Skip to main content
Log in

Factors which deter public officials from reporting corruption

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of over 800 public sector employees was conducted to explore the factors which would be most likely to deter public sector employees from reporting workplace corruption. Respondents were asked to consider whether they would make a report in the absence of certain factors which have been found in past research to impact on the decision to make reports. The aim was to determine which workplace strategies managers should make a priority when encouraging employees to report workplace corruption. Concern about not having enough proof was the most commonly reported deterrent, followed by the absence of legal protection from negative consequences. The factors which were reported as deterring the least number of respondents were the absence of role responsibility for reporting corruption and not being directly affected by the corruption. Respondents from lower income groups were more likely to be deterred from reporting corruption in the absence of encouraging factors. In addition, a relationship was found between a lack of information about mechanisms for reporting corruption and a negative attitude toward reporting corruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caiden, G.E. and Truelson, J.A. (1988) Whistleblower Protection in the USA: Lessons learnt and to be learnt. American Journal of Public Administration, 47(2), pp. 119-129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, T.M. and Alpin, D.G. (1988) "Whistleblower Protection - The Gap Between the Law and Reality", Howard Law Journal, 31, pp. 223-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, J.B. and Miceli, M.P. (1985) "Potential Predictors of Whistle-Blowing: A Prosocial Behavior Perspective", Academy of Management Review, 10(4), pp. 823-836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, M. (1987) "Whistleblowers", in M.D. Ermann and R.J. Lundman (eds) Corporate and governmental deviance: Problems of organizational behavior in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 197-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, M.P. and Glazer, P.M. (1989) The Whistleblowers - Exposing Corruption in Government and Industry. New York: Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J.W. (1986) "Principled Organisational Dissent: A Theoretical Essay", Research in Organisational Behavior, 8, pp. 1-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, D.B., Miceli, M.P. and Cohen, D.J. (1987) "Oppositionists and Group Norms: The Reciprocal Influence of Whistle-blowers and Co-workers", Journal of Business Ethics, 6, pp. 527-542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorta, A. and Forell, S. (1994) Unravelling Corruption - A Public Sector Perspective. Independent Commission Against Corruption. Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorta, A. and Forell, S. (1995) "Layers of decision: Linking social definitions of corruption and willingness to take action", Crime, Law and Social Change, 23, pp. 315-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICAC Research Section (1997) Monitoring the Impact of the NSW Protected Disclosures Act, 1994 - Encouraging Public Sector Employees to Report CorruptionIndependent Commission Against Corruption.

  • Jos, P.H., Tomkins, M.E. and Hays, S.W. (1989) "In praise of difficult people: a portrait of the committed whistleblower", Public Administration Review, November-December, pp. 552-561.

  • McMillan, J. (Undated) "Principled Organisational Dissent: Whistleblowing in Response to Corruption", Paper delivered at the Fourth Annual Anti-Corruption Conference, Sydney.

  • Miceli, M.P. and Near, J.P. (1984) "The Relationship Among Beliefs, Organisational Position, and Whistle-Blowing Status: A Discriminant Analysis", Academy of Management Journal, 27(4), pp. 687-705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M.P. and Near, J.P. (1985) "Characteristics of Organisational Climate and Perceived Wrongdoing Associated withWhistle-Blowing Decisions", Personnel Psychology, 38, pp. 525-544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M.P. and Near, J.P. (1988) "Whistle-blowers: A challenge to human resources practice", in R.S Schuler, S.A. Youngblood and V.L. Huber (eds) Readings in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 3rd Ed., West Publishing Company.

  • Miceli, M.P., Roach, B.P. and Near, J.P. (1988) "The motivations of anonymous whistleblowers: The case of federal employees", Public Personnel Management, 17, pp. 281-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees-Black, C., Mayhew, P. and Percy, A. (1996) The 1996 British Crime Survey England and Wales, Home Office Statistical Bulletin, Issue 19/96.

  • Near, J.P. and Miceli, M.P. (1986) "Retaliation Against Whistle Blowers: Predictors and Effects", Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), pp. 137-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P. and Miceli, M.P. (1996) "Whistle-blowing: myth and reality", Journal of Management, 22, pp. 507-527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M.J./SPSS Inc. (1992) SPSS for Windows Advanced Statistics Release5 SPSS Inc: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.M. and Oseth, J.M. (1993) "The Whistleblowing Era: A Management Perspective", Employee relations, 19(2), Autumn, pp. 179-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K. and Victor, B. (1992) Peer Reporting of Unethical BehaviorSocial Context.

  • Truelson, J. (1987) "Blowing the Whistle on Systematic Corruption: On Maximising Reform and Minimising Retaliation", Corruption and Reform, 2, pp. 55-74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zipparo, L. Factors which deter public officials from reporting corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change 30, 273–287 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008326527512

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008326527512

Keywords

Navigation