skip to main content
10.1145/3322385.3322397acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Blockchain Ethics Research: A Conceptual Model

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Blockchain is being widely adopted far beyond finance into numerous domains of society and promises unprecedented potential to disrupt organizations, businesses, industries, and economies. However, blockchain is still in its infancy and its future is highly controversial, arousing phenomenal enthusiasm, high expectations, and even intense criticism. The possible impacts of blockchain and its applications on the society could be fundamental and revolutionary, inevitably bringing unpredicted ethical challenges in the foreseeable future. Identifying the ethical challenges of blockchain is urgent and critically needed to ensure that blockchain is adopted ethically. However, discussions on the ethics of blockchain are largely insufficient, which leaves a void of theoretical understanding so far. In this paper, we provide a systematic discussion on the ethics of blockchain applications and map the main social challenges raised by its technology and applications. The paper starts with a review of the technological concepts and applications of blockchain. Then, it overviews the current research on the ethics of technologies and general research on blockchain to briefly introduce the authors' approach. Afterwards, a conceptual model of blockchain ethics research is developed. This research hopes to serve as an initial roadmap for the study of blockchain ethics, and to raise timely awareness and stimulate further debate on the ethics of blockchain in the IS community.

References

  1. Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Swan, M. Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Underwood, S. Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Communications of the ACM, 59, 11 (2016), 15--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tapscott, D. and Tapscott, A. The impact of the blockchain goes beyond financial services. Harvard Business Review (May 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wörner, D. and Bilgeri, D. The Bitcoin Ecosystem: Disruption Beyond Financial Services, City, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tapscott, D. and Tapscott, A. Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World. Penguin, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Moor, J. H. The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21, 4 (July 2006), 18--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Moor, J. H. What Is Computer Ethics? Metaphilosophy, 16, 4 (1985), 266--275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Göbel, J., Keeler, H. P., Krzesinski, A. E. and Taylor, P. G. Bitcoin blockchain dynamics: The selfish-mine strategy in the presence of propagation delay. Performance Evaluation, 104 (2016), 23--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Treleaven, P., Brown, R. G. and Yang, D. Blockchain Technology in Finance. Computer, 50, 9 (2017), 14--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bostrom, N. and Yudkowsky, E. The ethics of artificial intelligence. The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence (2014), 316--334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stahl, B. C. Morality, ethics, and reflection: a categorization of normative IS research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 8 (August 2012), 636--656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Davison, R. M. Professional ethics in information systems: A personal perspective. Communications of the AIS, 3, 2es (2000), 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mingers, J. and Walsham, G. Toward ethical information systems: the contribution of discourse ethics. Mis Quarterly, 34, 4 (2010), 833--854. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mason, R. O. Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age. MIS Quarterly, 10, 1 (March 1986), 5--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Floridi, L. Information Ethics, Its Nature and Scope. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 35, 2 (June 2005), 3--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Langford, D. Ethics and the Internet: Appropriate Behavior in Electronic Communication. Ethics & Behavior, 6, 2 (06 1996), 91--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Miller, K. W. Ethical Analysis in the Cloud. IT Professional, 12, 6 (Nov 2010), 7--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fairfield, J. and Shtein, H. Big Data, Big Problems: Emerging Issues in the Ethics of Data Science and Journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 29, 1 (2014), 38--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S. and Floridi, L. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3, 2 (2016), 2053951716679679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Stahl, B. C. Ethics, morality and critique: An essay on Enid Mumford's socio-technical approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 9 (September 2007), 479--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Doss, E. and Loui, M. C. Ethics and the privacy of electronic mail. The Information Society, 11, 3 (1995), 223--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Calzarossa, M. C., De Lotto, I. and Rogerson, S. Ethics and information systems - Guest editors' introduction. Information Systems Frontiers, 12, 4 (Sep 2009), 357--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Conger, S., Loch, K. D. and Helft, B. L. Ethics and information technology use: a factor analysis of attitudes to computer use. Information Systems Journal, 5, 3 (1995), 161--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Marx, G. T. Ethics for the New Surveillance. The Information Society, 14, 3 (1998), 171--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Peterson, D. K. Computer ethics: the influence of guidelines and universal moral beliefs. Information Technology & People, 15, 4 (2002), 346--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Adam, A. Computer ethics in a different voice. Information and Organization, 11, 4 (2001), 235--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Smith, H. J. and Hasnas, J. Ethics and Information Systems: The Corporate Domain. MIS Quarterly, 23, 1 (1999), 109--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Haines, R. and Leonard, L. N. K. Situational influences on ethical decision-making in an IT context. Information & Management, 44, 3 (2007), 313--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Moores, T. T. and Chang, J. C.-J. Ethical Decision Making in Software Piracy: Initial Development and Test of a Four-Component Model. MIS Quarterly, 30, 1 (2006), 167--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hansen, J. and Walden, E. The role of restrictiveness of use in determining ethical and legal awareness of unauthorized file sharing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 9 (September 2013), 521--549.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Taddeo, M. and Vaccaro, A. Analyzing Peer-to-Peer Technology Using Information Ethics. The Information Society, 27, 2 (2011), 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Jones, S. Doing social network ethics: a critical, interdisciplinary approach. Information Technology & People, 30, 4 (2017), 910--926.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Bush, V. D., Venable, B. T. and Bush, A. J. Ethics and Marketing on this Internet: Practitioners' Perceptions of Societal, Industry and Company Concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 3 (Feb 2000), 237--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Wolf, M. J. and Fresco, N. Ethics of the software vulnerabilities and exploits market. The Information Society, 32, 4 (2016), 269--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Chatterjee, S. and Sarker, S. Infusing ethical considerations in knowledge management scholarship: Toward a research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 8 (August 2013), 452--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Banerjee, D., Cronan, T. P. and Jones, T. W. Modeling IT Ethics: A Study in Situational Ethics. MIS Quarterly, 22, 1 (1998), 31--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Holub, M. and Johnson, J. Bitcoin research across disciplines. The Information Society, 34, 2 (2018), 114--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B. and Teubner, T. The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 29 (2018), 50--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Rimba, P., Tran, A. B., Weber, I., Staples, M., Ponomarev, A. and Xu, X. Quantifying the Cost of Distrust: Comparing Blockchain and Cloud Services for Business Process Execution. Information Systems Frontiers (Aug 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Li, X. and Wang, C. A. The technology and economic determinants of cryptocurrency exchange rates: The case of Bitcoin. Decision Support Systems, 95 (2017), 49 - 60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Polasik, M., Piotrowska, A. I., Wisniewski, T. P., Kotkowski, R. and Lightfoot, G. Price Fluctuations and the Use of Bitcoin: An Empirical Inquiry. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 1 (2015), 9--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Thelwall, M. Can social news websites pay for content and curation? The SteemIt cryptocurrency model. Journal of Information Science, 0, 0 (2017), 0165551517748290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Mai, F., Shan, Z., Bai, Q., Wang, X. and Chiang, R. H. L. How Does Social Media Impact Bitcoin Value? A Test of the Silent Majority Hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 1 (2018), 19--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Avital, M. Peer Review: Toward a Blockchain-enabled Market-based Ecosystem. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 42 (2018), 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J. and Janssen, M. Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 3 (2017), 355--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Dai, J. and Vasarhelyi, M. A. Toward Blockchain-Based Accounting and Assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31, 3 (2017), 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Li, Z., Wang, W. M., Liu, G., Liu, L., He, J. and Huang, G. Q. Toward open manufacturing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118, 1 (2018), 303--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Kshetri, N. Potential roles of blockchain in fighting poverty and reducing financial exclusion in the global south. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 20, 4 (2017), 201--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Ying, W., Jia, S. and Du, W. Digital enablement of blockchain: Evidence from HNA group. International Journal of Information Management, 39 (2018), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Gozman, D., Liebenau, J. and Mangan, J. The Innovation Mechanisms of Fintech Start-Ups: Insights from SWIFT's Innotribe Competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 1 (2018), 145--179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S. and Smolander, K. Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?--A Systematic Review. PLOS ONE, 11, 10 (10 2016), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Agre, P. E. P2P and the promise of internet equality. Communications of the ACM, 46, 2 (2003), 39--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Allen, C., Wallach, W. and Smit, I. Why Machine Ethics? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21, 4 (July 2006), 12--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Bonneau, J., Miller, A., Clark, J., Narayanan, A., Kroll, J. A. and Felten, E. W. SoK: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies. City, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. DuPont, Q. The politics of cryptography: Bitcoin and the ordering machines. Journal of Peer Production, 1, 4 (2014), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Dierksmeier, C. and Seele, P. Cryptocurrencies and Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Angel, J. J. and McCabe, D. The Ethics of Payments: Paper, Plastic, or Bitcoin? Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 3 (2015), 603--611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Rousseau, J.-J. The Social Contract and Discourses. JM Dent & Sons, 1920.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Reijers, W., O'Brolcháin, F. and Haynes, P. Governance in Blockchain Technologies & Social Contract Theories. Ledger, 1, 0 (2016), 134--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. George, J. F. and King, J. L. Examining the computing and centralization debate. Communications of the ACM, 34, 7 (July 1991), 62--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Blockchain Ethics Research: A Conceptual Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMIS-CPR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Computers and People Research Conference
      June 2019
      211 pages
      ISBN:9781450360883
      DOI:10.1145/3322385

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 June 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGMIS-CPR '19 Paper Acceptance Rate20of30submissions,67%Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader