skip to main content
10.1145/3077343.3077350acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiuxidConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Users' perception of ease of use (EOU) and confidence with skill using SMS in emergency conditions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper is to investigate the correlation between ease of use (EOU) and confidence with skill with regard to the use of SMS (Short Messaging Service) for warning messages in an emergency situation. This paper is part of our formative study to investigate the possibility for using SMS in emergency conditions from the users' perspective. The case study that we used was warning messages for an urban kampung flood disaster area in Indonesia. We analysed the users' perception of EOU and confidence with skill when using SMS. This study collected data from 350 participants who live in a flood prone area in Bandar Harjo, Semarang, Indonesia. The data indicated a strong and positive correlation between EOU and confidence with skill for using SMS in emergency conditions. The users' gender, age and level of education influence the strength of the correlation coefficients between EOU and confidence with skill. The users' frequency of use (FOU) did not influence the strength of the correlation coefficients between EOU and confidence with skill.

References

  1. Asian and Pacific training centre (APCICT). 2010. ICT for Disaster Risk Reduction. Retrieved May 22, 2014 from http://www.preventionweb.net/files/14338_14338ICTDCaseStudy21.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Basher, R.2006. Global early warning systems for natural hazards: systematic and people-centred, 364, 1845: 2167-2182Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bevan, N. 1999. Quality in use: Meeting user needs for quality, Journal of Systems and Software, 49, 1: 89--96 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Battle, L. 2005. Patterns of integration: Bringing user centered design into the software development lifecycle. Human-Centered Software Engineering---Integrating Usability in the Software Development Lifecycle, Springer, 287--308Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, N. A., & Dunlop, M. D. 2005. Toward a Multidisciplinary Model of Context to Support Context-Aware. Computing: Human--Computer Interaction, 20, Tandfonline.com. Retrieved May 17, 2014 from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327051hci2004_2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chowdhury, G.G & Chowdhury, S. 2011. Information users and usability in the digital age. Neal-Schuman Publisher, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, F. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (1989), 319. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dal Grande, C. Chittleborough, S. Campostrini, M. Dollard and A.Taylor. 2016. Pre-Survey Text Messages (SMS) Improve Participation Rate in an Australian Mobile Telephone Survey: An Experimental Study, PLOS ONE, 1, 2(2016)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dillon, A. and Morris, M.G. 1996. User acceptance of new information technology: theories and models.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eason, K.D. 1984. Towards the experimental study of usability', Behaviour & Information Technology, 3, 2(1984), 133--143 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Florence, J.F.P.J. 2013. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th edition.), Allen & Unwin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Funo, S., Yamamoto, N., & Silas, J. 2002. Typology of kampung houses and their transformation process. Journal of Asian architecture and building engineering, 1, 2: 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gabbard, J.L., Hix, D., and Swan, J.E. 1999. User-centered design and evaluation of virtual environments. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 19, 6(1999), 51--59 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., and Horsburgh, S. 2010. Do they want it? Do they use it? The 'Demand-Side' of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand Government Information Quarterly, 27, (2), 177--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gefen, D., and Straub, D.W. 1997. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model, MIS quarterly, 389--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hallahan, K. 2001. Improving public relations web sites through usability research. Public Relations Review, 27, 2: 223--239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jackson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Kolenic III, A., Fitzgerald, H. E., Harold, R., & Von Eye, A. 2008. Race, gender, and information technology use: the new digital divide. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 4: 437--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jumisko-Pyykkö, S., & Vainio, T. 2012. Framing the context of use for mobile HCI In Social and Organizational Impacts of Emerging Mobile Devices: Evaluating Use, 217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Keil, M., Beranek, P. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (1995). Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems, 13, 1(1995), 75--91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)E0032-M Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kesper, A. 2007. Warning Dissemination Technologies for Tsunami Early Warning in Local Communities: Book Warning Dissemination Technologies for Tsunami Early Warning in Local Communities, retrieved Nov 24, 2016 from http://www.preventionweb.net/files/12175_12175WarningDisseminationTechnologi.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nielsen, J., & Levy, J. 1994. Measuring usability: preference vs. performance. Communication ACM, 37, 4(1995), 66--75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/175276.175282 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nugraheni, D. M. K., & Vries, D. d. 2015. Improving the Effectiveness of the Dissemination Method in Disaster Early Warning Message. In E-Proceeding of the International Conference on Information Technology & Society 2015. 504--511.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nugraheni, D. M. K., & Vries, D. d. 2016. Profile of a typical mobile SMS user in emergency situations (empirical study in an urban flood prone area). In 2016 2nd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech), (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSITech.2016.7852615 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Nunes, I. L. 2006. Ergonomics and Usability--key factors in Knowledge Society. Retrieved Nov 24, 2016 from https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/1725/1/Nunes_EWIS2_2006.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2001. Understanding the Digital Divide, retrieved Nov 24, 2016 from http://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ong, C.-S., & Lai, J.-Y. 2006. Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 5(2006), 816--829. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Parasuraman, A. 2000. Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of service research, 2 (2000), 307--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Parker, D.J., Priest, S.J., and Tapsell, S.M. (2009), Understanding and enhancing the information, Meteorological Applications, 16(2009), 103--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Petrie, H., and Bevan, N.2009, The evaluation of accessibility, usability and user experience, The universal access handbook, 10--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Porter, C.E. and Donthu, N.2006. Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics, Journal of business research, 59, 9(2006), 999--1007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Redwing. 2016. Indonesia's telecoms market - Redwing, retrieved Nov 24, 2016 from http://redwing-asia.com/market-data/market-data-telecoms/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Runeson, P., & Höst, M. 2009. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering, 14, 2, 131--164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Statista. 2016. Number of mobile device users who sent texts messages in the United Kingdom (UK) as of September 2013, "Number of mobile text message senders by demographic UK 2013 | Survey". Retrieved August 10, 2016 from http://www.statista.com/statistics/309622/number-of-mobile-text-message-senders-by-demographic-uk/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Statista. 2016. Usage penetration of text messaging (SMS) in France in 2014, "SMS usage in France by education 2014 Retrieved August 10, 2016 from http://www.statista.com/statistics/410961/sms-usage-infrance-by-education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Statista. 2016. Share of U.S. cell phone owners who used their phone to send and receive messages in 2012 and 2013, "U.S. cell phone owners: phone used for texting 2012-2013, by education | Survey". Retrieved August 10, 2016 from http://www.statista.com/statistics/247676/us-cell-phone-owners-who-used-their-phone-for-texting-by-education/. [Accessed: 10- Aug- 2016].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Velasquez. J, D., Cumiskey, L., Werner, M., Meijer, K., Fakhruddin, S., and Hassan, A. 2015 Improving the social performance of flash flood early warnings using mobile services, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6, 1(2015), 57--72 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Vredenburg, K., Mao, J.-Y., Smith, P. W., & Carey, T. 2002. A survey of user-centered design practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 4, 1(2002), 471--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wilson, T. D. 2000. Human information behavior. Informing science, 3, 2(2000), 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Yap, N. T. 2011. Disaster Management, Developing Country Communities & Climate Change: The Role of ICTs. Retrieved Nov 24, 2016 from http://pt.esacproject.net/sites/intranet.esacproject.net/files/yapdisastermanagementdevelopmenticts.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Users' perception of ease of use (EOU) and confidence with skill using SMS in emergency conditions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CHIuXiD '17: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction and User Experience in Indonesia
      April 2017
      76 pages
      ISBN:9781450352123
      DOI:10.1145/3077343

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate22of50submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader