skip to main content
10.1145/3379247.3379248acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccdeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Aging Population Perception and Post Adoption Behavior About the Usability of Smart Home Technology of Pakistani Culture

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

New technology provides opportunities for the transport of vast, bendy interventions with older adults. Twenty first century is penetrating era in our lives like smart home technology Smart home era is innovation to help the old age population in this era. As smart home consists of numerous interactive generations as an answer for aged people Last few years, the adoption of smart home technology has critical subject among research industries. According to previous studies, smart home technology (SHT) have effective outcomes on the old age people. There is no restrict of gender, religion and locality for SHT. The findings of the well-installed studies indicate that there's need to test the belief of old age people approximately the usability of SHT in Pakistan's lifestyle. Many of the preceding studies already conducted but their results had been challenged so there's need to conduct new examine with large pattern and populace.

References

  1. Gao, Q., Ebert, D., Chen, X., & Ding, Y. (2015). Design of a mobile social community platform for older Chinese people in urban areas. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 25(1), 66--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Culley, J.M., Herman, J., Smith, D,& Tavakoli, A.(2013). Effects of technology and connectedness on community- dwelling older adults. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics17(3), Retrieved from http://ojni.org/issues/?p=2864Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Rogers, E. M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. Free Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dommes, A., Chevalier, A., & Lia, S. (2011). The role of cognitive flexibility and vocabulary abilities of younger and older users in searching for information on the web. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 717--726.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Zhou, J., Rau, P. L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2012). Use and design of handheld computers for older adults: A review and appraisal. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(12), 799--826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Leeraphong, B. Papasratorn, and V. Chongsuphajaisiddhi, "A study on factors influencing elderly intention to use smart home in Thailand: a pilot study," in The 10th International Conference on e-Business, Bangkok, Thailand, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Alaiad and L. Zhou, "Patients' behavioral intentions toward using WSN based smart home healthcare systems: an empirical investigation," in 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 824--833, Kauai, HI, USA, 2015, IEEE. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at ScopusGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Geraedts H. A. E., Zijlstra W., Zhang W., Bulstra S., Stevens M. (2014). Adherence to and effectiveness of an individually tailored home-based exercise program for frail older adults, driven by mobility monitoring: design of a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 14:570. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. EleftheriaVaportzis, MariaGiatsiClausen and Alan J.Gow "Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting with Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study" Human-Media Interaction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology 04 October 2017Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Li, Q., & Luximon, Y. (2018). Understanding older adults' post-adoption usage behavior and perceptions of mobile technology. International Journal of Design, 12(3), 93--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. https://www.iotevolutionworld.com/m2m/articles/376816-history-smart-homes.htm retrived on 5 may 2019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sofianiza Abd MalMuna Azuddin, "The Use of Technology by Older People "2013 International Journal Of Interactive Digital Media, Vol. 1(3), ISSN 2289-4098, e-ISSN 2289-4101Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. J. Morrison, and A. Barnett, "Older people, technology and community the potential of technology to help older people renew or develop social contacts and to actively engage in their communities" Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, Technical Report, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Hill, A. Dickinson, J. Arnott, P. Gregor, and L. McIver, "Older Web Users' Eye Movements: Experience Counts", in Proceeding CHI '11 Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1151--1160, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Barnard, Y., Bradley, M. D., Hodgson, F., & Lloyd, A. D. (2013). Learning to use new technologies by older adults: Perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1715--1724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. U.S. Census Bureau (2011). The older population: 2010. Census Briefs 2010, 1--19. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-09.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Olson, K. E., O'Brien, M. A., Rogers, W. A., & Charness, N. (2011). Diffusion of technology: Frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing International, 36, 123--145. doi: 10.1007/s12126-010-9077-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319--337. doi:10.2307/249008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Arning, K., & Ziefle, M. (2009). Different perspectives on technology acceptance: The role of technology type and age. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5889/2009, 20--41. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10308-7_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen, K.&Chan, A.H.S.(2014).Gerontechnologyacceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635--652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Birnholtz, J. (2010). Adopt, adapt, abandon: Understanding why some young adults start, and then stop, using instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1427--1433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Albertin, L. A., & Albertin, R. M. M. (2005). Tecnologia de Informação -- Desafios da tecnologia de informac ¸ão aplicada aos negócios. São Paulo: Atlas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333--352Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Perceived Value and Technology Adoption Across Four End User GroupsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. C. Reinisch, M. J. Kofler, and W. Kastner, "ThinkHome: a smart home as digital ecosystem," in 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, pp. 256--261, Dubai, UAE, 2010, IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. T. Koskela and K. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, "Evolution towards smart home environments: empirical evaluation of three user interfaces," Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 8, no. 3-4, pp. 234--240, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Heetae Yang, Wonji Lee, and Hwansoo Lee "IoT Smart Home Adoption: The Importance of Proper Level Automation" Journal of Sensors Volume 2018Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Drag, L. L., & Bieliauskas, L. A. (2010). Contemporary review 2009: Cognitive aging. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 23(2), 75--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Borson, S., Scanlan, J., Brush, M., Vitaliano, P., & Dokmak, A. (2000). The mini-cog: A cognitive 'vital signs' measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15(11), 1021--1027.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Agrell, B., & Dehlin, O. (1998). The clock-drawing test. Age and Ageing, 27(3), 399--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Benedict, R. H., Smerbeck, A., Parikh, R., Rodgers, J., Cadavid, D., & Erlanger, D. (2012). Reliability and equivalence of alternate forms for the symbol digit modalities test: Implications for multiple sclerosis clinical trials. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 18(9), 1320--1325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Zaphiris, P., Kurniawan, S., & Ghiawadwala, M. (2007). A systematic approach to the development of research-based web design guidelines for older people. Universal Access in the Information Society, 6(1), 59--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Peek, S. T., Wouters, E. J., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Aging Population Perception and Post Adoption Behavior About the Usability of Smart Home Technology of Pakistani Culture

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCDE '20: Proceedings of 2020 6th International Conference on Computing and Data Engineering
      January 2020
      279 pages
      ISBN:9781450376730
      DOI:10.1145/3379247

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 March 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader