ABSTRACT
Digital marketing is increasingly moving from desktop (e.g., browser) to mobile environments (e.g., within mobile applications). The means for delivering ads however, remains largely unchanged: banners and videos. In this work, we explore transforming ad delivery methods to the mobile environment while mitigating issues causing frustration and distractions to the users, evident in both web and mobile marketing. We demonstrate that softly enforcing interaction with the ad - with minimal usable screen space reduction - can improve user's attitude towards mobile advertising. Brand recollection is also influenced via increased interactions with the ad delivery method.
- Mirriad Advertising. 2016. ORC International Survey.Google Scholar
- Yakov Bart, Andrew T Stephen and Miklos Sarvary. 2014. Which products are best suited to mobile advertising? A field study of mobile display advertising effects on consumer attitudes and intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (3). 270--285.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jan Panero Benway. Year. Banner blindness: The irony of attention grabbing on the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 463--467.Google Scholar
- Moira Burke, Anthony Hornof, Erik Nilsen and Nicholas Gorman. 2005. High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12 (4). 423--445. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raymond Chen. 2003. The default answer to every dialog box is "Cancel", Microsoft.Google Scholar
- Chang-Hoan Cho. 2003. Factors influencing clicking of banner ads on the WWW. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6 (2). 201--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kushal S Dave and Vasudeva Varma. Year. Learning the click-through rate for rare/new ads from similar ads. In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, ACM, 897--898. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fd D. Davis. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance Of Information Technology. MIS quarterly. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Subhankar Dhar and Upkar Varshney. 2011. Challenges and business models for mobile location-based services and advertising. Communications of the ACM, 54 (5). 121--128. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Duncan. 2004. Method and system for mobile display of context-based advertising content, Google Patents.Google Scholar
- GroupM. 2016. This Year Next Year: Worldwide Media and Marketing Forecasts, GroupM, 44.Google Scholar
- Ailsa Kolsaker and Nikolaos Drakatos. 2009. Mobile advertising: The influence of emotional attachment to mobile devices on consumer receptiveness. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15 (4). 267--280.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prestige Marketing. 2015. Who Looks at Banner Ads.Google Scholar
- José Martí Parreño, Silvia Sanz-Blas, Carla Ruiz-Mafé and Joaquin Aldás-Manzano. 2013. Key factors of teenagers' mobile advertising acceptance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113 (5). 732--749.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suman Nath, Felix Xiaozhu Lin, Lenin Ravindranath and Jitendra Padhye. Year. SmartAds: bringing contextual ads to mobile apps. In Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, ACM, 111--124. Google ScholarDigital Library
- William J Stanton, Michael J Etzel and Bruce J Walker. 1994. Fundamentals of marketing. McGraw-Hill College.Google Scholar
- Melody M Tsang, Shu-Chun Ho and Ting-Peng Liang. 2004. Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study. International journal of electronic commerce, 8 (3). 65--78. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Choy-Har Wong, Garry Wei-Han Tan, Boon-In Tan and Keng-Boon Ooi. 2015. Mobile advertising: the changing landscape of the advertising industry. Telematics and Informatics, 32 (4). 720--734. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Byunghwa Yang, Youngchan Kim and Changjo Yoo. 2013. The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology-and emotion-based evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 66 (9). 1345--1352.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Mobile advertising: evaluating the effects of animation, user and content relevance
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe potential for user-relevant, context-appropriate, targeted advertising on mobile devices is enormous given device improvements and advances in personal and location-based data collection. However, little is known about how users experience display ...
Effect of Brand Loyalty on Advertising and Trade Promotions: A Game Theoretic Analysis with Empirical Evidence
In this paper we examine the issue of balancing media advertising pull strategy and trade promotions push strategy for manufacturers of consumer packaged goods utilizing a three-stage game theoretic analysis and test model's implications with scanner ...
Differences in Dynamic Brand Competition Across Markets: An Empirical Analysis
We investigate differences in the dynamics of marketing decisions across geographic markets empirically. We begin with a linear-quadratic game involving forward-looking firms competing on prices and advertising. Based on the corresponding Markov perfect ...
Comments