Download PDF
Semin Hear 2006; 27(4): 325-329
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-954860
Published in 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Hearing Aid Self-Efficacy of New and Experienced Hearing Aid Users

Sherri L. Smith1 , Robin Lea West2
  • 1James H. Quillen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mountain Home, Tennessee and Departments of Communicative Disorders and Surgery, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee
  • 2Department of Psychology and Center for Gerontological Studies, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 November 2006 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Hearing aid self-efficacy (i.e., beliefs individuals have in their ability to perform the skills needed to be successful hearing aid users) may be related to long-term hearing aid use. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the audiologic correlates of hearing aid self-efficacy as assessed by the Measure of Audiologic Rehabilitation Self-Efficacy for Hearing Aids (MARS-HA). New and experienced hearing aid users (n = 211) were given the MARS-HA. The results indicated that individuals with moderately severe hearing loss had lower self-efficacy for aided listening conditions than individuals with mild hearing loss. Individuals with poor word recognition abilities in quiet also had lower overall hearing aid self-efficacy than individuals with good to fair word recognition abilities. These results suggested that hearing aid users who have a moderate hearing loss (or worse) and hearing aid users with poor word recognition abilities may require additional counseling and audiologic rehabilitation to increase their hearing aid self-efficacy.

KEYWORDS

Hearing aids - self-efficacy - older adult - outcome measurement - audiologic rehabilitation

REFERENCES

  • 1 Kricos P B. The influence of nonaudiological variables on audiological rehabilitation outcomes.  Ear Hear. 2000;  21 7S-14S
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice-Hall 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Carson A J, Pichora-Fuller M K. Health promotion and audiology: the community-clinic link.  J Acad Rehab Audiol. 1997;  30 29-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Noh S, Gange J P, Kaspar V. Models of health behaviors and compliance: applications to audiological rehabilitation research. In: Gange JP, Tye-Murray Research in Audiological Rehabilitation: Current Trends and Future Directions. J Acad Rehab Audiology Mono 1994 27: 375-389
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Weinstein B E. Geriatric Audiology. New York; Thieme 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Smith S L, West R, Kricos P B. Hearing aid self-efficacy of older adults. Poster presented at: The American Academy of Audiology Annual Convention March 30-April 4, 2004 Salt Lake City, UT;
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Carhart R, Jerger J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1959;  24 330-345
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tillman T W, Carhart R. An Expanded Test for Speech Discrimination Utilizing CNC Monosyllabic Words[Technical Report]. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. Brooks Air Force Base, TX; USAF School of Aerospace Medicine 1966
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Department of Veterans Affairs .Speech Recognition and Identification Materials, Disc 2.0 Mountain Home, TN; VA Medical Center 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Smith S L, West R L. The application of self-efficacy principles to audiologic rehabilitation: a tutorial.  Am J Audiol. 2006;  15 46-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Sherri L SmithAu.D. Ph.D. 

James H. Quillen VA Medical Center

Audiology-126, Mountain Home, TN 37684

Email: sherri.smith@med.va.gov

Robin Lea WestPh.D. 

PO BOX 112250, Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville

FL 32611-2250

Email: rwest@geron.ufl.edu

      >