Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2008, 53(8):345-353 | DOI: 10.17221/349-CJAS

The effects of space allowance on egg yield, egg quality and plumage condition of laying hens in battery cages

M. Sarica, S. Boga, U.S. Yamak
Agricultural Faculty, Department of Animal Science, Ondokuz Mayis University, Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of cage stocking density on egg yield, some egg quality traits and plumage condition in laying hens. Eighteen weeks-old 264 ISA-Brown pullets were divided into four cage density groups. The densities were 2 000, 1 000, 667 and 500 cm2 per hen (by allocating 1, 2, 3 and 4 hens per cage; floor area 40 × 50 cm) with 48, 30, 24 and 21 replicate cages, totally 123 three-tier battery cages. During the experimental period from 18 to 53 weeks of age, all birds were provided illumination for 16 hours a day. The hens were fed a diet containing 11.7 MJ ME/kg and 180 g CP during the period of 18 to 40 weeks of age and 11.3 MJ ME/kg and 170 g CP during the period of 41 to 54 weeks of age. Feed and water were available for ad libitum. Egg yield, mortality, live weights at 50% egg production age and at the end of experiment, pecking related mortalities, some egg quality traits and plumage condition were recorded weekly. Hen-housed egg production, egg mass, viability, and live weights were significantly decreased by higher densities. Most of the egg quality traits were not affected by cage densities. Pecking related mortalities increased in cage densities of 667 cm2 and 500 cm2 per hen compared to the other densities (P < 0.05) while plumage scores were higher in all body parts of hens kept in cages of 2 000 cm2 and 1 000 cm2 densities compared to the higher densities. The results showed that brown laying hens should be kept in cages having 1 000-2 000 cm2 densities in order to improve their welfare and performance.

Keywords: cage space allowance; egg yield; feather score; plumage condition; mortality; egg quality

Published: August 31, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sarica M, Boga S, Yamak US. The effects of space allowance on egg yield, egg quality and plumage condition of laying hens in battery cages. Czech J. Anim. Sci.. 2008;53(8):345-353. doi: 10.17221/349-CJAS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adams A.W., Craig J.V. (1985): Effect of crowding and cage shape on productivity and profitability of caged layers. Poultry Science, 64, 238-242. Allison R. (2006): Enhance management. Poultry World, 160, 20. Go to original source...
    2. Altan A., Altan Ö., Ozkan S., Ozkan K., Akbaş Y., Ayhan D.V. (2002): Effects of cage density on the performance of laying hens during high summer temperatures. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 26, 695-700.
    3. Ambrosen T., Petersen V.E. (1997): The influence of protein level in the diet on cannibalism and quality of plumage of layers. Poultry Science, 76, 559-563. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Anderson K.E., Adams A.W., Craig J.V. (1989): Behavioral adaptation of floor-reared White Leghorn pullets to different cage densities and cage shapes during the initial settling-in period. Poultry Science, 68, 70-78. Go to original source...
    5. Anderson K.E., Havenstein G.B., Brake J. (1995): Effect of strain and rearing dietary regimens, space and feeder space effects on subsequent laying performance. Poultry Science, 74, 1079-1092. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Anderson K.E., Davis G.S., Jenkins P.K., Carroll A.S. (2004): Effect of bird age, density and molt on behavioral profiles of two commercial layer strains in cages. Poultry Science, 83, 15-23. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Bell D. (1981): Cage selection and management. Feedstuffs, 53, 20-24.
    8. Blokhuis H.J. (2004): Recent developments in European and international welfare regulations. World's Poultry Science Journal, 60, 469-477. Go to original source...
    9. Blokhuis H.J., Hopster H., Geverink N.A., Korte S.M., Van Reenen C.G. (1998): Studies of stress in farm animals. Comparative Haematology International, 8, 94-101. Go to original source...
    10. Bright A., Jones T.A., Dawkins M.S. (2006): A non-intrusive method of assessing plumage condition in commercial flocks of laying hens. Animal Welfare, 15, 113-118. Go to original source...
    11. Broom D.M., Corke M.J. (2002): Effects of disease on farm animal welfare. Acta Veterinary Brno, 71, 133-136. Go to original source...
    12. Carey J.B., Kuo F.L., Andersen K.E. (1995): Effect of cage population on the productive performance of layers. Poultry Science, 74, 633-637. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Channing C.E., Hughes D.B., Walker A.W. (2001): Spatial distribution and behaviour of laying hens housed in an alternative system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 72, 335-345. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Council Directive 1999/74/EC (1999): Laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of European Communities, L 203, 0053-0057.
    15. Craig J.V., Milliken G.A. (1989): Further studies of space and group size effect in caged hens of stocks differing in fearful behaviour. Productivity and Behaviour. Poultry Science, 68, 9-16. Go to original source...
    16. Cunningham D.L., Ostrander C.E. (1982): The effects of strain and cage shape and density on performance and fearfulness of White Leghorn layers. Poultry Science, 61, 239-243. Go to original source...
    17. De Reu K., Grijspeerdt K., Heyndrickx M., Uyttendaele M., Debevere J., Herman L. (2006): Bacteria shell contamination in the egg collection chains of different housing systems for laying hens. British Poultry Science, 47, 163-172. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Fleming R.H., Whitehead C.C., Alvey D., Gregory N.G., Wilkins L.J. (1994): Bone structure and breaking strength in laying hens housed in different husbandry systems. British Poultry Science, 35, 651-662. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Guesdon V., Ahmed A.M.H., Mallet S., Faure J.M., Nys Y. (2006): Effect of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality. British Poultry Science, 47, 1-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Hansen I., Braasted B.O. (1994): Effects of rearing density on pecking behaviour and plumage condition of laying hens in two types of aviary. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 40, 263-272. Go to original source...
    21. Hester P.Y., Wilson E.K. (1986): Performance of White Leghorn hens in response to cage density and the introduction of cage mates. Poultry Science, 65, 2029-2033. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Hester P.Y., Muir W.M., Craig J.V., Albright J.L. (1996): Group selection for adaptation to multi-hen cages: Production traits during heat and cold exposures. Poultry Science, 75, 1308-1314. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Huber-Eicher B., Sebö F. (2001): The prevalence of feather pecking and development in commercial flocks of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 74, 223-231. Go to original source...
    24. Jalal M.A., Scheideler S.E., Marx D. (2006): Effect of bird cage space and dietary metabolizable energy level on production parameters in laying hens. Poultry Science, 85, 306-311. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. LaBrash L.F., Scheideler S.E. (2005): Farm feather condition score survey of commercial laying hens. Journal Applied Poultry Research, 14, 740-744. Go to original source...
    26. Lee K., Moss C.V. (1995): Effect of population density on layer performance. Poultry Science, 74, 1754-1760. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Leeson S., Morrison W.D. (1978): Effect of feather cover on feed efficiency in laying birds. Poultry Science, 57, 1094-1096. Go to original source...
    28. Mallet S., Guesdon V., Ahmed A.M.H., Nys Y. (2006): Comparison of egg shell hygiene in two housing systems: Standard and furnished cages. British Poultry. Science, 47, 30-35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. McAdie T.M., Keeling L.J. (2000): Effect of manipulating feathers of laying hens on the incidence of feather pecking and cannibalism. Applied Animal. Behaviour Science, 68, 215-229. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Nahashon S.N., Adefobe N.A., Amenyenu A., Wright D. (2006): Laying performance of Pearl Gray Guinea Fowl hens as affected by caging density. Poultry Science, 85, 1682-1689. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Nicol C.J., Gregory N.G., Knowles T.G., Parkman I.D., Wilkins L.J. (1999): Differential effects of increased stocking density, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 65, 137-152. Go to original source...
    32. Nicol C.J., Brown S.N., Glen E., Pope S.J., Short F.J., Warriss P.D., Zimmerman P.H., Wilkins L.J. (2006): Effects of stocking density flock size and management on the welfare of laying hens in single-tier aviaries. British Poultry Science, 47, 135-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Onbasilar E.E., Aksoy F.T. (2005): Stress parameters and immune response of layers under different cage floor and density conditions. Livestock Production Science, 95, 255-263. Go to original source...
    34. Ouart M.D., Adams A.W. (1982a): Effect of cage design and bird density on layers. 1. Productivity, feathering and nervousness. Poultry Science, 61, 1606-1613. Go to original source...
    35. Ouart M.D., Adams A.W. (1982b): Effect of cage design and bird density on layers. 2. Bird movement and feeding behaviour. Poultry Science, 61, 1614-1620. Go to original source...
    36. Pavan A.C., Garcia E.A., Mori C., Pizzolante C.C., Piccinin A. (2005): Efeito da dansidade na gaiola sobre desempenho de poederiras comariciais nas fases de cria, recria e produçao. Revista Brassilaria. Zootechnica, 34, 1320-1328. Go to original source...
    37. Rodenburg T.B., Buitenhuis A.J., Ask B., Uitdehaag K.A., Koene P., Vander Poel J.J., Bovehuis H. (2003): Heritability of feather pecking and open-field response of laying hens at two different ages. Poultry Science, 82, 861-867. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    38. Roush W.B., Mashaly M.M., Graves H.B. (1984): Effect of increased bird production in a fixed cage area on production and economic responses of Single Comb White Leghorn laying hens. Poultry Science, 63, 45-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    39. Sandoval M., Miles R.D., Jacobs R.D. (1991): Cage space and house temperature gradient effects on performance of White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science (Abstract), 70, 103 pp. Go to PubMed...
    40. Saylam S.K., Sarica M., Erener G. (1992): The effects of cage density, egg collection time and hens age on egg quality and some production parameters. The Productivity Symposium in Poultry Production, 26-27 October, Ýzmir, Turkey, 57-66. (in Turkish)
    41. Siegel P.B. (1993): Behaviour-genetic analyses and poultry husbandry. Poultry Science, 72, 1-6. Go to original source...
    42. Sohail S.S., Bryant M.M., Rao S.K., Roland D.A. (2001): Influence of cage space and prior dietary phosphorus level on phosphorus requirement of commercial Leghorns. Poultry Science, 80, 769-775. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    43. Stadelman W.J. (1995): Quality identification of shell eggs. In: Srtadelman W.J., Cotterill O.J. (eds.): Food Product Press, Binghamton, NY. Chapter 3-4, 39-80.
    44. Süto Z., Horn P., Ujvari J. (1997): The effect of different housing systems on production and egg quality traits of brown and Leghorn type layers. Acta Agraria Kaposvariensis, 1, 29-35.
    45. Tauson R. (2005): Management and housing systems for layers -effect on welfare and production. World's Poultry Science Journal, 61, 477-487. Go to original source...
    46. Wezyk S., Karawczyk J., Calik J., Portowicz K. (2006): Quality traits of eggs from Hy Line White and Hy Line Brown hens kept in cages and on litter. In: XII European Poultry Conf., 10-14 September. Book of Abstracts, World's Poultry Science Journal, 62, 142-143.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content