skip to main content
10.1145/3290607.3313073acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

DIY Community WiFi Networks: Insights on Participatory Design

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a first version of a set of insights developed collaboratively by researchers during a three-year participatory design project spread across four European locations. The MAZI project explored potential uses of a "Do-It-Yourself" WiFi networking technology platform. Built using low-cost Raspberry Pi computer hardware and specially developed, open-source software, this toolkit has the potential to enable hyper-local applications and services to be developed and maintained within a host community for its own use. The nine insights are a distillation and articulation of the collective reflections of the project partners gained from their experiences of working in diverse settings with varied communities and stakeholders. In this paper, we discuss the reflective process, we present the insights to the CHI community in order to gain feedback, and we situate our findings within previous literature.

References

  1. Panayotis Antoniadis. 2018. The Organic Internet: Building Communications Networks from the Grassroots. In CoDesigning Economies in Transition, Vincenzo Mario Bruno Giorgino and Zack Walsh (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 235--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Panayotis Antoniadis and Ileana Apostol. 2014. The Right(s) to the Hybrid City and the Role of DIY Networking. J. Community Informatics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Luca Belli, Bruno de Souza Ramos, Panayotis Antoniadis, et al. 2018. The community network manual: how to build the Internet yourself. FGV Direito Rio. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25696Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Susanne Bødker and Morten Kyng. 2018. Participatory Design that Matters-Facing the Big Issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 1: 1--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Andrew Clement and Peter Van den Besselaar. 1993. A retrospective look at PD projects. Communications of the ACM 36, 6: 29--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gareth Davies, Mark Gaved, Koula Charitonos, Patrick McAndrew, Ann Jones and Eileen Scanlon. 2018. D3.10 Comparative study of the MAZI pilots (version 3). MAZI Developing a DIY networking toolkit for location-based collective awareness. From: http://www.mazizone.eu/about/deliverables/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gareth Davies, Katalin Hausel, and James Stevens. 2018. Community partners acting as insider researchers to facilitate a Do-It-Yourself networking. 1--2. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/55413Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Laura Forlano and Anijo Mathew. 2014. From Design Fiction to Design Friction: Speculative and Participatory Design of Values-Embedded Urban Technology. Journal of Urban Technology 21, 4: 7--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ole Sejer Iversen, Kim Halskov, and Tuck W Leong. 2012. Values-led participatory design. CoDesign 8, 2--3: 87--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ray Pawson and Nicholas Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications. From: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/realistic-evaluation/book205276Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Michael Smyth, Lone Koefoed Hansen, Douglas C Schuler, et al. 2018. Maker Movements, Do-It-Yourself Cultures and Participatory Design. ACM Press, 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michael Smyth and Ingi Helgason. 2017. Making and Unfinishedness: Designing Toolkits for Negotiation. The Design Journal: S3966--S3974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Andreas Unteidig, Panayotis Antoniadis, Ileana Apostol, Mark Gaved, Gareth Davies, Harris Niavis, Stavroula Maglavera, James Stevens, Elizabeth Calderon-Lünig, Anna Heilgemeir. 2018. D3.6 - An interdisciplinary framework for comparisons and cross-fertilization strategies of MAZI pilots (version2) pp29--31 From: http://www.mazizone.eu/about/deliverables/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Andreas Unteidig, Blanca Domínguez Cobreros, Elizabeth Calderon-Lüning, and Gesche Joost. 2017. Digital commons, urban struggles and the role of Design. The Design Journal: S3106--S3120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. DIY Community WiFi Networks: Insights on Participatory Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      3673 pages
      ISBN:9781450359719
      DOI:10.1145/3290607

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format