skip to main content
10.1145/3274192.3274227acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Revisiting Interactive Art from an Interaction Design Perspective: Opening a Research Agenda

Published:22 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The articulation of art and science has been an important source of innovation and groundbreaking contributions in many domains throughout history. In this paper, we revisit the concept of interactive art, from an interaction design perspective, aiming at identifying the interaction approaches that emerge in interactive art examples found in the literature and also in other non-academic sources, such as online communities and digital games. Moreover, we investigate the use of frameworks and methodologies to support the design of interactive art. Results of this study illustrate the ways interaction approaches found in interactive art examples can inspire novel forms of interaction, which can also be useful in the design of interactive systems without artistic intent. Furthermore, frameworks and methodologies to support the design and evaluation of interactive art provide different ways to approach the design of interactive systems, giving focus to experiential aspects that otherwise could be overlooked. Lastly, we outline a research agenda to encourage research on interactive art from an interaction design perspective.

References

  1. Piotr D. Adamczyk, Kevin Hamilton, Michael B. Twidale, and Brian P. Bailey. 2007. HCI and New Media Arts: Methodology and Evaluation. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2813--2816. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ximena Alarcón-Díaz, Kira Askaroff, Linda Candy, Ernest A. Edmonds, Jane Faram, and Gillian Hobson. 2014. Evaluation in Public Art: The Light Logic Exhibition. In Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice, Linda Candy and Sam Ferguson (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 187--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Liam J. Bannon and Pelle Ehn. 2013. Design: Design Matters in Participatory Design. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson (Eds.). Routledge, London, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2014. Social Awareness in HCI. interactions 21, 4 (July 2014), 66--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2015. Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2093--2102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Stephen Barrass and Ana Luisa Sanchez Laws. 2014. Experience and Evaluation in the Collective Creation of a Public Digital Exhibition. In Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice, Linda Candy and Sam Ferguson (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 209--219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden. 2013. Uncomfortable User Experience. Commun. ACM 56, 9 (Sept. 2013), 66--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ben Bengler and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2014. In the Wild: Evaluating Collaborative Interactive Musical Experiences in Public Settings. In Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice, Linda Candy and Sam Ferguson (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 169--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Susanne Bødker. 2006. When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Changing Roles (NordiCHI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. John Bowers, Liam Bannon, Mike Fraser, Jon Hindmarsh, Steve Benford, Christian Heath, Gustav Taxén, and Luigina Ciolfi. 2007. From the Disappearing Computer to Living Exhibitions: Shaping Interactivity in Museum Settings. In The Disappearing Computer: Interaction Design, System Infrastructures and Applications for Smart Environments, Norbert Streitz, Achilles Kameas, and Irene Mavrommati (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 30--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Margaret M. Bradley and Peter J. Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 25, 1 (1994), 49--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Richard Brown. 2016. IMorphia: An Embodied Performance System. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3820--3823. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Anil Camci. 2016. Distractions: Interactive Visualizations on a Kinetic Sculpture Using Infrasound Vibrations. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3827--3830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Linda Candy. 2014. Evaluation and Experience in Art. In Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice, Linda Candy and Sam Ferguson (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 25--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Linda Candy and Ernest A. Edmonds. 1999. Introducing Creativity to Cognition. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C '99). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Luigina Ciolfi, Gabriela Avram, Laura Maye, Nick Dulake, Mark T. Marshall, Dick van Dijk, and Fiona McDermott. 2016. Articulating Co-Design in Museums: Reflections on Two Participatory Processes. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. L. Ciolfi, M. Fernstrom, L.J. Bannon, P. Deshpande, P. Gallagher, C. McGettrick, N. Quinn, and S. Shirley. 2007. The Shannon Portal Installation: Interaction Design for Public Places. Computer 40, 7 (July 2007), 64--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Luigina Ciolfi and Daniela Petrelli. 2015. Studying a Community of Volunteers at a Historic Cemetery to Inspire Interaction Concepts. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Luigina Ciolfi, Daniela Petrelli, Fiona McDermott, Gabriela Avram, and Dick van Dijk. 2015. Co-design to Empower Cultural Heritage Professionals as Technology Designers. In Empowering Users through Design: Interdisciplinary Studies and Combined Approaches for Technological Products and Services, David Bihanic (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 213--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rachel Elizabeth Clarke, Jo Briggs, Ann Light, Sara Heitlinger, and Clara Crivellaro. 2014. Socially Engaged Arts Practice in HCI. In CHI' 14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 69--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Brigid Costello and Ernest A. Edmonds. 2007. A Study in Play, Pleasure and Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 76--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Brigid Costello and Ernest A. Edmonds. 2009. A Tool for Characterizing the Experience of Play. In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment (IE '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Daniel Cressey. 2017. Age of the Arduino. Nature 544, 7648 (April 2017), 125--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Peter Dalsgård and Kim Halskov. 2006. Real Life Experiences with Experience Design. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Changing Roles (NordiCHI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 331--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Antonio Daniele. 2016. This Is Not Private. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3831--3834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. John Dewey. 1934. Art as Experience. Minton, Balch & Company, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Suélia F. Rodrigues Carla Silva Rocha Aguiar Tiago F. Lucena Mateus Miranda Adson F. Rocha Ramesh Raskar Diana Domingues, Cristiano Jacques Miosso. 2014. Embodiments, visualizations, and immersion with enactive affective systems, In Proc. SPIE. Proc. SPIE 9012, 90120J--90120J--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Judith Doyle and Naoto Hieda. 2016. Avian Attractor. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3835--3838. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Emanuel Felipe Duarte and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2016. Revisiting the Three HCI Waves: A Preliminary Discussion on Philosophy of Science and Research Paradigms. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Systems (IHC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 38, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Emanuel Felipe Duarte and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2018. InterArt: Learning Human-Computer Interaction Through the Making of Interactive Art. In Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Human Issues, Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 35--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Emanuel Felipe Duarte, Fabrício Matheus Gonçalves, and M. Cecilia C. Baranauskas. 2018. InstInt: Enacting a Small-scale Interactive Installation Through Co-design. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, in press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ernest Edmonds, Steve Benford, Zafer Bilda, Jill Fantauzzacoffin, Roger Malina, and Hughes Vinet. 2013. Digital Arts: Did You Feel That?. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2439--2446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ernest Edmonds and Sean Clark. 2016. Tango Apart: Moving Together. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3663--3666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ernest A. Edmonds. 2014. Human Computer Interaction, Art and Experience. In Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice, Linda Candy and Sam Ferguson (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 11--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Douglas C. Engelbart. 1962. Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. Technical Report. Stanford Research Institute. https://www.dougengelbart.org/pubs/augment-3906.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. David England. 2016. Art.CHI: Curating the Digital. In Curating the Digital: Space for Art and Interaction, David England, Thecla Schiphorst, and Nick Bryan-Kinns (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. David England, Linda Candy, Celine Latulipe, Thecla Schiphorst, Ernest Edmonds, Younghui Kim, Sean Clark, and Andruid Kerne. 2015. Art.CHI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2329--2332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. David England, Ernest Edmonds, Jennifer G. Sheridan, Scott Pobiner, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Peter Wright, Michael Twidale, and Carla Diana. 2011. Digital Arts and Interaction (Invited). In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 609--612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. David England, Celine Latulipe, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Ernest Edmonds, and Sean Clark. 2016. Art.CHI II: Digital Art in a Post-Digital World. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3477--3483. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. David England, Jocelyn C. Spence, Celine E. Latulipe, Ernest A. Edmonds, Linda Candy, Thecla Schiphorst, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Kirk Woolford. 2014. Art and Interaction SIG: Cataloging the Digital Arts. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1115--1118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Jill Fantauzzacoffin, Joanna Berzowska, Ernest Edmonds, Ken Goldberg, D. Fox Harrell, and Brian Smith. 2012. The Arts, HCI, and Innovation Policy Discourse: Invited Panel. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1111--1114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Jill Fantauzzacoffin, Linda Candy, Ayoka Chenzira, Ernest Edmonds, David England, Thecla Schiphorst, and Atau Tanaka. 2012. Articulating Lines of Research in Digital Arts, HCI, and Interaction (Invited SIG). In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1177--1180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Christopher Frayling. 1993. Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers 1, 1 (1993), 1--5. http://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/384/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. E. Frecon, O. Stahl, J. Soderberg, and A. Wallberg. 2004. Visualising Sound Perception in a Submarine: A Museum Installation. In Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications. IEEE, Budapest, Hungary, 38--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Game Freak. 1998. Pokémon Red. Game {Game Boy}. Nintendo Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. William Gaver. 2012. What Should We Expect from Research Through Design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 937--946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Byeongwon Ha. 2016. Endless Ripples: A Growing Interactive Donation Device. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3843--3846. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces Between People, Bits and Atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '97). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. G. Jacucci, M. Wagner, I. Wagner, E. Giaccardi, M. Annunziato, N. Breyer, J. Hansen, K. Jo, S. Ossevoort, A. Perini, N. Roussel, and S. Schuricht. 2010. ParticipArt: Exploring participation in interactive art installations. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities. IEEE, Seoul, South Korea, 3--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Maša Jazbec and Floris Erich. 2016. Investigating Human Identity Using The idMirror Interactive Installation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3851--3854. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. François Jégou. 2009. Co-design Approaches for Early Phases of Augmented Environments. In Designing User Friendly Augmented Work Environments: From Meeting Rooms to Digital Collaborative Spaces, Saadi Lahlou (Ed.). Springer London, London, 159--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Mauri Kaipainen, Niklas Ravaja, Pia Tikka, Rasmus Vuori, Roberto Pugliese, Marco Rapino, and Tapio Takala. 2011. Enactive Systems and Enactive Media: Embodied Human-Machine Coupling beyond Interfaces. Leonardo 44, 5 (13 September 2011), 433--438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Laewoo (Leo) Kang. 2016. Breaking AndyWall: Transgressive and Playful Exploration on the Dynamic Role of Users in Art and Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3855--3858. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. George (Poonkhin) Khut. 2016. Designing Biofeedback Artworks for Relaxation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3859--3862. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Hiroki Kobayashi, Hiromi Kudo, Vicki Moulder, Michael Heidt, and Lorna Boschman. 2017. Fukushima Audio Census. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1393--1398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. The Big Hole in HCI Research. interactions 22, 2 (Feb. 2015), 48--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Myron W. Krueger. 1977. Responsive Environments. In Proceedings of the June 13-16, 1977, National Computer Conference (AFIPS '77). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 423--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Sang Won Lee and Georg Essl. 2017. Live Writing: Gloomy Streets. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1387--1392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Tuck W. Leong, Lalya Gaye, Atau Tanaka, Robyn Taylor, and Peter C. Wright. 2011. The User in Flux: Bringing HCI and Digital Arts Together to Interrogate Shifting Roles in Interactive Media. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 45--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Eitan Mendelowitz, Damon Seeley, and David Glicksman. 2016. Whorl: An Immersive Dive into a World of Flowers, Color, and Play. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3871--3874. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Lizzie Muller, Ernest Edmonds, and M. Connell. 2006. Living laboratories for interactive art. CoDesign 2, 4 (2006), 195--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Predrag K. Nikolic. 2015. Collective Creativity: Utilizing the Potentials of Multimodal Environments. In Internet of Things. IoT Infrastructures, Raffaele Giaffreda, Dagmar Cagáňová, Yong Li, Roberto Riggio, and Agnès Voisard (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 27--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Evelyn Patsoule. 2014. Interactions around a Multi-touch Tabletop: A Rapid Ethnographic Study in a Museum. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design Practice, Aaron Marcus (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 434--445.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Celia Pearce, Gillian Smith, Jeanie Choi, and Isabella Carlsson. 2016. eBee: Merging Quilting, Electronics & Board Game Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3877--3880. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Irene Posch and Ebru Kurbak. 2016. CRAFTED LOGIC Towards Hand-Crafting a Computer. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3881--3884. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Jennifer Seevinck. 2016. Dichroic W. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3889--3892. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Phoebe Sengers and Chris Csikszentmihályi. 2003. HCI and the Arts: A Conflicted Convergence?. In CHI '03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 876--877. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Orit Shaer, Consuelo Valdes, Sirui Liu, Kara Lu, Kimberly Chang, Wendy Xu, Traci L. Haddock, Swapnil Bhatia, Douglas Densmore, and Robert Kincaid. 2014. Designing reality-based interfaces for experiential bio-design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 6 (01 Aug 2014), 1515--1532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Gavin Sim, Brendan Cassidy, and Janet C. Read. 2018. Crowdsourcing Ideas for Augmented Reality Museum Experiences with Children. In Museum Experience Design: Crowds, Ecosystems and Novel Technologies, Arnold Vermeeren, Licia Calvi, and Amalia Sabiescu (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 75--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Chek Tien Tan and Sam Ferguson. 2014. The Role of Emotions in Art Evaluation. In Interactive Experience in the Digital Age: Evaluating New Art Practice, Linda Candy and Sam Ferguson (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 139--- 152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. thatgamecompany. 2012. Journey. Game {Playstation 3}. Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Tokyo, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Francisco J. Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Viveka Weiley and Ernest Edmonds. 2011. The HCI Researcher As Artist and Designer: Approaches to Creativity and Distance. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 233--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Stephen Wilson. 1996. Art as Research. Available at: http://userwww.sfsu.edu/swilson/papers/artist.researcher.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Stephen Wilson. 2003. Science and Art - Looking Backward/Looking Forward. Available at: http://www.artcenter.edu/williamson/neuro/exhibit/f_body_wilson.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research Through Design As a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Revisiting Interactive Art from an Interaction Design Perspective: Opening a Research Agenda

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            IHC '18: Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            October 2018
            488 pages
            ISBN:9781450366014
            DOI:10.1145/3274192

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 22 October 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            IHC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate42of166submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader