skip to main content
10.1145/3546155.3546705acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

All the World is our Stage: Empowering Children to Tackle Bullying through Theatre of the Oppressed in Critical Design and Making

Published:08 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Bullying is a serious problem concerning us all. The problem has already been tackled within HCI research, including different design and technology-based interventions, some of which strongly advocate human agency, social responsibility, action taking, and ownership for children. Along these lines, we address the problem of bullying in collaboration with children through critical design and Making. Critical and empowering approaches have aroused interest in child computer interaction (CCI) research, while we particularly explore Theatre of the Oppressed as a tool for evaluating design concepts with children and for empowering children to act as agents of change. Different theatre and drama-based methods have been utilized in CCI, while their potential for empowering children remains poorly explored. This study positions Theatre of the Oppressed within critical design and Making process, examines children's experiences with it and scrutinizes in which sense it can be considered empowering, with implications for CCI research and design.

References

  1. Amy Ahearn, Vincent Kizza, and José Douglas Martinez. 2013. PuppetPlay: testing interactive puppets to promote reading comprehension in Uganda & El Salvador. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’13), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 317–319. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485838Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Lidiane Alencastro, Jorge Silva, André Komatsu, Fabiane Silva, Flávia Mello, and Marta Silva. 2020. Theater of the Oppressed and bullying: nursing performance in school adolescent health. Revista brasileira de enfermagem 73, (February 2020), 20170910. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0910Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mats Alvesson and Stanley Deetz. 2000. Doing critical management research. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Zahra Ashktorab and Jessica Vitak. 2016. Designing Cyberbullying Mitigation and Prevention Solutions through Participatory Design With Teenagers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3895–3905. Retrieved August 30, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858548Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Diva Smriti, Brenna McNally, Evan Golub, Elizabeth Bonsignore, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2019. Stranger Danger! Social Media App Features Co-designed with Children to Keep Them Safe Online. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 394–406. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323133Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Emilia Barakova, Jan Gillesen, and Loe Feijs. 2008. Use of goals and dramatic elements in behavioral training of children with ASD. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children (IDC ’08), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 37–40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1463689.1463713Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jaclyn Barnes, S. Maryam FakhrHosseini, Eric Vasey, Chung Hyuk Park, and Myounghoon Jeon. 2019. Informal STEAM Education Case Study: Child-Robot Musical Theater. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312890Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ruth Belknap, Kristin Haglund, Holly Felzer, Jessica Pruszynski, and John Schneider. 2013. A Theater Intervention to Prevent Teen Dating Violence for Mexican-American Middle School Students. The Journal of adolescent health: official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine 53, (April 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Steve Benford, Andy Crabtree, Stuart Reeves, Jennifer Sheridan, Alan Dix, Martin Flintham, and Adam Drozd. 2006. The Frame of the Game: Blurring the Boundary between Fiction and Reality in Mobile Experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 427–436. Retrieved August 30, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124836Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Foram Bhukhanwala. 2014. Theater of the Oppressed in an After-School Program: Middle School Students’ Perspectives on Bullying and Prevention: This Article Examines Students’ Participation in Boalian Theater Activities to Role-Play, Rehearse, and Develop Strategies to use When Bullied or Witnessing Bullying. Middle School Journal 46, 1 (September 2014), 3–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2014.11461899Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stacy Black, Rezvan Joshaghani, Dhanush kumar Ratakonda, Hoda Mehrpouyan, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2019. Anon what what? Children's Understanding of the Language of Privacy. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 439–445. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3325324Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Augusto Boal. 2000. Theater of the Oppressed. Pluto Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Augusto Boal. 2006. The Aesthetics of the Oppressed. Routledge, London. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969830Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Eva Brandt and Camilla Grunnet. 2000. Evoking the future: drama and props in user centered design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruce Burton. 2010. Dramatising the hidden hurt: Acting against covert bullying by adolescent girls. Research in Drama Education 15, (May 2010). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13569781003700151Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jerel P. Calzo, Laura M. Bogart, Nick Bazo, Evelyn Francis, Abe Rybeck, Kaamila Mohamed, David Menino, Talia Kieu, and Riana B. Jumamil. 2021. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Theater-Based HIV Prevention Workshop Developed by and for LGBTQ Youth. Prog Community Health Partnersh 15, 2 (2021), 189–201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2021.0021Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Henrique Campos, Joana Campos, João Cabral, Carlos Martinho, Jeppe Herlev Nielsen, and Ana Paiva. 2013. My dream theatre. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS ’13), International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1357–1358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Apala Lahiri Chavan, Douglas Gorney, Beena Prabhu, and Sarit Arora. 2009. COVER STORY The washing machine that ate my sari—mistakes in cross-cultural design. interactions 16, 1 (January 2009), 26–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1456202.1456209Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sharon Lynn Chu, Francis Quek, Michael Saenz, Sourabh Bhangaonkar, and Osazuwa Okundaye. 2015. Enabling Instrumental Interaction Through Electronics Making: Effects on Children's Storytelling. In Interactive Storytelling (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 329–337. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27036-4_31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Merijke Coenraad, Jen Palmer, Diana Franklin, and David Weintrop. 2019. Enacting Identities: Participatory Design as a Context for Youth to Reflect, Project, and Apply their Emerging Identities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 185–196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jan Cohen-Cruz and Mady Schutzman. Playing Boal. Routledge & CRC Press. Retrieved August 31, 2021 from https://www.routledge.com/Playing-Boal/Cohen-Cruz-Schutzman/p/book/9780415086080Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jay A. Conger and Rabindra N. Kanungo. 1988. The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice. The Academy of Management Review 13, 3 (1988), 471–482. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/258093Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Diane Conrad. 2010. In Search of the Radical in Performance. In Youth and Theatre of the Oppressed, Peter Duffy and Elinor Vettraino (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, 125–141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105966_7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nuria Cordero Ramos and Manuel Muñoz Bellerin. 2019. Social work and applied theatre: creative experiences with a group of homeless people in the city of Seville. European Journal of Social Work 22, 3 (May 2019), 485–498. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1366298Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Melanie Crean. 2013. Once upon a time in the Bronx: working with youth to address violence through performance and play. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’13), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 443–446. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485806Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Joana P. Cruz, Carla Malafaia, José Eduardo Silva, and Isabel Menezes. 2019. The Use of Theatre of the Oppressed in the Classroom: Engaging Students in a Critical Active European Citizenship Project. The Educational Forum 83, 4 (October 2019), 365–382. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2019.1626518Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Laura Day. 2002. “Putting Yourself in Other People's Shoes”: The use of Forum theatre to explore refugee and homeless issues in schools. Journal of Moral Education 31, 1 (March 2002), 21–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240120111418Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Peter De Jong. 2016. Ratkaisukeskeisen terapian oppikirja (3. painos. ed.). Lyhytterapiainstituutti Oy, Helsinki.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jan Derboven, Maarten Van Mechelen, and Karin Slegers. 2015. Multimodal Analysis in Participatory Design with Children: A Primary School Case Study. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2825–2828. Retrieved August 31, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702475Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Peter Duffy. 2009. Youth and theatre of the oppressed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Eva Eriksson, Gökçe Elif Baykal, Staffan Björk, and Olof Torgersson. 2019. Using Gameplay Design Patterns with Children in the Redesign of a Collaborative Co-located Game. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 15–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323155Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Christopher Frauenberger, Katta Spiel, Laura Scheepmaker, and Irene Posch. 2019. Nurturing Constructive Disagreement - Agonistic Design with Neurodiverse Children. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. Retrieved August 31, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300501Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sarah Gallacher, Connie Golsteijn, Yvonne Rogers, Licia Capra, and Sophie Eustace. 2016. SmallTalk: Using Tangible Interactions to Gather Feedback from Children. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’16), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 253–261. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839481Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ana Dias Garcia, Eunice Macedo, and João Queirós. 2019. Roteiros de coconstrução de conhecimento, expressão e participação: como pessoas jovens (re)criam cidadania?*. Praxis educativa 14, 3 (2019), 1230–1250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Angela Genova. 2015. Barriers to inclusive education in Greece, Spain and Lithuania: results from emancipatory disability research. Disability & Society 30, 7 (August 2015), 1042–1054. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1075867Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Mark A. Giesler. 2017. Teaching Note—Theatre of the Oppressed and Social Work Education: Radicalizing the Practice Classroom. Journal of Social Work Education 53, 2 (April 2017), 347–353. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1260503Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Karen M. Gourd and Tina Y. Gourd. 2011. Enacting Democracy: Using Forum Theatre to Confront Bullying. Equity & Excellence in Education 44, 3 (July 2011), 403–419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.589275Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Marianthi Grizioti and Chronis Kynigos. 2021. Children as players, modders, and creators of simulation games: A design for making sense of complex real-world problems: Children as players, modders and creators of simulation games. In Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’21), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 363–374. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3460706Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Lynne Hall, Sarah Woods, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Polly Sobreperez. 2004. Using storyboards to guide virtual world design. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community (IDC ’04), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 125–126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1017833.1017853Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Nick Hammond. 2013. Introducing Forum Theatre to elicit and advocate children's views. Educational Psychology in Practice 29, 1 (March 2013), 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2012.733309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Cynthia Hardy and Sharon O'Sullivan. 1998. The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice. Human Relations - HUM RELAT 51, (April 1998), 451–483. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016989830806Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Heidi Hartikainen, Netta Iivari, and Marianne Kinnula. 2019. Children's design recommendations for online safety education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 22, (December 2019), 100146. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.100146Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Marja-Liisa Hassi, Hannu Niemelä, Ari Paloniemi, Jouni Piekkari, and Kaisa Wolde. 2015. Drama in Child Rights Education - Developing a Pedagogical Model. EJSBS (August 2015), 291–307. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.172Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Janet Hicks, Brian Clair, and Stephan Berry. 2016. Using Solution-Focused Dramatic Empathy Training to Eliminate Cyber-Bullying. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health 11, (October 2016), 378–390. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2016.1172533Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Nathan Holbert. 2016. Leveraging cultural values and “ways of knowing” to increase diversity in maker activities. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 9–10, (December 2016), 33–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2016.10.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Giulio Iacucci and Kari Kuutti. 2002. Everyday Life as a Stage in Creating and Performing Scenarios for Wireless Devices. Personal Ub Comp 6, 4 (September 2002), 299–306. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s007790200031Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Netta Iivari. 2020. Empowering children to make and shape our digital futures – from adults creating technologies to children transforming cultures. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 37, 5 (January 2020), 279–293. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2020-0023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Netta Iivari and Marianne Kinnula. 2018. Empowering children through design and making: towards protagonist role adoption. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210600Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Netta Iivari and Kari Kuutti. 2018. Critical design in interaction design and children: impossible, inappropriate or critical imperative? In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 456–464. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202773Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Netta Iivari, Sumita Sharma, Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Tonja Molin-Juustila, Kari Kuutti, Jenni Holappa, and Essi Kinnunen. 2021. Critical agenda driving child–computer interaction research—Taking a stock of the past and envisioning the future. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction (September 2021), 100408. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100408Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Netta Iivari, Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Sumita Sharma, Tonja Molin-Juustila, and Essi Kinnunen. 2021. CHI Against Bullying: Taking Stock of the Past and Envisioning the Future. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445282Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Ole Sejer Iversen and Christian Dindler. 2008. Pursuing aesthetic inquiry in participatory design. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008 (PDC ’08), Indiana University, USA, 138–145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Ole Sejer Iversen and Rachel Charlotte Smith. 2012. Scandinavian participatory design: dialogic curation with teenagers. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’12), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 106–115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307109Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Ole Sejer Iversen, Rachel Charlotte Smith, and Christian Dindler. 2017. Child as Protagonist: Expanding the Role of Children in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079725Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Ole Sejer Iversen, Rachel Charlotte Smith, and Christian Dindler. 2018. From computational thinking to computational empowerment: a 21st century PD agenda. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210592Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Nairruti Jani. 2018. Ethno-theatre: Exploring a narrative intervention for trafficking survivors. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 28, 5 (July 2018), 548–556. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1432439Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Louise B. Jennings, Deborah M. Parra-Medina, Deanne K. Hilfinger-Messias, and Kerry McLoughlin. 2006. Toward a Critical Social Theory of Youth Empowerment. Journal of Community Practice 14, 1–2 (January 2006), 31–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_03Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Katja Joronen, Annukka Häkämies, and Päivi Åstedt-Kurki. 2011. Children's experiences of a drama programme in social and emotional learning. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 25, 4 (2011), 671–678. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00877.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Yasmin Kafai, Chris Proctor, and Debora Lui. 2019. From Theory Bias to Theory Dialogue: Embracing Cognitive, Situated, and Critical Framings of Computational Thinking in K-12 CS Education. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 101–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339400Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Matthew Kam, Akhil Mathur, Anuj Kumar, and John Canny. 2009. Designing digital games for rural children: a study of traditional village games in India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31–40. Retrieved August 31, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518707Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Martha Katsaridou and Koldobika Vío. 2015. Theatre of the Oppressed as a tool of educational and social intervention: the case of Forum Theatre.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Marianne Kinnula, Netta Iivari, Tonja Molin-Juustila, Topi Leinonen, Eetu Mansikkamäki, Toni Käkelä, and Martti Similä. 2017. Cooperation, Combat, or Competence Building – What Do We Mean When We Are ‘Empowering Children’ in and through Digital Technology Design? Thirty eighth International Conference on Information Systems (2017), 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Warren Linds and Linda Goulet. 2010. Acting Outside the Box. In Youth and Theatre of the Oppressed, Peter Duffy and Elinor Vettraino (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, 159–183. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105966_9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Brenna McNally, Priya Kumar, Chelsea Hordatt, Matthew Louis Mauriello, Shalmali Naik, Leyla Norooz, Alazandra Shorter, Evan Golub, and Allison Druin. 2018. Co-designing Mobile Online Safety Applications with Children. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. Retrieved August 31, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174097Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Gopal Midha. 2010. Theatre of the Oppressed A Manual for Educators. Master's Capstone Projects (January 2010). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cie_capstones/11Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Zoe Minh-Tam Dao-Kroeker, Alexandra Kitson, Alissa N. Antle, Yumiko Murai, and Azadeh Adibi. 2021. Designing Biotech Ethics Cards: Promoting Critical Making During an Online Workshop with Youth. In Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’21), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 450–455. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3465182Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Christiana Moschou and R.A. Rodriguez. 2016. The formation of citizenship through community theatre. A study in Aguascalientes, Mexico. 15, (January 2016), 22–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2390/jsse-v15-i4-1495Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Manuel Muñoz-Bellerín and Nuria Cordero-Ramos. 2020. The Role of Applied Theatre in Social Work: Creative Interventions with Homeless Individuals. The British Journal of Social Work 50, 5 (July 2020), 1611–1629. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa033Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Lena S. Opfermann. 2020. Language, trust and transformation: exploring theatre as a research method with migrant youth. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 23, 2 (March 2020), 139–153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1645386Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Ana Paiva, Isabel Machado, and Rui Prada. 2001. Heroes, villians, magicians, …: dramatis personae in a virtual story creation environment. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI ’01), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 129–136. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/359784.360314Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Samiullah Paracha, Lynne Hall, Kathy Clawson, and Nicole Mitsche. 2020. Design, Development, and Usability of a Virtual Environment on Moral, Social, and Emotional Leaning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments 10, (May 2020), 4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.2020070104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Roma Patel, Holger Schnädelbach, and Boriana Koleva. 2018. Come and Play: Interactive Theatre For Early Years. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 376–385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173251Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Jori Pitkänen and Vera Gergov. 2016. Draaman keinoin kiusaamista vastaan: menetelmiä kiusaamisen ennaltaehkäisyyn, tutkimiseen ja käsittelyyn (1. painos ed.). Helsingin kaupunki, Opetusvirasto, Helsinki.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. B. Polajnar. 2020. The theatre of the oppressed as a form of artivist theatre in Slovenia. Amfiteater 8, 1 (2020), 294–297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Mikko Rajanen and Netta Iivari. 2019. Empowered or Disempowered? An Analysis of Usability Practitioners’ Interventions in Open Source Projects. . 1–45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Janet C. Read, Daniel Fitton, and Emanuela Mazzone. 2010. Using obstructed theatre with child designers to convey requirements. In CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4063–4068. Retrieved August 31, 2021 from http://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Rachel Rhoades. 2021. Nurturing hopeful agency: Applied theatre pedagogy in collaboration with social movements. In Theatre Pedagogy in the Era of Climate Crisis. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Pedro Ribeiro, Anna Michel, Ido Iurgel, Christian Ressel, Cristina Sylla, and Wolfgang Müller. 2018. Empowering children to author digital media effects for reader's theatre. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 569–574. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210793Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. J. Robertson and J. Good. 2003. Using a Collaborative Virtual Role-Play Environment to Foster Characterisation in Stories. undefined (2003). Retrieved August 31, 2021 from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Using-a-Collaborative-Virtual-Role-Play-Environment-Robertson-Good/de69a45b07c57f480ed17ad83dda13059c3fe7d5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Marjorie Roques, Deise Matos Do Amparo, Neslihan Zabci, Didier Drieu, Teresa Rebelo, and Florent Cosseron. 2019. Le harcèlement chez les adolescents victimes: Méthodologie d'une recherche internationale. [Adolescents victims of bullying. Presentation of a methodology for an international research.]. Annales Médico-Psychologiques 177, 10 (2019), 999–1004. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2019.09.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Karen Rust, Elizabeth Foss, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Brenna McNally, Chelsea Hordatt, Meethu Malu, Bie Mei, and Hubert Kofi Gumbs. 2014. Interactive and live performance design with children. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children (IDC ’14), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 305–308. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610478Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Carolina Beniamina Rutta, Gianluca Schiavo, Massimo Zancanaro, and Elisa Rubegni. 2019. Comic-based Digital Storytelling with Primary School Children. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 508–513. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3325331Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Egusa Ryohei, Kusunoki Fusako, Wada Kumiko, Mizoguchi Hiroshi, Namatame Miki, and Inagaki Shigenori. 2012. Evaluation of the puppet theater based on inclusive design method: a case study of fourth-year elementary school students with normal hearing. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’12), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 216–219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307129Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Egusa Ryohei, Wada Kumiko, Adachi Takayuki, Goseki Masafumi, Namatame Miki, Kusunoki Fusako, Mizoguchi Hiroshi, and Inagaki Shigenori. 2013. Evaluation of interactive puppet theater based on inclusive design methods: a case study of students at elementary school for the deaf. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’13), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 467–470. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Johnny Saldaña. 2005. Theatre of the Oppressed with Children: A Field Experiment. Youth Theatre Journal 19, (May 2005), 117–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08929092.2005.10012580Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Michael Sanders. 2004. Urban Odyssey: Theatre of the Oppressed and Talented Minority Youth. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 28, 2 (December 2004), 218–241. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320402800205Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Marie-Monique Schaper and Narcis Pares. 2016. Making Sense of Body and Space through Full-Body Interaction Design: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’16), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 613–618. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2935992Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Sara Schroeter. 2013. “The way it works” doesn't: Theatre of the Oppressed as Critical Pedagogy and Counternarrative. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l’éducation 36, 4 (2013), 394–415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Sonali Shah. 2006. Sharing the world: The researcher and the researched. Qualitative Research 6, (May 2006), 207–220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106062710Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. William Shakespeare. 1599. As You Like It, Act-II, Scene-VII (https://www.william-shakespeare.info/script-text-as-you-like-it.htm).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Sumita Sharma, Krishnaveni Achary, Marianne Kinnula, Netta Iivari, and Blessin Varkey. 2020. Gathering garbage or going green? shifting social perspectives to empower individuals with special needs. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 311–322. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394394Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Sumita Sharma, Pekka Kallioniemi, Jaakko Hakulinen, Tuuli Keskinen, and Markku Turunen. 2019. Exploring Globally Inclusive Online Collaboration for Indian and Finnish Schoolchildren. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323119Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Sumita Sharma, Pekka Kallioniemi, Tomi Heimonen, Jaakko Hakulinen, Markku Turunen, and Tuuli Keskinen. 2018. Overcoming socio-technical challenges for cross-cultural collaborative applications. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 325–336. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202730Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Rachel Charlotte Smith, Ole Sejer Iversen, and Mikkel Hjorth. 2015. Design thinking for digital fabrication in education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 5, (September 2015), 20–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.10.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Dani Snyder-Young. 2011. Rehearsals for revolution? Theatre of the Oppressed, dominant discourses, and democratic tensions. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 16, 1 (February 2011), 29–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2011.541600Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Michael Soenthorn Speek and Maarten Van Mechelen. 2018. Storytelling shapes: a toolkit to enable children to express their needs and wishes. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 619–624. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Katta Spiel, Emeline Brulé, Christopher Frauenberger, Gilles Bailley, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2020. In the details: the micro-ethics of negotiations and in-situ judgements in participatory design with marginalised children. CoDesign 16, 1 (January 2020), 45–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1722174Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  98. Alina Striner and Brenna McNally. 2017. Transitioning Between Audience and Performer: Co-Designing Interactive Music Performances with Children. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2115–2122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053171Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Orkan Telhan, Yasmin B. Kafai, Richard Lee Davis, KFai Steele, and Barrie M. Adleberg. 2014. Connected messages: a maker approach to interactive community murals with youth. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children (IDC ’14), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 193–196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610450Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Kenneth W. Thomas and Betty A. Velthouse. 1990. Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation. The Academy of Management Review 15, 4 (1990), 666–681. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/258687Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Hakan Usakli̇ and Hakan Uşakli. 2015. Enhancing Social Emotional Learning: Drama with Host and Refugee Children in Turkey. International Journal of Human and Behavioral Science 1, 2 (May 2015), 22–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.19148/ijhbs.12003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Marco Vala, Pedro Sequeira, Ana Paiva, and Ruth Aylett. 2007. FearNot! demo: a virtual environment with synthetic characters to help bullying. In Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS ’07), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1329125.1329452Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Maarten Van Mechelen, Line Have Musaeus, Ole Sejer Iversen, Christian Dindler, and Arthur Hjorth. 2021. A Systematic Review of Empowerment in Child-Computer Interaction Research. In Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’21), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 119–130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3460701Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Maarten Van Mechelen, Ann Laenen, Bieke Zaman, Bert Willems, and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2019. Collaborative Design Thinking (CoDeT): A co-design approach for high child-to-adult ratios. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 130, (October 2019), 179–195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.06.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Netta Iivari, Sumita Sharma, Tonja Molin-Juustila, Kari Kuutti, Nina Juustila-Cevirel, Essi Kinnunen, and Jenni Holappa. 2021. Nowhere to Now-here: Empowering Children to Reimagine Bully Prevention at Schools Using Critical Design Fiction: Exploring the Potential of Participatory, Empowering Design Fiction in Collaboration with Children. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 734–748. Retrieved February 20, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Marianne Kinnula, Heidi Hartikainen, and Netta Iivari. 2020. Embedded assumptions in design and Making projects with children. In 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (OzCHI ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 178–188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. Jamie A Ward, Daniel Richardson, Guido Orgs, Kelly Hunter, and Antonia Hamilton. 2018. Sensing interpersonal synchrony between actors and autistic children in theatre using wrist-worn accelerometers. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 148–155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3267242.3267263Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Anne Weibert, Konstantin Aal, Thomas von Rekowski, and Volker Wulf. 2015. “Hey, can we make that, please?”: On Craft as a Means of Cross-cultural Community-Building. The Journal of Community Informatics 11, (June 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v11i2.2841Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  109. Ryan Wistort and Cynthia Breazeal. 2011. TofuDraw: a mixed-reality choreography tool for authoring robot character performance. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’11), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 213–216. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1999030.1999064Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Michael Wrentschur and Michaela Moser. 2014. ‘Stop: Now we are speaking!’ A creative and dissident approach of empowering disadvantaged young people. International Social Work 57, 4 (July 2014), 398–410. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872814526764Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Nancy Yost. 2003. Look what kindergarten children can do with technologies! In Proceedings of the international federation for information processing working group 3.5 open conference on Young children and learning technologies - Volume 34 (CRPIT ’03), Australian Computer Society, Inc., AUS, 113–115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Sue Young. 2016. Ratkaisukeskeinen lähestymistapa koulukiusaamiseen. In Ratkaisukeskeisen lyhytterapian oppikirja. Helsinki: Lyhytterapiainstutuutti Oy, 287-296. (original Sue Young. Solutions for Bullying in Primary Schools. In Peter de Jong and Insoo Kim Berg. 2008. Interviewing for solutions (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education, 308-318.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Junnan Yu, Janet Ruppert, Ricarose Roque, and Ben Kirshner. 2020. Youth civic engagement through computing: cases and implications. ACM Inroads 11, 4 (March 2020), 42–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3432727Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NordiCHI '22: Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference
    October 2022
    1091 pages
    ISBN:9781450396998
    DOI:10.1145/3546155

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 October 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format