skip to main content
10.1145/3152832.3152834acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring mobile ad formats to increase brand recollection and enhance user experience

Published:26 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital marketing is increasingly moving from desktop (e.g., browser) to mobile environments (e.g., within mobile applications). The means for delivering ads however, remains largely unchanged: banners and videos. In this work, we explore transforming ad delivery methods to the mobile environment while mitigating issues causing frustration and distractions to the users, evident in both web and mobile marketing. We demonstrate that softly enforcing interaction with the ad - with minimal usable screen space reduction - can improve user's attitude towards mobile advertising. Brand recollection is also influenced via increased interactions with the ad delivery method.

References

  1. Mirriad Advertising. 2016. ORC International Survey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Yakov Bart, Andrew T Stephen and Miklos Sarvary. 2014. Which products are best suited to mobile advertising? A field study of mobile display advertising effects on consumer attitudes and intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (3). 270--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jan Panero Benway. Year. Banner blindness: The irony of attention grabbing on the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 463--467.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Moira Burke, Anthony Hornof, Erik Nilsen and Nicholas Gorman. 2005. High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12 (4). 423--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Raymond Chen. 2003. The default answer to every dialog box is "Cancel", Microsoft.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang-Hoan Cho. 2003. Factors influencing clicking of banner ads on the WWW. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6 (2). 201--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kushal S Dave and Vasudeva Varma. Year. Learning the click-through rate for rare/new ads from similar ads. In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, ACM, 897--898. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fd D. Davis. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance Of Information Technology. MIS quarterly. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Subhankar Dhar and Upkar Varshney. 2011. Challenges and business models for mobile location-based services and advertising. Communications of the ACM, 54 (5). 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Duncan. 2004. Method and system for mobile display of context-based advertising content, Google Patents.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. GroupM. 2016. This Year Next Year: Worldwide Media and Marketing Forecasts, GroupM, 44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ailsa Kolsaker and Nikolaos Drakatos. 2009. Mobile advertising: The influence of emotional attachment to mobile devices on consumer receptiveness. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15 (4). 267--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Prestige Marketing. 2015. Who Looks at Banner Ads.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. José Martí Parreño, Silvia Sanz-Blas, Carla Ruiz-Mafé and Joaquin Aldás-Manzano. 2013. Key factors of teenagers' mobile advertising acceptance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113 (5). 732--749.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Suman Nath, Felix Xiaozhu Lin, Lenin Ravindranath and Jitendra Padhye. Year. SmartAds: bringing contextual ads to mobile apps. In Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, ACM, 111--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. William J Stanton, Michael J Etzel and Bruce J Walker. 1994. Fundamentals of marketing. McGraw-Hill College.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Melody M Tsang, Shu-Chun Ho and Ting-Peng Liang. 2004. Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study. International journal of electronic commerce, 8 (3). 65--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Choy-Har Wong, Garry Wei-Han Tan, Boon-In Tan and Keng-Boon Ooi. 2015. Mobile advertising: the changing landscape of the advertising industry. Telematics and Informatics, 32 (4). 720--734. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Byunghwa Yang, Youngchan Kim and Changjo Yoo. 2013. The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology-and emotion-based evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 66 (9). 1345--1352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MUM '17: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
    November 2017
    567 pages
    ISBN:9781450353786
    DOI:10.1145/3152832

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 November 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader