ABSTRACT
Introduction: Citizen involvement in scientific projects has become a way of encouraging curiosity and greater understanding of science whilst providing an unprecedented engagement between professional scientists and the general public. In this paper we specifically focus on the impact of online citizen science (OCS) participation in the science education of primary school age children in New Zealand. Methods: We use four exploratory cases within a broader research project to examine the nature and impact of embedding OCS projects that use web based online crowdsourcing and collaboration tools within classroom environments of primary school science learners. Results & Discussion: Our findings provide insights into primary school teachers' perception of OCS. They offer initial insights into how teachers embed OCS in a classroom environment, and why this improves science learning aptitudes, inquisitiveness and capabilities in primary school age children. We also notice that successfully embedding OCS projects in education is affected by the project context, how the results are disseminated, and inclusivity in socio-cultural aspects.
- Tinati, R., M. Van Kleek, E. Simperl, M. Luczak-Rösch, R. Simpson, and N. Shadbolt. 2015. Designing for citizen data analysis: A cross-sectional case study of a multi-domain citizen science platform. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM Press, 4069--4078. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tinati, R., M. Luczak-Roesch, E. Simperl, and W. Hall. 2017. An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 527--540. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jay, C., R. Dunne, D. Gelsthorpe, and M. Vigo. 2016. To sign up, or not to sign up?: maximizing citizen science contribution rates through optional registration. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1827--1832. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tinati, R., M. Luczak-Roesch, E. Simperl, and W. Hall. 2016. Because science is awesome: studying participation in a citizen science game. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM, 45--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oliveira, N., E. Jun, and K. Reinecke. 2017. Citizen Science Opportunities in Volunteer-Based Online Experiments. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6800--6812. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Law, E., K.Z. Gajos, A. Wiggins, M.L. Gray, and A.C. Williams. 2017. Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Research: Implications of Uncertainty. In CSCW. 1544--1561. Google ScholarDigital Library
- What is Curious Minds? Available at: https://www.curiousminds.nz/about/. Last access: 15th February 2019.Google Scholar
- 2007. Ministry of Education. The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
- Hofstein, A. and V.N. Lunetta. 1982. The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of educational research, 52(2), 201--217.Google Scholar
- Hofstein, A. and V.N. Lunetta. 2004. The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty?first century. Science education, 88(1), 28--54.Google Scholar
- Bolstad, R. and R. Hipkins. 2008. Seeing yourself in science. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council For Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Tytler, R., D. Symington, V. Kirkwood, and C. Malcolm. 2008. Engaging students in authentic science through school--community links: learning from the rural experience. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 54(3).Google Scholar
- Caygill, R., V. Hanlar, and C. Harris-Miller. 2016. Student attitudes to maths and science: what we know from New Zealand's TIMSS 2014/15 results for Year 5 and Year 9. Retrieved 15th February, 2019 from: http://www.education-counts.govt.nz/publications/series/2571/timss-201415/student-attitudes-to-maths-and-science-what-we-know-from-new-zealands-timss-201415-results-for-year-5-and-year-9.Google Scholar
- Educational Assessment Research Unit and New Zealand Council for Educational Research. W?nangatia te Putanga Tauira National Monitoring Study of Student Achievement Science. 2012. Available at: http://nmssa.otago.ac.nz/-reports/2012_Science_ONLINE.pdf. Last access: 15th February 2019.Google Scholar
- Raddick, M.J., G. Bracey, K. Carney, G. Gyuk, K. Borne, J. Wallin, S. Jacoby, and A. Planetarium. 2009. Citizen science: status and research directions for the coming decade. AGB Stars and Related Phenomenastro 2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, 2010, 46P.Google Scholar
- Raddick, M.J., G. Bracey, P.L. Gay, C.J. Lintott, C. Cardamone, P. Murray, K. Schawinski, A.S. Szalay, and J. Vandenberg. 2013. Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of citizen scientists. arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.6886.Google Scholar
- Crowston, K., E. Mitchell, and C. Østerlund. 2018. Coordinating Advanced Crowd Work: Extending Citizen Science. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wiggins, A. and K. Crowston. 2011. From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassman, K., G. Mugar, C. Østerlund, and C. Jackson. 2013. Learning at the seafloor, looking at the sky: The relationship between individual tasks and collaborative engagement in two citizen science projects. In proceedings for 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.Google Scholar
- Nov, O., O. Arazy, and D. Anderson. 2011. Dusting for science: motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. ACM, 68--74. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lewenstein, B.V. 2004. What does citizen science accomplish.Google Scholar
- Yadav, P. and J. Darlington. 2017. Conceptual Frameworks for Building Online Citizen Science Projects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05084.Google Scholar
- Curtis, V. 2014. Online citizen science games: opportunities for the biological sciences. Applied & translational genomics, 3(4), 90--94.Google Scholar
- Raddick, M., G. Bracey, P. Gay, C. Lintott, P. Murray, K. Schawinski, A. Szalay, and J. Vandenberg. 2010. Galaxy zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Sept. Astronomy Education Review, 9(1).Google Scholar
- Yin, R.K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). London and Singapore: Sage.Google Scholar
- Benbasat, I., D.K. Goldstein, and M. Mead. 1987. The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS quarterly, 11(3), 369--386. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532--550.Google Scholar
- Yin, R.K. 1994. Case study research: design and methods. 1994. Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Darke, P., G. Shanks, and M. Broadbent. 1998. Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information systems journal, 8(4), 273--289.Google Scholar
- Chambers, D.W. 1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw?a?Scientist Test. Science education, 67(2), 255--265.Google Scholar
- Smith, L.T., Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. 2013: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Using the Web for Science in the Classroom: Online Citizen Science Participation in Teaching and Learning
Recommendations
Web-based logging of classroom teaching activities for blended learning
ICWL'07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Advances in web based learningNowadays, eLearning has been adapted in all educational institutes, starting from kindergartens, primary schools, high schools, to the universities. Teachers are encouraged to use computer and Internet as a teaching medium in addition to the classroom ...
Modes of classroom assessment in computer science
CompSysTech '11: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Systems and TechnologiesThis paper is about the role of classroom assessment in teaching at university level. In classroom assessment, students are directly involved during teaching in the classroom. It is about promoting learning, and not on evaluation and assigning grades. ...
Using Flipped classroom at University to improve the chemistry learning
TEEM'18: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityThe main objective of this paper was to improve the learning of Chemistry subject using Flipped classroom, because it makes class time more engaging. The lecture portion of General Chemistry courses in engineer degrees have been pushed outside the ...
Comments