skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173648acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Back to Analogue: Self-Reporting for Parkinson's Disease

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We report the process used to create artefacts for self-reporting Parkinson's Disease symptoms. Our premise was that a technology-based approach would provide participants with an effective, flexible, and resilient technique. After testing four prototypes using Bluetooth, NFC, and a microcontroller we accomplished almost full compliance and high acceptance using a paper diary to track day-to-day fluctuations over 49 days. This diary is tailored to each patient's condition, does not require any handwriting, allows for implicit reminders, provides recording flexibility, and its answers can be encoded automatically. We share five design implications for future Parkinson's self-reporting artefacts: reduce participant completion demand, design to offset the effect of tremor on input, enable implicit reminders, design for positive and negative consequences of increased awareness of symptoms, and consider the effects of handwritten notes in compliance, encoding burden, and data quality.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1491.mp4

mp4

210.6 MB

References

  1. Angelo Antonini, Pablo Martinez-Martin, Ray K. Chaudhuri, Marcelo Merello, Robert Hauser, Regina Katzenschlager, Per Odin, Mark Stacy, Fabrizio Stocchi, Werner Poewe, Oliver Rascol, Cristina Sampaio, Anette Schrag, Glenn T. Stebbins, and Christopher G. Goetz. 2011. Wearing-off scales in Parkinson's disease: Critique and recommendations. Movement Disorders 26, 12 (10 2011), 2169--2175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Ashburn, E. Stack, C. Ballinger, L. Fazakarley, and C. Fitton. 2008. The circumstances of falls among people with Parkinson's disease and the use of Falls Diaries to facilitate reporting. Disability and Rehabilitation 30, 16 (1 2008), 1205--1212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Amid Ayobi, Paul Marshall, Anna L. Cox, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Quantifying the Body and Caring for the Mind. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 6889--6901. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Niall Bolger, Angelina Davis, and Eshkol Rafaeli. 2003. Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is Lived. Annual Review of Psychology 54, 1 (2 2003), 579--616.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Niall Bolger, Patrick E Shrout, Amie S Green, Eshkol Rafaeli, and Harry T Reis. 2006. Paper or plastic revisited: Let's keep them both--Reply to Broderick and Stone (2006); Tennen, Affleck, Coyne, Larsen, and DeLongis (2006); and Takarangi, Garry, and Loftus (2006). (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Joan E. Broderick and Arthur A. Stone. 2006. Paper and electronic diaries: Too early for conclusions on compliance rates and their effects--Comment on Green, Rafaeli, Bolger, Shrout, and Reis (2006). Psychological Methods 11, 1 (3 2006), 106--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Michelle Clare Carter, Victoria Jane Burley, Camilla Nykjaer, and Janet Elizabeth Cade. 2013. Adherence to a Smartphone Application for Weight Loss Compared to Website and Paper Diary: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15, 4 (4 2013), e32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Tamlin Conner Christensen, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Eliza Bliss-Moreau, Kirsten Lebo, and Tamlin Conner Christensen. 2003. A Practical Guide to Experience-Sampling Procedures. Journal of Happiness Studies 4, 1 (2003), 53--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Oystein Dale and Kaare Birger Hagen. 2007. Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60, 1 (1 2007), 8--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Denzil Ferreira, Vassilis Kostakos, and Anind K. Dey. 2015. AWARE: Mobile Context Instrumentation Framework. Frontiers in ICT 2 (4 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Linda A. Fletcher, Darin J. Erickson, Traci L. Toomey, and Alexander C. Wagenaar. 2003. Handheld Computers. Evaluation Review 27, 2 (4 2003), 165--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Adam Galpin, Steven P. Tipper, Jeremy P.R. Dick, and Ellen Poliakoff. 2011. Object affordance and spatial-compatibility effects in Parkinson's disease. Cortex 47, 3 (2011), 332 -- 341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Alan Godfrey, Alan Bourke, Silvia Del Din, Rosie Morris, Aodhan Hickey, Jorunn L Helbostad, and Lynn Rochester. 2016. Towards holistic free-living assessment in Parkinson's disease: Unification of gait and fall algorithms with a single accelerometer. In 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 651--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Christopher G Goetz, Barbara C Tilley, Stephanie R Shaftman, Glenn T Stebbins, Stanley Fahn, Pablo Martinez-Martin, Werner Poewe, Cristina Sampaio, Matthew B Stern, Richard Dodel, Bruno Dubois, Robert Holloway, Joseph Jankovic, Jaime Kulisevsky, Anthony E Lang, Andrew Lees, Sue Leurgans, Peter a LeWitt, David Nyenhuis, C Warren Olanow, Olivier Rascol, Anette Schrag, Jeanne a Teresi, Jacobus J van Hilten, and Nancy LaPelle. 2008. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society 23, 15 (11 2008), 2129--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Amie S. Green, Eshkol Rafaeli, Niall Bolger, Patrick E. Shrout, and Harry T. Reis. 2006. Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods 11, 1 (2006), 87--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Robert A. Hauser, Frieda Deckers, and Philippe Lehert. 2004. Parkinson's disease home diary: Further validation and implications for clinical trials. Movement Disorders 19, 12 (12 2004), 1409--1413.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Turid Heiberg, Tore K Kvien, Øystein Dale, Petter Mowinckel, Gerd J Aanerud, Ann B Songe-Møller, Till Uhlig, and Kåre B Hagen. 2007. Daily health status registration (patient diary) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison between personal digital assistant and paper-pencil format. Arthritis Care & Research 57, 3 (2007), 454--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sharpley Hsieh, Samantha Schubert, Christopher Hoon, Eneida Mioshi, and John R Hodges. 2013. Validation of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders 36, 3--4 (2013), 242--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Heather Hunter, Lynn Rochester, Rosie Morris, and Sue Lord. 2017. Longitudinal falls data in Parkinson's disease: feasibility of fall diaries and effect of attrition. Disability and Rehabilitation (6 2017), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M E Hyland, C A Kenyon, R Allen, and P Howarth. 1993. Diary keeping in asthma: comparison of written and electronic methods. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 306, 6876 (2 1993), 487--9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8448458http: //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid= PMC1676776Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Stephen Intille, Caitlin Haynes, Dharam Maniar, Aditya Ponnada, and Justin Manjourides. 2016. µEMA. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing UbiComp '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1124--1128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. T K Kvien, P Mowinckel, T Heiberg, K L Dammann, Ø Dale, G J Aanerud, T N Alme, and T Uhlig. 2005. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 64, 10 (10 2005), 1480--1484.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jessica Lam, Ronald G. Barr, Nicole Catherine, Haley Tsui, Claire L. Hahnhaussen, Julie Pauwels, and Rollin Brant. 2010. Electronic and Paper Diary Recording of Infant and Caregiver Behaviors. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics 31, 9 (10 2010), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Shannon J Lane, Nancy M Heddle, Emmy Arnold, and Irwin Walker. 2006. A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection. BMC medical informatics and decision making 6 (5 2006), 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jakob Eg Larsen, Kasper Eskelund, and Thomas Blomseth Christiansen. 2017. Active Self-Tracking of Subjective Experience with a One-Button Wearable: A Case Study in Military PTSD. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.03437 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jean-Philippe Laurenceau and Niall Bolger. 2005. Using Diary Methods to Study Marital and Family Processes. Journal of Family Psychology 19, 1 (3 2005), 86--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. James L Levine and Michael A Schappert. 2005. A mouse adapter for people with hand tremor. IBM Systems Journal 44, 3 (2005), 621--628. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Yue Liao, Kara Skelton, Genevieve Dunton, and Meg Bruening. 2016. A systematic review of methods and procedures used in ecological momentary assessments of diet and physical activity research in youth: an adapted STROBE checklist for reporting EMA studies (CREMAS). Journal of medical Internet research 18, 6 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Paul Luff, Christian Heath, Moira Norrie, Beat Signer, and Peter Herdman. 2004. Only touching the surface. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '04. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Heikki Luukinen, Keijo Koski, Liisa Hiltunen, and Sirkka-Liisa Kivelä. 1994. Incidence rate of falls in an aged population in Northern Finland. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 47, 8 (8 1994), 843--850.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kelly E. Lyons and Rajesh Pahwa. 2007. Electronic motor function diary for patients with Parkinson's disease: A feasibility study. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 13, 5 (7 2007), 304--307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Altaf Mangera, Alberto Marzo, Nicola Heron, Dayan Fernando, Khawar Hameed, Abdel-Hamid A. Soliman, Mike Bradley, Ian Hosking, Mohamed Abdel-Maguid, Martin Levermore, Wendy B. Tindale, and Christopher Chapple. 2014. Development of two electronic bladder diaries: A patient and healthcare professionals pilot study. Neurourology and Urodynamics 33, 7 (9 2014), 1101--1109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Johan Marinus, Martine Visser, Anne M Stiggelbout, Jose Martin Rabey, Ubaldo Bonuccelli, Peter H Kraus, and Jacobus Bob J van Hilten. 2002. Activity-based diary for Parkinson's disease. Clinical neuropharmacology 25, 1 (2002), 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Rob McCarney, James Warner, Steve Iliffe, Robbert van Haselen, Mark Griffin, and Peter Fisher. 2007. The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Medical Research Methodology 7, 1 (12 2007), 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Mattijn Morren, Sandra Dulmen, Jessika Ouwerkerk, and Jozien Bensing. 2009. Compliance with momentary pain measurement using electronic diaries: A systematic review. European Journal of Pain 13, 4 (4 2009), 354--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Jan M. Noyes and Kate J. Garland. 2008. Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? Ergonomics 51, 9 (9 2008), 1352--1375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Francisco Nunes, Nervo Verdezoto, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Morten Kyng, Erik Grönvall, and Cristiano Storni. 2015. Self-Care Technologies in HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22, 6 (12 2015), 1--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Dag Nyholm, Jan Kowalski, and Sten-Magnus Aquilonius. 2004. Wireless real-time electronic data capture for self-assessment of motor function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders 19, 4 (4 2004), 446--451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Spyridon Spyros Papapetropoulos. 2012. Patient Diaries As a Clinical Endpoint in Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 18, 5 (5 2012), 380--387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Gaurav Paruthi, Shriti Raj, Ankita Gupta, Chuan-Che Huang, Yung-Ju Chang, and Mark W Newman. 2017. HEED. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers on - UbiComp '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 181--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. V. Peto, C. Jenkinson, and R. Fitzpatrick. 1998. PDQ-39: a review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. Journal of Neurology 245, S1 (4 1998), S10--S14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. S L Pullman. 1998. Spiral analysis: a new technique for measuring tremor with a digitizing tablet. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society 13 Suppl 3 (1998), 85--9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9827601Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. J Reimer, M Grabowski, O Lindvall, and P Hagell. 2004. Use and interpretation of on/off diaries in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 75, 3 (2004), 396--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Urša Reja, Katja Lozar Manfreda, Valentina Hlebec, and Vasja Vehovar. 2003. Open-ended vs. close-ended questions in web questionnaires. Developments in applied statistics 19, 1 (2003), 159--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Yann Riche, Nathalie Henry Riche, Ken Hinckley, Sheri Panabaker, Sarah Fuelling, and Sarah Williams. 2017. As We May Ink?. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 3241--3253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Abigail J. Sellen and Richard Harper. 2002. The myth of the paperless office. MIT Press. 231 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Saul Shiffman, Arthur A Stone, and Michael R Hufford. 2008. Ecological Momentary Assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol 4 (2008), 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Jennifer N Stinson and Jennifer N. 2009. Improving the Assessment of Pediatric Chronic Pain: Harnessing the Potential of Electronic Diaries. Pain Research and Management 14, 1 (2009), 59--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Howard Tennen, Glenn Affleck, James C. Coyne, Randy J. Larsen, and Anita DeLongis. 2006. Paper and plastic in daily diary research: Comment on Green, Rafaeli, Bolger, Shrout, and Reis (2006). Psychological Methods 11, 1 (2006), 112--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Kwon Kuen Tsang. 2012. The use of midpoint on Likert Scale: The implications for educational research. Hong Kong Teachers' Centre Journal 11, 1 (2012), 121--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Julio Vega. 2017. JulioV/paperstream: PaperStream. (Nov. 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. G Velikova, E P Wright, A B Smith, A Cull, A Gould, D Forman, T Perren, M Stead, J Brown, and P J Selby. 1999. Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 17, 3 (3 1999), 998--1007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Mary H Wilde and Suzanne Garvin. 2007. A concept analysis of self-monitoring. Journal of Advanced Nursing 57, 3 (2007), 339--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Jerome A Yesavage and Javaid I Sheikh. 1986. 9/Geriatric depression scale (GDS) recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical gerontologist 5, 1--2 (1986), 165--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Back to Analogue: Self-Reporting for Parkinson's Disease

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader