the successful vaginal
delivery. Misoprostol has been found to be more superior than other conventional methods and resulting in
shorter induction to delivery time.
Materials and Methods: 100 patients with 36 or more gestation period, requiring induction, were divided
into 2 groups of 50 each. Group I were given 25 mg misoprostol orally and Group II were given vaginally.
Dosage was repeated every 4th hourly and monitored.
Results: The major indications of labour were severe pre- eclampsia, post dated pregnancy, mild preeclampsia,
and PROM. Majority of the women who had undergone induction of labour were primigravida.
90% of patients in the vaginal group delivered vaginally as compared to 80% of the patients in the oral
group. Caesarian section was planned in the cases of fetal distress, failure to progress or failed induction of
labour.
Conclusion: Women who received vaginal misoprostol experiences shorter induction delivery times,
required fewer doses of misoprostol amd required oxytocin augmentation less frequently than those who
received oral misoprostol.

Keywords: Induction of labour, Misoprostol, Vaginal delivery.


How to cite : Nalamaru P R , Comparative study of 25 mg oral and 25 mg vaginal misoprostol administration for induction of labour at term. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res 2020;7(3):331-334

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.